Disclaimer: This is an example of a student written essay.
Click here for sample essays written by our professional writers.

This essay may contain factual inaccuracies or out of date material. Please refer to an authoritative source if you require up-to-date information on any health or medical issue.

Health Benefits of a Vegetarian Diet Essay

Info: 2700 words (11 pages) Essay
Published: 12th May 2021 in Nutrition

Reference this

You Can Do It: The Science is Behind You

Do your vegetarian friends ever challenge you about the ethics of killing animals for food when you are about to enjoy a really great burger?  Many vegetarians assert that it is unethical to kill animals for food.  Meat-eaters do not consider their diets to be unethical because meat has been part of the human diet since pre-history.  The divergent ethical beliefs of meat-eaters and plant-eaters do not present common ground for the two groups to come to a consensus about whether meat-based or plant-based diets are better for us.  However, the scientific study of both dietary options should be the basis by which the two groups come to a common opinion on which is better.  There are compelling, scientifically-based reasons why vegetarianism is preferential to a meat-based diet.  Despite how really terrific that burger might taste to you, adopting a vegetarian diet should be your goal as a means of protecting your health, conserving planetary resources, and protecting the environment. 

Get Help With Your Essay

If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!

Find out more

While meat-eaters correctly point out that meat has been a significant part of the human diet for over two and one-half million years (Domínguez-Rodrigo), it is also true that long before meat was put on the menu humans evolved to exist on a vegetarian diet.  Even today, humans have the long intestines and short, flat teeth that are compatible with an herbivore’s diet, not the short intestines and sharp teeth needed to eat raw meat (Mills.) Humans can synthesize eleven of the twenty proteins they need to survive; and the remaining nine proteins must come from dietary sources (FDA).  If you are a meat-eater you do not have to put much thought into sourcing those nine essential protein types because virtually any meat-based food product contains them all.  A vegetarian can obtain all of the essential proteins from plant-based sources, but a little more thought needs to go into meal planning to make sure they are included.  Soybeans, quinoa, and buckwheat are sources of complete proteins, which contain all 9 of the essential amino acids that humans can’t synthesize (Kemmerer & Acosta.)  Despite the relative ease of eating meat to obtain all the necessary proteins that we need to survive, a vegetarian diet provides options for complete nutrition, including all necessary proteins (Marsh et al.)  Considering the relative ease of sourcing food for both kinds of diet, our decision to be meat-eaters or plant-eaters should be made based on other criteria.

The health-related outcomes of each diet present an important criterion for measuring which diet is better for us.  Not only does a vegetarian diet provide complete nutrition, it has health benefits over a meat-eating diet.  Meat-based diet supporters like to point out that the type of iron found in animal protein is more readily absorbed by the human body than the iron found in plants (NIH.) That is an accurate claim, however, it overlooks that the type of iron found in meats is linked to a higher rate of development of kidney stones (Breslau.) Additionally, the iron compound found in red meat (heme iron) is associated with increased risk of colon cancer (Harvard Health Publishing.) Leafy green vegetables, legumes, including soybeans, quinoa, and buckwheat provide vegetarians with a heme iron source that is not associated with the development of these conditions (Mahan & Raymond.) One area where the meat-eating diet might seem superior is in calcium absorption and bone density.  While meat-eaters may have easy-to-absorb calcium available in meat, they use a lot of calcium from their bones neutralizing the acids that are a by-product of metabolizing meat-protein (Lang.) The human body is less efficient at absorbing plant-based calcium, but vegetarians have many choices for obtaining calcium, including kale, collard greens, spinach and tofu; and a study demonstrated that vegetarians bone strength is equal to that of non-vegetarians (Garvan Institute.) Overall, it appears that obtaining the essential nutrients calcium and iron is healthier when obtained through a vegetarian diet.

The health benefits of a vegetarian diet are not limited to iron and calcium.  A plant-based diet contributes to a healthier weight and a longer and healthier life.  Harvard University scientists determined that eating meat increases the type 2 diabetes risk for women, despite that vegetarians generally eat more carbohydrates than meat-eaters (Garvan Institute.) Another study determined that men have an increased risk of this disease if they eat processed meats (Barnard.)  An Oxford University study revealed that a greater percentage of meat-eaters were obese than were vegetarians; with an 8.3% higher body mass index, on average (Spencer.)  Yet another medical study established that eating red meat was associated with increased risks of heart disease, as well as death from cancer (Zhong.)  Beyond maintaining a lower risk of diabetes, heart disease, and cancer, scientific research has also shown us that maintaining a vegetarian diet for a period of at least 20 years increases life expectancy by over 4 years (Orlich.)  Another large study involving over 73 thousand people discovered that a vegetarian diet is correlated with a  reduction (12%) in mortality from any cause (Virtanen.)   The findings from these studies clearly demonstrate that there are positive health-related reasons for switching to a vegetarian diet.

The amount of resources it requires to support a plant-based versus a meat-based diet is a second criterion on which to judge the merits of each diet.  At present, 820 million people (that is about 1 in 9 people) are in chronic hunger worldwide (FAO.) The current population of the planet is about 7 billion people, with a projected growth to 9.8 billion by the year 2050 (United Nations.)  We will need additional resources in the form of food, water and land to support these additional people.  Right now, with our current population, we are straining the resources of the planet, and still not doing very well with feeding everyone who needs to be fed.  Considering how resource intensive it is to sustain a meat-eating diet it only makes sense that we shift to a plant-based diet.  Animal food products not only require us to devote land and other resources to raising farm animals, but they also require us to dedicate land and water resources to raising grain for feeding farm animals.  Data published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences  reflect that compared to plant-based foodstuffs, beef production requires 160 times as much land area and 8 times as much water for irrigation; and poultry and eggs required eight times as much land as for plant-based foodstuffs (Eschel.)  A meat-based diet places extraordinary demands on the planet’s resources.  The plant-based diet is clearly less resource intensive and kinder to our planet, making it a more sustainable diet plan for all of us.

Find out how UKEssays.com can help you!

Our academic experts are ready and waiting to assist with any writing project you may have. From simple essay plans, through to full dissertations, you can guarantee we have a service perfectly matched to your needs.

View our services

The enormous negative impact that producing food for a meat-based diet has on the world’s resources is compounded by the enormous negative impact it has on the quality of the environment of the planet.  This is a third criterion on which we can determine the relative benefits of both diet plans.  In the process of producing and transporting all of the grain that we need to feed farm animals, we use extraordinary amounts of water, land, and fuel.  Then in turn, we use even more land, water, and fuel raising, transporting, slaughtering the animals before they become our food.  During all of this production activity, we are degrading the natural air, land and water habitats of the earth.   Animal waste pollutes our air and contaminates our groundwater.  The animals themselves are a significant contributor to carbon dioxide and methane emissions, which is compounded by the emissions of the vehicles used to transport the feed to the animals and the animals to our tables. The production of meat-based food stuffs produces eleven times as much in greenhouse gasses as does plant-based foodstuffs.  (Eschel.)  According to the US Environmental Protection Agency, farm animals create 500 million tons of manure each year; and water runoff from animal feedlots pollutes groundwater, as well as rivers and streams (EPA.)  Beyond the degradation to our water supply, waste from farm animals pollutes the air.  A study of children who live near commercial farm operations (CFO) found that living near a CFO increased asthma rates by 3 times in comparison to children who did not live near  a CFO (Merchant, et al.) The negative impact on our environment of raising animals for food consumption adds additional support for the conclusion that the meat-based diet has negative health impacts for humans. Even for those who are not impacted by respiratory disease are affected by the air quality impact of raising animals for a meat-based diet.  The contribution of raising farm animals to the build-up of greenhouse gasses in our atmosphere contributes to global warming, and its subsequent negative effects on our planet, which include longer periods of drought, local and coastal flooding, more destructive storms and hurricanes, and more intense heat waves (Wuebbles.)  The vegetarian diet creates less demand on the environment and is greatly more desirable from a planet-health perspective.

 Now that you know why a plant-based diet is better for your health and the earth’s health you are well-prepared to address your friends when they raise the issue of the ethics of killing animals for food.  You can tell them that the ethical issue is probably not the most convincing reason for you to change your meat-eating ways.  You can tell them that it is far more convincing for you to change to a vegetarian diet because of the health effects it will have for you.  You can add that another compelling reason is that a plant-based diet is less burdensome on the planet’s resources.  You can bolster your argument by telling them how the production of the vegetarian diet creates less pollution in the earth’s land, air, and water environments.  You are going to be a fantastic pitch-person on this topic because you know that scientific research backs you up!  Now that you can convincingly argue the benefits of the plant-based diet for your friends, you are really going to want to make the change for yourself.  So, put down that burger and start planning a new, plant-based menu for yourself.

Works Cited

  • Barnard, Neal et al. “Meat consumption as a risk factor for type 2 diabetes.” Nutrients vol. 6, iss. 2, 21 February 2014, pp. 897-910, https://doi.org/10.3390/nu6020897
  • Breslau , N.A. et al. “Relationship of Animal Protein-Rich Diet to Kidney Stone Formation and Calcium Metabolism.” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 66, iss.1, January1988, pp. 140-146. 
  • Domínguez-Rodrigo, “Meat-Eating by Early Hominids at the FLK 22 Zinjanthropus Site, Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania): An Experimental Approach Using Cut-Mark Data.” Journal of Human Evolution vol. 33, 1997, pp. 669-690.
  • EPA. “National Compliance Initiative: Preventing Animal Waste from Contaminating Surface and Ground Water.”  Need date   https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/national-compliance-initiative-preventing-animal-waste-contaminating-surface-and-ground
  • FDA (US Food & Drug Administration). Protein Fact Sheet. 5 May 2016. http://www.vegsource.com/news/2009/11/the-comparative-anatomy-of-eating.html  pdf     what to do when no author?
  • Food Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, “The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World.” 2019 p. 3, http://www.fao.org/3/ca5162en/ca5162en.pdf     what to do when no author?
  • Harvard Medical School. Red Meat and Colon Cancer. January 2008. 10 February 2020. https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/red-meat-and-colon-cancer.  Accessed 8 February 2020. 
  • Kemmerer, A. and R. Acosta. “The Essential Amino Acid Content of Several Vegetables.” The Journal of Nutrition, vol. 38, Issue 4, August 1949, pp. 527-533. https://academic.oup.com/jn/article-abstract/38/4/527/4725905?redirectedFrom=fulltext  
  • Lang, Susan. “Eating Less Meat May Help Reduce Osteoporosis Risk, Studies Show.” Cornell Chronicle, 14 November 1996, Cornell University. https://news.cornell.edu/stories/1996/11/eating-less-meat-may-help-reduce-osteoporosis-risk
  • Marsh, Kate et al. “Meeting Nutritional Needs on a Vegetarian Diet.” Australian Family Physician, vol. 38 no. 8, August 2009, pp. 600-602, https://www.racgp.org.au/download/Documents/AFP/2009/August/200908marsh.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2020. 
  • Merchant, James et al. “Asthma and Farm Exposures in a Cohort of Rural Iowa Children.” Environmental Health Perspectives vol. 113, 2005, pp. 350-356, doi:10.1289/ehp.7240
  • Mills, Milton R. “The Comparitive Anatomy of Eating.” Vegsource.com. 21 November 2009. http://www.vegsource.com/news/2009/11/the-comparative-anatomy-of-eating.html 
  • National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements. “Iron Fact Sheet for Health Professionals.”  https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/Iron-HealthProfessional/. Accessed 9/2/2019.
  • Office of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health. “Dietary Supplement Fact Sheet: Iron.”  In: Krause's Food & the Nutrition Care Process - E-Book, Mahan, L. Kathleen and Sylvia Escott-Stump, eds. St. Louis, Mo. : Elsevier/Saunders, ©2012. Print.   Container?
  • Orlich, M. et al. “Vegetarian Dietary Patterns and Mortality in Adventist Health Study 2.” JAMA Internal Medicine, vol. 173 iss. 13, 8 July 2013, pp. 1230–1238. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6473
  • Spencer, , E. et al. “Diet and Body Mass Index in 38 000 EPIC-Oxford Meat-Eaters, Fish-Eaters, Vegetarians and Vegans.” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 27, 22 May 2003, pp.  728–734, https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802300
  • Virtanen, Heli et al. “Dietary Proteins and Protein Sources and Risk Of Death: The Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study.” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Volume 109, Issue 9 April 2019, pp. 1462–1471, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqz025    find in db
  • Wuebbles, D.J. et al. “Executive Summary.” Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, vol. I, edited by D.J. Wuebbles, U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA, 2017, pp. 12-34, doi: 10.7930/J0DJ5CTG.    What to do when in another container?
  • Zhong, Victor et al.“Associations of Processed Meat, Unprocessed Red Meat, Poultry, or Fish Intake with Incident Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortality.” JAMA Internal Medicine, 3 February 2020,  DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6969
  •  https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/blog/2017/06/world-population-projected-to-reach-9-8-billion-in-2050-and-11-2-billion-in-2100-says-un/    “World population projected to reach 9.8 billion in 2050, and 11.2 billion in 2100 – says UN

 

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have your work published on UKEssays.com then please: