Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays.
The global economic integration (GEI) is the process whereby different national markets, including goods, services and factors of production, are increasingly being knitted together into a single global market. It should be noted that GEI is a process of change, not a state of affairs or result. The historians appear to be in agreement that our world has gone through the two greatest periods of global economic integration, one was the fifty years before the outbreak of World War 1 (1870-1914), the other period was the fifty years following the ending of the 2nd World War (1950-2000).
Global economic integration is the result of four factors: the growth of world trade, the growth of global finance, the rise of the multinational corporation and the international migration of people. Although there is still controversy over the advantages and the disadvantages of global economic integration, objectively speaking, our world has never stopped the process of GEI. As an important link in GEI, international trade has become more and more important, as is shown in the volume, frequency and scope of the trade. How has GEI influenced the countries around us, even the whole world, that is the main topic of the essay.
Countries can be divided into three types: developed country (e.g. the United Kingdom), developing country (e.g. China), less developed country (e.g. some countries in Africa). Then the effects of GEI on employment, welfare and environment in the three types of countries will be discussed in theoretical and practical levels.
Effects on employment:
Although there are always someone complaining about the GEI leads them to lose their jobs.
In theory level, the process of GEI is the procedure of making the resource optimization worldwide. It is beneficial for overall economic efficiency.
Obviously, the most efficient outcome for both America and Britain is for America to specialize in producing wheat, while the British specialize in producing cloth. Trade, will enable both countries to exchange their products and enjoy a higher level of consumption. So why not do it? Unfortunately, at the same time of doing this, farmers in Britain and weavers in America will lose their jobs.
Furthermore, one of the most important processes of GEI is specialization. Because of this productivity improves and fewer workers are needed to produce the same amount of production. Although there are complaints, this is good news. That means there is sufficient number of labor to put into new industries. The market will eventually guide them to new jobs, although the process is not pleasant.
Specifically, for developed countries, in one hand GEI encourages capitalist put their capital into developing countries which have relatively cheaper labor. This could lead to a rise of unemployment in developed countries. At the same time, GEI means more competition on price. However higher social welfare made the developed countries in a disadvantage position in such competition. In the other hand, global economic integration make the world as one single worldwide market, the demand of the market is larger than before. Thus, it’s possible to make a large economic scale which plays a positive role in promoting employment. This is a table of developed countries (take UK and USA as an example) unemployment rate and unemployment number below:-
From the tables, the unemployment condition stayed at a same level during 1990 to 2005. Take the international labor element into consideration, the unemployment both in UK and USA is acceptable.
For developing countries, due to the lower labor costs, their products of labor-intensive industries (for example textile industry) become more competitive in the world market. Global economic integration has brought a greater demand for those industries. Prosperity of these industries also means the promotion of employment.
At the same time GEI brings foreign investment, if the country could attract foreign investment, the local surplus of labor could find jobs in foreign-owned factories. China is a good example.
The employment of FDI industry was growth all the time since 1993 in the table. By 2005, 5.98% jobs were supplied by FDI factories. Obviously GEI has brought benefits to the employment of China.
If the country has failed in attracting foreign investment, the GEI means this country become a market for all the producers. Then the influx of products would have a serious impact on local industries, which led to unemployment. But if people are put out of work, there is no income to buy imports. So these countries, which failed in attracting FDI, always set some barriers to protect their national industries and employment. Mongolia is a good example.
Mongolia joined the WTO in January 1997. Since May 1997, it took the implementation of zero-tariff except alcohol and tobacco products. As a result, there was large influx of foreign products, but no FDI. After two years practice, the Government of Mongolia believe that this policy bringing prices down while also making the national industry came under attack, and reducing the national tariff revenues, thus exacerbating the government’s financial crisis. So they made the tariffs at 5% level, for some agricultural products at 15% level.
For less developed countries, such as some countries in Africa. Although GEI has always ignored this continent, for the abundant resources and cheap primary products, GEI also played a certain role in the development of these countries. If there is no trade effect of GEI on the demand for resources, there will be more people facing unemployment. Through the export of primary resources, countries have accumulated wealth and more jobs can be created.
As a conclusion, the impact of GEI on the number of jobs is still in dispute. But GEI makes the employment more sensible.
Effects on social welfare:
We can illustrate the effects of the GEI on welfare by the following diagram:
This diagram was used to illustrate the effects of the tariff on welfare in small country model in lecture 6.
Assuming the tariffs reach a very high level, as marked with the dotted line in the diagram. All the foreign products are kept out. There is no connection between this country and the world. Then all the products are supplied by the domestic producers. The demand would meet the supply at the crossing M. In this case, domestic producers obtains the greatest profit, however, customers have to endure a high price, at the same time there are many people cannot pay for the product. If this product is a necessity of life, for example food, that would mean famine. Social welfare loss is obvious.
Assuming the tariffs is zero, which means free trade, one of the final aims of the GEI. In this case, supply and demand are equal at P. Domestic producers take a low marker share and make less profit, but customers achieve the maximum benefits. They can buy goods in a low price and there is adequate supply.
Take North Korea, South Korea and People’s Republic of China (PRC) as examples. The following table compares the per capita GDP among North Korea, South Korea and China in each period.
In 1960s, the per capita GDP of North Korea is three times more than both South Korea and China. When the turbulent military rule ended, South Korea began to participate in the process of global economic integration. Then South Korea made great achievements on economy and became one of Newly Industrial Economics. In the late 1970s, PRC turned to take the reform and open policy, China’s economic success has also started to make the world attention, especially after 2000. Based on political reasons, there is nearly no connection between North Korea and the other world, excluding China. By 2004, the per capita GDP of South Korea is over 144 times than it is in North Korea, while China is 17 times than North Korea. North Korea and South Korea have the similar geographical environment, natural resources and customs. China and North Korea have the same political system. The most prominent difference is whether to participate in the process of global economic integration. No countries have succeeded in developing without participating in GEI.
As a conclusion of the theoretical analysis and empirical research, GEI contributed the increase of social welfare. No countries have succeeded in developing without participating in GEI.
Effects on ecological environment:
Ecological environment pollution is one of the main reasons for complaints of global economic integration by wide range of people. As the analysis in this essay, GEI encourages greater levels of consumption. It is clear that producing more products means consuming more energy and resources. However, this can have adverse environmental consequences.
Take emissions of carbon dioxide as an example:
From this data, it is easy to see that emissions of CO2 growing. The most important contributor is developing country (as China in chart). The reason is diverse, but one of these is GEI. As developed countries, have sufficient advanced technology to improve energy and resources to reduce environmental damage. At the same time they have moved their high-polluting industries to developing countries by the way of investment. Take London as an example. Now the environment here is very good, but without global economic integration, UK have to produce all kinds of products for themselves, including high-polluting products, which they usual import from other countries. Under these conditions, the environment of London would be considerably more polluted.
In developing countries the government faces a dilemma of choice, to develop economic or to protect environment. It might be only exist in theory to accomplish the two things simultaneously. Without GEI, there would not be a strong demand on resources, then the environment could be well protected, but people here would live a simple and poor life. China is the most typical example of developing countries. In achieving economic development, environmental pollution has become a big problem, which was complained by western journalists before Beijing Olympic Games.
From another point of view, GEI makes the competition much fiercer. In this background, GEI potentially makes it difficult to deal with global environmental problems because an individual country tackling pollution could find it difficult to compete with countries with lower standards.
More importantly, we own the same earth, the same ecosystem. Despite the current environment in developed countries seems better in the situation of GEI. The environmental damage in developing countries will eventually affect developed countries. No one can gain from the environmental destruction and pollution.
The conclusion is that GEI indeed had a bad effect on the global environment.
As it said that there are a thousand Hamlets in a thousand people’s eyes. The disputes of global economic integration will continue, however, the process of globalization cannot be prevented. What we should do is to minimize the negative effects of global economic integration, and to maximize its positive factors. Then we will have a better life and a harmonious world.
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
Related ServicesView all
DMCA / Removal Request
If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please.