Improvement of 32X32 Playfair Cipher using Random Number Generator
4639 words (19 pages) Essay
18th May 2020 Computer Science Reference this
Disclaimer: This work has been submitted by a university student. This is not an example of the work produced by our Essay Writing Service. You can view samples of our professional work here.
Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UKEssays.com.
ABSTRACT
This paper deals with the modification of Playfair cipher.
The existing strategies of Playfair cipher are studied like those enforced on 5X5, 7X4 and 6X6 Playfair matrix.
The study of existing strategies shows that they suffer from many drawbacks like In this paper, the presented encryption mechanism makes the cryptanalysis a very complex process. This has been achieved by first, inserting all the 256 ASCII characters in a sequential order within a 32X32 matrix and, by changing the rotation mechanism for encryption and decryption. The encrypted text obtained is almost unreadable.
General Terms
Encryption, Decryption, Plaintext, Ciphertext.
Keywords
Playfair Cipher, Substitution, Cryptography, Network Security, Symmetric Key.
INTRODUCTION
 Etymologically speaking, the word cryptography comes from the Greek origin. It is a combination of two words Crypto and Graphy. Crypto means Secret and Graphy means Writing. Cryptography is the art of converting plaintext to a cipher text with the help of an encryption algorithm. The process has been depicted in Figure 1. Cryptography is segmented into Symmetric key and Asymmetric key cryptography. It is further defined that same key used for encryption and decryption is called Symmetric key cryptography. Otherwise it is called Asymmetric key cryptography. We will use substitution / replacement Playfair cipher of symmetric key cryptography. The method arranges the plaintext in a table based on a key value, where the key is usually arranged as an N x N matrix.
2 PLAYFAIR CIPHER
The Playfair figure was the principal reasonable digraph substitution figure. The plan was developed in 1854 by Charles Wheatstone however was named after Lord Playfair who advanced the utilization of the figure. The strategy scrambles sets of letters (digraphs), rather than single letters as in the basic substitution figure. The Playfair is fundamentally harder to break since the recurrence examination utilized for basic substitution figures does not work with it. Recurrence examination can at present be attempted, yet on the 25*25=625 potential digraphs instead of the 25 potential monographs. Recurrence examination accordingly requires substantially more ciphertext so as to work.
If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!
Find out moreIt is a symmetric substitution figure for example a solitary key is utilized for both encryption and unscrambling. A Playfair cipher uses a 5X5 matrix and encrypts pairs of letters called digraphs. The 5 by 5 table contains a key word or phrase. The table is generated by first filling in the spaces with the letters of the keyword without including any duplicate letters and then filling in rest of the letters in alphabetical order. „I‟ and „J‟ are set in same section with the goal that all the 26 characters can be filled in a 5X5 network. The encryption in a Playfair figure is finished by utilizing the accompanying procedure.
This process is also known as the conversion process:
1. If a digraph contains same letters then add an „X‟ between them and repair the letters.
2. If the letters of the digraph appear consecutively in a row then replace them with the letters to their immediate right. In case the letter is the last letter in the row, than replace it with first letter from the left of the same row.
3. If the letters of the digraph appear consecutively in a column then replace them with the letter to their immediate below. In case the letter is the last letter in the column, than replace it with first letter from the top of the same column.
4. If the letters are on different rows and columns, replace them with the letters on the same row such that, they lie in column of the other letter. Replacing the first letter of the digraph first.
2.1 Limitations of 5X5 matrix:
 It considers the letters I and J or L and M as one character.
 26 letters alone can take as keyword without duplicates.
 Space between two words in the plaintext is not considered as one character. It cannot use special characters and numbers.
 It only uses uppercase alphabets.
 A spare letter X is added when the plaintext word consists of odd number of character. In the decryption process this X is ignored. X is a substantial character and makes disarray since it could be a piece of plaintext, so we can’t just expel X in unscrambling process.
• X is utilized a filler letter while rehashing letter falls in a similar pair are isolated.
3.PROPOSED METHOD
In the proposed method a 32X32 matrix is being used in which the matrix is shifted by some random value, due to which the corresponding positions of the letters are changed. This random number can lie between 0 and 32. It can be manually entered by the user and also can be generated by a random number generator function. The random number generated rotates the matrix by that particular value.
3.1 The Encryption algorithm:
1. Read the keyword.
2. Eliminate the repeated characters in keyword.
3. Construct a 32X32 matrix by filling the character of keyword from left to right and top to bottom. 4. Fill the token of network with the rest of the characters from ASCII esteems 0 to 255.
5. Peruse a plaintext.
6. Separation the plaintext into pair of characters.
7. Add the character “Null” when odd number of characters are present in the message.
8. Generate a random number using RAND function.
9. Shift the matrix from top to bottom towards left circularly by the first generated random number.
10. Encrypt the first diagraph using the following modified conversion process: a) If a digraph contains same letters then add a „*‟ between them and repair the letters. b) If the letters of the digraph appear consecutively in a row then replace them with the letters to right, shifted by the value of random number generated. In case the letter is the last letter in the row, then replace it with that letter which is random number position from the left of the same row. c) If the letters of the digraph appear consecutively in a column then replace them with the letters below, shifted by the value of random number generated. In case the letter is the last letter in the column, then replace it with that letter which is random number position below in the same column. d) If the letters are on different rows and columns, replace them with the letters on the same row such that, they lie in column of the other letter. Replacing the first letter of the digraph first.
11. Generate another random number and rotate a matrix by making a left shift circularly with the generated random number. Then encrypt another digraph using the conversion process and so on.
12. Send all the random numbers generated to the receiver.
3.2 The Decryption algorithm:
1. Read the keyword.
2. Eliminate the repeated characters in keyword.
3. Construct a matrix by filling the character of keyword from left to right and top to bottom.
4. Fill the reminder of matrix with the remaining characters from ASCII values 0 to 255.
5. Read the ciphertext.
6. Divide the ciphertext into pair of characters.
7. Add the character “Null” when odd number of characters in the message. Use the received random numbers in reverse order to rotate the matrix.
8. Use the lastly generated random number to rotate the matrix from bottom to top using right shift circularly then decrypt firstly the last diagraph.
9. Again use the second last generated random number to rotate the matrix and decrypt the second last diagraph and so on in reverse order of diagraph and random number.
10. Decrypt using the conversion process.
11. Finally reverse the string and obtain the plaintext.
4. DEVLOPMENT OF THE MATRIX
The initial matrix would be developed by first taking a 32X32 matrix and then filling the matrix with all the ASCII values in a sequential manner. The complete matrix obtained has been depicted in Table 1 [7]. Let the keyword be: Play:5⇗. On inserting the keyword in the matrix, Table 2 is obtained. Let the plaintext be Dell. Since „l‟ occurs consecutively, we separate them with a „*‟ obtaining 3 diagraphs:
De l* l*
Initially, let the random number generated be 4 so that the matrix will be rotated circularly left by 4 positions as shown in Table 3. Now, to encrypt the second digraph the above obtained Table 3 is rotated by random number 6 (say) by which we obtain Table 4.
Using the conversion process on Table 4, the cipher text of the second digraph „l*‟ is obtained as „P+‟
Similarly, in order to encrypt the third digraph, the above obtained Table 4 is rotated by random number 8 thus, obtaining Table 5.
Using the conversion process, the cipher text of the third digraph „l‟* is also obtained as „P+‟.
Thus, „Dell‟ is encrypted to „CfP+P+‟
AN ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE OF 9 X 9 PLAYFAIR CIPHER
The purpose of this example is to illustrate the functioning of a 9 x 9 of Playfair cipher matrix, but the concept can be extended to any size of matrix. The 9 x 9 Playfair cipher uses 9 x 9 matrix which contains the key at the beginning of the matrix. The key should not be more than 81 characters (pertaining to the size 9 x 9) decided by the security administrator. Let us take the following example to understand the functioning of the 9 x 9 Playfair cipher. In the model, the key is “Playfair figure model”.
To put the key in the matrix, following steps are taken:
1. First, remove the spaces from the key.
2. Then, remove the duplicate character that is in the key.
3. Finally, insert the key characters at the beginning of the matrix followed by the rest
of characters that are not part of the key character. The subsequent 9 x 9 grid is portrayed in Figure1.
A. Encryption
To encrypt a given plaintext using 9 x 9 Playfair cipher,
following steps are taken.
 Replace the spaces in the plaintext by “BMW”
2. Replace the repeated letter by “AOX” and if the number of characters is odd, add “AOX” at the end of the plaintext.
FIG. 1 A 9 X 9 MATRIX WITH THE KEY “PLAYFAIR CIPHER EXAMPLE”
3. Break the plaintext into digraphs (groups of 2 letters), then apply the following rules to encrypt the plaintext:
a. If the two letters appear in the same row of the matrix, replace them with other letters
that are on the right of them (if the letter is at the end of the row take the letter that is
in the beginning of the row).
b. If the two letters appear in the same column of the matrix, replace them with
other letters that are below them (if the letter is in bottom of the column take the
letter that is on top of the column)
c. If the two letters are not on the same row or column, replace them with the letters on the
same line separately yet at the other pair of corners of the square shape characterized by the unique pair. The request is significant – the primary letter of the encoded pair is the one
that lies on a similar line as the primary letter of the plaintext pair. As an example, consider encrypting the plaintext “My bird is on the treeLU”. Replace each space by “BMW” and replace one of the duplicated letters by “AOX” as
follows:
MyBMWbirdBMWisBMWonBMWtheBMWtrAOXeLU
Then, encrypt each 2 letters separately as follows:
My BM Wb ir dB MW is BM Wo nB MW th eB MW tr AO Xe LU.
Note the in the example above, BMW was used to replace the spaces in the plaintext and AOX was used to replace the repeated letter and for single last pair. The reason for doing this is the following.
 If spaces or duplicated letters are replaced by one character (e.g. X, O, ^) or any other character,but if the same character is part of the plaintext, it will be replaced by space or duplicate the next character in the decryption side.
 If we add two characters to an odd plaintext, it will result in another odd plaintext rather than even (to encrypt it as pair).
So, to solve the above problems, three different characters were used to replace the spaces in the plaintext and to replace the repeated letter and for single last pair.
Let us see how each pair in the above example plaintext will be encrypted.
1. The pair My forms a rectangle (by applying rule 3c from Section IIA), replace it with Jr (see Fig. 2).
2. The pair BM forms a rectangle (rule 3c), replace it with DK (see Fig. 2).
3. The pair Wb forms a rectangle (rule 3c), replace it with Rn (see Fig. 2).
4. The pair ir is in same row (rule3 a), replace it with rc.
5. The pair MW forms a rectangle (rule 3c), replace it with NV.
6. The pair is forms a rectangle (rule 3c), replace it with lw.
7. The pair BM forms a rectangle (rule 3c), replace it with DK.
8. The pair Wo forms a rectangle (rule 3c), replace it with Xn.
9. The pair nB forms a rectangle (rule 3c), replace it with gE.
10. The pair MW forms a rectangle (rule 3c), replace it with NV.
11. The pair th forms a rectangle (rule 3c), replace it with
12. The pair eB is in same row (rule 3a), replace it with xC.
13. The pair MW forms a rectangle (rule 3c), replace it with NV.
14. The pair tr forms a rectangle (rule 3c), replace it with za.
15. The pair AO forms a rectangle (rule 3c), replace it with FJ (see Fig. 3)
16. The pair Xe forms a rectangle (rule 3c), replace it with PF (see Fig. 3).
17. The pair LU is in same row (rule 3a), replace it with Uj (See Fig. 3).
The resulting ciphertext will be as follows:
JrDKRnrcgANVlwDKXngENVaxCNVzaFJPFUj
B. Decryption
To decrypt the ciphertext on the receiver side, use the inverse (opposite) steps that were done in the encryption side, and the original correct plaintext will be recovered.
3. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS OF VARIOUS MATRIX SIZES FOR THE KEY
Different sizes of the matrices for the key were implemented ranging from 9 x 9 to 11 x 11. The characters contained in these matrices (without any specific key) are shown in Figures 4(A) and 4(B) for 10 x 10 and 11 x 11 respectively (note that an example of 9 x 9 is already given in Fig. 1, but with a specific key, although all 81 characters are there). Accordingly, a 10 x 10 matrix contained 100 characters, and an 11 x 11 matrix consisted of 121 characters. Two set of experiments were done. In the first set, the plaintext was variable but the key was kept the same. In the second set, the plaintext was kept the same but the key was changed. For both sets, avalanche effect was measured. Avalanche effect measures the change in the output when the input or the key is slightly changed [13]. Details of these experiments and results are given below.
The change in the output characters ranged between 1 and 12 characters. A clearer picture of the trends is visible which shows that an increase in the size of plaintext does not contribute much to the avalanche effect. The reason for this is that there is only onebit change in the whole plaintext input, and this onebit change does not depend on the size of the plaintext. Moreover, it is also observed that for all three matrix sizes, the biggest change was observed for plaintext of 75 characters. This could be attributed to the structure of the plaintext itself, which, in this case, might have a strong impact on the output due to the particular key selected for encryption.
5. CRYPTANALYSIS
In 5×5 Playfair cipher, cryptanalysis is done through two processes. First is brute force attack and second is frequency analysis. In brute force attack we apply several permutation and combinations while in frequency analysis number of occurrences of letters in English alphabets are found and compared to maximum occurrence of each letter in plaintext. Also, the number of permutations applied on each digraph is 676 combinations, which can be easily broken in few hours. But in 32×32 Playfair, as we are using all the 256 ASCII values which will take more time to apply brute force attack.
Our academic experts are ready and waiting to assist with any writing project you may have. From simple essay plans, through to full dissertations, you can guarantee we have a service perfectly matched to your needs.
View our serviceson each pair of diagraphs because each diagraph takes 676 combinations. The frequency analysis of 32×32 is very typical, as the frequency analysis of alphabets is available but not that of ASCII symbols. Also, in the proposed method, the conversion process has been slightly altered i.e. in the original conversion process; if the letters of the digraph appear consecutively in a column then they are replaced with the letter to their immediate below. In case the letter is the last letter in the column, then it is replaced with first letter from the top of the same column. But in the proposed method, if the letters of the digraph appear consecutively in a row then replace them with the letters to right, shifted by the value of random number generated. In case the letter is the last letter in the row, than replace it with that letter which is random number position from the left of the same row. If the letters of the digraph appear consecutively in a column then replace them with the letters below, shifted by the value of random number generated. In case the letter is the last letter in the column, than replace it with that letter which is random number position below in the same column.
6. CONCLUSION
The implementation of advanced encryption algorithm generates cipher text which is very complex. It is concluded that by changing the encryption mechanism by including a random number, the complexity of the encrypted text can be significantly increased.
Playfair cipher has a strong potential for usage in wireless and mobile communications in which the sender is constrained by limited power. This potential of Playfair cipher lies in its simple design which allows for less power consumption than more complex algorithms such as RSA, DES, and AES. The results indicate that the avalanche effect does not depend on the size of the plaintext itself. However, there may be notable changes in the output with plaintext of certain sizes, but no change with other plaintext of the same size. This strongly depends on the plaintext itself and the order (position) of the characters it contains in the matrix. Furthermore, bigger key sizes have a stronger impact on the output compared to smaller key sizes.
Table 6: Comparison between Proposed and Existing method
Properties 
Existing Methods 
Proposed Method (32×32) 

1 
Encryption technique 
Normal 
Modified 
2 
Frequency Analysis 
Possible with alphabets 
Not easy due to symbols 
3 
Key size 
25,36,38 
1024 
4 
Matrix size 
25,36,28 
1024 
5 
Random numbers 
Not used 
Used 
6 
Rotation 
Not used 
Used 
The above depicted table clearly shows the difference between existing methods of encryption used in 5X5, 6X6, 7X4, 32X32 matrix and proposed method that changes the encryption mechanism and increases the key size.
The advantages of proposed method can be enlisted as follows:
 The conversion process has been altered which enhances the complexity of the ciphertext.
 The matrix is rotated by a certain random number before encrypting.
 It allows more than 26 characters as keyword.
 The letters „I‟ and „J‟ are not treated as same characters.
 It considers the space between two words in plaintext as one character.
 This proposed scheme is case sensitive.
 The user can easily encrypt and decrypt the combination of alphabets, numbers and special characters efficiently at the same time, the complexity of cryptanalysis is uncompromised. It can be safely concluded that the proposed method is very much efficient than the existing method by the virtue of its extended matrix, increased key size and modified encryption mechanism.
7 REFERENCES
[1] Andrew S. Tanenbaum, Networks Computer, 5th edition, Pearson Education, ISBN10: 0132553171.
[2] William Stallings, “Cryptography and Network Security Principles and Practice”, 4th Edition, Prentice Hall,2006.
[3] Aftab Alam, Sehat Ullah, Ishtiaq Wahid, & Shah Khalid “Universal Playfair Cipher Using MXN Matrix”. International Jourrnal of Advanced Computer Science, Vol.1, No.3, Pp.113117, Sep.2011. [4] Ravindra Babu K, S.Uday Kumar, A. Vinay Babu, I.V.N.S. Aditya, P.Komuraiah, “An Extension to Traditional Playfair Cryptographic Method”. International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887), Volume 17 No.5, March 2011.
[5] Muhammad Salam, Nasir Rashid, Shah Khalid, Muhammad Raees Khan, “A NXM Version of 5X5 Playfair Cipher for any Natural Language (Urdu as Special Case)”. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 73 2011.
[6] A. Aftab Alam, B. Shah Khalid, and C. Muhammad Salam, “A Modified Version of Playfair Cipher Using 7×4 Matrix”. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 4, August 2013.
[7] S.S.Dhenakaran, M. Ilayaraja, “Extension of Playfair Cipher using 16X16 Matrix”. International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 888) Volume 48– No.7, June 2012.
[8] Arvind Kumar, Pawan Singh Mehra, Gagan Gupta, Aatif Jamshed, “Modified Block Playfair Cipher using Random Shift Key Generation”. International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887) Volume 58– No.5, November 2012 .
32×32 Matrix
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
Related Services
View allDMCA / Removal Request
If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have your work published on the UKDiss.com website then please: