Reviewing the leadership style and organizational culture of Marks and Spencer
Disclaimer: This work has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional academic writers. You can view samples of our professional work here.
Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays.
Published: Mon, 5 Dec 2016
In this assignment, I will be reviewing the leadership style and organizational culture of Marks and Spencer which is one of the biggest well-known British retailers globally.
The reason I have chosen M&S is its global diversity across the entire organization as well as its recognition in global scene among customers. The company is also known for its ethical approaches towards all the suppliers they work with and the sustainability of their products as well as its contributions to Corporate Social Responsibility in leading other company’s and NGO’s to follow.
By being one of the most established and structured organization, M&S is one of the companies that I have the desire to work for; even though I am truly happy with my current job.
However, the reason I am today looking into M&S infrastructure is its complexity but the simplicity within their organization. It’s also rather challenging to act together as one entity whilst having global existences both at corporate level and at Retail store level. Hence it evolves cross cultural organizational behaviours and mutual identity that employees would stay under one big umbrella.
In order to manage and sustain the success of the entire organization, it’s crucial to further review the corporate leaders and company’s mission, vision and values which we will explore on this paper.
Marks and Spencer (M&S) is one of Britain’s oldest and best known retailers of clothing, foods, home ware. M&S “employ more than 60,000 people worldwide, operate more than 450 stores in 30 countries, and serve tens of millions of customers every week”.
The company was first established by Michael Marks and Tom Spencer. Marks had immigrated to England in 1882 after fleeing anti-Semitic persecution in Russian Poland. Here he began to eke out a living selling goods on a stall in Leeds town market. Due to his lack of English he made a sign to go on his stall that read “Don’t ask the price, it’s a penny”. His stall was so successful that by 1890 he had stalls in five cities across the country. Tom Spencer, joined Marks, in 1894. This partnership signified the advent of M&S as we know it today. By the turn of the century the company had expanded to 36 branches nationwide. Following the deaths of Marks and Spencer, the running of the company fell into the hands of Marks’ 28-year-old son Simon. It was he that led M&S to “break with time-honoured British retailing tradition…by eliminating wholesalers and establishing direct links with manufacturers”. The company continued to grow and in 1926 it became a PLC. Two years later it launched its now famous St Michael brand and in 1931 in a drive to “concentrate on goods that had rapid turnover” it introduced food departments into stores.
During World War II approximately half of the company’s stores were damaged or destroyed in air raids. However the business rebuilt and in 1964 Simon Marks handed over the running of it to his brother-in-law Israel Sieff. In the subsequent decade M&S began to expand abroad in North America and later Europe.
Brief Overview of M&S’s Corporate Leaders
Sieff’s son, Marcus Sieff became chairman in 1972. He was replaced by Derek Rayner 12 years later. Rayner became the first chairman to be hired from outside the Marks family. During Rayner’s tenure as chairman M&S expanded into financial services by launching their own charge card. Rayner retired in 1991 and CEO Richard Greenbury took charge.
In the 1990’s M&S began to rapidly expand across Europe and into Asia, opening stores in Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary and Spain. In 1999 following growing criticism of Greenburys’ failure to expand the business fast enough and embrace new ideas he was succeeded by, Peter Salsbury. In that same year “continued poor sales led Marks and Spencer to cut 700 jobs, close its 38 stores in Canada and part company with its clothing supplier of 30 years, William Baird”.
Following this continued poor performance the company, was subject to an unsuccessful takeover bid by Phillip Green of the Arcadia group. In response to this M&S appointed Belgian Luc Vandevelde as CEO. The following spring M&S announced a recovery plan to rescue the struggling chain, which involved selling off the majority of its global operations. Consequently, “unhappy with the company’s direction and its departure from older values, Marks and Spencer board members Sir David Sieff (the last remaining founder member), Sir Ralph Robins and Sir Michael Perry left the board in July 2001”.
Within a year and a half of Vandevelde’s appointment “profits began rising, but although at the time Vandevelde was credited with a revival, it proved to be short-lived”, because by 2004 sales had fallen again and the brand had lost some of its credibility. In light of this it was felt drastic changes were needed and in May 2004 Stuart Rose, formerly head of Arcadia, was named CEO. Since his appointment Rose has instituted change programmes within the organisation and given it new strategic direction. The effects of these changes are already beginning to be seen and M&S is showing clear signs of recovery. However it is too early to say whether this improvement is sustainable.
M&S was set up and run by a family for a long part of its history, its values and culture derived from that. For many years it was viewed as being very patriarchal and inward looking. The perception people had of the company up until the 1980’s was of quality, affordability and reliability, embodied in the St Michael brand. During this time leadership of the business was very strong but inward focused. However, recent changes in the market place have presented a great challenge to the company which it is still addressing.
it is our perception of reality that shapes and directs our behaviour, not some objective understanding of it
by Huczynski and Buchanan
Marks and Spencer’s corporate objectives are incorporated in its mission statement. This outlines what the business is and what it should be. Mission statements set out in writing what the firm wants to achieve and often include information on the values of the business. M&S outlines its core business as clothing and Food. Company’s financial objectives are to deliver shareholder value in terms of increase returns, but also in terms of increase sales and market share in retailing. It beliefs and values are outlined as “Our customers continue to see Marks & Spencer as the place to shop for special food, produced to exacting standards”. M&S also sees its workforce as an important part of its plan and also considers modernising its stores as a key corporate objective. M&S also outlines its corporate social responsibility in its mission statement and considers the needs of other stakeholders too.
Company’s main vision, mission and value statement is briefly as follows:
Vision: The standard against which all others are measured
Mission: Making aspirational quality accessible to all
Values: Quality, value, service, innovation and trust
Once established, from the customers’ point of view, M&S was considered the epitome of quality, affordability and reliability which reached its apogee in the 50’s and 60’s when customers used to scramble to acquire M&S’s reproductions of catwalk fashion. M&S’s clothes lines became so popular that in the 50’s “limits were set on production as everyone wanted the affordable stylish Paris inspired 1950’s glamour”. This perception changed during the 90’s. As ever increasing choice was available on the high street and a growing number of competitors emerged as rivals in M&S’s core markets. Retailers such as Top Shop, Warehouse and Gap offered more fashionable designs and labels, whereas others such as Next and Debenhams offered better value. Even food chains such as Tesco, Waitrose and Sainsbury’s began to encroach on M&S’s market share in the prepared food markets. In light of this people began to view the company as out-dated and old fashioned. This negative perception of the company is just now beginning to be counteracted for reasons which I will detail later in discussing leadership.
From the stand point of employees M&S was viewed as an employer of choice in the mid-20th century. People felt secure in their employment and viewed a career in M&S as highly desirable. In the post-war period the company imposed a more explicit human relations policy. As Marcus Sieff, the incumbent chairman at the time, put it “the chief executive has a duty to treat his employees as he would like to be treated himself, to do as he would be done by”.
This image was reinforced by the way M&S treated its staff, “stores were furnished with good staff canteens, rest rooms, medical and dental care, hairdressers, chiropodists, clean toilets and good training facilities”. By the 1980’s and 90’s it had stopped being viewed as a viable career path and became characterised as ‘dead-end job’. This was reflected in the pay, management and promotional structures in place at the time. This is something subsequent CEO’s have had to address.
This is the set of beliefs and attitudes of both employees and management that helps to influence decision making and behaviour within the organisation. The simple way of explaining culture is the way of how things are done in a business.
According to Huczynski and Buchanan “an organization’s culture focuses on the values, beliefs and meanings used by its members to grasp how its uniqueness originates, evolves and operates”. Edgar Schein makes the distinction between three levels of culture within an organisation distinguished by their visibility to and accessibility by individuals, “surface manifestations of culture, organisational values and basic assumptions”.
Organisational culture and values: “The views of the original founder as modified by the company’s current senior management”
Culture at M&S
In the case of M&S we can see that the original culture derived from the founders and the founder’s family. In a sense you can say that they were family values, with an overtone of religion.
Culture in the early days was based on quick turnover, honesty, hard work and no frills attached. These values evolved into the company’s culture which became paternalistic, an approach is commonly associated with family run businesses. The repercussions of this culture are such that if you are not in the family you cannot rise to the top. This has an effect all the way through the company right down to the employees on the shop floor.
From the mid-19th century family organisations had the strongest sense of culture, one based on loyalty, paternalism and community. However in the 1960’s, post war restructuring concentrated on capital mobility, acquisitions and mergers. The old forms of identification tended to break down and anyone who spoke of solidarity or loyalty was seen as archaic. With rapid organisational growth it became very difficult for firms to maintain the family touch. So by the turn of the 21st century Marks and Spencer had become vulnerable to hostile takeovers with its ever falling share prices and low profit margins. The inward looking culture of the company and the absence of strong leadership were blamed for its poor performance.
Stuart Rose’s vision after he was given the position of CEO was to revert back to old values and simplify a culture which had become too confused and confusing.
The type of culture of Marks and Spencer is a customer driven culture. Customer driven culture is where everywhere in the business make a real effort to improve customer service, market research, employing right people, and training. The business is trying to update the technology e- commerce. It also has a positive culture where staff and workers communicate well. They also regard change as opportunity than not a treat. I also found they are dynamic, this where a business is always looking to change the way they work. They are always looking for new ideas.
According to Huczynski and Buchanan leadership is “the process of influencing the activities of an organized group in its efforts toward goal-setting and goal achievement”. They go on to mention that “leadership appears to be a critical determinant of organizational effectiveness”.
It is useful to distinguish between leadership and management. These two concepts are sometimes seen as synonymous as leadership is seen as one component of the management role. However, other commentators on the subject make clear distinctions between the two. Leaders are portrayed as “someone who develops drives new initiatives, [whereas] managers achieve stability”.
“Managers do things right, while leaders do the right thing”.
By Warren G. Bennis
Due to the complex nature of this topic a great effort has been made to distinguish the qualities that make a successful leader. This line of research has been greatly influenced by the great man theory. This argued that “leaders reach positions of influence from which they dominate and direct the lives of others by force of personality”.
Leadership and Management Styles at M&S
In M&S’s history, men such as, Sir Marcus Sieff could be seen to fall into the “great man” category.
Leadership in the early years was very much in the hands of the family and based on traditional family values. It was strong but essentially inward looking. By the late 90’s when M&S was in trouble there was a need for a change of leadership.
Nowadays a more distributive form of leadership is required. One which creates “a vision of a possible future that allows [the leader] and others to see more clearly the steps to take, building on personal capacities and strengths”. Examples of these types of leader would be Luc Vandevelde and Stuart Rose.
Under Vandevelde’s leadership a recovery plan was put in place based on getting the company closer to its customers and returning the company to its core strengths. Recovery was based around focusing on the UK, selling their own brand and retaking command of their supply chain. His vision was to return Marks and Spencer’s to its reputation for quality, value, service and innovation.
Once articulated, the vision is shared through events designed to disseminate it. Thus we have Vandevelde’s address to the shareholders and Stuart Rose’s mass motivational training for all of staff. They use “catch phrases” to describe and share what is already happening and to encourage others .In the advertising campaign “Your M&S” Rose is embodying the key values and beliefs on which the newly revived M&S is based. In differentiating the customer base and appealing to different sectors through sub-branding such as Per Una by Sir George Davis for the younger customer and Limited Edition for the more style conscious older customer, whilst maintaining the offering of high quality standard basics to everyone M&S is becoming more competitive with other high street retailers. Also the advent of the “Simply Food” stores accentuates one of M&S’s traditional and continuing strengths- its food offerings.
The management style is the pattern of behaviour that he or she shows in carry out a management role over a period of time the most common management styles, are as follows:
Autocratic Management/Leadership style
Autocratic management style is one where the manager is used to giving instructions like telling people what to do rather than asking them for their options. The manager is the only person contributing to the decision- making process. This style of management is more typical of UK management between 1970s and 1980s, although you are sure to find it today. A number of managers who started up with this approach find it difficult or impossible to change their ways. They are used to holding on power and do not understand how the process of ’empowerment’ might work. The result of this style is that members of the group often dissatisfied with the leader. This results in little cohesion, the need for high levels of supervision, and poor levels of motivation amongst employees.
Consultative Management/Leadership style
Consultative managers are ones who seek to consult other people before making a decision. Alternatively, they will seek to consult people before implementing a decision. This type of manager wants to draw on more sources of opinion him or herself. The consultative manager will have listening skills and also the ability to create the right sorts of channels to consult other people. In an organisation with a culture of consultation, there will be a series of mechanisms (e.g. newsletters, team briefing, suggestions boxes, etc.) that make it possible to get the feel of the concerns of other people involved in the decision- making, as well as to draw on their expertise.
Democratic Management/Leadership style
This is a third type of management style is the democratic one, which involves empowerment. This gives individuals and team responsibility to make decisions, usually within the framework. The team is then held responsible for the decisions that it chooses to make. The manager with this style will feel comfortable allow others to make decisions. The democratic manager will also have to have a good overall understanding of decisions being made, and will want regular feed back on results. However, they will be confidants that empower individuals and teams will use the responsibility given to them wisely.
Which style M&S follows?
The management style of Marks and Spencer is consultative so this would mean, that leader consults with other before decision is made. There will be a group influence in the final decision; even through it is made by the leader. For example the marketing department, about whether to launch a new range of products may consider first than rushing straight into launching the products. The decisions are all taken in to account.
The business of Marks and Spencer sometimes might use a mixture of Management Styles for example Marks and Spencer is consultative, the business might also be using democratic management style.
Laissez-faire- This is where people are allowed to do what they feel correct, this is usually associated with medium status (e.g. Managing director – Marketing Director) probably because they are experts in their field so they know what they are doing. Marks and Spencer have a variety of management styles they often give a choice to the management but it depends upon where they are on the hierarchical scale. Those higher on the scale are autocratic and tell staff what to do, from the production line to the logistical designers. Those managers without managers below them are the ones which have to use an autocratic style because those below them have no knowledge on the field, while those around the middle are permitted to adopt a laissez-faire attitude to management, they are high enough in the company and have enough knowledge to use the style properly and to its maximum potential but the shareholders always have a eye on what they are doing with any big decisions having a democratic vote on the item.
Marks and Spencer have a tall structure with many staff working together also communication and responsibility goes down the line of management, to help make sure the company runs smoothly. The company also has a customer driven culture with is very positive to try to meet with customer’s needs. Management/leadership style within the organization is very useful because managers are able to make important discussion and are able to consult people before implementing a decision or sometimes they may also use a mixture of management style like they may be democratic, this is when individual teams work together for discussions being made by them.
The structure, culture and management style are all used to improve and help the way the company works towards meeting its objectives such as increasing sales. Staff might also feel they can work together to achieve their targets to improve sales and help the company recovery back, may be the company could increase their market share at the moment for the company’s welfare.
Marks & Spencer devotes significant time and resources to developing its leaders and nurturing its talent. This approach brings a huge success to the company as well as in witnessing significant change in the way that people behave as a result of investing in its employees and the way that they challenge problems within the organisation.
In concluding my assignment, I would like to make an excerpt from Tanith Dodge who is running the HR department at Marks and Spencer HQ ;
“It is very much about you as an individual leader, your impact on your style with your team and then your impact on your style with your organisation,” she concludes. “So it builds on the whole ‘Your M&S’ message – yourself, your team, your organisation.”
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: