Essay Typer Tools: Do They Really Work? Pros and Cons Explained

Info: 5188 words (21 pages) Study Guides
Published: 03 Apr 2025

Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp

Essay typer tools are automated writing applications that generate essay-style text with minimal human input. These range from simple programs like EssayTyper (which produces paragraphs as you smash random keys) to more advanced AI-driven platforms such as Editpad’s AI Essay Writer or MyEssayWriter.ai that can create entire academic essays from a prompt. Students often turn to these tools in hopes of quickly producing assignments with little effort – especially when facing tight deadlines or writer’s block.

The appeal is understandable: in seconds, an essay typer can spit out content that would take a human hours to draft. However, this convenience comes at a cost. Educators and experts have raised ethical and quality concerns, noting that while these tools can generate text, the output may be academically deficient or even plagiarised.

Using an essay typer to do one’s coursework also blurs the line of academic integrity, essentially outsourcing the thinking and writing that students are meant to develop. In this article, we explore what essay typer tools are, their pros and cons, and how (if at all) they can be used responsibly in an academic setting.

What Are Essay Typer Tools?

Definition and Working Mechanism

Essay typer tools (also called AI essay writers or essay generators) are software platforms designed to automatically produce written essays on a given topic or question. Unlike general AI chatbots (e.g. ChatGPT) which can have open-ended conversations, essay typers are tailored for academic-style outputs – often structuring text into introductions, body paragraphs, and conclusions. They typically work by leveraging large language models or pre-programmed databases.

For example, the novelty site EssayTyper.com famously claims to use a “patented combination of magic and Wikipedia” to draft essays instantly. In reality, EssayTyper simply fetches content from Wikipedia related to the topic and dumps it into an essay format as the user types, which the site itself warns is “not real… and that’s plagiarism.”

Newer essay typer platforms have adopted genuine AI generative models (especially since 2022–2023) to produce original text. Rather than copying text outright, these use machine learning algorithms (often based on GPT-3 or GPT-4) to predict and compose an essay word by word.

Look up and copy methods

One UK analysis notes a key shift: older tools relied on “simple ‘lookup and copy’ methods” to assemble essays. Whereas the latest generation can “generate unique content” based on large AI training data. In practical terms, this means modern essay typers can take a prompt or title you provide and invent an essay that didn’t exist before.

In fact, sometimes even including made-up citations or references to mimic academic writing. Each tool has its own mechanism and features, but the core idea is the same: automate the writing process by having a computer system produce the prose.

Popularity Among Students

The use of essay generators has surged in popularity, especially with the mainstreaming of AI in education. Students are understandably tempted by tools that promise to do the “heavy lifting” of writing. Many such platforms are freely accessible online, requiring no more than entering a topic and clicking “generate.”

For instance, MyEssayWriter.ai markets itself as “fast, accurate & reliable” – just “enter your topic…and let our AI handle the rest”, boasting that it creates “100% unique, plagiarism-free, and high-quality essays in just 90 seconds”. The appeal of instant, effort-free content has led to widespread trial among students. Surveys in 2023–24 found that a significant portion of students have experimented with AI writing tools.

In one global survey of university learners, 86% admitted to using AI in their studies. 24% even admit to using AI to draft assignments or essays. Another study of U.S. college students found 56% had used AI on coursework, though over half of them also acknowledged that doing so counts as “cheating or plagiarism.” These figures underscore how common essay typers and similar AI tools have become in academia. Students cite reasons like saving time, getting past writer’s block, or simply curiosity about AI.

Creates a Godsend Complex

Especially for those who struggle with academic writing, an essay typer can seem like a lifeline. In essence, a quick fix to produce something, anything, to submit. Social media further fuels this trend. TikTok and YouTube videos demonstrate how to use AI chatbots or essay generators to churn out homework answers. In the UK, secondary school teachers note an “explosion in AI ‘study aids’” enticing pupils to cheat on assignments.

Despite warnings, the allure of pressing a button and getting a ready-made essay is hard to resist for some learners. In summary, essay typer tools have risen from obscure curiosities to widely-used resources virtually overnight. But their popularity far outstrips their actual effectiveness, as we shall see.

Pros of Using Essay Typer Tools

Quick Content Generation

The most obvious advantage of essay typer tools is speed. They can generate written content far faster than any human could. In moments – often under a minute – a student can obtain several paragraphs of text on a given topic. This rapid turnaround is a huge draw for those facing imminent deadlines or last-minute panic. Now, the core text of an assignment that might normally take you an evening to draft can appear almost instantly on your screen.

For example, an analysis by UK Essays found that AI writing apps can create content “within a few minutes, compared to what could be several hours’ work to write the essay manually.” The convenience of having a “first draft” appear at the press of a button is monumental. It’s like having a tireless ghostwriter on call 24/7. Students who are juggling multiple deadlines or procrastinating until the eleventh hour may use these tools to whip up an immediate essay that they can then attempt to refine.

Time saving crowdsourcing

Even beyond emergencies, quick content generation has its uses. It allows a writer to instantly externalise ideas. That is, one can input a basic prompt or thesis and receive a fleshed-out piece of text to review. In theory, this could free up time to focus on other tasks like editing, researching sources, or studying for exams. The time-saving aspect is frequently advertised by the tool providers themselves. One such platform boasts “save hours of work – get a fully formatted, well-structured essay in seconds.”

For students who feel there simply aren’t enough hours in the day, the sheer speed of essay typers is their single biggest advantage. In a fast-paced academic environment, they offer a tempting shortcut to produce written work at a moment’s notice.

An essay typer tools breakdown from UKEssays.com

Overcoming Writer’s Block

Another benefit of using an essay generator is as a cure for writer’s block. Staring at a blank page can be intimidating, and not everyone finds it easy to start an essay from scratch. In such cases, an AI writing tool can serve as a helpful prompt or brainstorming partner. By generating some initial content, it can break the vicious cycle of not knowing what to write. This can often paralyses students.

Reactionary Nature of Essay Typer Tools

The generated text provides something to react to – it’s easier to critique or tweak an existing paragraph than to conjure one from nothing. Many students use these tools to kickstart their creativity. Even if the output isn’t perfect, it can spark ideas or show a possible direction for the essay. The developers of EssayTyper pitched it in this very way: as a source of guidance & inspiration for students who “don’t know where or how to start” on a topic.

The playful interface of EssayTyper (which fills the page with text as you hit any keys) underscores its intended use as an idea generator rather than a final writing solution. More sophisticated AI essay writers similarly claim to help users overcome the blank page. For example, one student testimonial for an AI writing tool states it “helped me brainstorm fresh and unique ideas for my topic, giving me a strong starting point for my writing.”

This highlights how AI-generated content can serve as a springboard. You might feed in a prompt and get back a few paragraphs that are not submission-ready. Still, they contain a few useful points or a tentative structure that you can build upon. Some tools have features explicitly designed for this iterative approach.

A recent review noted a tool called JotBot that can even take a user’s partial input and then suggest the next sentence or paragraph, almost like autocomplete for essays, helping you build your draft piece by piece. Such capabilities can gently prod a stuck writer forward. In short, essay typers can function as a creative aid. By providing instant text on the page, they remove the intimidation of the blank screen and help writers move past blocks in the writing process.

Inspiration and Idea Generation

Beyond just overcoming blocks, essay typers can actively inspire and generate ideas for content. Drawing on large datasets and information, they might surface angles or examples on a topic the student didn’t consider. In this sense, they act like a supercharged brainstorming tool.

For instance, an AI essay generator given a broad topic might output an essay draft that includes several distinct arguments or sub-topics. This can effectively lay out an outline that a student could follow up on. One tech writer who tested popular AI essay tools observed that they are useful for getting a general sense of how you might approach an essay question.

In her experiment, the tool’s output mentioned relevant facts (like specific legal penalties for a law in question) which the user hadn’t provided, indicating the AI pulled in external information. Although the AI did not cite sources, the details it provided were a helpful springboard for further research. Similarly, another tool delivered “10 paragraphs back, some with subheadings like ‘historical background’ and ‘implications’” for the given topic, essentially drafting a structured outline of key points.

Inspirational

This kind of output can inspire students to explore subtopics and ensure their essay covers a comprehensive range of ideas. If you’re not sure what to write, an AI’s take on it can reveal common themes or perspectives. In turn, you can then expand with your own analysis. Essay typer outputs can also spark creative ideas. Because AI can introduce unexpected connections or phrasing, it might give a fresh twist that gets your own thinking going.

Even the act of evaluating the AI’s content – deciding what makes sense and what doesn’t – can clarify your own stance and help you generate original ideas. Some students treat AI drafts as a rough idea map, extracting the best parts and discarding the rest. Used in this way, the tool is not writing the essay for you so much as collaborating in the planning stage.

It’s worth noting that the breadth of information AI can draw on (especially GPT-based systems trained on millions of texts) means it might mention evidence, theories, or examples from domains you might miss in a quick manual brainstorm. In theory, this could enhance the richness of your essay (provided you verify any facts the AI introduces).

In summary, when used carefully, essay typers can function as idea generators – they supply a pool of raw material (topics, arguments, examples, possible thesis statements) from which a student can then select and refine the best elements for their own work.

Cons of Using Essay Typer Tools

Questionable Content Quality

For all their speed and convenience, essay typers often fall short on the quality of the output. The text generated may be grammatically fluent, but that doesn’t guarantee it’s a good essay. In many cases, AI-produced essays are superficial – they lack the depth, clarity of argument, and critical insight that teachers expect. One major issue is that these tools cannot truly understand the assignment or subject matter; they predict plausible sentences but do not exercise human reasoning.

As a result, the content can be off-target or filled with generic filler. A review of EssayTyper.com noted that if you input a title, it might give you an essay that doesn’t exactly match the topic – for example, searching for a psychology essay yielded a paper on a different title that just happened to contain the word “psychology.” The reviewer concluded “I hardly think that’s helpful… It is as if I looked online for essay samples on a similar topic.”

Vagueness

In other words, the content quality is equivalent to a random vaguely-related example, not a tailored answer to your specific question. Even when the topic is correctly identified, AI essays tend to be factually unreliable or out-of-date. The tool might state assertions confidently, but upon closer inspection some “facts” may be incorrect or unsupported. As educators have pointed out, language models “can’t discern between fact and fiction” and often hallucinate – meaning they may fabricate information that sounds credible but is false. This is especially problematic in academic writing which demands accuracy and evidence.

An essay typer might churn out a convincing paragraph about a historical event or a scientific study, but unless the student verifies those details, they could be unwittingly submitting misinformation. Another quality issue is the lack of coherent argumentation. AI tools cannot truly perform analysis or critical evaluation; they recombine patterns from training data. A UK Essays analysis observed that even the best AI writers still “fail to create credible reasoned arguments or reflections, and lack critical thinking.“

Confusing

The output might read smoothly at first glance, but deeper examination shows it’s just stating obvious points or even contradicting itself. Complex essay prompts that require a position or original analysis are likely to stump an essay generator – it will produce either a one-sided answer or a meandering, contradictory text because it doesn’t actually know how to form a logical argument. Additionally, AI-generated prose can be oddly vague or verbose. Some tools pad the essay with redundant sentences or clichéd language to reach a word count (e.g. one tester noted an AI tool simply “added a bunch of words” without adding substance).

This kind of fluff might fool a word-count requirement but will not impress a marker looking for concise, meaningful content. There are also instances where the tone or style isn’t appropriate – an AI might write in a manner that’s too informal, too stilted, or inconsistent, requiring extensive editing to fit academic standards. In short, while essay typer tools can generate text, they often cannot produce a high-quality essay.

Ultimately, work they produce frequently requires significant revision to meet academic expectations. Therefore, without human oversight it may contain factual errors, weak reasoning, or irrelevant material that would result in a poor grade if submitted as-is.

Ethical and Academic Integrity Concerns

The use of essay generators raises serious ethical issues, particularly in an academic context. Most education institutions consider it academic misconduct to submit work written by an AI as if it were your own. In essence, handing in an AI-written essay is a form of plagiarism (since the student is taking credit for writing that they did not personally do) or cheating (since they gained an unfair advantage by not doing the required work themselves). Universities and schools have started updating their policies to explicitly forbid unacknowledged AI-generated content in assignments.

The risks to students are high: if you are caught submitting an essay you didn’t write, the penalties can be severe – ranging from failing the assignment to expulsion. As one commentary bluntly put it, “If you are caught handing in a paper that is recognised by your university as being AI generated you risk failing your course, or even expulsion.”

Undermining your academic career

Using these tools to cheat undermines the whole purpose of coursework, which is to develop your own understanding and skills. Even beyond formal discipline, there’s an ethical learning issue: relying on AI to do your writing means you are not practicing and improving your own writing and critical thinking abilities, essentially short-changing your education. There is also an ongoing debate in academia about detection and fairness.

Detectability falsehoods

Some students mistakenly believe that because AI-generated text isn’t copy-pasted from an existing source, it’s undetectable and therefore “safe” to use. It’s true that traditional plagiarism checkers (like Turnitin’s standard mode) might not flag AI-written text, since it is usually original in a statistical sense.

However, new detection tools have emerged that analyze writing style and entropy to identify AI-generated content. While these detectors are not foolproof, they are constantly improving. AI text often has telltale patterns – one study notes that even the best AI’s writing “has patterns that detection apps can often recognise.”

Educators have reported catching students because the essay’s style seemed non-human or too generic. In some cases, instructors compare a student’s known writing to the suspicious essay or even quiz the student on the content to confirm authorship. Aside from detection, there’s the broader integrity issue: using an essay typer skirts the rules and spirit of honest scholarship.

It can be argued that using AI in this way is equivalent to using an essay mill (paying someone else to write your assignment) – in fact, some essay mills themselves now incorporate AI tools, blurring the lines further. The UK’s Quality Assurance Agency has warned that AI-assisted cheating poses a new challenge to academic standards, and that indiscriminate use of such tools “may harm the quality of [students’] education and undermine confidence in their qualifications.”

In summary, students should be very clear that submitting AI-written work as their own is unethical and usually against the rules. The convenience of essay typers does not justify the violation of trust and honesty expected in education. Beyond the risk of getting caught and punished, there’s the personal ethical cost of knowing one hasn’t earned their grade legitimately.

Potential for Plagiarism

Despite marketing claims of “plagiarism-free” content, essay typer tools carry a significant plagiarism risk. Some of the older or simpler tools (like the original EssayTyper.com) literally copy content from external sources. Consider, for instance, EssayTyper’s trick of pulling text from Wikipedia results in essays that are often verbatim or lightly rephrased versions of Wikipedia articles. As a Business Insider investigation showed, an EssayTyper output on Steve Jobs was essentially “just a rewrite of [Jobs’] Wikipedia page.”

Submitting such material would be no different from copying directly from Wikipedia – a clear plagiarism case that any standard checker or knowledgeable teacher could catch. Even when outright copying is not happening, plagiarism can occur in more subtle ways. Many AI essay generators do not cite any sources, even if the content was influenced by existing works.

This means a student might turn in an essay full of ideas or specific facts that aren’t common knowledge, with no credit given to the original authors – that is technically plagiarism of ideas/information. Unless the student themselves adds citations after the fact, the AI’s output can lead them to inadvertently claim others’ research as their own.

Similarity in output

Moreover, if multiple students use the same tool with similar prompts, there’s a chance the outputs could end up dangerously similar to each other or to some existing text. While advanced AI models try to produce varied results, they might still converge on certain phrasings or facts that trigger plagiarism flags.

A cautionary example comes from paraphrasing tools (a close cousin of essay generators): simply rewording source material via AI might evade detection briefly, but it’s still an act of plagiarism and can be identified upon closer scrutiny. Penn Foster College explicitly warns that using AI to paraphrase content from the internet “makes it difficult for plagiarism detection tools to identify misconduct, but it still falls under academic dishonesty.”

The same logic applies to essay typers – if the tool regurgitates knowledge that you didn’t come up with and you present it as yours, you are plagiarising. Another aspect to consider is plagiarism of writing style. Some sophisticated detectors or examiners look at writing style consistency. If you submit an essay drastically better or different in style from your usual work, it raises suspicions that it’s not your original writing. That suspicion might not be “plagiarism” in the traditional sense, but it shades into the territory of misrepresentation and can prompt further investigation (which could then uncover plagiarism or AI usage).

Summary

Finally, it’s worth remembering that not all AI output is as unique as advertised. Large language models have a probabilistic tendency to echo common phrases or structures seen in training data. If a prompt is common, the AI’s response might match portions of its training examples.

In effect, the AI could accidentally reproduce parts of someone else’s text from its dataset. Turnitin reported that in a sample of student papers submitted, about 11% showed signs of AI-generated passages – and while AI text itself might not trip a plagiarism alarm, if any of those passages happened to coincide with published text, it would. In summary, using an essay typer without careful checks can lead to plagiarised content being submitted, whether directly (copy-paste from sources), or indirectly (uncited information, AI-recycled phrasing).

The student then bears full responsibility for that plagiarism. The safest assumption is that anything an essay tool produces could be plagiarised unless verified otherwise. This is a major downside that can nullify any benefit of using the tool in the first place, given the grave consequences plagiarism carries in academia.

Maximising the Effectiveness of Essay Typers

Use as a Supplementary Tool: Given the drawbacks above, outright reliance on essay typers is clearly risky. However, if one chooses to use these tools, the key is to use them responsibly and sparingly – as a supplement, not a substitute for your own writing.

Think of an AI essay writer as an assistant for brainstorming, outlining, or improving your drafts, rather than an automatic essay vending machine. For instance, you might use an AI tool to generate a few ideas about how to structure your essay or to propose some arguments on the topic, but then you should take over to do the real writing and thinking. In practical terms, there are a few legitimate ways students can leverage such tools without veering into misconduct.

AI for Research Assistance

One is using AI for research assistance: you can ask it to explain a concept or summarise information (much like you’d use an encyclopedia) to help you understand the material – just be cautious to fact-check what it tells you. Another acceptable use is as a writing coach or editor. For example, after writing your own essay, you could use AI to suggest improvements or check grammar (similar to using Grammarly or a spellchecker) – this way, the ideas and structure are yours, and AI is only helping polish the language.

A lot of educators say the ethical line is crossed when AI generates content you submit, but using AI to support your learning process is fine. So you could have AI generate practice questions, help you brainstorm topics, or even create sample outlines to study from. If you do generate any actual text with AI, treat it as a rough draft only. Never just copy-paste it into your assignment without significant human development.

Personalising the draft

Some students use AI to produce a draft and then rewrite it in their own words and style – while this is still a grey area (since the ideas are AI-originated), the heavy rewriting at least ensures the student is engaging with and transforming the material. The golden rule is transparency and learning: if an AI tool helped significantly, you should ideally acknowledge it and ensure you’ve learned the underlying material.

UK universities encourage students to critically question AI outputs and incorporate their own analysis before considering any content for submission. The moment a student relies on the AI to do the intellectual work (deciding the argument, finding the evidence, etc.), the tool has ceased being “supplementary” and has become a shortcut – which is problematic.

To maximise effectiveness ethically, always use essay typers in the early stages (idea generation, outlining, preliminary drafts) and then put them aside. Use them the way you’d use a textbook or a tutor: as a source of guidance and examples, not as the author of your final piece. By maintaining this approach, students can extract some benefits of AI assistance (like overcoming writer’s block or exploring different perspectives) while still producing authentic, original work that reflects their own effort and learning.

Editing and Refinement Strategies

If you do use an essay typer to produce a draft (or parts of it), it is crucial to thoroughly edit and refine the output. Treat the AI-generated text as raw material – potentially useful, but definitely not publication-ready. Here are some strategies to maximise the quality and integrity of the final work:

Verify Facts and Sources

Never assume the AI’s facts are correct. Cross-check every important detail. If the AI provided any references or quotes (some tools try to include references), verify them from the original source. Often, AI references can be irrelevant or even fabricated. It’s the student’s responsibility to ensure all information in the essay is accurate and backed by real sources. If the tool did not provide citations, you must find scholarly sources to support any claims you decide to keep, and cite them properly in Harvard style (or whatever format required).

One tech reviewer advised that you should “go through everything [the AI] spits back and look it up independently, find solid sourcing, and add that yourself.” This due diligence is non-negotiable for academic work.

Reorganise and Improve Structure

AI essays can be poorly structured or illogical in flow. Take a hard look at the coherence of the draft. You may need to rewrite the introduction or thesis statement to clearly answer the essay question. Ensure each paragraph has a clear point and that the overall argument develops logically.

Sometimes AI will jumble points or include extra fluff that needs cutting. Don’t hesitate to re-outline the essay after reading the AI draft – you might discover a better order for the points or decide to discard irrelevant sections entirely.

Add Your Own Analysis

To elevate the essay from a generic AI output, inject your own insights, examples, and critical analysis. If the AI provided a general argument, challenge it or expand on it: why is that argument important? Do you agree or is there an alternative perspective? The goal is to infuse the essay with original thought that reflects your understanding. AI is currently incapable of genuine critical thinking, so this is where you must do the heavy lifting. By adding original analysis, you also differentiate the final text from the AI’s style.

Rewrite in Your Voice

It’s important that the final writing sounds like you, not a robot. That means adjusting phrasing, tone, and word choice. You might notice the AI uses certain repetitive phrases or an overly formal tone – feel free to rewrite sentences to match your natural writing style (while still keeping it academic). Not only does this improve readability, but it also helps avoid detection since the prose becomes more human-unique.

There are even tools that offer to “humanise” AI text (for instance, Editpad’s AI Essay Writer has a feature to “remove 30-40% of AI text” to make it sound more human), but it’s best if you do the humanising by consciously editing the language.

Check for Plagiarism and AI clues

After heavily revising, it’s wise to run your essay through a plagiarism checker to ensure nothing was unintentionally copied. Given the concerns, also consider using an AI-text detector on your draft to see if it still looks “AI-written.”

These detectors aren’t definitive, but if even after editing, a detector flags large portions as AI-generated, that’s a sign you need to rewrite those parts more thoroughly. Some new essay generator services advertise themselves as “undetectable AI” that produce human-like text, but you should be skeptical of such claims – always double-check with your own judgment and tools.

Proofread and Refine

Finally, treat the essay like any draft – proofread for grammar, clarity, and conciseness. AI might make fewer typos than a human, but it can still produce awkward sentences or misuse terms. Ensure the final version is polished. It can help to read it aloud or have a peer read it. Then you can catch any unnatural phrasing that slips through.

By following these editing and refinement steps, a student can transform an AI-generated draft into a more credible and original piece of writing. It’s a lot of work – arguably nearly as much as writing an essay from scratch – which raises the question of whether using the essay typer saved much time at all.

But if one is determined to use such a tool, rigorous editing is the only way to make the output suitable. In the end, the effectiveness of an essay typer is maximised not when it replaces the writing process, but when it is just one part of a broader, human-led process of drafting, critical thinking, and revising.

An AI-generated essay that is untouched by human hands is almost guaranteed to be problematic; an AI-assisted essay that has been carefully reworked by a knowledgeable student stands a much better chance of meeting academic standards without crossing ethical lines.

Conclusion

Essay typer tools encapsulate both the promise and pitfalls of AI in education. They undoubtedly offer speed and convenience, and can serve as handy aids for sparking ideas or structuring thoughts. In the best-case scenario, a student might use these tools to overcome initial hurdles in writing and then produce a refined, original essay of their own. However, the effectiveness of such tools is less than prudent when it comes to producing ready-to-submit quality work.

The content they generate often lacks substance, accuracy, and personal voice. More worryingly, relying on them can lead students into ethical quagmires – from plagiarism (intentional or not) to breaches of academic integrity policies – which can have far-reaching consequences on one’s academic journey. As one observer quipped, using EssayTyper or the like is fine “for fun,” but you should “please don’t ever try to use this legitimately.”

In UK academia and beyond, integrity and genuine skill development are paramount; no shortcut tool can replace the learning that comes from grappling with an essay itself. In conclusion, you’ll best utilise essay typer tools with extreme caution. Only as a secondary aid for brainstorming or drafting, and always with thorough human revision and ethical use in mind.

Students would do well to remember that while you can outsource the task of writing to a machine, you cannot outsource the responsibility for what you submit. An AI-generated essay may save you a bit of typing today, but it cannot cultivate the writing proficiency and critical thinking that will ultimately determine your success.