Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UKEssays.com.
It is the unconscious mind and underlying motives that intrigue philosophers, scientists, doctors, and even common men to comprehend the human mind and even themselves. One philosophical doctrine, existentialism, attempts to explain the logic and concept of self and the awareness thereof. Life is not bound by societies’ standards or what appears to be acceptable in the eyes of others. Instead, identity or truth is, “more a matter of decision than discovery” (Flynn, 10). This eviction of truth, therefore, is a decision of heart and will. Kafka’s Hunger Artist explores two of the basic elements of existentialism: existence precedes essence and freedom in demonstrating existentialism through the “artist,” the reader gains a greater understanding of epimeleia heautou (care of self).
Becoming an individual is an eventual goal dealing strictly with the present. In this sense existentialism answers the age old question: Is the character of one a result of nature or nurture? The answer would be nature. The concept of existence precedes essence explains that who an individual becomes is a result of their personal decisions. Essentially a person is who he or she chooses to be, rather than an outcome of the past. In both literature and reality most would blame prior events as to whom they have developed into, especially in the negative sense, while existentialism argues that one is not a victim of the past.
However, within the realm of pure existence, there is no room to incorporate ethics, the past, or the future. Marcel suggests that he is the prey of existence; that he himself is, and at the same time is also part of a whole (Marcel, 51). Each individual is part thought as well as part body. Physically the body will take care of itself as an involuntary system, not being dependent on thought. An individual, then, belongs to a body, while thought and pure existence have no ties to it. The goal is to understand the relationship of the two while not letting physical technicalities hinder thought. “The point to note is the metaphysical connotation given to a kind of repellent consistency which is alleged to be characteristic of thought” (Marcel, 53).
There is a common misconception between thought and wisdom. Wisdom is the use of prior experiences which is not a part of existence itself. What could be called worldly wisdom is like a curtain that conceals fundamental existence. It prohibits the mind from enlightenment and creates opacity. Although one ought to be selfless, they often will consider themselves to be the center of existence. In order to not be blinded, ‘lessons of life’ must be released and one must limit living and allow oneself to be forgotten. To be is a choice, but to truly be is to cease to be (Flynn, 25).
The protagonist in the short story The Hunger Artist accomplished the aspect of existence precedes essence. Although in the beginning he was admired for his gift, he was in the end chastised for his way of life. Crowds would gather around his cage and peer in as he sat in solemn silence in reverence of his own existence, but to them he was purely a form of entertainment. What he considered to be an accomplishment, such as fasting for forty days, all too soon became boring to the onlooker. In the end, his death almost came completely unnoticed because interest in this form of art was quickly dulled and eventually vacant because of the lack of understanding on the audiences’ part.
Having learned to let himself go, the artist led a life many would conclude is not worth living as well as being embarrassing. He was able to clear his mind and sit for countless hours contemplating his existence or being. Negative enlightenment of absurdity had come to him, a presence that would reveal to him more than the common man could possibly understand. He had succeeded in separating his body and mind. While denying his body food, his thought would thrive, which in his mind was a great success. What brought him satisfaction was not so much his art and his audience but his ability to discipline himself and enjoy existence of self rather than what society would consider living. Although he did not value understanding from the onlooker, the artist did long for appreciation of his work. His last words to the overseer did not represent regret, but instead his feelings of having wanted to be recognized and remembered.
Perhaps the most peculiar statement the artist makes is his reasoning of fasting; that any food he ever tried did not bring fulfillment or satisfaction. It was not that food literally failed to bring a pleasant taste or that he really disliked anything he had trie; instead he speaks symbolically. An ordinary person relies of food as a means of survival and at times simply for pleasure. Because he had been enlightened he needed more than tangible food to survive, he also needed food for his thought. With his priorities in place he denied his body of what it longed for in order to satisfy his existence. His existence was his being as opposed to his physical self.
Kafka uses symbolism again when he explains the artist’s activity of, “drawing deep into himself, paying no attention to anyone or anything, not even the all-important striking of the clock” (Kafka, 394). Time can be a tangible concept. People rely on it to function and live organized on a day to day basis. The artist does live on time. He has no day, month, year, hour, or minute. He spends his life in contemplation; he does not feel the pressure of a schedule and does not waste time on petty activity.
Another important aspect of existentialism is freedom. Its basic definition is an individual’s path to identity despite social stigmas and economic pressures. This is the difference between the norm of what is expected and the ‘reality’ of what is. Freedom calls for one to create his or her own values. This allows him or her to be their only guide to personal being, for no one can do it for them. Freedom is not to be limited to social conformities such as religion or politics. True freedom is strictly an inner concept leaving room for the individual to live and think as what is revealed to be true. Existence matters not to the world; it is a self revelation. However at the same time there are limitations when physically acting out upon what is revealed. This realistic sense causes most revelations to be a negative enlightenment.
Metaphorically speaking if life is an act then every man or woman is a performer. Because living out means interaction with the world each individual acts or performs for others along for himself. Marcel says, “He is therefore acting rather than being himself” (60). While it is impossible to only exist in thought, one must not allow ‘acting’ out a life to put up a wall to prevent further development of enlightened existence. Genuine freedom is to be stripped of all shields that act as outside forces which intrude in existence.
Although freedom of existentialism is vast, it even has its limits. Some philosophers argue that the universe takes its own hand in determining events which causes one to act out a certain way. Had this event not occurred they may not have acted otherwise. Freedom is then bound by the following antecedent of natural or cultural events (Flynn, 38).
The Hunger Artist is filled with examples of existentialistic freedom. Ironically the artist chooses to keep himself locked inside a cage. Freedom itself does not allow one to have everything. Most would interpret this to mean that he is confined and trapped; unwilling to be there. However he is in there be choice. Not physically free, he finds being stationary and in fasting routine to bring contemplative freedom. Even in the end when his performance was no longer popular, he continued to fast. This fasting freedom seemed as though it could run on forever. Constantly searching for more, he was never completely satisfied. While searching for more, he could only ask himself ‘why stop now’ “since he felt that there were no limits to his capacity for fasting” (Kafka 395).
At the end of the story following his death, the artist is soon replaced by a vivacious young panther. People longed to see something new and exciting. Being an animal he will act like one, but Kafka uses his actions to portray the common man’s qualities. The panther was happy with any food that was given to him and ate it without thought. This means that most men “eat up” what they are given without hesitation. They do not worry about “digesting” anything deeper such as their individualism and existence.
Kafka mentions that the animal also does not miss his freedom. Perhaps this is because he did not understand freedom in the first place and is not aware of what exactly he has lost. It is also possible that he never had freedom to begin with. Existentialistic freedom is something discovered and not given as a gift. People were most fascinated with the panther than they were the artist for entertainment purposes. The panther was also something they could understand since they have not yet been exposed to something beyond their being. It is something they will never understand until they realize that they are not really living.
Kafka successfully uses existentialism to portray how an individual comes to terms with being and nothingness in order to become more than what they were. He provokes one to ask “Why do we exist?” and “Why is there rather than there is not?” through existence proceeds essence and freedom.
Flynn, Thomas. Existentialism A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press Inc., 2006. (9-60). Print. Works Cited
Marcel, Gabriel. The Philosophy of Existentialism. 9th ed. NY: The Citadel Press, 1968. (14-65). Print.
Kafka, Franz. ‘A Hunger Artist.’ Literature an Introduction to Reading and Writing 9th ed. NY Pearson Education Inc. 2009. 393-398.
de Beauvoir, Simone. Philosophical Writings. NY: Board of Trustees of the University of Illinios, 1908. (221-236). Print.
Wolin, Richard. The Terms of Cultural Criticism. NY: Columbia University Press, 1992. (83-95). Print.
Lohafer, Susan. Coming to Terms with the Short Story. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, 1983. (7-28). Print.
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
Related ServicesView all
DMCA / Removal Request
If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have your work published on the UKDiss.com website then please: