Why team performance management is important

Published: Last Edited:

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Team performance management is important to the success of a company. Without it, it is difficult to determine whether a team is headed in the right direction. A project's success is largely based on a team's efficiency. Getting people to focus on the right things to accomplish drives good business results.

Effective team management motivates workers to take responsibility for their job performance and produce superior outputs. In most cases, a consistent demand for a quality performance yields the best results. Managing the performance of a team is a real challenge because it requires a lot of diplomacy, tact, and discipline. For instance, negative feedback should always be paired with motivation and should not be given too frequently.

A team should work in harmony - in any organization, two or more people working together harmoniously is a major factor towards achieving success. It is the duty of a leader to monitor the performance of his or her team; bring out the best among his or her subordinates; and determine the weaknesses, strengths, and potential development of each team member. Team performance management is the major key in increasing productivity within a group.

Performance management centers on allowing an individual to perform to the best of his or her ability. This enables the employee to meet or exceed expectations and develop efficient communication with his or her fellow employees and leaders. The leader, in turn, should give feedback for continuing improvements and for skills to be nurtured and developed.

Team-Related Performance Measurement.

Measures, or "yardsticks," should be used to determine how well each element is performed. Standards are points or ranges on the "yardstick" that define performance at those specific levels. Each one of the three types of elements and their related measures and standards can address team-related performance.

Measuring performance related to work done by a team can be approached in at least four ways. Two of these approaches measure performance at the individual level and two measure performance at the team level.

Team-Related Measures Matrix

Team-Related Measures Matrix

Behaviors/Process Measures

Results Measures

Individual Level: An employee's contribution to the team

Whether or how well the employee: cooperates with team members, communicates ideas during meetings, participates in the team's decision-making processes.

The quality of the written report, the turnaround time for the individual's product, the accuracy of the advice supplied to the team, the status of the employee's case backlog.

Team Level: The team's performance

Whether or how well the team: runs effective meetings, communicates well as a group; allows all opinions to be heard, comes to consensus on decisions.

The customer satisfaction rate with the team's product, the percent decline of the case backlog, the cycle time for the team's entire work process

In most cases, work assignments at the team level and their related measures and standards can only be addressed through non-critical and/or additional performance elements, and can only be factored into the summary level through non-critical elements. However, it is possible to develop a critical element and standard that holds a supervisor, manager, or team leader responsible for the team's performance- as long as that person has the leadership responsibility for the team and can reasonably be expected to command the resources and authority necessary to achieve the team's results.

Team Level

The Team's Performance.

Work assignments, measures, and standards for the team as a whole can be incorporated into the employee's performance plan through non-critical elements and additional performance elements. Using non-critical elements is the only way that the team's performance as a whole can affect the summary level. Non-critical elements cannot be used in two-level appraisal programs because they would have no effect on the summary rating level and, by definition, they must affect the summary level. Additional performance elements are the only elements that a two-level appraisal program can use to include team performance in the employee's performance plan.

The Team's Processes.

The team can be appraised on its internal group processes. Work assignments and performance measures could include how well: the team works together as a group; meetings are planned and run, and if they're on time; the team reaches consensus; and/or the team uses successful problem-solving techniques. Specific examples of non-critical or additional elements (work assignments) and standards that address the team's performance on its group processes are listed below.

Open and Honest Communication.

The supervisor, team leader, and team members are generally satisfied that:

-team members communicate openly and honestly with each other without fear of telling the truth;

-team members provide feedback on each other's performance;

-team members express their opinions and everyone's opinion is heard;

-the team works together to solve destructive conflicts rather than ignoring conflicts;

-the team encourages every member to be open and honest, even if people have to share information that goes against what the team would like to hear; and

-the team recognizes that everyone on the team has something to contribute -such as knowledge, skills, abilities, and information -that is of value to all.

Effective Meetings.

The supervisor, team leader, and team members are generally satisfied that:

-team meetings are planned and each meeting has an agenda;

-team members are prepared, give the meeting their full attention, and the team accomplishes what it set out to accomplish during the meeting;

-meetings have a facilitator who is responsible for keeping the meeting focused and moving;

-designated team member takes notes of the key subjects, main points raised, and action items; and

-at the end of the meeting, the team sets an agenda for the next meeting and conducts a 1-minute evaluation.

Team Mission.

The supervisor, team leader, and team members are generally satisfied that:

-each person on the team knows exactly why the team exists and what it contributes to the organization;

-members understand and can explain how the team fits into the organization;

-members know exactly why the team does what it does and agree on the team's mission, or they work together to resolve disagreement;

-members know and understand the team's priorities and goals and they progress steadily toward those goals; and

-everyone on the team is working toward accomplishing the same thing.

Clearly Defined Roles.

The supervisor, team leader, and team members are generally satisfied that:

-team members understand their duties and know who is responsible for specific issues and tasks;

-team members have the skills they need to accomplish their roles within the team;

-each team member's role is known and makes sense to the whole team;

-team members clearly understand the team's rules of how to behave within the group;

-team members understand which roles belong to one person and which are shared, and how the shared roles are switched;

-the team uses each member's talents, and involves everyone in team activities so no one feels left out or taken advantage of.

Decision-Making Procedures.

The supervisor, team leader, and team members are generally satisfied that:

-the team discusses how decisions will be made, such as when to take a poll or when to decide by consensus;

-the team explores important issues by asking members to vote or state an opinion verbally or in writing;

-the team tests for a consensus;

-the team uses data as the basis of decisions; and

-the team can reach a decision and support that decision.

The Team's Results.

The team can be appraised on the results of its work products or services. Measures used to appraise the team's performance could include: the number of cases completed correctly; the ratio of satisfied customers to unsatisfied customers; the number of customer requests for a team report; the total cost of a team project; the percent of customer needs filled; and/or the subscription rate of a team newsletter. Below are examples of non-critical or additional elements (work assignments) and standards(specific points or ranges along the measurement yardstick) that represent the team's work results.

Case Backlog.

-any case backlog decreases from 1 to 9 cases each month during the appraisal period.

Customer Service.

-fifty to seventy-five percent of customers say they are "satisfied" or "highly satisfied" with the team's services.

Team Size

Numerous studies have been conducted on team size and its relationship to performance and to various factors such as team spirit, individual and team attitudes, and interaction among team members. To date, the findings suggest that smaller teams allow for closer relationships among members, a deeper knowledge of the members and a better sense of the whole picture at any given time. On the other hand, there may be a preference on the part of some team members to participate in large teams in order to avoid an "intimate" environment, achieve greater anonymity and have the security of knowing that there are more people to do the work required of the group. In a marketing simulation with teams of two, three, and four, team performance varied by team size, with performance significantly higher for the four-person teams. Performance gains as group size increased from three to five members. Gains declined as team size increased with no noticeable improvement in performance observed for groups larger than five. Normally team size should generally be between three and six members. Larger teams have more diverse viewpoints which may lead to better decisions and higher team performance, although they may experience greater challenges with scheduling meetings and poor participation. Therefore, within the range of team size between three and six, we propose that: Team Size will have a significant and positive effect on student team performance.


What is Team?

-Unit of 2 or more people

-Interact or coordinate their work

-To accomplish a specific goal

- A group of people committed to a common purpose, set of performance goals, and approach for which the team members hold themselves mutually accountable.

Differences Between Groups and Teams


-Designated leader

-Individual accountability

-Identical purpose for group & organization

-Individual work products

-Runs efficient meetings

-Effectiveness=influence on business

-Discusses, decides, delegates work to individuals


-Shares/rotates leader

-Accountable to each other

-Specific team vision or purpose

-Collective work products

-Encourages open-ended discussions

-Effectiveness=value of collective work

-Discusses, decides, shares work

Share information


Collective performanceComparing Work Team and Work Group






Individual and mutual

Random and varied



Work Groups

Work TeamsC

Types of Work Team

Organizational Context

-Formal structure -Strategy

-Environment -Reward, Control systems

-CultureWork Team Effectiveness Model

Team Composition

-Knowledge and skills

-Benefits and costs

Team Characteristics




Team Type




Team Processes

-Stage of development



-Conflict resolution

Work Team Effectiveness

-Productive output

-Personal satisfaction

Formal Teams

Vertical - composed of a manager and subordinates, sometimes called functional or command teams.

Horizontal - composed of employees from the same hierarchical level but from different areas of expertise.

Special-Purpose - created outside the formal organization for special projects and disband once project is completed.

Self-Directed Team

Typically permanent teams

-Employees with several skills and functions

-Given access to various resources - information, equipment, machinery, and supplies needed to perform the complete task

-Empowered with decision making authority select new members - $

Horizontal and Vertical Team

Teams in the New Workplace

Virtual teams

- consist of geographically or organizationally dispersed members linked via technology -Use computer technology to tie together physically dispersed members in order to achieve a common goal.

Global teams

-cross-border teams made up of members from different nationalities -intercultural -virtual

Challenges of Virtual Teams

-Select the right team members

-Manage socialization

-Foster trust

-Effectively manage communications

Managing Virtual Teams

Establish regular times for group interaction.

Set up firm rules for communication.

Use visual forms of communication where possible.

Copy the good points of on-site teams. For example, allow time for informal chitchat and socializing, and celebrate achievements.

Give and receive feedback and offer assistance on a regular basis. Be persistent with people who are not communicating with you or each other.

Agree on standard technology so all team members can work together easily.

Consider using 360-degree feedback to better understand and evaluate team members. This type of feedback comes from the full circle of daily contacts that an employee might have, including supervisors, peers, subordinates, and clients.

Provide a virtual workspace via an intranet, website, or bulletin board.

Note which employees effectively use email to build team rapport.

Smooth the way for the next assignment if membership on the team, or the team itself, is not permanent.

Be available to employees, but don't wait for them to seek you out.

Encourage informal, off-line conversation between team members.

An Illustration of Team Workspace


Name: Danny Ong

Position: Attacker

Name: Jason Wong

Position: AttackerC:\Users\Dell-user\Pictures\355463_14.pngC:\Users\Dell-user\Pictures\355463_13.png

Name: Choong Cheng Hui

Position: Attacker

Name: Chan Yit Seng

Position: Attacker





Name: Bobo Chong

Position: Defender

Name: Jimmy Loi

Position: Defender

Name: Chin Mun Fung

Position: Coach

Name: Henry Choo

Position: Coach

An Illustration of Team Workspace

Example: CHELSEA FOOTBALL TEAMC:\Users\user\Desktop\Danny File\卡通人物头像图标下载1.png

Name: Lescott

Position: Attacker

Name: Evra

Position: AttackerC:\Users\user\Desktop\Danny File\卡通人物头像图标下载11.png

Name: Hangeland

Position: Attacker

Name: Barry

Position: Attacker

C:\Users\user\Desktop\Danny File\卡通人物头像图标下载13.pngC:\Users\user\Desktop\Danny File\卡通人物头像图标下载10.png


C:\Users\user\Desktop\Danny File\卡通人物头像图标ddd下载22.pngC:\Users\user\Desktop\Danny File\卡通人物头像图标下载15.png

C:\Users\user\Desktop\Danny File\卡通人物头像图标下载16.pngC:\Users\user\Desktop\Danny File\卡通人物头像图标下载12.png

Name: Torres

Position: Defender

Name: Beattie

Position: Defender

Name: Hart

Position: Coach

Name: Bramble

Position: Coach

The strategy comparison between CHELSEA and DTEC football team

DTEC football team strategy

CHELSEA football team strategy

Sports Teams as Models

Good Models

Example: Chelsea

Successful teams integrate cooperation and competition.

Successful teams score early wins.

Successful teams avoid losing streaks.

Practice makes perfect.

Successful teams use halftime breaks.

Winning teams have a stable membership.

Successful teams debrief after failures and successes.


Poor Models

Example: D-TEC Football Team

All sport teams aren't alike.

Work teams are more varied and complex.

A lot of employees can't relate to sports metaphors.

Work team outcomes aren't easily defined in terms of wins and losses.


Conducting a Team Meeting

12 steps to more efficient and effective meetings:

Prepare a meeting agenda.

Distribute the agenda in advance.

Consult with participants before the meeting.

Get participants to go over the agenda.

Establish specific time parameters.

Maintain focused discussion.

Encourage and support participation of all members.

Maintain a balanced style.

Encourage the clash of ideas.

Discourage the clash of personalities.

Be an effective listener.

Bring proper closure.


Characteristics of Teams

Teams of 5-12 seem to work best


-Ideal size is thought to be 7

-Variations of from 5 to 12 typically are associated with good team performance

-Small teams (2-4 members) show more agreement, ask more questions

-Large teams (12 or more) tend to have more disagreements; subgroups form, conflicts among them occur

Group Size

Research shows that:

Smaller groups are faster at completing tasks.

When problem solving, larger groups do better.

Social Loafing

The tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working collectively than when working individually.

To reduce social loafing, teams should not be larger than necessary, and individuals should be held accountable for their actions.

Characteristics of Teams


-Produce more innovative solutions to solve the problems

-Source of creativity

-Contribute to a healthy level of conflict that leads to decision making

-Work team performance -racial, national, ethnic

-Short term = difficulty learning to work together

-Leadership helps problems fade over time

-Fresh and multiple perspectives on issues help the team identify creative or unique solutions and avoid weak alternatives

-The difficulty of working together may make it harder to unify a diverse team and reach agreements

-Although diversity's advantages dissipate with time, the added-value of diverse teams increases as the team becomes more cohesive

Impact of diverse groups

Diversity in personality, age, gender, and experience promotes conflict, which stimulates creativity and idea generation, which leads to improved decision making.

Cultural diversity in groups initially leads to more difficulty in building cohesion, gaining satisfaction, being productive.

Problems pass with time (certainly by three months).

Culturally diverse groups bring more viewpoints out.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Diversity

Advantages Disadvantages

Multiple perspectives Ambiguity

Greater openness to new ideas Complexity

Multiple interpretations Confusion

Increased creativity Miscommunication

Increased flexibility Difficulty in reaching a single agreement

Increased problem-solving skills Difficulty in agreeing on specific actions

Characteristics of Teams

-Spend time and energy helping the team reach its goal

Member Roles

Task specialist role :spend time and energy helping the team reach its goal

-Initiate ideas

-Give opinions

-Seek information



Socio-emotional role support team members emotional needs



-Reduce tension



Team Member Roles

Creator- Innovator

Initiates creative ideas


Explorer- Promoter

Champions ideas after they have been initiated

Coordinates and integrates


Offers insightful analysis of options

Encourages the search for more information

Reporter- Adviser

Assessor Developer

Fight external battles

Provides Structure

Upholder- Maintainer

Thruster- Organizer

Provides direction and follow through

Examines details and enforce rules

Controller Inspector

Concluder Producer

HIGHTeam Member Roles

Task Specialist Role

-Focuses on task accomplishment over human needs.

Member Task Behavior -Important role, but if adopted by everyone, team's social needs won't be met.

Dual Role

-Focuses on task and people.

-May be a team leader.

-Important role, but not essential if members adopt task specialist and socio emotional roles.

Non participator Role

-Contributes little to either task or people needs of team.

-Not an important role-if adopted by too many members, team will disband.

Socio emotional Role

-Focuses on people needs of team over task.

-Important role, but if adopted by everyone, team's tasks won't be accomplished.


LOWMember Social Behavior

Forming: Orientation, break the ice

Leader: Facilities social interchangesStages of Team Development

Storming: Conflict, disagreement

Leader: Encourages participation surface differences

Norming: Establishment of order and cohesion

Leader: Helps clarify team roles, norms, values

Performing: Cooperation, problem solving

Leader: Facilities task accomplishment

Adjourning: Task completion

Leader: Brings closure, signifies completion

Team Cohesiveness

High cohesiveness is attractive feature of team

-Extent to which team members are attracted to the team and motivated to remain in it


-Team structure


Determinants of Team Cohesiveness

Team structure and context influence cohesiveness

Team Structure

-Team interaction - the more time spent together, the more cohesive the team

-Shared goals - members agree on goals, they will be more cohesive

-Personal attraction to the team - similar attitudes and values and enjoy being together

Team Context

-Moderate competition with other teams - cohesiveness increases as it strives to win

-Team success & favorable evaluation of the team by outsiders - add to cohesiveness

Consequences of Team Cohesiveness

High morale - mixed team performance

Morale - higher in cohesive teams

-Increased communication among members

-Friendly team climate

-Maintenance of membership

Productivity - mixed

-Cohesive Team members' productivity tends to be uniform

-Non-cohesive teams have wider variation in member productivity

Team Norms

-Standard of conduct that is shared by team members and guides their behavior

-Valuable - define boundaries of acceptable behavior

-Not written down

Development of Team Norms

Critical events in team's history

Primacy: first behavior precedents

Team Norms

Explicit statements from leaders or members

Carryover from other experiences


Most important team characteristic

-Antagonistic interaction in which one party attempts to thwart the intentions or goals of another

-Conflict is inevitable whenever people work together in teams

-Among members within a team or between one team and another

-Can have healthy impact = energizes people toward higher performance

Causes of Team Conflict

-Scarce Resources

-Communication breakdown

-Personality clashes

-Goal differences

Balancing Conflict and Cooperation

-Groupthink = tendency for people to be so committed to a cohesive team that they are reluctant to express contrary opinions

-Abilene Paradox = (Jerry Harvey) tendency to go along with others for the sake of avoiding conflict

-Low levels of conflict -associated with poor decision making in top management teams

-Superordinate Goals = goal that cannot be reached by a single party

-Negotiation = parties engage one another in an attempt to systematically reach a solution

-Mediation = process of using a third party to settle a dispute

Effective Teams

Unified commitment

Clear Goals

Good communication

Effective Teams

Relevant skills

Mutual trust

Negotiating skills

Effective leadership

External support

Internal support


Lack of support, consistency of direction, vision, budget, and resources,

Improvement strategy:

-Plan events to demonstrate the firm's support of the leader

-Increase budget and resources

-Increase communication and contact with leader

-Change leadershipWhy Teams Fail: The Leadership, Focus, and Capability Pyramid


Lack of clarify about team purpose, roles, strategy, and goals.

Improvement strategy:

-Establish and clarify team mission

-Ensure open channels for communications and information transfer

-Clarify team member roles

-Establish regular team meetings


Lack of critical skill sets, knowledge, ongoing learning, and development.

Improve strategy:

-Staff the team with the right employees

-Provide appropriate education and training

-Establish individual development plans

-Regularly assess team effectiveness


Question 2

In an organization which is moving into teamwork the supervisor's role will changed from direct supervision to team facilitation and development: What problems are these supervisors likely to experience in their changed of role, and what forms of training and development would help them?

The Challenge of Team Leadership

Becoming an effective team leader requires:

-Learning to share information

-Developing the ability to trust others

-Learning to give up authority

-Knowing when to leave their teams alone and when to intercede

New roles that team leaders take on

-Managing the team's external boundary

-Facilitating the team process

Leading Productive Teams

Team Leader Skills

-Coaching, not bossing

-Help define, analyze, and solve problems

-Encourage participation by others

-Serve as a facilitator

Team Leader Values

-Respecting fellow team members

-Trusting fellow team members

-Putting the team first

Liaisons with external constituents

CoachesTeam Leader Roles

Effective Team Leadership Roles


Conflict Managers

Team Leader Behaviors

Stages of Team Development

The Leader's Role in Creating a Self-Managing Team


The teams and their leaders begin working out their specific responsibilities.

Training is the leader's main task.


Questions typically arise regarding who is leading the team and what its structure and purpose should be.

The leader ensures that team members continue to learn and eventually exercise leadership skills.


Team members agree on purpose, structure, and leadership and are prepared to start performing.

The leader's job is to emphasize the need for the team to temper cooperation with the responsibility to supervise its own members.


A period of productivity, achievement, and pride as the team members work together to get the job done.


How to Improve Team Performance

Select members for skill and teamwork.

Establish challenging performance standards.

Emphasize the task's importance.

Assign whole tasks.

Send the right signals.

Encourage social support.

Make sure there are unambiguous team rules.

Challenge the group regularly with fresh facts and information.

Train and cross-train.

Provide the necessary tools and material support.

Encourage "emotionally intelligent" team behavior.

Typical Leader Transition Problems

Perceived Loss of Power or Status

Unclear Team Leader Roles

Job Security Concerns

The Double Standard Problem

Organizational StructureProviding an Organizational Context That Supports Teams

Teamwork Approach

Organizational System

Organizational Policies

Employee Skills

Designing Organizations to Manage Teams

Effective Teams

Basis for Teamwork to Flourish

Employee Skills

Organizational Policies

Organizational Philosophy

Organizational Structure

Organizational Systems





-Employment stability

-Equal treatment



-Information systems

-Flat structure

-All or most work organized around teams

-High-involvement, high-delegation jobs

-High involvement

Pros and Cons of Group Decision Making


More points of view

More ways to define the problem

More possible solutions/alternatives

More creative decisions

Stronger commitment to decisions


More disagreement and less problem solving

Desire for consensus (groupthink)

Domination by a single individual

Less of commitment to the group decision

The importance of managers and supervisors in times of change

In times of change, managers and supervisors can be both the greatest ally and the greatest obstacle for change teams. They are the closest to the employees who must adopt the new processes and behaviors associated with a project or initiative. In many cases, the work of managers and supervisors will also be impacted by a project. Getting managers and supervisors on-board and taking the lead in supporting employee change is crucial.


The role of managers and supervisors

They are five roles that managers and supervisors must play in times of change at the 2011 benchmarking study identified:

1.Communicator - Communicate with direct reports about the change

2.Advocate - Demonstrate support for the change

3.Coach - Coach employees through the change process

4.Liaison - Engage with and provide support to the project team

5.Resistance manager - Identify and manage resistance

Role 1: Communicator

- Employees want to hear change messages about how their work and their team will be affected by a change from the person they report to. An employee's supervisor is a key conduit of information about the organization, the work that is done and changes to that work resulting from projects and initiatives. Answers to questions like, What does this mean to me? What's in it for me? Why should I get on board? and Why are we doing this? are best delivered by an employee's immediate supervisor. The change management team needs to provide talking points and pertinent information, but those messages should ultimately be delivered to employees by their supervisor.

Role 2: Advocate

-Employees look to their supervisors not only for direct communication messages about a change, but also to evaluate their level of support for the change effort. If a manager only passively supports or even resists a change, then you can expect the same from that person's direct reports. Managers and supervisors need to demonstrate their support in active and observable ways. The key here is this: managers and supervisors must first be on-board before they can support their employees. A change management team should create targeted and customized tactics for engaging and managing the change first with managers and supervisors, and only then charge this important group with leading change with their direct reports.

Role 3: Coach

-The role of coach involves supporting employees through the process of change they experience when projects and initiatives impact their day-to-day work. Prosci's ADKAR model describes this individual change process as five building blocks of successful change: Awareness of the need for change, Desire to participate and support the change, Knowledge on how to change, Ability to implement required skills and behaviour and Reinforcement to sustain the change. Because of their relationship, managers and supervisors can coach individual employees through this change process and help them address the barrier points that are inhibiting successful change.

Role 4: Liaison

-This role involves interacting with the project team. As the liaison, managers and supervisors provide information from the team to their direct reports. But perhaps more importantly, they provide information about the project from their employees back up to the project team. Managers are in the best position to provide design input, usability results and employee feedback on particular aspects of the solution back to the project team.

Role 5: Resistance manager

-No one is closer to a resistant employee than his or her supervisor. In terms of managing resistance, managers and supervisors are in the best place to identify what resistance looks like, where it is coming from and the source of that resistance. They are also the best suited - when provided with the training and tools to do so - to actively manage that resistance when it occurs. They can use the ADKAR model to hone in on which element of the change process is driving resistance and address it accordingly.

Role fulfillment benchmarking findings

For each role, participants ranked managers and supervisors on a scale from "completely ineffective" to "extremely effective". From the data, it is easy to see that managers are struggling the most with fulfilling the coach and the resistance manager roles.

The roles of "Coach" and "Resistance manager" represent the biggest departure for many managers from the role they have historically played in the organization. The other three roles are more aligned with what a manager has done in the past, but effectively coaching employees through a change and identifying and managing resistance to change require a new set of skills. Many times, great managers have difficulty when tasked with becoming great managers of change because they have not been adequately prepared to do so.C:\Users\Dell-user\Pictures\tutorial-job-roles-mod4-fulfillment.gif

Training for managers and supervisors

The finding show that should set off a warning for many change managers and business leaders. While managers and supervisors are identified as a critical success factor in times of change, they are not being adequately prepared to fulfill the roles identified in the research.


The program follows the change management process for managers shown below which begins with a focus on preparing yourself for change before moving on to the creation of specific activities for leading your direct reports through change:C:\Users\Dell-user\Pictures\managers-guide-flow.png

Prosci's Change Management Process for Managers and Supervisors

Performance Planning

-Dialogue between an employers and employees to establish clear, specific performance expectations at the beginning of the performance cycle.Performance Management Model

Performance Criteria

-Information that provides the foundation for performance: competencies, expectations, and goals

Performance Review

-Summative two-way discussion and written documentation focusing on employee performance: Areas of excellence, goals for improvement, and development needs

Ongoing Coaching

-Two-way discussions which focus on recognizing employee excellence and areas for improvement and learning, as well as identifying barriers to performance.

Multiple Sources of Feedback

-Process which provides employees with performance information to supplement supervisor feedback; may include feedback sources as self peers, or direct reports.

Components of Performance Management:

1. Performance Planning:

A dialogue between a supervisor and an employee to establish clear, specific performance expectations at the beginning of the performance cycle.

2. Coaching:

Two-way discussions which focus on recognizing employee excellence and areas for improvement and learning, as well as identifying barriers to performance.

3. Multiple Sources of Feedback:

A process which provides employees with performance information to supplement supervisory feedback; may include feedback sources such as self-evaluation, peers, constituents or direct reports.

4. Performance Review:

A summative two-way discussion and written documentation focusing on employee performance: areas of excellence, goals for improvement and development needs.

What Employees Need to Succeed:

Employees need to know what supervisors expect them to do, when, and how well. If they don't know, how can they succeed?

Employees need regular, specific feedback on their job performances. They need to know where they are excelling and where they could improve. If they don't know what they should continue to do and what they should change, how can they get better?

Employees need to understand how their work fits in with the work of others, the goals of their work unit, and the overall mission and purpose of the division and university. This aspect is of key importance because it's motivating to feel part of a larger purpose and to have sense of contributing to achieve that purpose.

Employees need to play an active role in defining and redefining their job. First, it is motivating to do so. Second, employees, particularly experienced ones, know their job better than anyone else and often know best how to remove any barriers to their success.

Employees need to know their levels of authority. When they know what decisions they can make on their own, what decisions need to involve others, and what decisions are managerial, they can operate with greater confidence. This knowledge also speeds up processes.

Employees need to have opportunities to develop their skills and grow. An employee who is learning new things and applying them is more likely to be retained and more likely to be motivated.

Minimum Expectation for Performance Management Process



Minimum Expectation

Performance Planning

Discuss the core competencies and how they are related to the employee's job

Planning discussion between supervisor and employees


Encourage ongoing two-way communication during the performance cycle

As-needed feedback shared between supervisor and employees

Multiple Sources of Feedback

Provide employees with one additional source of feedback other than the supervisor

Employee complete a self-evaluation or receives feedback from one other sources prior to performance review

Performance Review

Evaluate performance based on the performance planning discussion

Written annual evaluation

Performance Planning

Definition and Expectations

Performance planning is the second step in the performance management process. Its establish and agree upon performance expectations, clarify what the employee will be evaluated on, and set the stage for ongoing feedback and coaching throughout the year.

The job task and objectives of the employee will be aligned with the goals and objectives of the department and division. The employee will understand the link between his or her responsibilities and the overall goals.

Job responsibilities will be modified to reflect any changes in the work context.

Employers and employee will agree to the major job tasks and objectives for the employee, how success will be measured, what assignments are most or least important, and the level of authority the employee has with respect to each job responsibility.

The employers and employee will identify any help the manager can provide, any potential barriers to achieving the objectives, and means for overcoming the barriers.

A formal document (a performance plan) will be produced that summarizes the discussions and agreements and is signed by both the supervisor and employee.

Supervisor's Role Have a thorough understanding of the work involved -the critical functions and key tasks. -Review job description to ensure that information is accurate and up to date. -Keep in mind the performance planning process involves a relatively equal partnership between supervisor and employee. They negotiate together, because they share a common interest- success. -Since the supervisor may be more expert in the "big picture" issues his/her responsibility is to discuss how the employee supports the organizational needs of the department or division and fits with other employees in the unit. -Know what constitutes "successful performance" and effectively communicate this. Because the employee is an expert in the job, it is the employee who should, by and large, generate the criteria used to gauge success, with the supervisor's involvement. -Identify priority areas, if appropriate, among the core and job-specific competencies that will be emphasized in the evaluation.

-Communicate how the results of the employee's work contribute to the department's, division's or university's goals. -Ask the employee what information, resources, tools, training and supervision is needed. Create a climate for real dialogue and teamwork during the meeting.

Employee's Role Have a thorough understanding of the work involved -the critical functions, key tasks. -Review job description to ensure that information is accurate and up to date. -Understand what constitutes "successful performance" of the core competencies related to the job. -Come prepared to share and discuss your personal objectives and the measures of success related to each objective. -Understand how the results of your position contributes to the department's, division's, or university's goals and objectives. -Communicate what information, resources, tools, training and supervision is needed. Ask questions to clarify information and inform the discussion.

Discussion of Barriers and Help Need

Since the principle goal of the performance planning process is to support employee success and foster employee growth and development, it is important that the supervisor and employee discuss any difficulties, challenges, or problems that might interfere with achieving the objectives and meeting standards. As a partner in the process, the

supervisor's role is to actively participate in identifying ways he or she can assist the employee in being successful. This dialogue may also include the identification of training or development needs of the employee that are important to his or her success.

Discussion of Priorities and Authority

It is important that the supervisor and employee agree on which objectives are most important and which are of less importance. The purpose of this discussion is to help the employee know where to allocate his or her time without having to consult with the supervisor on everything. A simply way to do this is to designate a priority for each task or objective. For example, you might rate them as priority one -essential, priority two important, and priority three -least important. The setting of priorities should be a fairly straightforward process. Remember, the employee and supervisor should do it together, so they arrive at a common understanding. This discussion also ensures the priorities reflect what the department or division needs in order to achieve their respective goals and objectives.

Employees need to know when they can make decisions on their own and when they need to consult the supervisor. For each objective, discuss the level of decision making available to the employee. A supervisor might use the following rating system:

Complete Authority: No need to get permission or report afterward Act and Report: Employee can make decision and act, but needs to report decision to the supervisor. Ask: Employee needs to get decision or permission to decide from supervisor


Definition and Expectations

Coaching is an ongoing process of communication between the supervisor and the employee focused on improving current performance and building capabilities for the future. It involves the supervisor and employee working together to share information about work progress, potential barriers and problems, possible solutions to problems, and how the supervisor can help the employee. Coaching includes a variety of activities, such as:

observing performance

providing instruction

directing employee's efforts

providing encouragement

correcting poor performance

recognizing excellent performance

listening to employee concerns and ideas

removing barriers to performance

Coaching should occur on an as-needed basis throughout the year and may be initiated by either the supervisor or the employee. Supervisor and the employee should be encouraged to document these discussions as appropriate.

Supervisor's Role

-Provide ongoing performance feedback to prevent problems from arising. -Provide ongoing performance feedback to employees to recognize excellent performance. Solicit ideas and suggestions from the employee for improving work processes.

-Work with the employee to remove barriers to success and identify strategies to minimize barriers. -Discuss the employee's learning and professional development needs. -Solicit employee feedback on supervisory coaching effectiveness.

Employee's Role

-Ask you supervisor for coaching when it is needed. -Listen and respond to feedback from coaches. -Provide feedback to your coaches about what they need to know to help you be successful.

Below are general guidelines for the supervisor to keep in mind when coaching an employee: -Do allow time for coaching. Even on informal basis, it takes time to do it well. -Do ask how you can be of help to the employee. -Do ask the employee what prevents him or her from performing, if the coaching is about not meeting expectations. -Do ask the employee for solutions to the problem. -Do describe the employee's performance as specifically as possible. Describe what impact it has on others, the department or division. -Do write down what you and the employee each agree to do. -Do talk about follow up. Will you meet again to discuss the issue? When? -Don't be distracted by interruptions. -Don't assume the employee knows what you are thinking.

-Don't assume that the performance issue exists because the employee has a bad attitude. -Don't end on a threatening or negative note. Re-state your support and willingness to help the employee be successful.

Multiple Sources of Feedback

Definition and Expectations

Getting feedback from multiple sources helps employees know when they are doing something really well, and when it would be helpful to do something a little differently. Multiple sources of feedback could include one or more of the following:

Self-evaluation Upward feedback (people who report to you) Peer feedback (people with whom you work) Customer feedback (people you serve both in and outside the unit). Work environment surveys (an expanded form of upward feedback)

Every employee should receive feedback from at least one other source in addition to their supervisor and their own self-evaluation.

Supervisor's Role

-Gather feedback information from other sources - customer input, workplace survey, peer feedback, etc.

-Read and reflect on the information provided from these multiple sources before the performance review; develop questions and comments in response to the feedback.

-Schedule time to discuss the feedback information with the employee either prior to or during the performance review.

If self-evaluation is used as a form of feedback to the performance management process, the supervisor should:

-Emphasize the importance of self-evaluation as a method for both the supervisor and employee to learn.

-Prepare the employee for self-evaluation by discussing it briefly in the performance planning discussion.

-Give the employee a copy of the self-evaluation form; compare it to the performance review form and discuss any difference.

-Read and reflect on the self-evaluation the employee submits before the performance review; develop questions and comments in response.

-Schedule time to discuss the self-evaluation with the employee either prior to or during the performance review.

Employee's Role

Assuming self-evaluation is a form of feedback used in the performance management process, the employee should:

-Take adequate time to complete the self-evaluation form in a thoughtful way, including comments as well as ratings for their performance.

-Use the self-evaluation to create information to share with and questions to ask the supervisor during the review discussion.

-Make a copy of the self-evaluation and give it to your supervisor well ahead of your scheduled performance review.

Performance Review

Definition and Expectations

Performance review is an extremely important component of the entire performance management process. It is the culminating discussion between the supervisor and employee regarding:

-where performance exceeded, met, or fell below expectations.

-the learning and development needed and received.

-objectives that were set and achieved by the employee.

-feedback from others affected by the employee's performance.

Performance reviews succeed under the following conditions:

-The supervisor takes on the role of helper and problem solver, rather than primary evaluator.

-The employee is actively involved in the partnership and engaged in realistic self-evaluation.

-The supervisor uses appropriate interpersonal skills to involve the employee.

-The employee understands what to expect, in terms of content and process, before walking in the door.

-The supervisor treats the review meeting as important, something that should not be delayed and rescheduled.

-Both parties understand the why of performance review -that it's not to punish, but to improve performance so everyone wins.

Supervisor's Role

During the performance review:

-Provide specific feedback on the employee's performance, including priority objectives identified during performance planning.

-Offer the employee an opportunity to share his or her self-evaluation, if one has been completed. -Discuss learning and development needs of the employee. -Set objectives for improvement. -Set learning and development objectives, if appropriate. -Answer employee questions with regard to the performance review. -Sign performance review and obtain the employee's signature.

After the performance review:

Make a copy of the review for the employee and yourself.

Return the original to the appropriate individual in the unit for filing.

Employee's Role

Before the performance review:

-Confirm the meeting with your supervisor.

-Gather any documentation regarding your performance that you have collected throughout the year. Consider submitting quarterly progress reports on achievements.

-Completed your self-evaluation; make a copy and give it to your supervisor in advance of the meeting.

-Review your objectives and standards of performance set during the performance planning meeting.

-Write down questions that you want to ask your supervisor.

-Be prepared to talk about your performance -what you do well, -how you could improve, -what you would like to learn.

During the performance review:

-Listening to feedback from the supervisor and ask questions to clarify information.

-Share information from self-evaluation.

-Offer suggestions and ideas for improving performance, if needed.

-Identify areas for learning and development.

-Identify obstacles to performance and suggested solutions.

-Sign performance review form, attaching comments if desired.

After the performance review:

-Keep copy of the performance review for future reference.

-Use the information gained in the performance review to build on strengths and improve areas for growth.


While the supervisor is not Superman in real life, but in a team, the supervisor has played the role of Superman. As a supervisor, he has the power to lead and led each team member, but the responsibility that he carries is most important. Therefore, it would be more in pay salary. It is also the core of a team. As a supervisor, not only have the good leadership, it must have the rounded management approach. The supervisor is the soul in a team, the team will become rudderless if without the supervise of the supervisor.