Group dynamics in the business world
Disclaimer: This work has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional academic writers. You can view samples of our professional work here.
Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays.
Published: Mon, 5 Dec 2016
Importance Of Understanding Group Dynamics In The Business World
The study of two or more persons who are associated to each other by common relations, which form a group, is known as the group dynamics. This is very important in the areas of sociology, psychology, and communication studies. They relate and manipulate each other and build up a variety of dynamic processes which split them from a arbitrary collection of persons. These processes are norm, role, associations, and growth; need to fit in, social power, and effect on conduct. Groups can be categorized as collective such as main, secondary and category group. In an institute growth, the expression group process refers to the perceptive of the behaviors of citizens in groups that are trying to unravel a quandary or formulate a resolution (Drucker, 2007). It is an important feature of successful solidarity and is an aspect affecting the result of any type of an event done by a group. Factors such as influence, power and inter-personal conflict have an effect on dynamics and the performance of a group.
Importance Of Understanding Group Dynamics
As the team is formed, it is very crucial to be aware of the group in the areas such as; what to do when the team gets mutual for the first time, what to do when a member leaves or someone else joins after the group has matured, what happens when the leader of the group is replaced by a new member or from the team, why the team exists, the kind of relations they have, what if conflict arises among the team members.
How Does Positive Interdependence Help To Achieve Mutual Goals?
Positive interdependence is the ideal eminence that defines the collaboration and changes group work into solidarity. It is an important characteristic that has been emphasized by scholars alarmed first and foremost with promoting the academic achievement of the students and cognitive growth and also scholars apprehensive with the holistic growth of students simply involve the growth of freedom to select freely and do something free from the outside influence. Thus a great result is experienced within teamwork unlike from an individual since with respect to time and capital, an individual will spend more compared to the team.
Are Groups Or Individuals More Effective In Work Environments
For groups to become effective in work environments there are various steps that give the guideline to their success. These include: organizing a cross-function team based on the various and types of skill and ability of every member, ascertain clear objectives and boundaries for the team, endow with the team clear power and self-government to systemize their work and achieve their objectives, set a sensible but distinct time frame to achieve their objective in order to inspire and compel the team to results, maintain the team by providing all essential resources to achieve their objective and finally remunerate and identify the team as one and not as persons (Cooper, 1992).
Why Is It Said That Research About Groups Is NOT Always Valid And Relevant?
This is because the reimbursement of a research is not always definite and may not be felt by the players and is not different to their interests, is a reason of which one must be satisfied. What is group cohesiveness? Is group cohesiveness important? How do group cohesive forces affect group processes? What can you do to increase cohesiveness in your group?
Group cohesiveness is how much the members of the team are pulled together to the ideas and views of the team. It is an important aspect as it strengthens the team in terms of growth and maturity and also in marketing strategies not forgetting the behavior of the team. To increase the cohesiveness of the in the group, involve every member in the discussions by giving all an opportunity to air their ideas or views and also organizing some social activity such as games that all members will participate in freely. Engaging the team members in training courses that will add to their skills. This will open up the spirit of many people and create a stronger bond among them thus strengthening the group.
How Does Social Influence/Interaction Affect Decision-Making? How Can You Encourage/Promote And Discourage Members Acceptance Of Proposals In The Workplace?
Social influence affects the decision making in that a persons attitude can come in between the communication. Attitude in this case is a person’s perception toward a thing or an idea or even to another to another person.
Are Leaders An Important Aspect Of Groups? Can Leaders Emerge From Groups? How? What Is The Importance Of Group Members Perceptions About Leadership And Why Is This Phenomenon Important As It Pertains To Group Outcomes?
Leaders are an important aspect in a group. No group can make a move without a form of leadership. The role of leaders in groups or even organizations is to create and implement ideas and also to push and encourage the members to achieving their goals and objectives. According to Bruce and Pepitone (1998), leaders can emerge from groups of which would be the best step since this particular person will have views the problems from different perceptions that is from the position of been a member and having interacted with them and discussed issues from a personal level, he or she will be able to tackle them and come with solutions that will benefit not only the team but the members as well.
Leadership is in due course about creating a technique for people to add to making something bizarre take place. The importance of the member’s perceptions about leadership is very important as they may make or break the team. Most importantly when the leader happens to hear about the issues, he she will be able to rule in a different direction or support his way of governance (Hamel & Breen, 2007). If the members don’t like the present leader the team may be facing disaster as they will be performing in protest that they will end up not achieving their goals or producing good results. Leadership is basically making sure the job is completed successfully.
Why are teams more effective than work groups in certain situations? Identify these situations where teams are more effective than work group and provide examples.
Teams are better performing than groups. this is so because a team is smaller than a group in most cases who have come together with a common goal while a group come together to contribute to a topic on their views and knowledge. Teams necessitate individual and joint accountability whereas groups don’t. A team’s purpose is in cooperation strong-minded and intended with organization. Teams have the role of leadership distributed among the members of the team, they dedicated in working in harmony to of course achieve the goals and they work by applying all forms of respect to the counterparts this characteristics strengthen they union (Hyman & Mason, 1995).
Groups are helpful and important to an organization because they can finish critical responsibilities whereas teams are also very important and can work at high levels than distinctive work (Robbins & Coulter, 2009). This higher presentation level is the effect of a superior synergy consequential from teamwork and jointly created outputs to a certain extent than a pool of individual output. The more casual environment in which members of a team work, and also which also allow for community of performance to build up ensuing in on-going erudition and creative application, encourages the strength of teams.
Bruce, A., & Pepitone, J.S. (1998). Motivating Employees. London: McGraw-Hill.
Cooper, R.N (1992). Economic Stabilization and Debt in Developing Countries,
2nd ed., MIT Press, Edinburgh.
Drucker, P.F. (2007). Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. Edinburgh:
Hamel, G., & Breen, B. (2007). The future of management. Atlanta: Harvard Business Press.
Hyman, J., & Mason, B. (1995). Managing Employee Involvement and Participation.
New York: SAGE.
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2009).Management. (10th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: