Death with Dignity

1323 words (5 pages) Essay in Human Rights

23/09/19 Human Rights Reference this

Disclaimer: This work has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work produced by our Essay Writing Service. You can view samples of our professional work here.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays.

Death with Dignity

Death with Dignity is also known as physician-assisted death and should be legalized in all fifty states, in my opinion. Death with Dignity allows individuals that meet specific criteria to have an end-of-life option that is peaceful, humane, dignified, and in their control (Death with Dignity National Center, 2017). In the states that permit the use of physician-assisted death, physicians can prescribe medications that will hasten the patient’s death as long as they meet the strict criteria. In physician-assisted death, the physician cannot administer the medication; that would be active euthanasia. The patient has to be the one to administer the medication to themselves (Jaret, 2016).

Physician-assisted death is not a new sensation. Since ancient times there have been requests by individuals to end their suffering through physician-assisted death and even euthanasia. Even in those times, there were multiple disagreements on this issue. During modern times, there is reliable evidence that a secret practice of physician-assisted death occurs in the western world, even though it is against the law. The medical profession and law tended to use the ‘Don’t ask, Don’t tell’ point of view on the matter (Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2004). That was until Dr. Jack Kevorkian paraded the secret practice in the 1990s by assisting in the region of 150 patient’s deaths (Quill & Sussman, n.d.). He was sentenced over 60 years for what he did, even though the patients and families were appreciative of him and his efforts (Messerli, 2012).

There is a strict criterion that needs to be met for a patient to be considered eligible for physician-assisted death. Participation is firmly voluntary. The process for requesting participation includes two oral requests, one written requests, and waiting for a period of time among other requirements; there are no exceptions allotted for these requirements. The other qualifications for physician-assisted death are:

  • The patient must be eighteen years of age or older and a resident living in California, Colorado, Oregon, Vermont, or Washington.
  • The patient must be of sound mind and having the ability to make and communicate what the patient decides for their healthcare (i.e., mentally competent).
  • The patient must have been diagnosed with an incurable disease that will cause death in six months or less.
  • The patient must also have the ability to take the prescribed medication under their own power.
  • It is required that two physicians determine whether the individual meets all the criteria.
  • The patient must also have two verbal requests, one written request.
  • There is a waiting period and other requirements for physician-assisted death (Death with Dignity National Center, 2017).

Physicians take an oath that they will never intentionally harm a patient. People say that physician-assisted suicide violates this oath and breaks the trust between patient and physician. There is a fear that allowing physician-assisted death opens the door to abuse of it. Patient’s lives could eventually be ended against their own free will when other treatments are more expensive, or the illness is more difficult to treat (Quill & Sussman, n.d.). Another argument is that the government and insurance companies could put pressure on the physicians to recommend physician-assisted death without trying other means first; basically, encouraging people to give up on recovery too soon (Messerli, 2012). Then there is the “sanctity of life” religious argument. Sanctity of life is the belief that human life is irreplaceable and precious so death is should never be rushed or hastened in any way (Jaret, 2016).

It should be a standard human right to be able to choose to die with dignity. As long as a person is of sound mind and is capable of making decisions for themselves, then they should be able to make such decisions on whether or not to die in pain. Keeping patients from having this choice thus making them suffer in such a way is inhumane. It would be best to help them maintain their autonomy and allow them to die with dignity. Laws can be created to prevent abuse of physician-assisted death. With these laws in place, the value of human life can be protected too. Giving patients this choice can allow them to have one last precious gift of happiness with their loved ones. No one wants to be remembered or wants to remember their loved ones suffering. Without this option, patients may choose to commit suicide leaving their loved ones to find them. For the ones that are left here on earth, Dying with dignity provides the chance to prevent any unnecessary pain or regret by giving them the ability to plan and say what they need and want to say before it is too late. Another positive is the possibility that it could decrease healthcare costs, which in turn can save estates and reduce insurance premiums (Messerli, 2012).

In 2014, a young woman named Brittany Maynard (29-years-old) was diagnosed with a stage four malignant brain tumor and given six months to live. The brain tumor, glioblastoma, was causing her to have terrible headaches, neck pain, seizures, and stroke-like symptoms. A seizure caused her the inability to speak; though she recognized her husband, she was not able to say his name. She spent months researching treatment options and came to realized there was no cure for her and the treatment options available would ruin the little bit of time she had left. At one point, she considered Hospice. Ultimately, she decided to die with the help of physician-assisted death. After coming to her final decision, she moved from her home in California to Oregon. Having this option provided Brittany with great relief. Upon her arrival in Oregon, she teamed up with Compassion & Choices (the end-of-life choice advocacy group) to advocate for physician-assisted death to be available to all terminally ill Americans. Brittany traveled and did the things she loved. For example, Brittany family created beautiful memories when they traveled to the Grand Canyon before her passing. Brittany’s family and friends had the opportunity to surround her as she died peacefully in her home versus watching her suffer as she took her final breath. Brittany utilized the Death with Dignity law and passed away on November 1, 2014. California legalized physician-assisted death in 2015 (The Brittany Fund, 2014).

(The Brittany Fund, 2017)

 Physician-assisted death needs to be an option in all fifty states of the US. It is a viable last resort for terminally ill patients. Everyone should have the choice to die in peace and with dignity. Strict laws and criterion would to not only help physicians to know who qualifies but also to keep this option from being abused. This option would allow the patient to keep their autonomy and dignity in the end.

References

 

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please: