Art And Architecture Of The Crusades History Essay

A man of eighty, wrote Lord Byron, has outlived probably three new schools of painting, two of architecture and poetry and a hundred in dress. Byrons sentiment would certainly ring true for most periods of those facets of human history, but the medieval time of the crusades was an exception to that rule to a large extent. Western Europe was nearly a century into the High Middle Age period when Pope Urban II called the first crusade at the Council of Clermont in 1095. This was the time of the medieval renaissance with an explosion of invention and advancement in invention, technology, culture and commercial pursuits. Painting, dress, and literature developed and were influenced on a local and regional basis. The primary influence the crusaders took with them to the Levant was architectural. Two architectural styles emerged in Western Europe during the time of the crusades – Romanesque from approximately the 11th to late 12th century, and Gothic from the 12th century to well past the end of the last crusade. These two styles were used in church design and construction. William the Conqueror, ultimately seizing England in 1066, helped to usher in another form (not style) of architecture that would change the landscape of medieval Europe – castles. With Romanesque architecture being in place by 1095 and Gothic soon to follow, the influence of Western European structural design and castles was set to follow them to the Holy Land, and they would bring back certain architectural influences as well as manuscript elements that would contribute to an already-growing renaissance.

Church building in the Holy Land must be addressed both before and after the arrival of the Crusaders. Though Muslims had been tolerant of non-Muslims for some time, namely Christians and Jews as “People of the Book,” that tolerance and the amicable relations between them were beginning to show signs of stress. Persecution of non-Muslims began to increase after the year 1000. Muslims began destroying Christian and Jewish architecture, culminating in the ordered destruction of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre on October 18, 1009, by Fatimid Caliph al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah. Denys Pringle, a specialist on church art and architecture in the Holy Land during the crusades, writes, “…by 1014, only a handful of church buildings, including the Nativity in Bethlehem and the monastery of St. Catherine on Mount Sinai, were left standing within the caliph’s lands.” [1] The architectural history of the Holy Land is one that is fraught with the destruction of churches and monuments and their reconstruction when conditions improved. An example of this is the Anastasis, which was a rotunda in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.

PRESENTATION IMAGE

Photo – Christian religious icons, Istanbul, Turkey: Anastasis – Resurrection Fresco in Church of the Holy Sepulchre, Jerusalem

This is a fresco, or wall painting, depicting the resurrection. The church was constructed by Constantine about 325 CE. It was later damaged during the Persian invasion of Jerusalem in 630 under Khosrau II, and finally ordered destroyed by Hakim. Pringle references this cycle of damage and destruction as creating a “tabula rasa,” or blank slate, upon which architecture Crusaders could later build. This was significant to the Crusade architecture that developed. The original buildings under Constantine were of course heavily influenced by Byzantine canons coupled with indigenous styles as was common to the familiarity of local people to provide easier acceptance for the sake of conversion. Had those structures remained intact, there would have been little if any room and certainly limited ability under even the most talented builder’s hand for Western influence to be added.

With this “blank slate” in mind, it is evident in many structures that the Crusaders rebuilt that the remnants and fragments of churches destroyed before their arrival were used in the reconstruction of the entirety. Such fragments were often not used in their original location.

PRESENTATION IMAGE

Tom Wukitsch, Illustration – Triumphal Arch of Constantine Spolia Map, Rome, Italy

The use of “spolia” (the “spoils” of war) finds a long tradition, dating back to Roman times. Constantine’s Triumphal Arch contains elements, such as a relief of Marcus Aurelius, taken from other monuments such as the triumphal monuments of the emperors Trajan, Hadrian, and Marcus Aurelius. [2] Spolia was taken from ancient buildings and monuments, especially those that had been destroyed, in the Holy Land during the first crusade and influenced the rising cultural and architectural renovation of the 12th century renaissance. This influence, however, involved the content rather than the structure of the buildings and monuments on which the spolia were included. Construction styles reveal a heavier influence from west to east. [3] 

It is believed by some that the same hand that constructed column capitals at the Church of Nazareth also constructed those at the Holy Sepulchre as well as the Romanesque abbey in Avignon. [4] This would verify the same master constructing elements of churches in Western Europe also traveling and doing the same in the Holy Land. Some disagree with this assessment and instead believe the capitals and columns to be designed by students of the initial masters. [5] But this disagreement is irrelevant to the point at hand – the clear influence of Western European art and architecture upon that in the Holy Land during the first crusade. Whether by the master himself or his students, the transfer of the influence is the point at hand.

PRESENTATION IMAGES

Church of Nazareth and Avignon Abbey Capitals

This influence was not intended to be merely temporary. Capitals in the Jerusalem were discovered buried in 1908, and it is believed that they were concealed to protect them from Muslim destruction as the later Crusades ended in dismal failure with holy sites being inaccessible to Christians and Jews until the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948. (S9).

PRESENTATION IMAGES

Julianna Lees, Photo – Church of Nazareth Capitals, Jerusalem

Their concealment signals the belief that the Crusaders completely believed their efforts to conquer and retain the Holy Land would end in success, at which point they could be reestablished. These capitals with raised relief images also call to mind Western European design.

The influence of Western groin and rib vaulting can be seen in the Cenacle – the “Church of the Apostles.” This affect is actually a generational one – that of the West finding its roots in ancient Rome under Theodosius I and transmitting it thence to the Crusader States upon the launch of the crusades. [6] Indeed, this generational influence is seen in the very same structure from beginning to end. The church was built by Theodosius I around 382 CE on Mount Zion but was destroyed in 1009 by Hakim in his campaign against Christians in Jerusalem. The date of its reconstruction is a matter of debate. The Cenacle contains a technique known as “tas de charge,” in which the lowest points of an arch are horizontally embedded into the wall behind them to reduce the width of the space spanned by the rising blocks above it in an arch and to support the arch. [7] These were not part of the original church built under Theodosius but were instead part of the reconstruction of the church after it was heavily damaged. The church contains groin and rib vaulting indicative of late Romanesque and early Gothic Northern Europe.

PRESENTATION IMAGES

Wikipedia, Groin Vault Illustration

Century One Foundation, Photo – Cenacle Upper Room of the Last Supper

The 12th century renaissance again makes its presence known here. Hugh Plommer writes, “…the three mouldings down the centers of the Cenacle’s transverse ribs still suggest incisions down a single flat transverse arch, thus proclaiming their ancestry in transverse arches of the earlier twelfth century.” [8] Walking into the upper room of the Cenacle clearly leaves the impression of entering the nave of a Gothic church.

After the First Crusade, art and architecture in the Holy Land began to take on a life of its own – its own style and characteristics. Crusaders had been exposed to Arabic techniques and incorporated them into the methods and techniques with which they were accustomed. The word “accustomed” is used very loosely here given the rapidity with which Romanesque and Gothic styles emerged and progressed in Northern Europe, especially through the 12th century as the widely varied Romanesque styles gave way to a more homogenous Gothic style toward the end of the century. [9] Analysis of the Damascus Gate in Jerusalem as well as Crusader wall-painting of the mid-12th century yields the influence indigenous work on the Western styles brought by the Crusaders.

PRESENTATION IMAGES

Earthly Footsteps of the Man from Galilee, Photo – Damascus Gate

Church of the Nativity Column of St. Margaret

The Damascus Gate – the main entrance to the Old City of Jerusalem – is a three-layer structure in the sense that it was originally built under Hadrian in the 2nd century CE under Roman rule and stands today much as it was constructed in 1537 under Suleiman the Magnificent, the sultan of the Ottoman Empire. Between the Hadrian remains and the current building were found the 12th century remnants of what crusaders called St. Stephen’s Gate because of its proximity to the Church of St. Stephen and place of his martyrdom. [10] The crusader gate was begun in the late 12th century, while the column of St. Margaret in the Church of the Nativity was constructed under Justinian I in 565 CE. At that time, Byzantine influences melded with local tradition to facilitate conversion, and now during the crusades they were both adapting to the 12th century world view of the crusaders and influencing it. Christians indigenous to the Holy Land had different traditions and styles, and those were reflected together with the Romanesque influence brought by the crusaders. [11] The transfer of architectural and artistic methods and techniques between east and west during the crusades in many instances must be viewed with Constantinople as an intermediary influence given the Byzantine Empire from which it sprang. Romanesque art and architecture was prevalent during the 11th and 12th centuries in Western Europe, and with Abbot Suger at St. Denis in Ile-de-France began to give way to a consciously-borne canon in Gothic cathedrals and figural representation by the mid-12th century. (S18). Thus, with the First Crusade launched in 1095, Northern Europe had widely-varying Romanesque methods and techniques to offer in influence in the Holy Land with the arrival of the more realistic representations of Gothic architectural sculpture. Building portals in the Levant often had pointed designs before the arrival of the crusaders, and Muslim architecture in Spain may have contributed to the emergence of such arch types in Western Europe prior to the crusades. But they began to take on features such as the layered depth of a Western European nature. [12] 

PRESENTATION IMAGES

University of Pittsburgh, Photo – Bascilica of Saint-Denis Portal, Saint-Denis, France

Marty Smith, Photo – Mosque of Madrasa Portal, Cairo, Egypt

When speaking of architecture in the Holy Land as influenced and affected by the Crusades, attention must turn to the utter explosion of castle-building that took place. There was literally a “Starbucks on every corner,” so to speak, as crusaders built these fortifications, waystations, and royal residences all over the Holy Land. In those structures is told the same story shown by the comparisons – new methods and techniques were introduced as a result of the culture and knowledge brought to the Holy Land by the Crusaders (particularly effected by the 12th century renaissance), and they were combined with local styles. The results were columns, capitals, arches, and more that were uniquely tailored to the environment in which they were built precisely because of those combined influences while retaining their uniquely Romanesque or Gothic identity.

Discussion of the introduction of crusaders on castle building in the Holy Land requires an analysis of the introduction of castles to Northern and Western Europe as well. The use of stone fortifications has a long history dating back to ancient Rome, but castles as popularly recognized were constructed all across England and other parts of Europe following Norman conquests. Normans introduced castles to Europe in the form of the most basic design – the motte and bailey. Prior to the crusades, warfare among nobles followed rules of chivalry and honor and rarely culminated in actual battle and bloodshed. A manor would be sieged and pillaged as well as perhaps nobility kidnapped in hopes of gaining ransom for their return. These structures were built for defensive purposes upon man-made mounds of earth on which a keep was built with an enclosed area beneath to which residents of the lord’s manor and other villagers could retreat. [13] The lord of the village in which the castle was located lived in the keep and there held official meetings, entertainment for guests, and so forth. Castle life in the Middle Ages was not a private affair. Home life in general was not nearly as private as we consider it today. [14] 

PRESENTATION IMAGE

Castle Rising Castle

Beneath the motte, or earthen mound, was the bailey. In addition to serving as a refuge in times of conflict, the bailey was used in times of peace for storage of grain and animals. Because of the nature of medieval warfare being more a matter of pillaging and posturing, these initial castles were passive in their design and did not provide adequate defense against even a very small military contingent set upon serious destruction. [15] The motte-and-bailey design was gradually replaced by the stone keep castle from around 1100 onward, which was a motte-and-bailey with the bailey and castle keep within the same wall instead of connected to each other by a bridge. This provided a stronger fortification of stone rather than wood and held everything in one compact area, thus decreasing the space to defend. The stone was erected with even weight distribution to prevent tower collapse, and the material was less expensive to acquire than timber. [16] The keep was a tall tower to provide for downward weapon trajectory as well as an enhanced range of view already provided by the mound.

PRESENTATION IMAGE

Arques Castle Keep

The crusades introduced those who “took up the cross” to a completely different sort of warfare with which many of those in especially younger generations were not at all accustomed – warfare in which blood was actually spilled and the enemy was truly an enemy. As territory was successfully captured during the first crusade, the need of course arose to provide adequate measures to both retain and maintain it. The passive motte-and-bailey structures of the Normans would not provide what was necessary, and newer siege technology was challenging even the stone keep. A new design was given birth in the Crusader States – the concentric design. [17] It was this design that created nearly impenetrable walls as soldiers within were able to engage the enemy without.

PRESENTATION IMAGE

Crac des Chevaliers

The most important and most symbolic of this design was the Crac des Chevaliers. The siege weaponry that had become the norm for those laying siege to castles in the Holy Land did not prove successful against this new design and largely contributed to their successful defense of the lands upon which they were built during the first crusade. The concentric castle was referenced as an active design because it allowed defenders to take offensive actions within the rings of walls circling the castle. These castles sprouted across the Holy Land during the successful first crusade. But newer siege weapons were constructed that, during subsequent crusades, allowed the enemy outside the walls to successfully attack the inside castle without actually being inside. [18] This provided the ability to attack the castle effectively without having to cross the walls until the fortifications were substantially reduced.

Beyond the Romanesque and Gothic cathedral designs of churches that influenced newer structures in the Holy Land and the redesign of some of those pre-existing as well as the explosion of castles and the development of their styles, one form of artistic influence that primarily flowed from east to west was the illuminated manuscript. Manuscripts of those taking up new residence in the Holy Land contained styles that had not to that point been seen in Western Europe. The intermediary influence of Constantinople arises here. The Melisende Psalter reveals both European and Armenian influence combined with Byzantine, painted in vibrant colors at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem between 1131 and 1143. [19] 

PRESENTATION IMAGES

MELISANDE PSALTER 1 and 2

One significant contribution to the medieval renaissance was the flow of knowledge from east to west. As Muslims captured the Holy Land and Greek territory, they did not discard previous scholarship that had to that point been amassed by preceding cultures, including those in Egypt. They did largely destroy art that depicted people because this is unacceptable in Islamic doctrine. But the knowledge contained in the scholarly and literary works that they acquired was stored in libraries and shared with others in more peaceful times. Some was also recaptured in Andalusia (Spain) during its reconquest as well. This knowledge poured into Europe and promoted new methods in art and architecture as well as in political and social ogranization and bureaucracy, such as the formation of the Exchequer in England after Adelard of Bath brought the abacus back to England from Toledo. Adelard also began translating Arabic texts for a Western audience to benefit programs in education and research. [20] Along with this knowledge came increased scholarship and literacy. A new script was also introduced, pseudo-Kufic (or Kufesque), that was based on the cursive Arabic script in which straight and angular strokes were used. [21] 

PRESENTATION IMAGES

Pseudo-Kufic Madonna

The crusades saw artistic and architectural influence flow in both directions between east and west, such as in the form of Romanesque and Gothic influence in pre-existing and new church structures built in the Holy Land. The most visible and widely-scattered form of western influence in the east lay in the castles constructed by crusaders and a revolutionary new active design. Manuscripts, including the influence of Arabic scripts, flowed into the west and helped promote the medieval renaissance that ensued simultaneously with the crusades. Instead of spanning styles and defying definition, as Byron may suggest, the medieval period of the crusades is identified by that which it produced.