The Benefits and Challenges of the Multiage Classroom

Multiage classrooms are nothing new. Back in the days of the one-room schoolhouse, children of all ages studied together with the help of one teacher. In the 1990s, multiage classrooms took on a whole new meaning (Miller, 1993). Fluctuating enrollments, teacher layoffs, and financial operating cost cutbacks have been among the top reasons for schools, especially in rural America, to look towards the multiage classroom. Multiage classrooms are the preferred cost-cutting measure but the effectiveness of multiage classroom instruction has created much concern and attention.

In the mid-1960s through mid-1970s many schools implemented open education and multiage grouping (Miller, 1993). “Some schools tried to develop the multiage concept but many of these programs disappeared because of negative parental reactions and a mismatch between the teaching methods and the curricular expectations”, (Miller, 1993, p. 65). In the 1990s, the use of the multiage classroom began to gain popularity. Schools developed mixed age and grade classrooms and began teaching them as multiage groups only to face frustration and criticism. The move to the multiage classroom was often done to save school districts money instead of a better way to educate our children. Because of this, they rarely were successful and met with frustrated educators as they were never trained in the philosophy of multiage education (Miller, 1993).

However, some educators in the mid-1990s still wanted to change the way they educated children and continued to look more closely into the multiage class setting as a new alternative to teaching. A few teachers established multiage classrooms and developed programs that showed success. When other schools realized the success, the idea started to spread to other schools, then to districts, then to states (Miller, 1996).

Many researchers have tried to determine why the traditional single grade classroom has survived so long when there is evidence that it might not be the most effective method for learning. Many have concluded that it is just been around so long that society has a difficult time accepting change. Upon realizing that our traditional grade level system was not helping students progress to their potential, teachers began looking for a better method to meet the needs of all students (Miller, 1996).

Multiage education has emerged with great force since the 1990s as a viable alternative to traditional education. Educators today see the use of multiage classrooms as a good way for children to learn from each other, play as a group together, and learn to accept the diversity of their fellow classmates, which is difficult to do when teaching in the traditional education setting. In multiage education teachers only need to help children gain skills and strategies to enable them to learn and the students keep a record of their progress in learning activities. They also make their own choices in the learning of their activities which helps them reflect on their personal growth and learning (Stone, 1994).

The multiage systems are all different in some ways but in other ways are the same. Multiage classes include at least a two year grade span where students stay with the same teacher or group of teachers. Students tend to show increased self-esteem, cooperative behavior, better attitudes toward school, increased positive social behavior, increased personal responsibility and less discipline problems (Stone, 1994). Finally, the classroom is created with the child in mind rather than just for economic reasons.

This paper summarizes recent studies to determine the effects of multiage classroom instruction on student performance. The study investigates the benefits, challenges and views of teachers, administrators and parents in one rural eastern Oregon K-12 School.

Review of Literature

The effectiveness of multiage classroom instruction has been of great concern among teachers, administrators and parents. Working in a multiage classroom requires teachers to be committed to hard work considering that most have been educated to teach in single grade classrooms organized around a small ability group or whole class instruction. Based on this many parents, teachers and administrators are not sure of the multiage organization and its effect on student performance. This paper reviews recent studies to determine the effects of multiage classroom instruction on student performance. The paper reviews and analyzes various studies, showing strategies associated with multiage education, parent and student views of multiage classrooms, students motivation and ability to learn, benefits of the multiage classroom, benefits to teachers and challenges of the multiage classroom.

Strategies Associated with Multiage Education

There are many strategies associated with multiage teaching. Not all multiage programs are the same but often use a form of developmentally appropriate instruction, team teaching, or centers in their classrooms. Developmentally appropriate practices are a must in a multiage classroom according to Stone (1994). Developmentally appropriate practices is an approach which focuses on the child as a developing human being and life- long learner. The use of developmentally appropriate practices helps make sure that each child’s needs and capabilities are being addressed which helps every child learn at his or her own level. Most multiage classrooms are set up to work with students in groups by age, grade, or ability, but the overall practice looks at the children as one group of learners with different levels of needs (Stone, 1994).

Team teaching is another helpful method that leads to success in the multiage classroom. In team teaching, two or more teachers balance their time with the use of flexible scheduling. The use of team teaching has positive benefits to the children in a multiage classroom. Team teaching allows the opportunity for teachers to draw on each other’s ideas and knowledge. It also gives the students the opportunity to have different teachers’ opinions and allows the students to experience different teaching styles. When it comes to assessment of students, a team of teachers will be able to collaborate and determine what is best for each child much more effectively than if done individually, due to having the input of two or more views (Miller, 1996).

The use of centers becomes attractive as the team of teachers is able to split up and devote their time between the centers. Centers provide benefits for students by incorporating different learning styles and interests. The needs of children are more easily meet by developing centers that provide a range of developmentally appropriate activities (Miller, 1996). In the learning center approach, children have the opportunity to practice skills at their own level, solve problems on their own, be socially interactive and participate in open-ended activities (Stone, 1995).

A study into the strategies for teaching children in multiage classrooms was conducted by Stone (1994) in a K-3 multiage classroom. Stone (1994) states, “Teachers should focus on teaching children rather than teaching curriculum” (para. 4). Teachers often become frustrated when they try to teach grade specific curriculum in a multiage classroom, but if they have appropriate instructional strategies, they find multiage classes to be exciting and rewarding. The research found the success of the multiage teacher focused on developing children’s social skills and teaching broad academic subjects such as writing, math, and reading. It was felt that this method helped the students to see themselves as progressive and successful learners. Stone (1994) also stated that a teacher must guide, nurture and support the learning process and not just be a “giver of knowledge” (para. 10). Social interaction in mixed-age groups was felt to be of high importance. Cooperative learning groups and peer tutoring were found to be an effective strategy. Very little large-group instruction took place; small groupings based on the interests of the children were the norm.

According to Stone (1994), assessment by the teachers was conducted primarily through portfolios, which was seen as the ideal way to document the progress of each individual child. By use of portfolios, children could be assessed on their own personal achievement and potential and not in comparison with other students. The teachers found the portfolios to also be an instruction guide, as they showed each student’s strengths, areas of concern and interests. The results of the assessment showed that multiage classrooms were successful to both teachers and students (Stone, 1994).

Classroom Structure

Classroom observation and interviews were conducted to research the multiage classrooms serving students in grade three to five by Hoffman (2003). Teachers in multiage classrooms were interviewed and observed to obtain insights into the teaching and learning that takes place in multiage classrooms and ways in which multiage teachers address structure within their classrooms. The study was conducted over a short period of time, with four multiage teachers and their students as participants. It was found that the teachers had four practices in common: 1) student seating, to create arrangements with boys and girls together which helped provide collaboration within each group, 2) instructional practices that encouraged student-directed learning, 3) meeting the needs of diversity among their students. 4) content organized to help students make connections with their own lives (Hoffman, 2003). The study also found that these teachers used instructional practices such as differentiated instruction, flexible grouping, social collaboration, student choice, and curriculum that was approached from different levels of interest and ability.

Multiage Grouping Strategies and Student Performance

Many studies and reviews have been conducted on the effects of multiage grouping on student achievement. According to Mason and Burns (1996), “There are small negative effects because administrators tend to place the more independent, more cooperative and more able students in a multiage age class together” (p. 311). In their study, they reveal greater stress on the teachers and declining attention to individual students. They attribute a negative effect on the students due to greater classroom demands as the teachers cannot physically give attention to every group constantly.

Ong, Allison and Haladyna (2000) conducted a study with a group of K-3 students with Title 1 status in three school districts to determine whether the type of students taught was affected by the multiage classroom organization. They concluded that Title I students benefitted from the multiage grouping, as they tended to collaborate together and achieved great success in learning and retaining math, language, and reading skills in this manner (Ong, Allison, Haladyna, 2000).

At a small Nebraska school whose state rating was near the bottom on academic performance, a new administrator formed a group of eight teachers to research strategies that had been successful at other schools to try to implement these strategies into this school to see if they improved student performance. According to Melliger (2005), the teachers decided to do extensive research on multiage programs throughout the country. After the research and planning was completed, this school developed a 5/6 multiage classroom in a two year long pilot program. Extensive monitoring and recording of each student was done in each subject area and after one full year, they found that the students’ test scores were at least as high as or higher in some subjects than the students in traditional classrooms. The entire school then went to multiage classrooms and students’ performance continued to improve. The biggest obstacle was the acceptance by the parents. Even though they saw improvement in their children’s school achievement, they had received misinformation about how multiage classrooms work (Melliger, 2005). The education of parents was found to be a key element of success of the multiage classroom because, the more they knew, the more content the parents were with their children’s education. Melliger (2005) also stated that long-range planning and attention to detailed preparation by teachers is of extreme importance because it insures that all students are educated to pass the state testing, which is a leading goal among many school districts (Melliger, 2005).

Parent and Student Views of Multiage Classrooms

Research on parent and student views of multiage classrooms was conducted by Bergen (1995) she states that a study with 168 children and their parents was completed. The students were all six to eight years of age and two interviews were conducted; one at the beginning of the school year in which multiage class groupings had been implemented, and the other at the completion of the year. The findings differed for younger and older children. The parents and students were in agreement on their views regarding the younger children, who they believe benefited from the modeling of learning that was present in the classroom with the older students. The study also revealed that the older students and their parents had concerns that their children might not be learning. They felt the context lacked the challenge necessary for the eight year olds. The study did not provide the answers to the concerns about the context, so further research is needed to find a way to measure the actual performance of each child (Bergen, 1995). Overall, both parents and students were in favor of continuing the multiage classroom format, but requested their concerns be researched in depth.

Students Motivation and Ability to Learn

A student’s motivation and ability to learn is influenced by what is happening in different areas of his or her life. Multiage classrooms involve students from different grades and age, spending most of their learning time together (Miller, 1996). The learning environment is patterned like a family. The children tend to motivate other students and themselves, increasing their ability to learn (Miller, 1996). An example of this is when third graders are educated with fifth graders and perform a task; the instructor will then congratulate them as a group. This then motivates the students to perform other tasks, some challenging them to learn more. Students also learn to respect others and to solve problems together (Miller, 1996).

Teachers in multiage classrooms tend to require students to use skills that represent daily life situations (Hopping, 2000). An example of this is in real life. There are people with higher abilities and those with lower abilities in various aspects of life, all living in society together. Similarly, in multiage classrooms, students interact with one another at different ability levels. In students’ lives, they are likely to live with people of lower or higher ability levels than themselves. In a multiage classroom, teachers have students participate in activities that will allow them to compare their knowledge with each other to complete a task which helps motivate their learning capabilities. The teachers observe activities such as demonstrations, presentations, exhibits to aide them in assessing each student. The results are then recorded into individual portfolios. This allows the teachers to clearly see and assess each student’s strengths and weaknesses (Hopping, 2000).

Benefits of the Multiage Classroom

Educators, parents, administrators, and students identify many benefits of multiage classrooms. Students benefit due to mixed-age environment, because of the multiple-year experience (Stone, 1994). Older students also tend to provide instruction to their younger classmates. When a student shows another student how to do a skill, helps introduce the skill to one student while helping the other student strengthen his or her own understanding of the skill. Children need to learn the value of collaboration and be given the opportunity to learn cooperatively (Stone, 1994). “Ultimately, social interaction leads to a better understanding of learning” (Stone, 1994, para. 15).

Benefits to Students

The similarity of a child’s life to the world around the child helps benefit a student in a multiage classroom. When a child is grouped by age alone, it does not provide a natural life-like setting for the different ages to learn from each other (Miller, 1996). When a child takes part in a team sport, neighborhood game or just plays with friends, it is not uncommon for him to be interacting with other children of various ages. To a child the multiage classroom setting is therefore, more natural to his own life outside of school (Miller, 1996).

In a multiage classroom, older students have the opportunity to help their younger classmates, this in turn teaches them to be more helpful, understanding and patient of the younger students. The older students tend to gain self-confidence and self-esteem when in the multiage classroom with their younger peers. When students remain in the same classroom for more than one year, they have the opportunity to aid the younger students with class procedures (Miller, 1996). The transition time for the new students is then shortened. Students who continue on in the same classroom also have become familiar with each other and time is not needed to transition into a new setting each year. The shy, youngest students become comfortable in asking for help from their older classmates. “The older students teach the younger ones the classroom procedures, read them stories, and help them in other academic areas while the older students gain leadership and nurturing skills” (Cushman, 1990, p.30).

A multiage philosophy helps students of a particular age or grade to work at skills in many different academic and developmental levels. This is supported by an environment in which materials and learning strategies include individual as well as group needs (Miller, 1996).

“Lessons may be presented to the group as a whole or with different

levels and abilities. Students sometimes work in groups based on

ability rather than age or grade. The lines drawn between ages and

grades tend to disappear. This structure looks at the students as one

group of learners with varying levels of needs rather than a grade

level (Cushman, 1990, p. 28).

Benefits to Teachers

Teachers also experience advantages working with students in a multiage classroom. One of the largest benefits to teachers is that they have more time to work with the same group of children. Usually they teach a student for two or more years and this gives time for the teacher to assess each child and his or her strengths and weaknesses. Teachers get to know the majority of their students and at what level they were performing at the end of the previous year. In the multiage classroom, a teacher does not need to spend time getting to know all the students personally and academically, they only need to assess the new students who have entered the class (Cushman, 1990). According to Hoffman (2003), teachers have the benefit to allow students to pursue their interests and this enables them to integrate the subjects and make connections to them. She also states benefits in a teacher’s ability to plan open-ended assignments and by placing the students’ in groups to work provides benefits for a teacher and her students. The older students mentor the younger ones and this provides great learning and positive social interaction between all students within the classroom (Hoffman, 2003).

Challenges of the Multiage Classroom

The challenges of the multiage classroom can be frustrating and intensive to the teacher. Negative reactions from parents and fellow staff are an ongoing concern. A successful multiage classroom takes a lot of initial and continued planning. Planning curriculum, lessons, and schedules needs to focus on the philosophy that views children together regardless of age or grade and views the whole classroom as one community of learners. Teachers are faced with labor intensive schedules, having younger students feeling overwhelmed, older students that are not challenged and difficulty designing their curriculum. Therefore, teachers need time for training to teach in a multiage classroom. They also need extra time for sharing ideas with fellow teachers to assist them in their approach to effectively teach in the multiage classroom (Cushman, 1990).

Labor Intensive

Most multiage classrooms require a lot of planning and development to arrange them in a way that will successfully meet the needs of students, parents and teachers (Veenman, 1995). Time to meet the needs of different ages with open-ended assignments and projects is very important. Time is also the requirement for students to observe others, help each other and interact. Insufficient planning is likely to interfere with the success of the multiage classroom and the students’ learning process. The time it takes to create the assignments to meet all the students’ needs and the time to complete them successfully can be very labor intensive upon the teacher (Veenman, 1995). In interviews conducted with teachers in a 1995 study, Veenman (1995) shared his findings from the interviews with the teachers in Holland: “Interview data showed the teachers in the multi-grade classes to be less satisfied with their jobs than their counterparts in single-age classes as a result of the heavy teaching load and demands for classroom management” (Veenman, 1995, p. 321).

Teachers sometimes also find it difficult to work together with teams because of the need for constant communication. Differences in personality and teaching styles must be carefully considered when creating a team to teach in a multiage classroom to lessen the frustration upon the teachers (Cushman, 1990). Teachers need to be allowed to help formulate the team in which they will be teaching to insure the compatibility of the team prior to the onset of the school year.

Younger children feel overwhelmed or intimidated

A great challenge when placing children of different ages into the same classroom is that younger children are likely to feel overwhelmed and intimated by older classmates (Hoffman, 2003). Another point of concern is that younger children might be expected to accomplish developmentally inappropriate tasks and feel unnecessarily pressured (Stone, 1994). Teachers need to provide support and appropriate tasks for the students to accomplish. This will help insure that the younger students can progress without feeling pressured and in turn, ensure that the younger students progress without feeling overwhelmed or intimidated.

Older children are not sufficiently challenged

Older children may not gain new skills because the younger children are constantly asking for their help to solve problems or acquire a skill. The older children run the risk of just repeating skills that they already know. The concern that the older child will not be academically challenged with demanding curriculum is a large area of concern among parents.

Teachers tend to set up groups in ways so that the less competent students can learn from the more competent students (Lester, 2005). As the students learn they tend to help each other out, teachers see the less competent students being taught by the more competent students and it is easy for the teacher to let this practice continue. Teachers need to encourage the younger or less competent students to practice skills on their own while providing the older students with challenges (Stone, 1994).Another point of concern with the older child is not providing enough attention to learning their own academic level in the multiage classroom (Veenman, 1995).

Difficulties in designing and teaching the curriculum

Difficulties in designing curriculum that will be taught and the process in which it will be taught is an ongoing challenge within the multiage classroom (Hopping, 2000). Most teachers are trained to teach in single grade classrooms which target a small ability group or whole class instruction. Teachers who are placed into multiage classrooms face difficulties in their efforts to design a curriculum that will effectively teach students in different grades and ages. Teachers also find it difficult to design a curriculum that meets the guidelines set forth by the department of education without offending the expectations of parents and students in multiage classrooms. Teachers often times will integrate topics, selecting fewer for the year, to allot more time on each topic (Sims, 2008).

Research Proposal

A review of literature revealed insufficient resources to adequately examine the administrators, teachers, and parents views in this one rural Eastern Oregon K-12 School. More research is required to obtain insight into multiage classrooms in order to reveal the benefits and challenges of multiage classrooms and the future needs of students who attend this one rural Eastern Oregon K-12 School.

The focus of my research was to investigate the differences of opinion held by the administrators, teachers, and parents regarding multiage classrooms in this rural Eastern Oregon K-12 School. My study was guided by the following questions:

1. What is the history of one rural Eastern Oregon K-12 school relative to the use of multiage classrooms?

2. According to the teachers:

What are the social benefits for children in this one multiage school?

What are the social challenges for children in this one multiage school?

What are the academic benefits for children in this one multiage school?

What are the academic challenges for children in this one multiage school?

3. According to administrators:

What are the social benefits for children in this one multiage school?

What are the social challenges for children in this one multiage school?

What are the academic benefits for children in this one multiage school?

What are the academic challenges for children in this one multiage school?

4. According to parents:

What are the social benefits for children in this one multiage school?

What are the social challenges for children in this one multiage school?

What are the academic benefits for children in this one multiage school?

What are the academic challenges for children in this one multiage school?

5. How are the teachers in this school prepared to teach in multiage classrooms?

Procedures

Participants

My research was to investigate the various opinions of three groups of participants: administrators, teachers, and parents. The participants were selected from one rural Eastern Oregon K-12 School. To address the above research questions one administrators and eight teachers were surveyed. I then obtained a list of parents from this one multiage school to randomly select 8 parents. The actual parent participants were those who agreed to take part in my study. The selection as described above was intended to show a sample of the various opinions of the participants.

Four primary research questions were addressed during the data collection as listed above. In an effort to address these questions, the data was collected by use of surveys. Data collection was conducted at the school for a period of two months beginning in April and ending in May.

Data Analysis

As the data was gathered, it was placed into categories to summarize the perspectives for teachers, parents, and administrators about multiage classrooms. The analysis of data revealed shared perspectives by the three groups and showed the perspective views that differed between the three groups. I surveyed eight teachers, who together had taught over 40 years in the multiage classrooms. All the teachers felt school leadership and policy to support multiage instruction were of great importance for success. The parents on the other hand felt the multiage classroom was used primarily because of the rural setting and the low enrollment numbers. All participants surveyed felt that multiage learning has and continues to be a very successful method of learning among all students. It was unanimous among the participants that the children perceive each other in terms of personal qualities and capabilities and not in terms of grade level. The negative aspects of the multiage classroom was felt to be at a minimum at this one eastern Oregon school, both parents and teachers felt the students learned how to get along and learn from each other. The administrator stated, “The atmosphere within the school is just like a big family, and a community.”

Findings:

Surveys with Teachers, Administrators and Parents

By conducting a survey in one rural Eastern Oregon School, I was able to obtain the views of teachers, administrators and parents about the use of multiage instructional settings and how they felt this benefited or challenged the students. The first question that was asked obtained a unanimous response; reasons the school doesn’t have the numbers to support single classes.” “What year did the school convert to multiage school?” All responders replied with an answer similar to: “It has always been multiage, at least as long as I remember.” The next question was; “Why do you think the decision was made to change from single age to a multiage classroom in this school?” The responses to this question were similar revealing that all felt it had always been a multiage school because of its rural location, small student numbers and financial reasons. Teacher A responded to this question, “I have been teaching here for 23 years and this school has always been multiage due to the enrollment and rural location.” Teacher C had a similar reply, “I believe it has always been multiage probably due to financial

Administrator

Question: Do you feel there are enough teachers in each multiage classroom to

effectively teach all students? Please explain.

Response: Yes, we have a great staff that is very effective in the multiage setting.

Question: What are the social benefits and for the students in this

multiage school?

Response: The social benefits are plentiful; students do not perceive each other

as grade specific, the children’s relationships become strong among all

grades and ages and creates more of a family atmosphere within the school.

The social challenges are few and far between but on an occasion you will

have a child whose personality just doesn’t mesh with another child and

those children will be together for an extended period of time in the multiage

classroom.

Question: What are the social challenges for the students in this multiage school?

Response: The social challenges for the students are just not noticable. The school

has a fantastic atmosphere where the students, teachers, administrator all

communicate the same as a large family. The students all pull together

to create a unified unit. It is not uncommon to see a high-school student

stop in the hall or in the lunchroom to help a grade school student out.

Question: What are the academic benefits for students in this multiage school?

Response: The academic benefits for the children begin with the stability of staying with

the same group of students for two or three years. They get to know t