This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.
Safety of employees and productivity should be linked in a company. It is necessary for the safety manager at Jacob engineering cooperation to provide minimum health and safety standards to employees in order to abide by human rights standards. To ensure safety of employees the safety manager should follow the occupational safety and health act of 1970 in conjunction with other employment legislatures since they have been the basis of development in the American employment and labor law system. If the safety manager follows occupational safety and health act which calls for training and education, enforcing and develop safety standards as well as offering compliance assistance the company will be able to increase productivity and address injury concerns within the manufacturing department.
The occupational safety and health act requires that employers maintains and provides working environment that is free from risks of accident to enable the employees work without fears for injuries. The existence of a conducive working environment will promote productivity in the company. To my opinion it is the duty of the safety manager to ensure that employees are working from a conducive environment as this serves as a sign of being concerned with the healthy and safety standards of employees. Labor laws stipulate that the management should always provide a good working environment to its workers. therefore if safety manager at Jacob engineering cooperation fails to guarantee his or her employee within manufacturing department with appropriate working environment then employees then necessary legal actions may be taken by employees for instance taking the safety manager to court if employees are involved in injuries as a result of the failure of the safety manager to abide by safety standards, similarly employees of Jacob engineering cooperation may join workers union that will enable them have a collective bargaining power on the issues of safety with the company so as to have remedy procedures incase of injuries (1-3).
Personal Protective equipments are very important to employees working with machines since hazards at workplace are unpredictable. Occupational safety and health act warns that employees should not move near energized parts without protective equipments since these makes a worker more exposed to injuries. The argument between a workplace health officer and health coordinator as to whether hard hats are good for employees is quite desirable. It should be pointed out that some employees have often heard a negative attitude towards using hard hats while on duty but the truth of the matter is that hard hats and other protective equipments protects the health and safety of the employee therefore the management should enforce this condition to all employees in the manufacturing department as well as other departments where hard hats are used (4).
Hard hats have been widely adopted by health and safety officers of many companies because of their immeasurable importance to workers, It is advisable that hard hats are worn appropriately and no modifications are done on them for example drilling of holes. Head protection is essential in all industries where risks of falling or hanging objects are common or restricted headroom thus It should be emphasized at any workplace that protection of the head is mandatory and any worker who fails to cover his or her head does so at his or her own risk.
Although the use of hard hats are recommended in industries, employees may need to wear them in conjunction with other personal protective equipments like safety glass that protects the eye from eye hazards, gloves that provides protection for the purpose it is designed for, respirators that protects the worker from dust, gases, fumes, boots and safety shoes, chemical clothing among others (4-6)
Similarly hard hats should be adopted by safety officers of Jacob engineering cooperation because they protect workers from heat and very high temperatures however, it can also make a person sweat when it is too hot. All in all head hats can be used to minimize workers exposure to injuries. It is therefore important that hard hats should be given to workers and at the same time safety officers in manufacturing department should monitor their employees and ensure that head hats are used especially if they have been determined for use as this will help reduce the risks of occupational injuries (5).
Aerosol are very dangerous thus they should not be thrown into fire or even be left in direct sunlight just as Li Hong advised her friend, this is because pressure in the aerosol can build up very fast when exposed near heat or fire hence making the can to burst and eventually explode if thrown near a flame. The pressure builds up because of two reasons one increase in the gas pressure due to movement of particles in the gas that bumps onto the wall of the can thus creating more pressure and when the gas is exposed near heat the movement of particle increases and two more propellant turns into gas and because it has been thrown into fire the pressure will rise very fast hence leading to explosion (9).
In my opinion aerosol cans should not be thrown into fire or exposed near any source of heat because the can usually contain a gas that builds very fast in the can if it's put near fire. It is vital that Li Hong friend applies effective venting methods as it would help reduce the hazards involved in explosion of aerosol can as well as injuries to people around the area. Safety managers should therefore try and produce low cost pressure relief devices that are capable of venting aerosol can when pressure rises to very high level. Conclusively aerosol cans and gas are great environmental hazards at any work place therefore the safety managers should educate their staff or workers on proper methods of disposal that will not cause injuries to people within vicinity or the entire environment (7-8).
1. Occupation safety and health act [homepage on the internet]. Health Promotion in the Workplace; 2000 [updated April 17, 2010; cited March 1, 2010]. Available from http://www.michener.ca/lrc/lrcvanco.php.
2. Ashford Nicholas, Crisis in the Workplace: Occupational injury. Cambridge mass: MIT Press; 1976, P. 32.
3. Environment, Health and safety Leaders [homepage on the internet]. Accident theory that ties Safety and Productivity Together; 2002 [updated 2010; cited March 1, 2010]. Available from http://ehstoday.com/mag/ehs_imp_35910/.
4. Chris Kilbourne [homepage on the internet]. Essential Personal protective Equipment; 2008 [cited March 1, 2010]. Available from http://safetydailyadvisor.blr.com/archive/2008/08/18/personal_protective_equipment_ppe_maintenance_care.aspx.
5. Safety Library [homepage on the internet]. Personal protective Equipment; 2007 [cited March 1, 2010]. Available from http://www.safetyinfo.com/Safety%20Topic%20-%20Personal%20Protective%20Equipment%20-%20PPE.htm.
6. Nix Steve. Masco Woodsman Hard Hat System [monograph on the internet]. Washington: National Academy press; 2002 [cited 2010 march 1]. Available from http://forestry.about.com/od/chainsaws/gr/hard_hat.htm.
7. Greer Kathy. [homepage on the internet].Aerosol can be hazardous to health; 2005 [cited 2010 march 1]. Available from http://forestry.about.com/od/chainsaws/gr/hard_hat.htm.
8. Pye Catherine. [homepage on the internet]. Fear of injury after aerosol explosion; 2009 [cited 2010 march 1]. Available from http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/4549210.Blackburn_10_year_old_injured_after_aerosol_explosion/.
9. Jones Ryan. [homepage on the internet]. Aerosol can in Fire; 2007 [cited 2010 march 1]. Available from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7Wpkdb9wx0.