Concrete Elastic Modulus For Various Aggregate Types Construction Essay

Published: Last Edited:

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Concrete generally, is an inevitable constructional material in civil Engineering for profitability and economy of designs in life. Therefore, much emphasis must be placed on the efficacy for sustainability of the people to avoid risk of progressive collapse due to the instability of its nature after design. It is a challenge to curb the menace of inadequacy of design for the durability of concrete all day. The heterogeneity of concrete is real to be composed of Cement, Water (uncontaminated), Fine and Coarse aggregates otherwise known as constituent materials. The fossils lie embedded in a matrix of cement, water, fine and coarse aggregates and, are so strong because of the binding ability of the properties, absorbency in nature and most importantly, skilful knowledge of the designers during construction. The volume of concrete occupied by the coarse aggregates is significantly great compared to other properties thereby, playing the biggest role in terms of given desired strength recommended by different professional associations in the world. Concrete also is made up high compressive strength and a low value of tensile strength. It is used to protect corrosion of steel reinforcing bars.

The importance to investigate concrete Elastic Modulus for various aggregate types as a parameter which enhances deformation resulting to cracks during serviceability with time is a course that cannot be undermined in the study of concrete properties. This implies that Elastic Modulus is a property that depends on compressive strength and aggregates stiffness. Strength and Stiffness are termed as the most probable important of all the properties of concrete materials considered for suitable structures design. The strength of a material obviously controls the estimation of the collapse load of a structure. Stiffness is important to ensuring un-deflection too much under load as well as dominates the avoidance of buckling of compression members.

The characteristic strength of concrete is said to be classified based on designated concrete called strength class that depends on the types of constructions to be executed. When the value of compressive strength is too

high there is a probability that most of the structures will be constructed of concrete possessing strength below this value and, too low a value will cause inefficient use of materials. So, it is the characteristic strength value of the cube strength at 28 days below which not more than 5% of the test out comes may be expected to depreciate is the primary concern of every designer at every point in time.

The British Standards BS8110 indentifies the clause: The Strength, below which, not more than 5% of specimen will fail" to signify strength that is very close to the mean value of a large samples of concrete normally distributed in a Bell-shaped against the frequency. This is idealized that some samples of concrete are stronger while others are weaker in strength and these variations are measure of the standard deviation.


The properties of concrete in compression are attributed to Short- term and Long-term loadings when discussing the linearity and un-linearity of the stress-strain curve. Short-term loading is used for Normal weight or density concrete and represented the most linear part called the elastic region of the stress-strain curve. The curve defines the uniaxial compressive test performed at normal, average speed on concrete at 28 days. The straight elastic portion describes how stress and strain are closely related before maximum stress is effective. Modulus of Elasticity is a derivative parameter resulting from the slope of this linear portion of the curve and is always larger in value when the strength of the concrete increases. The stress-strain curve shape varies considerably for identical concrete of the same cylindrical strength under the same loading condition and this strange behaviour depicts the variability in concrete samples due to one factor or the other from testing procedures: Nilson, Darwin and Dolon (2004:40).

Long-term loading is the creeping nature of concrete with time. This is the continuous loading of concrete beyond 28 days of aged. The deformations of concrete are practically observed at this point in time which are proportional to the magnitude of the stress. At this region on the stress-strain curve, the stress is not longer linear. In addition to the load level, creep depends on the average humidity which is an important parameter to be investigated when designing a concrete.


Based on the review of others, the Magazine of concrete Research(1991), Kaplan revealed that concrete with the same compressive strength may have different dynamic modulus of elasticity of different aggregates. The British Standard Institute CP110, and European Code; model code for concrete structures whereas made no provision but grossly looked at estimating compressive strength only. ACI Code tried in its little way to include a term for concrete density the expression for elastic modulus, since this term is raised to the power of 1.5, it has considerable weighting. But the BS110 has provided bases to satisfy new expressions for estimating the elastic modulus based on the work of Teychenne, to conform to the Stress-strain relationship of concrete such that:

Ec28 = Ko + 0.2fcu28

BS8110, Ec28 = 5.5cu28 /ᵧ) and Et /Ec28 = 0.4 + 0.6ft /f28 where,

Ec28 = concrete elastic modulus at 28 days.

fcu28 = characteristic concrete strength at 28 days.

Ko = stiffness factor of aggregates (usually taken as

20Gpa, and 0.2 is a coefficient) by Teychenne

but Code varying from 14 to 26Gpa.

t = required age in days.

And these expressions have functional relationship which the elastic modulus yields to at all points in time for consistency of analysis of the properties of materials. Hence, this project is only pivoted on the overall ideas and assumptions of the BS8110 to investigation the effects of four aggregate types (Granite, Gravel, Grey Limestone and White Polar Chippings) of the same size of 10mm, on compressive strength at 28 days.


To have a thorough justification by testing the effects of these four aggregates on the Elastic modulus of concrete to conform to the generalized approach of the BS8110 expressions.

To critically compare and contrast the similarities or uniqueness between the experimental values of compressive strength targeted at 40-50N/mm2 of high strength concrete.

To generally examine the aggregates stiffness in relation to Elastic modulus.

Comparing compressive strengths of concrete in different proportion by volume of fine - coarse aggregates of the concrete samples ( and in this case, 30:70% and 40:60% ratios is used) respectively.

To verify the justification that the compressive strength of a cube is feasibly higher than the compressive strength of a cylinder when tested.




Concrete as heterogeneous material is categorized into normal and light weight concrete based on the design performance relating the characteristic strengths and densities of materials to suit appropriate constructions. The high strength concrete is term generally used to mean concrete with a uniaxial compressive strength value greater than 41Mpa, as assumed by the ACI committee 363. This is used for the Design of columns especially of high residential structures, Bridge of longer spans, offshore oil platforms and so on: Nilson, Darwin and Dolan (2004:52). Higher Elastic modulus and coefficient of creep lower reduce long-term deflection in compression. The disadvantages include the reduction in ultimate strain capacity, brittleness in compression and increase the tendency of cracks to occur and not economical. The requirement is of low water-cement ratio below 0.25 according to Nilson, Darwin and Dolan (2004:53). low strength is otherwise known as conventional concrete having the strength less than high strength concrete according to Bashir, Almusallam and Maslehuddin; In constructional and building Materials" (2003: 97-103). High strength concrete is relative to a uniaxial compressive strength that is greater than that which is derived ordinarily in a region because maximum strength of concrete that is currently being produced varies considerably from one region to the other: Bahshir, Almusallam and Maslehuddin (2003:2). Hence, the using of high strength brings about the reduction of cross sectional area and dead loads in a structure.

The functional mechanism of concrete depends on the overall constituent materials which are basically cement, water, fine and coarse aggregates in defined proportions with different properties resulting to characteristic strengths. The efficacy of a characteristic strength is attained only when the materials are properly selected, manufactured and designed, and the properties well defined and handled to yield desired result.

Several investigators and researchers have revealed through their experimental works the influence of materials composite on the Elastic modulus and Compressive strength. Specifically, the Construction and Building Materials research (2002) and (2003). These respective Materials recognized that concrete should be properly examined as a three phase constituent materials of aggregates, cement and a transition between them. Also, that the transition zone is ranged 10-50 thick and generally seen as being the weakest component of concrete resulting to influence on the mechanical behaviour of concrete as could be compared to volumetric importance according to the Construction and Building Materials (2010:505-512).


The problem of the High Strength Concrete as justified by the Construction and Building Materials (2003:3) is that cracking is more generalize and tends to homogeneous material characteristic as compared to the normal concrete: Bashir, Almusallam, Maslehuddin (2003:97-103). Also, High strength Concrete behaves as a linear elastic property and being subjected to brittleness than Normal concrete strength hence, cumulated that it is paramount to propound data on the mechanical properties of hardened concrete particularly, its strength in relation to the ideas of Bashir, Almusallam, Maslehuddin (2003:97-103); further argued that there is a good correlation between the Engineering properties of concrete such as stiffness factor.

Generally, it is understood that besides the constituent materials, Mix design and Stiffness also play importance roles to enhance strength accumulation in concrete design. And the below flow chart may be used simply to illustrate how concrete is form from various materials including design mix to achieve desired strength and durability.





PROPERTIES ( Strength, Workability and Durability )


Creep and Shrinkage

Elastic modulus

Fire resistance

Resistance to abrasion

Thermal conductivity

Figure 1: Concrete Flow Chart


There are basically three constituent materials of concrete for design purpose namely:


Fine and Coarse Aggregate.


2.3.1. CEMENT

Cement as a design material is of various types but more importantly restricted to the Ordinary Port land type for the purpose of this investigation. It constitutes principally of chemical compound such as Dicalcuim and Tricalcium Silicates in different proportions by percentage. Cement fineness and soundness are the most properties of interest to be examined to achieve desired concrete strength according to the British Standard Institution (1991:20). It is believe that High Strength Concrete is resulting from high performance Ordinary Portland cement well ground in good proportion.

The Cement paste helps to harden concrete to gain strength through a chemical reaction known as hydration property due to curing at 28 days age. It also mixes with water to fill the void of aggregates which enables the concrete to be easily placed and flows to avoid shrinkage. An Ordinary Port land Cement is one which all the particles will pass a No.100 sieve and over 95% will pass a No.200 sieve in British Standard (1991) and, must have minimum strength of (compressive strength) for 3-day mortal cubes of less than 15N/mm2, 7-day 23N/mm2 and 3-day concrete 8N/mm2 while, 7-day 14n/mm2, Kong and Evans (1996:20). Its weight is a function of the degree of compaction which is roughly taken as 1450kg/m2: Kong and Evans (1996).


Aggregates are the most important constituent materials of concrete. These materials constitute about 65-75% by volume of hardened mass occupied in concrete mix thereby, constituting the highest quota of concrete strength. The High performance strength of concrete is due to the type of aggregates to be used in design. There are two main types known as fine and coarse aggregates. Fine Aggregate

This is natural sand from a good source free of impurities and contaminations that is capable of achieving the cohesiveness of the mix and desired strength: Kong and Evans (1996). Fine Aggregate is derived from natural sand or crushed stone sand or crushed gravel with particle capable of passing a 5mm sieve by Kong and Evans.

A technically satisfied fine aggregate is one which has the capability of producing satisfactory concrete: Day (1999). It is said by Day to be standard and substandard if having the effect of retarding set, increased bleeding, excessive air entrainment, poor workability and increased water requirement, resulting in increase in shrinkage and extra cost.

Most importantly, the features of a fine aggregate that affect the functionality of a design concrete has been identified by Day (1999):

(i). Grading.

(ii). Particle shape and surface texture.

(iii). Clay.

(iv). Chemical catalysts (salt and alkaline).

(v). presence of mechanical weak particle.

(vi). Water absorption level.

(vi). source.

However, this investigation only discus on the effect of Grading, Particle shape and texture, and more importantly source of the aggregates. Coarse Aggregates .

The properties of a coarse aggregate rely on solely the source of basic rock, the crushing process and its treatment in terms of separation into fractions, segregation and contamination as proposed by Day (1999). It is also noted that a coarse aggregate is one which is derived crushed stone, crushed gravel that can retain on a 5mm sieve according to Kong and Evans (1996). One important feature of a coarse aggregate is the bond characteristic usually associated high strength concrete which flexural and tensile strength are of special consideration, and it is a composite nature of chemical effects of surface roughness, particle shapes, water absorption and cleanliness by Day (19990.

Again, Kong and Evans (1996); propounded that the durability and chemical inert under expose condition is the most requirement of a coarse aggregate, and the size, shape and surface texture and grading are said to be physical requirements must be examined because these are characteristics which enhance the strength or weakness of concrete.

2.4.0. GRADING

A durable concrete must be dense, and when fresh, good enough for compaction: Kong and Evans (1996). There are voids comprise of mixture of cement, water and fine aggregate in mortar and that which is slightly more than sufficient is recommended to fill the voids of coarse and, cement paste slightly more than sufficient also to fill the voids of fine aggregate: Kong and Evans (1996). The voids are seen as functions of grading and particle size distribution by Kong and Evans.

Generally, grading is the total way of accessing or categorizing the fineness and grade to which workability of concrete can be achieved considerably at a good flow. This is carried out through a comparative idea of sieve analysis as well as particle size distribution based on the recommendation by British Standards or ASTM of sieve sizes. These sieve sizes are used to estimate the cumulative percentage of finer of the weight retained particles on each sieve. And to comply with the BS 882, the percentages for the coarse aggregate and fine aggregate should fall within the limit the below tables: Kong and Evans (19960).

Table2.10 Grading Limits for Coarse Aggregates

Percentage by weight passing the standard sieves

Nominal size of Aggregates


sieve (mm) 40mm to 5mm 20mm to 5mm 14mm to 5mm

50.0 100 -

37. 90-100 100

20.0 35-70 90-100 100

14.0 - - 90-100

10.0 10-40 30-60 50-85

5.0 0-5 0-10 0-10

Kong and Evans (1996:36)

Table2.20 Grading Limits for Fine Aggregates

Percentage by weight passing the standard sieves

Additional Limits for Grading

Sieve Overall

Limits C M F

10.0mm 100

5.0mm 89-100

2.36mm 60-100 60-100 65-100 80-100

1.18mm 30-100 30-90 45-100 70-100

600mm 15-100 15-54 25-80 55-100

300 5-70 5-40 5-48 5-70

150mm 0-15 0-15

Kong and Evans (1996:36).

The above tables show that especially, the fine aggregate has zone division from coarse, medium and finer. The divisions are larger based on percentage passing the 600mm meaning in a fresh concrete mix, the content of the fine aggregate penetrating has an advantage over workability.


In the Construction and Building Materials (2010:505-512); Meddah, Zitouni and Belaabes used the effect of content and particle size distribution of coarse aggregate on the compressive strength as a base for argument of concrete strength. This revealed that several properties of aggregate such as degree of weathering, specific gravity, hardness, chemical, and mineral composition, shape, roughness, physical and chemical stability and pore structure are connected to the parent rock.

Also, that adequate proportion of granular fractions depend on the type of concrete targeted and thereby, used similar aggregates such as Limestone, Basalt, Diabase, Granite and Quartz of the sizes of 15mm and 25mm for comparison; and ascertained after experimentation that the great effect on the usefulness of aggregates is largely depends on the particle size distribution. Meddah, Zitouni and Belaabes (2010) came to conclusion that;

The value of compressive strength of normal concrete increases with the maximum size of coarse aggregates.

The content of the coarse aggregates has a great influence on the compressive strength of both normal and high strength concrete, and increase in compressive strength is succeeded.

The advantage of the coarse aggregate grains distribution on compressive strength of High Strength concrete is significant as compared to the Normal concrete.

The compressive strength is strongly connected to the coarse aggregates parameters such as content proportion of fine to coarse aggregate and grain distribution of concrete mixture.

Furthermore, Kong and Evans (1996) also supports these arguments but emphasize that higher coarse aggregate sizes results to lower water/cement ratio to achieve reasonable workability and higher strength of concrete. The reduced water/cement ratio is been offset by the strong effect of the lower bond area at the interface of the cement paste and the aggregate and of the discontinuities caused by the large particles.


Relative to the action of various aggregate types on concrete properties called Elastic Modulus and compressive strength, several researches have been carried out by different people to justify the boredom to study how the negative impacts are reduced considerably on concrete strength collective sources of aggregates.

In the Magazine of Concrete Research of (1999:291-304); this work reported the applicability of the BS approach to a range of 13 different aggregate types from a source in South Africa that the strength of concrete depends not only on stiffness, particle sizes, shape and texture, mix design but on selected sources of the aggregates. The source of controls the physical properties such as Relative Density RD, Look Bulk Density LBD, and Consolidated Bulk Density CBD, water absorption and Coefficient of thermal expansion should be examined in addition. Thus, Alexander (1991:291-304) concluded the results of his experimentation after thorough comparison to others that different aggregates produce different compressive and Elastic Modulus depending on their sources of selection which should be free from contaminations such as sodium chloride or alkaline and, was strongly supported by Day (1999); that chloride content of aggregates collected from beach sand is contaminated than dredge sand from sea. This contamination cause efflorescence and higher shrinkage and utter the setting and handing rates of concrete.

2.7.0. WATER

Water is necessary for the design of concrete since it enables the concrete to be properly mix the constituent materials together for compatibility. This design water should be free of contamination of sodium chloride, oils, alkalis and sugar which are catalysts to reduce the effect or workability of the constituent materials of concrete. The requirement for water testing has been provided by the BS3148 for concrete suitability. Suitable water of concrete is otherwise known as design water when the measured volume is enabled to be predicted by the idea of mix design. It is also known as consumable water or hygienic water is necessary in concrete cast to have the desired strength and, if water is suspected to be contaminated, it is advisable by the BS3148 to run or cast a series of test sample made of contaminated and hygienic water to enable the designer to predict its effect on concrete and made decision on the selection of minimum quantity or volume of water is required for optimum strength of concrete whereas, large volume of water gives low strength of concrete. Excess volume of water leads to loss of slump. Workability of concrete depends on the water content used for design when considering the water/cement ratio criterion of mix design.


The term Mix-Design is the ability or a medium of selecting good components of concrete known as binders that are normally accessed on batching by weight or volume. The major aim of mix design is to select the optimum ratio of cement, water and aggregates to achieve a concrete with desired strength, workability, durability and economy: Kong and Evans (1996:50). It is strongly emphasize by Kong and Evans that practical mix design are based on the free water/cement ratio as the most important factor and the water content to determine or influence the strength of concrete. The batching relative to weight is preferably important in design of concrete for desired strength, and the idea or process revolves round water/cement proportion for batching weight of concrete for conventional aggregates especially with a constant density in question.

2.8.1. Water- Cement Ratio In general practice of concrete technology, water/cement ratio is perhaps the most important emphasized parameter to be examined in design. The base point of a typical mix design is the proper placed value of the water/cement ratio. It is simply the ratio of water to cement in terms of weight: Kong and Evans (1996). Practical mix design methods engaged the free water/cement and water content which are the two required factors that influence the strength, durability and workability of concrete. In the calculation of the water/cement ratio only the weight of the free water is used amongst the overall water absorbed by the aggregates and, it is the total water less the absorbed water while, the water content is the weight of the free water per unit volume of concrete: Kong and Evans (1996:50). Kong and Evans emphasized that the establishment by an initial mixes otherwise known as trails batch or adjustments on site: supported by Day (1999). Both researchers recognised that there are two basically main methods of mix design captured from the works of Road Research Laboratory, the American Concrete Institute and Department of the Environment DoE known as the Traditional and DoE mixes. The water/cement ratio is chosen for strength and workability at average of 28 days called the mean target strength relative to characteristic strength: value that exceeds by a suitable margin known as current margin.


2.9.1. Durability

The ability of a concrete to achieve its purpose of design in service is very important in design. The parameters that influence the potential integrity of concrete is over estimated in terms of durability of concrete. The provision of appropriate workability, suitable cement, aggregates and water as major ingredients of concrete in accordance with given standard and codes of practice are the base line. The tendency of concrete to exhibit a free corrosive nature and, a maximum protection against external forms of attack is impinge upon the correct choice of materials and adequate proportions: Lydon (1983). Durable design concrete is stable and capable of withstanding all the environmental conditions to which it is exposed: Kong and Evans (1996:38).

2.9.2 Permeability

Permeability of concrete is related to durability and it is the crawl at which water can pass through the concrete: Kong and Evans (1996:39). Low permeable enables the concrete to withstand the effects of weathering, rain and action of freezing and thawing exposed conditions. The permeability of concrete increase rapidly with amount of voids and water/cement ratio and, when the amount over influxes the strength of concrete reduces. It is advisable that permeability should not exceed 7% else, bound to be corrosion in case of reinforcement: Kong and Evans (1996).


Creep is a property of concrete that depends on loading duration. When there is an increase in strength in concrete with age, it is said to be under creeping condition. Creep is not actually proportional to strength but inversely related and can be estimated provided the strength-age could be determined. This is generally relative to the creep values of specimen concrete mixes which is derived from loading to one-third of the cube strength at 28 days curing age: Kong and Evans (1996:30). The concrete is unlikely to be stressed beyond one-half of the cube strength and, the creep of concrete at specified period of loading is roughly estimated to be proportional to the stress by Kong and Evans. Different concrete of the same cement paste content would produce creep that is approximately proportional to the stress/ strength ratio. Desired strength unaffected by creep is determined with respect to the avoidance of long term loading duration of concrete. The rate at which creep increases depends on the increase in temperature as a linear function and, at a value of 1% of the 15 oC creep for each degree Celsius: Kong and Evans (1996:31). Generally, aggregate-cement ratio, aggregate content, cement content and water content do not have any significant effect on creep but water-cement ratio and cement type influence the level of creep in concrete design.


The shortening in length or contraction of concrete as a result of absorption of water in the gel is related to dry shrinkage: Kong and Evans (1996:33). It is a physical property of concrete unlike creep of chemical influence. Aggregate content, fineness of cement, and temperature influence the level of shrinkage of concrete. Low shrinkage concrete contains non-shrinking aggregates like limestone Quartzite gravel, mountain limestone, blast furnace slag, dolomite, granite and so on: Kong and Evans (1996:35). While, high shrinkage is as a result of aggregates volume change on wetting and drying such as slate, sandstone, basalt so on. Both coarse and fine aggregates influence the level of concrete shrinkage more importantly and, shrinkage is been reduced by using various aggregates of high Moduli of Elasticity that are dense and hard.

2.11.1. Aggregates Shrinkage Mechanism In Concrete

Aggregates do undergo change in volume because they contain some minerals in form of clay which swell up when absorbing water or dry out and shrink. During setting of concrete, the cement paste volume changes. Forces are exerted during setting on aggregates resulting in moisture content affecting the overall size of the aggregate. The total weight of aggregates is that which is related to Elastic modulus and the volume ratio of the cement paste. It is reasonable to say that all aggregates suppose to be shrinkable to a greater or less extent as well as change in volume for proper classifications and selections for high or low shrinkage types: Pike (1990). The effect of high shrinkage causes unwanted movement or cracks and reduction in durability of concrete thereby leads to corrosion of the reinforcement members.


The design strength is associated with Compressive strength of concrete which is the common measure for judging a standard durable concrete at 28 days curing age. Buildings and other Engineering structures are purely designed with the most performance estimate of the compressive strength for stability, workability and durability of concrete. In the National Ready Mix Concrete association (NRMCA:2003); compressive strength is generally regarded as a measure by breaking Cylindrical Concrete Specimens in a Compressive Testing Machine basically, based on the precepts of the BS8110 and ASTM. The estimation of compressive strength is derived from the failure load over the cross-sectional area that is resisting the load of unit of mega Pasca (Mpa); an International standard Unit of measurement: BS8110 (1985) and NRMCA (2003). Compressive Strength of concrete varies from 17-28Mpa. The compressive needs to be determined from a concrete mixture to attain the desired or required strength for specified for a job. The strength tested results from cast concrete cylinder is used for quality control, estimation of strength or acceptance of concrete in a design of structure for operations: NRMCA (2003). NRMCA propounded that cylinder tested for acceptability and quality control are made and cured with strict adherence to the procedures described for the standard-cured concrete in BS8110 and the ASTM C 31 standard practice for concrete specimen curing test. It is necessary or paramount as well as highly significant for Engineers to make decision on the use of Strength flc, specified for structural design elements as incorporated in the job title compliance by NRMCA (2003).

The concrete mixture design pave ways to estimating average value of characteristic strength flc, that is higher than specified type as a measure to reduce the level of risk to a minimal level in constructions. The compliance of required design strength of concrete specification is applicable to conform to the following accepted criteria by the National Ready Mix Concrete association NRMCA, (2003);

The average of 3 consecutive tests should be equal or exceed the specified Characteristic strength.

No single Strength test should fall below characteristic strength by more than 3.4Mpa or by more than 0.10 of flc , as it is more than 35Mpa.


Fundamentally, Elastic Modulus E, is a stress-strain relating parameter of concrete behaviour. The force per unit area and un dimensional relationship of concrete properties when subjected to loadings. The measurement of the elongation or compressive strength is built on the understanding of the term, Elastic modulus of concrete. The inability to estimate or predict the Young’s Modulus of concrete would result in a drastic collapse or deformation of concrete specimens under a given load and known stress. The Young’s Modulus is a material property that defines stiffness. The idea is properly reviewed and examined by Alexander (1999:991-304) in the Magazine of Concrete Research that, concrete Elastic modulus is resulted from stiffness of aggregates, and not concrete strength itself after conducting series of tests on different aggregates types. Besides stiffness, Elastic modulus is a function of the compressive strength and possesses different values using various aggregate types: Alexander (1999). Supportive motions of Elastic Modulus as related to normal aggregate is higher than hydrated cement paste: Felekoglu, Turkel and Baradan of Building and Environment, (2007:1795-1802). Rigorous investigations on the truth of the estimation of the elastic modulus was executed by experimentation of self compacting concrete and found out that the value of Self Compacting Concrete SCC, was really much higher than the traditional concrete at 28 days: Felekoglu, Turkel and Baradan (2007:1795-1802). The purpose of the reduction is attributed to the lower amount of coarse aggregated and increase in cement paste: Felekoglu, Turkel and Baradan (2007). Cement and Concrete Research (2010:1096-1105) by Azenha, Magalhaes, Faria and Cunha used Ambient Vibration of concrete, Static loadings of Composite beams and Cylindrical Compression test at 28 days to justify the argument that Elastic modulus is a real function of compressive strength and, had a consistent results of 40.8, 40.1 and 41.6GPa respectively which are approximately equal.

F Stress (N/mm2) peak stress

Elastic Modulus

5.5fcu28 / )



Figure 2.1: Cube in Compression. Figure 2.2:Stress-Strain Curve (BS8110)

The above Concrete Cube and Stress Strain curve explained the terms, concrete in compression and the secant modulus which is the tangential value obtained of the laboratory of the compressive strength and, it is dependent on load application. BS8110 and BS1881 agreed and recommend a standard cylinder test in addition for justification where stress should be applied at the rate of 0.6 0.4N/mm2 per second. And the secant modulus corresponding to stress equals one-third of the cube strength values.


BS8110 (1985)

(a). Ec28 = Ko + 0.2fcu28 ...............................................................................(2.1)

The review of other works investigates with much comparison justified that the above exist to validate that modulus is a function of the aggregate stiffness Ko, and the characteristic strength fcu, of concrete at 28 days: Alexander (1991). BS8110 recommends Ko as 20Gpa, and 0.2 is the coefficient. The code of practice recognizes the important of influence of aggregate properties on the Elastic modulus and, suggested that in the absence of the detail knowledge of aggregate stiffness values Ko, should vary from 14-26Gpa: Alexander (1991:291).

The design approach for estimating Elastic modulus at the age of 3-28 days was also justified using different aggregate types by taken the value of aggregate stiffness Ko values as the ordinates values of the intercept and rounded up significantly into decimal placed values on the graph of Elastic Modulus versus Cube Compressive strength: Alexander (1991). The 0.2 coefficient was compared with the slope of the tangent at constant rate. And the values of Ko with calculated from the regression equations of the aggregate types: Alexander (1991).

(b). Ec28 = 5.5(fcu/)..............................................................................................(2.2)

The above equation is non-linear derived from the stress- strain curve in BS8110 (1997). This defines the behaviour of a concrete cylinder under uniaxial compression. This maximum compressive stress at failure approximately equal to 0.8fcu (characteristics cube strength) and, the gamma , equals to the partial factor of safety taken as 1.5 for shear strength with shear reinforcement according to Arya (2009) and Kong and Evans (1996). This is the tangential angle of the stress- strain curve.

(c). fk = fm â€" 1.64...................................................................................................(2.3)

This is a linear function in limit state design of concrete. Specifically, BS81100 defines that characteristic strength of concrete fk, is the value of the cube strength below which not than 5% of the test result may be expected to fall. The parameter , is designated as the variation coefficient otherwise known as standard deviation which accounts for the variation encountered during testing of concrete cube specimens for compressive strength. While, the fm is the mean target strength the is aim at during mix design and depends on the nature of the quality control.

(2). fc = 140.44/10.92w/c..........................................................................................(2.4)

Lydon (1983) suggested the above empirical function of compressive strength due to water-cement ratio to compare or verified the target mean characteristic strength of concrete recommended by the BS8110 as the traditional graphical approach at different ages of concrete. It is practically feasible to depend on this equation as a source of estimating the target mean strength of a trial batch of concrete to achieve a desired strength and durable concrete.


The Elastic Modulus of concrete is known as a material stiffness property of concrete: Seward (2009). Concrete stiffness is imperative for estimation of the level of deformation or deflection of member when subjected to loadings. Concrete is high in compression and to achieve or offer resistance in bond, shear as well as compression, to avoid the rate of deformation (cracks or deflections), the stiffness of the concrete most be optimal. The stiffness of a material is generally known as the product of the Elastic modulus and cross- sectional area divided by the length of the material concerned. This is to say Stiffness is a function of the Elastic modulus derived from the secant value of the stress-strain curve used to define materials behaving elastically due to applied load. The stiffness of a concrete is an equivalent measure of the Elastic modulus and it is solely the property of the aggregates. The stiffness of the aggregates enables a designer to predict the resistance of concrete in compression on load application. The stiffer the aggregates, the higher the strength of the concrete to be determined for a job and the lower the strength, the lesser the stiffness. Stiffness is the property of the density and moisture content of aggregate particles that can be estimated from the California Bearing Ratio CBR, test in the British Standard BS1377 and ASTM Designation D1883.


It is very necessary to determine the material composite strength of granular particles to ascertain it integrity to be used in design. The California Bearing Ratio of soils is a wide idea initiated in 1930 by the California Division of Highways used mainly to estimate the bearing strength of soils primarily. The shearing resistance of soils (sub-base and sub-grade) is computed and used major for the design of pavements. This measures the load that is attributed to the Plunger to fully penetrate into the soils in unit of Megapasca.

The California Bearing Ratio depends on density and moisture content of moulding, and after soaking. To lay the asphalt, the soaked specimen is used for experimentation because the sub-grade below the full-height asphalt pavements is weak in its moisture content and affects the design to achieve desired strength.



3.0 BRITISH STANDARD, 1881-121-1983: Testing Of Concrete For Static Modulus.

The system of investigated that is generally recommended suitable for the research of the effects of various aggregate types on the Elastic Modulus of concrete is the British standard, 1881-121-1983 of measurements or designs of concrete properties in compression. The British standard recommends test procedures to achieving desired strength, durability, workability and economical scopes of designs of concrete. The parts of scope of the BS 1881 used is restricted to the achievement of the objectives of this research project which are basically;

The predictions of the grades of various aggregate types taking cognisance of their shapes and surface texture with the particle size distribution approach.

The mixture of a portion of concrete chosen sample of uncrushed aggregates of coarse nature and fine, cement and uncontaminated water.

Casting of the cube and cylindrical concrete specimens and curing at appropriate temperature at 28 days.

Measurements of the Elastic modulus of casted sample using standard compressive machine test at 28 days.

Determinations of the Poisson ratios of the moulded concrete.

To test the stiffness properties of the various aggregate types in use.

This method has great similarity as compared to the American Standard Test methods ASTM, Volume4, 2007 specified for concrete properties of strength. Since the above problem statements have been handled by the provisions of the British 1881, it is adopted to answer the questions of the research topic. Besides the experimentations or testing procedures recommended by the British standards, other generated equations are used to verify the strength of concrete and, these are clearly shown and defined in the subsequent chapters of this research project.

3.1 BRITISH STANDARD BS 8110- PART1 1985: Structural Use of Concrete

This part of the British standards in addition, addresses widely the use of concrete for desired purpose in life. It is more applicable because so many properties of structural concrete are investigated. Graphical methods and equations are postulated in this Part of British Standards to tackle the properties of concrete as shown in the preceding chapters. These graphs and equations serve as guides and solution to define practical problems of design of concrete structures. As the above British Standards 1881examines the experimental or testing procedures, British standards tries to solve and analyse the structural behaviour of concrete under compression


The advantage of these British Standards of the design of concrete is that structural concretes are design with some confident limits for durability, stability, desired strength and economy. These British standards are Universal meaning being generally acceptable for the design of concrete. This research is reckoned on these standards to justify the testing procedures and design of concrete properties for estimation of Elastic modulus. High strength and normal strength of concrete can be achieved and used for special purpose meant for in constructions of structures. It leads to a Quality Control achievement.

The limitations are been that there is bound to be variations in the tested values of the compressive strength and Elastic modulus of concrete though, been measured by the coefficient of variations but the reliability is minimal. This allows for so many samples cast of specimens making the method to be cumbersome and not economical in terms of cost of materials. The results are restricted to only the mean values of several specimens. In the course of cylindrical test, the end plate (cape) conditions of the cylinder affect the direct strain gauge to correctly estimate the displacement in vertical direction during the application of loads on the compression testing machine because of its un-smoothened surface.