Is there an economic case for the privatisation of the NHS?
Student-written example
Shared for study and reference. Not a sample of our professional writing.
About this example
This assignment was contributed by a student. The views expressed are the author’s and do not necessarily reflect those of UKEssays. Use it to inform your reading and develop your own work.
Question
Is there an economic case for the privatisation of the National Health Service?
Answer
Privatisation would turn the UK National Health Service into an American system with public reliance on private insurance. An economic case can be made for such a transformation as free public services encourage over-use (Morris et. al. 2005). Privatisation will also mean better patient choice. However, reasons can be given for why health care should not be privatised.
Equality
A privatised system would exclude many people from treatment given the expense of the insurance. To achieve equality, healthcare should be offered for free. Treatment should be provided according to medical need rather than the ability to pay (Sloman 2007).
Budgeting
The public can find it difficult to forecast their future health needs. It would be complicated for individuals to budget for future private medical expenses. A universal public system removes the financial complexity from individual planning.
Positive Externalities
The drawback of the American system is that those on low incomes often cannot afford treatment. If treatment is not provided, then sick patients could infect other people. The private health care system does not fully consider the effect that illness has on other people (Sloman 2007). In contrast, the NHS provides external protection to the wider community.
Patient Knowledge
Consumers have knowledge of common private markets such as the clothing trade. However, patients tend to have poorer knowledge of the health system. The danger with a private approach is that immoral doctors could promote more expensive treatment than is necessary (Sloman 2007). In contrast, the NHS does not give doctors fees for treatment, so there is less incentive for them to provide unnecessary services (Emmerson et. al. 2000).
Conclusion
The economic case for privatisation is outweighed by the benefits of the publically managed NHS.
References
Emmerson, C. , Frayne C. and Goodman A. (2000), Pressures in UK Healthcare: Challenges for the NHS, The Institute for Fiscal Studies. Available online at http://www.ifs.org.uk/comms/nhsspending.pdf. Accessed at 25/10/16
Morris, Z., Chang, L., Dawson, S. and Garside, P. editors (2005), Policy Futures for UK Health, United Kingdom, Radcliffe Publishing Ltd
Sloman, J., (2007), Essentials of Economics (4th ed.), Harlow: Prentice Hall
UK Essays writing support
Need support with your own question?
Get help from our experienced academic writers. All hold at least a 2:1 degree from a reputable university, and most hold a master’s degree or PhD, and/or have teaching experience.
Send us your question and, if you wish, any marking criteria. We’ll write a model answer to your brief.
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
Related Services
View all
DMCA / Removal Request
If you are the original writer of this assignment and no longer wish to have your work published on UKEssays.com then please click the following link to email our support team:
Request essay removal