Disclaimer: This is an example of a student written assignment.
Click here for sample essays written by our professional writers.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UKEssays.com.

Significance of Stakeholder Theory in Corporate Governance

Paper Type: Free Assignment Study Level: University / Undergraduate
Wordcount: 3041 words Published: 14th Dec 2020

Reference this


In contemporary society, business organizations are taking on an increasingly complex and significant role. Some corporate giants control vast resources and possess enormous influence in human’s daily life. Especially when they enter areas such as health care and education, they can have more deeply relationship and powerful impact on society. However, the nature of business activities is to pursue the best interests and it could lead to some conflicts between different stakeholders. Thus, properly corporate governance need to be used to ensure corporates continue operating on a normal track. In theoretical, corporate governance is a kind of system that could direct and control companies (Zandstra, 2002). The object of corporate governance is to make maximum profit for shareholders in the past. Unfortunately, it has been considered one of the most root cause of the governance crisis in the recent research (Spitzeck & Hansen, 2010).

Get Help With Your Assignment

If you need assistance with writing your assignment, our professional assignment writing service is here to help!

Assignment Writing Service

On the one hand, excessive pursuit share prices performance has neglected the interests of other groups, which cause the best interests between different stakeholders in unachievable. On the other hand, shareholder theory plays a passive role rather than an active role in the firm, in other words, managers’ just passive making decision that only adapts to the market instead of actively participating in the market. This is not only provoked the conflict between the various stakeholders and hinder long-term development of the enterprise. Therefore, stakeholder theory gradually gained more attention. This essay will have a brief introduction of stakeholder theory and give a case to discuss the significance of stakeholder theory in corporate governance. Also, demonstrate good corporate governance should not consider all stakeholders and give an explanation.

Stakeholder theory

Stakeholders could be any groups or individuals in an organization and enable effect or affected by a company’s operating (Freeman, 1984). The aim of stakeholder theory is to find what are the best interests based on different stakeholder groups. According to Freeman (1984) “Stakeholder theory promotes a practical, efficient, effective, and ethical way to manage organizations in a highly complex and turbulent environment”. It means Stakeholder theory play an important role in corporate governance and can serve company to balance various groups’ benefit. There are three key features of stakeholder theory (Donaldson, 2002). Firstly, managers are supposed to recognize and monitor all legitimate stakeholders, when making a decision and operating they should fair consider the interests of all stakeholders. Secondly, managers should avoid potential conflicts between different groups and address problems through open communication and dialogue. Thirdly, managers need to maintain Friendly Corporation with other entities, both public and private, to avoid risks from an unstable environment. These principles illustrate what the role of stakeholders play in a company and how to apply stakeholder theory in practice. Stakeholder theory usually including internal and external stakeholders (Du Plessis, 2007). Managers, employees, and owners are included in internal stakeholders and customers, suppliers; competitors are included in external stakeholders. Additionally, governments and local communities are considered as a legal or rule responsibility.  Specifically, these stakeholders have the following characteristics in the theory (Du Plessis, 2007).

A. Shareholder:

According to act and the constitution of corporations, shareholders could exercise a serious of power such as voting and transfer ownership. When shareholders received better dividends from a company, they will buy more shares and help the company maintain stability through their rights. In general, shareholders only passively react company’s operation rather than actively participate in corporate governance.

B. Employees:

Company gives employees more attention such as good training and generous welfare, they will work more effectively to bring better profit to the company. Moreover, employees could own a part of the shares in the company. As long as the company’s stock price rises, employees can benefit from it.

C. Bank and financial institution:

When a company provided a confident financial report with them, these financial institutions will not recall funds and would to lend the company more money in the future. In addition, the company is able to borrow funds at a low rate.

D. Government:

The government collects a large amount of fiscal revenue through tax collection, while at the same time providing a convenient trading environment for enterprises. Even the government will give allowance to support company improvement.

E. Community:

Local residents will provide the company with a large number of labour resources, and the company can rely on them for efficient production. Local residences will also prefer to purchase the company’s products or services when the company supports community building through charity activities such as help community develop local traditional culture.

F. Environment:

A number of environmental lobby groups considered as one part of the stakeholders and these lobby groups requested all company to meet environmental standards during production. If the company is outstanding in the field of environmental protection, the environmental protection organization actually has a propaganda role for the company. These stakeholders can affect the company in many ways and become a significant role in corporate governance. Companies have the responsibility to treat these stakeholders equally and consider their interests. Because these companies need stakeholders to support their operations so that profit from it. Thus, stakeholder theory is significant in the practical application of corporate governance.

Stakeholder theory at STARBUCKS

Some companies are reasonable to adopt stakeholder theory in practice and benefit from various stakeholders. Starbuck (Starbucks Corporation was founded in the Seattle USA in 1971 as a coffee company. In 2018, the company operates 28,218 coffee shop and is the world's largest coffee chain) is a great example, which has been frequently mentioned as a successful stakeholder-focused firm. Starbuck has taken a serious measure among various stakeholders and received positive feedback (Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S, 2006).

  1. Coffee framers:  In 2002, Starbucks began a called “the coffee and farmer equity (CAFE´)” practices. It claims that Starbucks has paid premium prices (74 percent higher) to support their coffee farmers to make the profit and benefit their families. Starbucks accepts a kind of responsible coffee purchasing policy, which including coffee planting, sales, etc. to ensure the high quality and sufficient supply of coffee.
  2. Suppliers:  Starbucks requires independent verification of the quality of the raw materials to ensure that the raw materials meet minimum standards. Starbucks prefers to buying products from high scoring suppliers and provide them with better contract terms or higher prices. These engage suppliers to take more stringent measures to enable provide better products.
  3. Customers:  Starbucks has always sought to provide the best service to its customers, such as allowing customers to use their own cups. Through these additional services to enhance customer loyalty. Starbucks also conducts satisfaction surveys on a long-term basis to ensure timely feedback from customers.
  4. Employees: In 2004, Starbucks ranked the thirty-fourth in top 100 companies to work by Fortune Magazine. According to the philosophy of Starbucks, they will treat their employees with dignity and ensure them feel valuable in the company like a “partner”. Starbucks will provide a stock option and health care to all staff. These welfare make staffs have more motivated to work.
  5. Environment: Starbucks make recycled coffee grounds into improved soil agents and give them to consumers free of charge. They also offer a discount to customers who use their own mug. These environmental protections encouraging everyone to protect the environment and give Starbuck many positive comments.
  6. Community: In 2004, Starbucks donated $1.8 million to a social project to improve conditions in coffee growing areas. These areas are often faced with serious pollution problems and lack of social resources. Through these programs, Starbucks can increase its potential presence in the region and will be given priority in opening branches.

Through the active implementation of stakeholder theory, Starbucks has become today's coffee giant. Although most of the interests are only passively reflecting Starbucks' policies rather than actively participating in corporate governance, Starbucks does not provide certain channels to some stakeholders.  Starbucks still has better corporate governance performance than most other companies. This also proves that the stakeholder theory is indispensable in corporate governance.

Why stakeholder significant in modern corporate governance

According to the above example analysis, it can be concluded that stakeholder theory can help companies maintain stability in a turbulent environment, conducive to company’s long-term sustainable development and reduce conflicts between various groups in the decision-making process.

  1. When stakeholders are treated well by an organization or company, they are more likely to return positive attitudes and behaviours. For example, customers will be buying more products due to better services and shareholders will buying more stock because share prices increase. In addition, it is more useful and effective in a complex and turbulent environment (Harrison, Freeman & Cavalcanti Sá de Abreu, 2015). Because stakeholders prefer to provider better information to companies which give priority to stakeholders. These companies could have a more flexible decision to responding uncertainly market and this advantage is not available for other competitions that not manage stakeholders. This is significant for corporate governance in the modern company due to the globalization process and uncertainty increased. Therefore, a company who apply stakeholder theory well could obtain better information in a complex business environment.
  2. The company actively participate in social activities, taking social responsibility can help to enhance their image and reputation. The public will be more inclined to buy products or service from companies with a positive social image (Drown & Dacin, 1997). In addition, Companies with a sense of social responsibility tend to have a high profile, which will leave a deep impression on the public and make it easier to recruit and retain talented people. The benefits to the company are savings in recruitment, training and management costs, and lower operating costs. This shows that positive interaction of company with stakeholders can promote their long-term sustainable development.
  3. Stakeholders participate in a company’s decision-making process could reduce conflicts between different stakeholder groups and improve decision quality to ensure competitive advantage (Spitzeck & Hansen, 2010). The company will consider all stakeholders’ interest during making decisions, which could balance the demands of individual groups to reduce economic losses. For example, when a company only give priority to profitability and neglect environment factor, the company could face a series of punishment from governments. This will not only affect the company’s income but also affect the company’s normal operations. Thus, stakeholders participate in the decision-making process could help the company reduce management costs and risks. These are three key features of stakeholder theory in the corporate governance, which proves that stakeholder theory has unique advantages in maintaining company’s long-term sustainable development.

Should managers consider all the stakeholders?

Although stakeholder theory has several advantages, in practical, it does not always satisfy the best interests of all stakeholders (Phillips, 2011). It is unnecessary for managers to consider all the stakeholders in corporate governance. As mentioned above, Starbucks has paid attention to a large number of stakeholder’s interest, but different stakeholder groups are difficult to have the same purpose. For example, Starbucks provided employees with high benefits and training, which means Starbucks, needs many funds to support it. However, for Starbucks shareholders, the only goal is to pursue higher profits. This interest dispute could lead to the company’s decision making inefficient and objective confusion (Du Plessis, 2007). Thus, when the company’s directors consider both the interests of shareholders and other stakeholders, the corporate objectives are difficult to clarify, which can easily lead the company into trouble. There are some people argue that all stakeholders supposed to be treated equally when stakeholder theory is applied in corporate governance (Phillips, 2011).

They claim companies that treat each stakeholder unequally in corporate governance will difficulty obtaining support from outside. These views cannot be generalized. How to treat and distinguish stakeholders depends on the needs of the company. On the one hand, company managers cannot just advocate equal treatment of all stakeholders and ignore that some groups actually contribute more than others in the organization. For some securities company, financing is certainly significant, and these capital providers deserve more attention in the company’s decision-making process. When these capital providers received adequate return and attention, they are willing to provide more funds to support the development of the company. Thus, a company that gives priority to one or two stakeholders still can obtain external supports. On the other hand, Sternberg (2000) argue that stakeholder theory confounds government and business when a company maintain the equal status of all stakeholders and believe they are equally important to the business.

Find Out How UKEssays.com Can Help You!

Our academic experts are ready and waiting to assist with any writing project you may have. From simple essay plans, through to full dissertations, you can guarantee we have a service perfectly matched to your needs.

View our services

According to Phillips (2011), stakeholders should be separated into direct stakeholders and indirect stakeholders. Direct stakeholders are those that need to be valued by the company in terms of ethics and obligations. These direct stakeholders can directly affect company’s business and be affected by the company. Firm management should primarily serve the interests of these people. Indirect stakeholders is a group or individual who will harm or benefit the company. They do not have a direct impact on the company but may affect other direct stakeholders, thus in some cases, the company need to account for them during decision-making. In the current complex business situation, equity rather than equality should be the main principle of benefit distribution in the stakeholder theory.


Corporate governance using stakeholder theory as a framework of administration, maintaining ethics when companies are constantly pursuing value creation. Stakeholder theory has proven its advantages in helping companies to achieve long-term sustainability. Through a positive interaction with a wide range of stakeholders, companies can gain more information and reduce decision-making mistakes in complex business environments. In addition, stakeholder theory does not require an absolutely average distribution of stakeholders’ interests. Treating stakeholders fairly and reasonably is the core of stakeholder theory and only in this way, it can play a vital role in contemporary corporate governance.

Reference List

  • Donaldson, T. (2002). The Stakeholder Revolution and the Clarkson Principles. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 107-111. doi: 10.5840/beq200212211
  • Du Plessis, J. (2007). Principles of contemporary corporate governance. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
  • Freeman RE. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, Pitman Publishing Inc.
  • Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders : theory and practice. Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
  • Harrison, J., Freeman, R., & Cavalcanti Sá de Abreu, M. (2015). Stakeholder Theory As an Ethical Approach to Effective Management: applying the theory to multiple contexts. Review Of Business Management, 858-869. doi: 10.7819/rbgn.v17i55.2647
  • Harrison, J., Freeman, R., & Cavalcanti Sá de Abreu, M. (2015). Stakeholder Theory As an Ethical Approach to Effective Management: applying the theory to multiple contexts. Review Of Business Management, 858-869. doi: 10.7819/rbgn.v17i55.2647
  • Heiko Spitzeck, Erik G. Hansen, (2010) "Stakeholder governance: how stakeholders influence corporate decision making", Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, Vol. 10 Issue: 4, pp.378-391, https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701011069623
  • Phillips, R. (2011). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. Readhowyouwant.com Ltd.
  • Spitzeck, H., & Hansen, E. (2010). Stakeholder governance: how stakeholders influence corporate decision making.  Corporate Governance: The International Journal Of Business In Society, 10(4), 378-391. doi: 10.1108/14720701011069623
  • Sternberg, N., & Heil, S. (2000). Organization charts.
  • Tom J. Drown & Peter A Dacin( 1997) , The Company and The Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses.Journal of Marketing, Jan 97, Vol. 61 Issue 1, p. 68.
  • Zandstra, G. (2002). Enron, board governance and moral failings. Corporate Governance: The International Journal Of Business In Society, 2(2), 16-19. doi: 10.1108/14720700210430333


Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this assignment and no longer wish to have your work published on UKEssays.com then please: