0115 966 7955 Today's Opening Times 10:00 - 20:00 (BST)

Effect of Supplier Management Procurement on Public Sectors

Disclaimer: This dissertation has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional dissertation writers. You can view samples of our professional work here.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays.

One: Introduction

Best Value (BV) was introduced into the public sector in 1998, announced through the government’s white paper "Modern Local Government in Touch with the People". This paper introduced extensive reform to local government, including the new initiative of BV. Within this BV is the e-Government, Community Planning, Strategic Partnerships and new political management structures (White Paper 1998). BV replaced the system of Compulsory Competitive Tendering (CCT) (Local Government Act 1999). The aim of BV is to influence the efficient expenditure of public money; estimated to total £455.2 billion for 2004, forecasted to grow by 3-5% for the period 2005-9 (www.statistics.gov.uk/). The 2001 review of local government procurement in England (Delivering Better Services for Citizens) was published as a consultation paper. The report included the following recommendation; there should be clear political responsibility for procurement, with elected members taking a strategic role in securing outcomes. Best Value is about breaking down the boundaries between the public and private sectors in local service delivery (The Byatt Report 2001).

Supplier relationship management within the public sector has to an extent been dictated by the central government initiatives evolving the CCT era into the Best Value regime. Best Value has led to distinctively different approaches within the public sector to consultation, competition, performance reviews, and to partnership working. Since the abolition of CCT, evidence is emerging of a new maturity in localgovernment's relationships with the private sector. In some authorities, this is evidenced by the fact that they are now recognisingthe inevitability of the mixed economy of provision,and are prepared to work within it (Bovaird, 2000).

Procurement, and best value procurement, is a complicated subject to examine, largely because getting the best value for a product or service does not necessarily mean choosing the lowest bidder. Indeed, modern procurement strategies need to consider several interrelated factors, of which costs is just one, when determining and implementing the best value procurement process. This implies a significant increase in the number of issues encountered by many public sector agencies, for who best value procurement and competitive tendering concerns have replaced the simpler days of low bid auctions for services. As a result of these changes, best value procurement has now developed into a significant strategic option, which can provide many advantages to the public sector procurement professionals. However, along with the potential benefits, best value procurement also brings significant related risk factors, especially in the public sector where policy and political considerations can lead to significantly different interpretations of best value both across public sector organisations and across individual projects within the same organisation. Indeed, when efficiently written and executed, best value contracts can both save money and increase service levels, however by its very nature best value involves a great deal of evaluation and comparison, which can complicate the process to the point where the potential gains are lost. Equally, distortions caused by interpretations and political factors may enter into play when gauging the many factors in addition to price, often leading to debates around different perceptions of what constitutes value for a given product or service.

Each best value procurement example is subjective and entirely unique, especially in the public sector, and because of this, communication between end users, procurement professionals, policy makers, and suppliers is of utmost importance. In procurement, as in other fields, people with the right knowledge about the product or service being supplied, and the project for which it is required, will be able to make better decisions than those without the necessary information. As such, when choices must be made, project sponsors, buyers, contract administrators, technical authorities, advisors, bidders, and contractors must be kept in the know. This leads to the hypothesis that supplier relationship management in the public sector will, by virtue of increasing the spread of knowledge along the procurement chain, better help the public sector to achieve best value in its procurement activities. This work intends to test this hypothesis through a detailed search of the existing literature on procurement in the public sector, and the various aspects of procurement which underlie the provision of best value for public sector organisations. This will be achieved using the positivist paradigm and phenomenological hermeneutics to identify, contextualise and analyse the various research on best value, and also to determine how supplier relationship management will impact on this for public sector organisations.


Two: Methodology

Due to the wide scope of the subject matter of this dissertation, and the specialised nature of procurement within the public sector, the work will be solely based on existing secondary research. As there is no primary research to interpret, the research process will be different from conventional dissertations. As such, the interpretation of the existing research will form the cornerstone of the analysis and also drive any conclusions. This means that the dissertation will not only need to analyse the content of these articles, but also the motive of the authors for writing them, the context and any inherent bias. A research method is needed that will identify any contextual factors or bias and exclude them from the overall results. The chosen method is phenomenological hermeneutics, because this methodology states that literature can only be fully interpreted through an analysis of its contextual basis. The method further argues that, instead of being based on historical or cultural contexts, each text reflects the mental frame of the writer or writers. As such, phenomenological hermeneutics will be used as the research methodology and philosophy because it allows one to take a text and "methodically isolate it from all extraneous things including the subject's biases and allow it to communicate its meaning to the subject" (Demeterio, 2001).

In order to effectively achieve this goal, the research method shall focus on eliminating any sources of inherent bias in order to draw out its key messages and fit them into a coherent discussion and analysis; however, as Lye (1996) states, "In order to 'understand' one must 'fore understand', have a stance, an anticipation and a contextualization. This is what is known as the "hermeneutic circle": one can only know what one is prepared to know, in the terms that one is prepared to know." As such, this work will need to examine the various articles of literature in the context of each other; to enable the construction of a hermeneutic circle and to truly understand the points each author is trying to make. As such, the interaction of the text with the contextual frame of reference given by the literature as a whole will lead to an interpretive paradigm being formed (Lye, 1996), through which it will be possible to draw out the common themes and the salient points from the literature.

To appropriately construct this paradigm, it is necessary to understand that each article will be an embodiment of the ideas, beliefs, knowledge and experiences of the author, and that the interpretation of the text will also be an embodiment of the ideas, beliefs, knowledge and experience of the reader; as such, it will be necessary for the author of this work to be aware of the impact that this will have on the interpretation of the articles. This work will embody the 'style' of the author (Lye, 1996), and will likely reveal some significant aspects of the author's views on politics and asset allocation, both conscious and unconscious. This will potentially add a further contextual bias to the interpretation, and one which may be significantly harder to identify, isolate and remove.

This potential contextual bias will also make it difficult to effectively apply the logical positivist paradigm, which is strongly based on taking an objective view of reality, rather than a subjective view. The view of positivism that knowledge can only be obtained by the use of data that can be verified by an independent observer (Schrag, 1992) implies that someone attempting to use the positivist paradigm for research purposes must be as objective and unbiased as possible. Indeed, as all phenomena are subject to natural laws that coexist with each other in a logical manner, humans can only discover these laws through the use of inductive and deductive hypotheses and empirical testing of social and scientific theories. As such, the positivist paradigm will have to be carefully applied to all research and interpretation in this work, taking into account the phenomenological hermeneutic interpretation to provide a well rounded argument and conclusion.

Regarding the research and data collection methods used, an inductive approach has been taken, which is appropriate as it involves interpretation of the research and data during the gathering, as well as the analysis phase. This has been extended through the use of a standard horizontal and vertical analysis of the existing literature and the initial sources found. The horizontal aspect of the research has involved using the terminology, key words and arguments underlying historical public sector procurement processes and strategies to uncover other related works which discuss the same concepts but with different arguments and in different contexts. The vertical aspect has involved examining the sources cited in the initial sources used to move back up the chain of argument and see how different arguments and theories have been formed and influenced over time. Online searches have also been used to facilitate looking for sources which cite the identified articles and examining how these sources have further developed the article.

The research and data gathered for this dissertation is composed entirely of secondary research. Initially, the author considered gathering and analysis primary data, however this was deemed to be unfeasible for two reasons. The first reason is that the majority of people working within public sector procurement are busy professionals, working full time to ensure that their procurement goals are met. As such, they would be unlikely to have the time available to assist in the research process, and their responses would be limited by the commercial and confidentiality considerations that underlie most procurement projects. Secondly, as was discussed above, this topic is highly specialised, with practitioners, advisors and academics having significant levels of knowledge and experience. As a result, it is more appropriate, and probably more accurate, to use the results of experienced academics and practitioners, who have carried out significant amounts of in depth, and often independent, research on this subject, as a contextual basis of the positivist paradigm being used; however, research gaps should be discussed when identified.

Another important consideration when collecting the data was the time horizon because, as stated above, the UK public sector procurement industry is now in a fundamentally different state than at any time in its prior history following the longest consecutive period under Labour rule. As such, examining research data and literature from too far in the past will likely be of limited use when discussing public sector procurement in the modern economic and political environment. Therefore it has been decided that data will only be used from the period 1997 to 2007, which is the period for which the Labour government has been in power, and within which most of the major reforms underlying the current processes, strategies, and improvements have been drawn up and implemented.

This research methodology has produced analyses of about fifty major articles on which the work will be based; together with some other articles defining the research methodology itself, and some sources providing general public sector procurement context and supplementary information. The major articles have been analysed and reviewed in the Structured Literature Review, under each of the main themes identified. This is the most logical method of analysis for this work, as the majority of the articles and surveys carried out around best value in the UK public sectors have been focused on specific areas such as the Public Private Partnership initiatives and the work of the Audit Commission. As such, a longitudinal method of analysis is also useful for the phenomenological hermeneutic approach taken by this work, as it will enable progressive clarity of understanding of the contextual factors underling the literature reviewed.

Considering the chosen methodology for this work, this dissertation will have a Structured Literature Review instead of a conventional literature review. This is because the research used is solely secondary; therefore there is no need to conduct a standard literature review, which is usually done to contextualise and direct any primary research and to help explain its results. As this work is not based on primary research, there is no need for a standard literature review, and hence the structured literature review is more appropriate, because it can serve as the findings, results and analysis for the work, which shall be interpreted within the ‘findings’. Because the research philosophy and methodology is phenomenological hermeneutics, an interpretive, positivist method of analysis is required, which is facilitated by a structured approach to the analysis. Finally, as the literature review is being conducted along various themes, it is vital that it is correctly structured to ensure that it is analytical rather than just descriptive, and that it maintains some criticality. As such, the structured literature review will involve a thematic/structured review of all the salient articles in the work, analysing the arguments and themes within each article and linking the various articles and themes to each other.

The last part of the literature review will be an interpretation of all the articles discussed in the review, identifying common themes, disagreements and any potential implications or conflicts. This analysis will need to consider the various biases, backgrounds and any knowledge of the authors. Many of the major disagreements may not be based on the subject of best value itself, but rather the authors views on the ultimate aims of ‘procurement’ and the importance of the process and methodology underling it. This scrutiny will enable analysis of the validity and reliability of the articles by means of triangulation with the other articles reviewed and analysed. This will further assist in the phenomenological hermeneutic approach taken by this work, and it will facilitate the identification of any bias or conflicts that were not obvious in the initial review of the literature.

The methodology will also attempt to identify existing gaps within the literature, and highlight areas where further research could be beneficial to the work. Because most of the literature is written from academic perspectives, there are likely to be gaps around the various objectives and contextual factors of the various public sector organisations; and the various procurement frameworks the have in place; and potentially a lack of in depth research around issues such as political pressure and policy directives. As such, this work will attempt to identify where the existing literature has failed to focus on areas such as these, and how these omissions can be addressed by future studies and research.


Three: Literature

Best Value Procurement in the UK Public Sector

There is a large volume of research focusing on procurement strategies and measures of value for private sector organisations, and recently literature (Male et al, 2007; Lian and Laing, 2004) has begun to focus on the different procurement practices needed by the public sector. Indeed, Lian and Laing (2004) focused on the transactional and relationship based nature of procurement strategies to determine to what extent procurement is different between the public and the private sector. They focused on health services, as public health services are often seen as one of the most complex services provided by the public sector (Male et al, 2007), and their research demonstrated how the differing environmental factors, such as politics and resource allocation in the public sector, impacted on procurement, whilst many service specific factors, such as the need for medicines and temporary staff, were constant across the public and private spheres Indeed, their research demonstrated that politics and policy drivers have a major impact on the procurement strategies used by public sector organisations, and that these strategies, and the methods used to engage suppliers, were significantly different from that of private sector organisations.

This research ties in with that of Dixon et al (2005) which showed that, whilst the private sector tended to build relationships with suppliers, and leverage these to obtain better value, public sector organisations often based their procurement strategies on the costs of individual transactions. As such, the literature concludes that the private sector’s relationship based procurement strategies offer better value than those of the public sector. However, Lian and Laing (2004) also commented that public policy decisions often restrict public sector organisations from building relationships with their suppliers, and thus the very nature of public sector organisations often hinders or prevents them from achieving best value from their procurement activities. Palaneeswaran et al (2003) criticise this political dimension, claiming that "procuring best value should be one of the key objectives (for the) public sector". Their argument is that best value depends upon the use of sound selection strategies, intended to ensure that all the procurement objectives are met, which includes the client and end user demands. As such, best value initiatives should all be geared towards the final state of business, rather than to serve public policy decisions. They conclude that, whilst the overall goal of any public sector organisation should be determined by public policy, best value procurement efforts should all be directed towards that goal and be free from political interference. Unfortunately, as Lian and Ling commented, whilst this may be desirable it is not always possible.

Current successes and failures of procurement strategies within central and local government

Walker (2006) notes that UK public sector organisations often make their main procurement decisions, for assets and services, at the local level, reflected in the fact that the NHS trusts and local government authorities all have their own procurement departments. Whilst this policy allows individual bodies to select the procurement strategy that best suits their needs, the lack of coordination of the procurement process can lead to inefficient supply markets, with either too few or too many suppliers, which reduces the efficiency of individual suppliers and thus increased the cost to the purchasers. These local procurement decisions are also often superseded or influence by central government guidelines and policies, for example Builders Merchants Journal (2006) detailed a new central government policy on public sector timber procurement. This policy specified that, whilst organisations are still responsible for their own procurement decisions, they must ensure that any timber they procure comes from a legal source, which increases the administrative burden for the local organisations. Furthermore, the government has also specified that organisations should supply sustainable timber wherever possible, however this is not compulsory. Such vague policy guidelines also make it difficult for organisations trying to balance budgets against policy.

Equally, such fragmented policies make it hard for public sector organisations to plan long term procurement strategies to respond to market uncertainty. For example, Loveday (2005) reported that the UK public sector was forced to cut back service provision as a result of significant energy price rises which they had not planned for. Whilst this failing is shared with the private sector, which Loveday (2005) stated as having lost over £1 billion due to a lack of energy procurement strategies and poor energy risk management, the fragmented nature of local procurement means that the public sector is often as much as risk from utility price rises as small businesses, some of which have been almost bankrupted due to rising energy bills in recent years (Loveday, 2005).

Perhaps in response to these drawbacks, the literature highlights one of the main strategies used in recent years by the public sector to improve its procurement strategies: the rise of Public Private Partnerships (PPP) and the Private Finance Initiative (PFI), which form long term partnerships with private sector organisations to share the provision of public services. Smyth and Edkins (2007) examined the management of these projects, the relationships between the primary public and private sector partners and the use of the Special Purpose Vehicles (SPUs) to facilitate the partnerships. They found that the management of these relationships had two main dynamics: the contract, transactional, approach of the public sector, and the relationship management approach of the private sector. The combination of these two approaches, and how they influenced the project management discipline within the partnership, showed that they led to greater strategic and tactical consideration being given to functions such as procurement, leading to greater value generation. This consideration led to greater collaboration, both between and within the organisations, as they adjusted to new procurement conditions, demonstrating improved proactive and strategic relationship management versus individual public sector organisations (Smyth and Edkins, 2007).

Dixon et al (2005) also examined the several case studies of the success of the Private Finance Initiative schemes, focusing on projects related to the construction of infrastructure and other facilities. These studies highlighted several examples of best practice and best value procurement, together with the key critical factors for success in PFI projects, whilst also pointing out some drawbacks and lessons for future projects. Indeed, the literature demonstrated that the key value benefits of the PFI are that the public sector obtains increased value for money, whilst also transferring risk to the private sector partner. However, this transfer is offset by higher procurement and transaction costs, relative to the private sector’s standard costs; partly due to the cultural differences between the public and private sector, and partly due to large-scale nature of PFI projects, which frequently acts as a barrier to entry for some financing partners and suppliers. This highlights the need to develop competitive public sector supplier markets, and also to develop the appropriate procurement and project management skills within the public sector to ensure that they can work with private sector partners to ensure best value (Dixon et al, 2005).

These show two contrasting views of the PFI/PPP, with Smyth and Edkins (2007) seeing the initiatives as an excellent way to bring private sector efficiency to public sector procurement, but with Dixon et al (2005) claiming that the wide differences in skill sets mean that a lot of the benefits from the private sector methodologies are lost. In response to contrasting views such as these, Li et al (2005) conducted research into the various perceptions of what makes the PFI attractive or unattractive to potential partners as a procurement system for projects. The research was based on a questionnaire / survey of stakeholders in the various projects, with the various potential issues and factors for the survey identified from the existing literature. This research showed that PPP and PFI procurement efficiency can have wide ranging benefits and drawbacks across different areas of a project. In particular, Li et al (2005) found the public / private sector partnerships were perceived as giving better access to the technology required for projects, and thus leading to better project economy. This in turn drove greater public benefit, helped the public sector avoid transactional costs, and also helped manage or avoid some regulatory and financial constraints, such as the public sector timber procurement policy (Builders Merchants Journal, 2006). However, they also found that participants inexperienced is public / private sector co-operation, the high costs of setting up and participating in the initiatives, the length of time they took, and the tendency to over-commercialise some projects could lead to PPP / PFI procurement being less attractive for both parties.

These various factors will impact differently on different projects, thus showing why there are such wide disparities between articles in the literature on the relative merits of PPP and PFI. For example, Weston and Cassidy (2006) claim that the procurement of public facilities and services under the PPP and PFI arrangements provides a wide variety of significant benefits to the public sector, and to the private sector partners. In contrast, Chapman (2006) highlights claims that private sector participation harms services and efficiency, whilst purely focusing on guaranteeing the private sector partners their profits. As a result, the literature concludes that the difference between the success and failure of PFI and PPP schemes depends on a "clear and common understanding of the positive and negative factors surrounding PPP / PFI procurement" (Li et al, 2005).

Another development in procurement is that direct competition between providers, via invitations to tender, is now widely used as the means of choosing suppliers or outsourcers for many public services in the UK. Smyth (1997) describes how competitive tendering can ensure local accessibility and accountability for users, innovation, from providers and help purchasers to reduce procurement and transaction costs. However, in common with many other writers, Smyth (1997) discusses co-operation and collaboration and the interference of policy decisions and the political process, which has led to the emergence of monopolies and inefficient integrated delivery systems, often to the detriment of value in the procurement process (Smyth, 1997).

Another effort made by the public sector, specifically the UK NHS, to improve purchasing efficiency is in the use of the NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency, PaSA, to negotiate National Framework Agreements through which individual NHS trusts can procure goods and services at bulk negotiated rates. However, as each NHS trust is a separate legal and managerial entity, responsible only to the Department of Health, a significant number of NHS trusts have resisted the move towards this centralised procurement approach in favour of their own relationships with suppliers. As a result, Cox et al (2005) discussed how PaSA, and the NHS senior management as a whole, have created regional procurement hubs and confederations in order to overcome this inability to enforce the Agreements within individual NHS Trusts. Whilst this was a sensible approach to resolving the lack of effective consolidation of demand at the individual Trust level, the individual procurement practices of regionally based NHS Trusts is still strongly driven by their own supply and demand considerations, and this has created a number of internal demand problems that the regionalised procurement approach has failed to overcome. These include "the failure by the Trusts individually, and by the NHS centrally, to control and manage the NHS design and specification process effectively and, in many cases, an inability to measure or collect information on the clinical and cost effectiveness of medical interventions" (Cox et al, 2005). As such, whilst these new reforms can be seen as a significant improvement on past collaborative procurement efforts, it is likely that they are still destined to fail, due to the fundamental nature of procurement in the NHS, and the lack of understanding around effectively aligning supply and demand at all levels of the NHS.

One final area, in which the public sector is often accused of being inefficient by the Audit Commission, and failing to secure best value procurement, is in the employing of management consultants for project management and other support roles. Corcoran and McLean (1998) investigated the purchase of management consultants in the public sector context, specifically the appointment of consultants to work with government departments, focusing specifically on the particular selection decisions. They found that, in accordance with government policy, many public sector decision makers focus mainly on securing best value for money when procuring consultants, however the criteria and information sources used to make the procurement decisions were often inconsistent. Similar to Cox et al (2005), Corcoran and McLean (1998) found that whilst the government’s public sector procurement principle was well known and relatively well understood, public sector decision makers seemed to be unable to connect this principle to the procurement process, often claiming that they did not have access to sufficient information to make an informed choice. Paradoxically, the majority of government departments tend to hire management consultants in an attempt to understand the procurement process that has hired the management consultants in the first place. One significant outcome of this is that the decision makers in many government organisations stated that they didn’t believe the selection process and decision around hiring management consultants was difficult, and would be straightforward if sufficient information was made available (Corcoran and McLean, 1998).

Future developments in procurement and threats to movement

The public sector is increasing beginning to rely on private sector organisations to form supplier consortia for major projects, especially those where the scale is such that individual suppliers are unable to cope with the demand. As the number of projects, especially the major PPP / PFI projects, increases; the demand for these consortia is likely to rise, and Jost (2005) believes that this may become the dominant model for public sector procurement in future. However, in order for this to occur, greater attention must be paid to building successful relationships, both between the consortium and the public sector organisation, and between the members of the consortium itself. Jost (2005) conducted a qualitative study of the existing consortia, and claimed that building trust, engaging staff and reconciling the differing objectives of the partners will be the main factors critical to this development, and a lack of trust among the private sector partners will be the biggest threat to progress.

Indeed, Swan and Khalfan (2007) claim that partnering will continue to grow significantly throughout the UK public sector. They focus on the UK public sector construction industry, and identified that, in future, factors such relationship management with external stakeholders, the general public in the case of public sector projects, will be important to the growth in partnership based projects. Indeed, whilst issues such as cost, quality, timeliness and safety will remain crucial to successful delivery, objectives such as sustainable and environmental development will grow in importance, and failure to acknowledge and address these issues will again pose threats to movement. Swan and Khalfan’s research showed that the industry is already moving forward, with a survey of project teams working on public sector construction revealing that construction projects are now considering teamwork, morale and sustainable development as important aspects in successful projects.

Another future development is likely to be the growth in the PFI and PPP schemes, which have been described as "the largest cultural change for decades in the way the public sector operates in the United Kingdom" (Braun, 2003). Whilst most of these projects typically have to be delivered within the framework of public procurement law, the involvement of private sector partners enables the projects to circumvent some of the inconveniences of said law, resulting in a so called "PFI procurement practice" (Braun, 2003). The divergence between the commercial requirement of the private sector partners and the requirements of the legal and regulatory environment are a cause for concern, as they may result in future UK or EU laws tightening these loopholes and removing some of the advantages. This would represent a threat to future movement, as the removal of some of the incentives for the private sector providers could result in a decrease in the number of providers willing to engage in such initiatives, and a decrease in the effort they apportion to them.

Indeed, as Broadbent and Laughlin (2005) state, PFI is a key product of the UK government’s aims to modernise the public sector for the future, and also has a key role to play in driving this agenda forward. Indeed, the government’s New Public Financial Management scheme includes legislation and policies aimed at bringing the public sector more into line with the private sector, using market efficiency to ensure supply chain effectiveness, whilst ensuring that the public services are not adversely affected by market forces. In common with much of the literature, Broadbent and Laughlin (2005) use healthcare as their model, examining the recent changes in NHS procurement and accounting policies around their investment in infrastructure. They contend that, driven by the New Public Financial Management (NPFM) scheme and the modernisation policies, the future developments of the PFI could mean that, in future, the public sector may not need to directly provide any finance or funding for the infrastructure of the public services. However, this may meet with significant opposition from the public who may see this as an attempt to privatise the NHS and other vital public services.

Showing the strength of this feeling, Ahadzi and Bowles (2004) report that, despite the increasing popularity of the PFI and PPP schemes as procurement tools, there are still many reports of problems in the initial stages of the process involving time and cost overruns due to the detailed nature of the contracts and negotiations. They claim that a significant proportion of the research and media attention in the UK has focused on the nature and extent of these delays and cost overruns, and that this has led to public opinion turning against the PFI in some cases, which has resulted in a loss of public trust. Ahadzi and Bowles (2004) report that these delays are due to a need to choose between the strengths of the various consortia; the high quality technical proposals they produce for the bid; and the quality of their financial proposals. As a result, the recommend that both sides enter the negotiations with a better understanding of what is important to each party and each party’s specific requirements, in order to speed up the negotiations improve the process as a whole.

Another potential future development for the public sector is to improve its role as a procurer of necessary technologies as, despite being a major user of many new technologies and innovations, areas of the public sector such as healthcare and the emergency services are often lacking in the skills needed to effectively procure these technologies. Phillips et al (2007) examine this deficiency by looking at the example of the introduction of the new digital signal process hearing aids into the NHS, and the role of the public sector procurement agencies in this introduction. This and other new technologies were introduced from the private sector and their adoption by the public sector relies heavily on the decisions of procurement agencies and policy makers. As such, Phillips et al (2007) highlight the need for policy makers to adopt a more dynamic perspective in future, to recognise the need for new technologies and the interactions of the key parties in their conception and design, to ensure that new technologies are quickly and easily integrated into the public sector.

One future development that has been viewed with great controversy by some analysts is the proposed introduction of ‘e-government’ systems, including e-procurement, customer relationship management systems and redesigned service delivery methods. Rogers (2003) reported that the cost of procuring and implementing the technologies required for the e-government system could outweigh any savings to the public sector by a factor of ten, with the spending between 2001 and 2006 resulting in savings of just 11% per annum of the total expenditure. This is another example of the strategic drift caused by public policy, with the government having made a commitment to e-government that was not based purely on best value considerations (Rogers, 2003).

Indeed, Gragan (2005) argues that procurement in the public sector, and in particular government procurement, should be fundamentally transformed from its current, inefficient, policy driven process to one which can truly "complement a government entity's vision and sense of public duty" (Gragan, 2005). Indeed, in a somewhat damning view of current public sector procurement strategies, he argues that current procurement and acquisition processes can be argued to represent a significant barrier to the success of many public sector projects, and thus fails to support the organisation's goals. This is cited as being the reason significant amounts of procurement activity currently occur outside of the formalised procurement process, and thus represents a significant barrier to the implementation of future strategies and programmes. As a result, there is a growing move towards procurement reform, and fundamental procurement transformation throughout the public sector, with the intention of shifting the main emphasis from the procurement process to the desired outcome, and thereby spreading the concept of best value instead of simply lowest price. However, the theories underlying this argument are strongly dependent on the assumptions that public sector organisations can be managed so that all parties are committed towards the same procurement outcome, and also that there will be little outside interference and direction in the procurement process; something which several organisations have singularly failed to achieve.

The current Labour government appears to have made a significant commitment to using PPP and the PFI to help fund major public sector initiatives in the future. However, within this commitment, there are likely to be significant issues due to the multidimensional impacts of infrastructure privatisation, which may present barriers to future developments. Indeed, Zhang (2005) conducted a questionnaire which revealed a wide range of barriers to the future use of PPPs in infrastructure development. These included significant levels of social, political, and legal risk; future unfavourable economic and commercial conditions; the continuing inefficient public procurement framework and a lack of mature financial engineering techniques. There are also specific problems related to the public and private sectors which need to be addressed before the PPP can be used further in infrastructure procurement and development. However, whilst Zhang's (2005) research revealed that there were several potential measure which could be taken to remove these barriers, the measures and techniques identified to help ensure best value in PPP procurements were quite generalised, with limited information around how they would actually benefit procurement.

Regardless of the nature of individual future developments, the literature is largely united in the view that, in order to adapt to the demands of the global economy, the public sector will need to develop a more strategic approach to procurement; emphasizing co-ordination across departments and establishing long-term relationships and partnerships with private sector suppliers (Bryson and Crosby 1992). Unfortunately, as discussed above, this is likely to continue to be a challenging task, due to the constraints provided by the operating framework and culture of the public sector. Indeed, Erridge and Greer (2002) claimed that, in order to make significant process in best value procurement, the public sector must focus on improving the interactions both between government departments and the private sector, and amongst the departments themselves. Only by identifying and removing the obstacles to this collaboration will the public sector be able to truly develop best value procurement strategies for the future.


How effective or applicable is the measurement of Best Value by Audit Commission

As mentioned previously, since it came to power in 1997, the Labour Government has pursued an agenda of modernization in order to improve the UK’s public services. Wilson (2005) reports that for local government departments, this agenda has led to the introduction of several measures designed to improve service delivery and efficiency, whilst also facilitating political management. One of the key policies intended to support this agenda was the introduction of the Best Value method, which was established under the Local Government Act 1999 (IRS Employment Review, Jan 2002). This method established the duty of local authorities to deliver services by the most economic, efficient and effective means available, and also publish annual performance plans and review all their services every five years. It also established the responsibility of the Audit Commission to inspect departments’ performance plans and reviews, and to examine their other activities in accordance with Best Value.

Indeed, given that the Audit Commission has no official role in procurement negotiations, it's only real role is that of a monitoring and control body for the performance of local government services. This role gives the Commission a clear potential to have a major impact on procurement activities, in the context of the government's procurement modernization agenda, both by indirectly influencing the content of collective procurement agreements, and also by mediating in the process of collective negotiations in order to ensure that the Best Value objectives, particularly in relation to external competition, are adhered to (Roper et al, 2007). However, whilst Roper et al's (2007) research into the Audit Commissions inspection reports on human resource services showed that the Audit Commission is pro actively promoting activities which support effective procurement and negotiating amongst public sector organisations, notably in relation to equality type issues, they also demonstrate support for concepts such as service externalisation, which actually limits the scope of their impact.

Within the Best Value doctrine, the Audit Commission uses Comprehensive Performance Assessments (CPA) to measure local authority performance in England, classifying each authority as excellent, good, fair, weak or poor (Wilson, 2005). These classifications impact on the responsibility and freedom given to the local authority to select its priorities and policies and manage its budgets As such, they can be seen to be extremely applicable to local authorities, as they force them to consider their procurement value and effectiveness, or risk losing their authority.

Indeed, the Best Value measure is particularly applicable to the PFI and PPP schemes, which account for billions of pounds’ worth of private sector investment in public sector procurement. As a result, achievement of value for money is a very important factor to consider, and the need for an empirical measure of said value is necessary to ensure that projects can be compared and audited. Ball et al (2007) conducted a study into the value for money and economic efficiency of PFI projects, based on some case studies and review of official reports on the scheme. They conducted detailed analysis several key issues affecting PFI in public schools, including costs, the transfer or risk, building quality and finance costs. This analysis supported the views of the Audit Committee the PFI does not provide Best Value for procurement in all cases, and that a wider range of procurement options should be considered for future projects (Ball and King, 2006).

However, one important aspect of Best Value that is considered by both the PFI process and the Audit Commission is the consideration of the full life cost of procuring and using an asset. Ratcliffe (2004) states that an important advantage of the PFI process is that it ensures that the full life cost of an asset it always considered when making procurement decisions relating to said asset. As such, the PFI process means that Best Value, in terms of the full life costs of any asset, is always brought to the forefront of any design and decision processes made in public sector procurement. Also, PFI spreads the risk across both parties to the initiative, and thus ensures that both parties identify and consider the true life cost of any asset, thus removing any risk of conflict of interest. Indeed, Ratcliffe (2004) further states that, whilst the goals and objectives of the public and private sector participants in a PFI scheme may well be opposite: service provision versus profit making, the PFI process ensures that both sides consider the same value indicators when making decisions, and thus a clear understanding of the relationship between cost and performance (Akintoye et al, 2003).

Also, whilst it has been argued that the measure of Best Value by the Audit Commission is not the most relevant for establishing Best Value in public sector procurement (Bradley, 2006); the availability of such a measurement ensures that value is put at the forefront of local authorities’ minds. Bradley (2006) shows an example of this, which occurred after the Society of Procurement Officers in Local Government released a statement in response to an Audit Commission report revealing that most local authorities fail to secure Best Value in procurement. The statement claimed that "the leadership required to establish good procurement practice at local councils is lacking (and) furthermore…many council leaders needed a wake-up call for failing to realize what purchasers could do to secure greater savings" (Bradley, 2006). However, some other bodies continue to produce their own league tables to rank local authorities according to their ability to devise and implement procurement strategies which deliver best value. Indeed, Hailstone (2002) reported that the National Federation of Builders proposed the publication of league tables for councils, claiming that the Audit Commission’s measures of competitive procurement were not effective enough to drive change.


Correlation of Best Value procurement with strategic management evolution

The ambiguities of the BV literature are likely contributing factors to the inability of the Audit Commission to measure performance (Hughes. M, 2006). Therefore with the lack of any valued and appropriate quantitative models which define and measure BV, it is likely that qualitative data shall be used to evaluate the congruence of BV and Strategic Procurement, attributable to the availability of pertinent qualitative base data (Gilbert, 2002); such as the Byatt report (2001).

Alexander (1997) notes that, traditionally, management was mainly concerned with deploying resources within an organisation, in order to maximise their utilisation and efficiency, however this situation is rapidly changing, with strategic management practices calling for managers to concern themselves more with how the resources are brought into the organisation. As such, areas such as supply-chain optimization and strategic partnerships and alliances have been pushed to the forefront of corporate and managerial activity and concern, and can be seen as a natural evolution of strategic management, making best value procurement a key part of securing sustained competitive advantage. Indeed, whilst managers have traditionally viewed ownership as the preferred procurement option, given that bringing a resource within an organisation gives ownership and control rights, they are now beginning to accept that part control or leasing of some assets can give strategic cost and flexibility benefits (Alexander, 1997).

The International Journal of Operations & Production Management (2006) carried out an assessment of recent developments in strategic supply management, aiming to identify threats, opportunities and current trends affecting the practice Whilst this study was based on three year study of private sector supply chains, the fact it examines all companies along the entire length and breadth of the chains makes it useful for considering strategic alliances and public sector procurement strategies. However, the results revealed that strategic supply management and procurement is still an emerging concept, and most companies find it very difficult to extend their reach within a supply chain in order to leverage significant value benefits. This helps explain why public and many private sector companies are having difficulty obtaining best value in their procurement, as there journal identified several key barriers preventing strategic management from developing best value procurement strategic and outcomes. Chief among these barriers are the substantial gaps that currently exist in strategic management theory, and the difficulties in linking theory to practice, making it difficult to combine supply strategy and supply chain management. One of the central gaps is the question of who should be responsible for planning and managing the supply chain, and how they can ensure effective procurement.

One area in which strategic management has begun to show good correlation with best value procurement is in buyer focused operations, which are designed to give a high level of strategic alignment along the supply chain; by specifying individual resources for individual buyers, in order to serve this each buyer as efficiently as possible. Van der Vaart and Pieter van Donk (2006) conducted a study aiming to identify the business characteristics that are designed to enable suppliers to develop buyer focused operations as part of their strategic supply chain management, and use this strategy to develop relationships with their key buyers. Their case study based research showed that there are a variety of different influences on suppliers, and a variety of reasons which may make them choose buyer focused operations as part of a best value procurement strategy. Several suppliers decided to implement buyer focused operations in order to obtain maximum flexibility when serving their buyers and fulfilling their diverse requirements and specifications. However, some suppliers merely used buyer focused operations to add additional value to their most valued customers, whilst continuing with their standard procurement strategies in most cases (Van der Vaart and Pieter van Donk, 2006).

Indeed, Van der Vaart and Pieter van Donk (2006) found that many suppliers would not consider buyer focused operations when supplying mainstream production technology and assets to the majority of their buyers, as these buyers value cost and speed over flexibility and individual specifications. As such, it can be argued that buyer focused operations are merely one aspect of strategic procurement management, and that true strategic management will need managers to consider various different flexible procurement strategies in order to obtain best value procurement in all cases. Van der Vaart and Pieter van Donk (2006) also point out that mutual trust and the transfer of risk are important considerations when entering into and managing any strategic procurement relationship, and that the need for close cooperation in supply chain partnerships will largely depend on the business characteristics of the buyer, the supplier and the market as a whole.

Value management and value engineering are two other emerging theories within strategic management, aimed to enhance value in projects and operation by use of strategic models and methods. Male et al (2007) examines how value management extends value chains beyond the boundaries of the organisation, looking to draw and engineer value from all areas of the extended value chain, including buyers and suppliers. Male et al detail (2007) the results or a significant number of value management studies, in both the public and private sectors and under all forms of procurement, including the PFI and PPP. They also highlight how value management is being used to develop a national asset procurement strategy for the Environment Agency, in order to meet best value considerations, and how value management can be used to ensure that strategic management practices correlate with the achievement of best value in all business activities

Nollet et al (2005) take a more general look, by using fundamental strategic management theories to address the generic context and content of most supply chains and procurement strategies and how said strategies are formulated and implemented. Within this work, Nollet et al demonstrate how supply strategy correlates with strategic management and how companies can ensure that their strategic management practices are aligned towards their procurement strategies. This correlation is used to produce a conceptual framework for the formulation of a supply strategy depending on the company’s objectives, resources and competencies, and is intended to help supply chain managers address critical strategic issues in order to create value for customers, whilst minimising costs and optimising their resource allocation (Nollet et al, 2005). Indeed, Quayle and Quayle (2000) argue that the impact of strategic procurement is largely dependent on how large a contribution the procurement function makes to the overall corporate strategy and the company’s financial and operational performance. Indeed, Quayle and Quayle (2000) tested their hypothesis by examining the impact of strategic procurement on the UK public sector, specifically the further and higher education sectors, providing empirical evidence that the progress made in strategic procurement in these sectors has led to significant overall performance and value improvements (Quayle and Quayle, 2000).

Finally, Benslimane et al (2005) examined how e-procurement strategies can be incorporated into strategic supply chain management in order to reduce corporate buyers’ transaction and search costs, whilst also affecting the "efficient boundaries" (Benslimane et al, 2005) of buying organizations. Their analysis is based on transaction costs economics, and demonstrates that the use of the Internet for sourcing and procurement does result in a significant decrease in search and transaction costs, allowing buying organisations to secure best value by diversifying or focusing their supplier base to suit their requirements. However, the research show that there was no clear correlation between the use of the internet and the costs of coordinating and integrating activity with suppliers, unless a specific portal or system was developed for the integration. However, the study did show that the use of such a portal would enable sourcing companies to reduce their coordination costs, and so allow them to outsource certain activities, or exercise greater flexibility over their procurement activities should they desire (Benslimane et al, 2005). This demonstrates that, whilst the use of the internet for procurement is more of a tactical decision, using specific systems to link with suppliers is a strategic decision, and thus gives greater value advantages to procuring companies.

Supplier relationships and the supply chain

Link the evolution of tiered supply chain management with the multi faceted strategic management approaches of BV (having already linked SM to BV)

Evolving supplier relationship models in the public sector

Revisit Bovaird and more up to date references – linking strategic management and BV evolution with partnering and cooperative supplier relationship models.

Adversarial and partnering relationships

Compare and contrast relationship models – consider this from a literature perspective

The impact of Byatt, Gershon, Egan et al

Linking the cooperative supplier management modelling with the evolution of public sector procurement evolutions

Interpretation of literature – common themes and analyses of authors

Review authors stances on related issues and any obvious political, strategic bias.

Attempt to justify/validate methodology

Four: Findings

The effectiveness of supplier relationship models within the public sector

Review (of literature relating to) successes and failures of alternative models pre and post BV

How supplier relationship management impacts on BV within the public sector

Consider the successes of applied supply chain management and the associated supplier management models in the private sector, with the lack of abilities and capacities to do likewise in the public sector et al



  • Ahadzi, M. and Bowles, G. (2004) Public-private partnerships and contract negotiations: an empirical study. Construction Management & Economics; Vol. 22, Issue 9, p. 967-978.
  • Akintoye, A. Hardcastle, C. Beck, M. Chinyio, E. and Asenova, D. (2003) Achieving best value in private finance initiative project procurement. Construction Management & Economics; Vol. 21, Issue 5, p. 461-470.
  • Alexander, M. (1997) Managing the Boundaries of the Organization. Long Range Planning; Vol. 30, Issue 5, p. 787-789.
  • Ball, R. Heafey, M. and King, D. (2007) The Private Finance Initiative in the UK. Public Management Review; Vol. 9, Issue 2, p. 289-310.
  • Ball, R. and King, D. (2006) The Private Finance Initiative in Local Government. Economic Affairs; Vol. 26, Issue 1, p. 36-40.
  • Benslimane, Y. Plaisent, M. and Bernard, P. (2005) Investigating Search Costs and Coordination Costs in Electronic Markets: A Transaction Costs Economics Perspective. Electronic Markets; Vol. 15, Issue 3, p. 213-224.
  • Bovaird, Tony (2000) The Role of Competition and Competitiveness in Best Value in England and Wales
  • Bradley, A (2006) Local council leaders need purchasing ‘wake-up call’. Supply Management; Vol. 11, Issue 1, p. 9.
  • Braun, P. (2003) Strict Compliance versus Commercial Reality: The Practical Application of EC Public Procurement Law to the UK's Private Finance Initiative. European Law Journal; Vol. 9, Issue 5, p. 575-598.
  • Broadbent, J. and Laughlin, R. (2005) The Role of PFI in the UK Government's Modernisation Agenda. Financial Accountability & Management; Vol. 21, Issue 1, p. 75-97.
  • Bryson J. M. and Crosby, B. C. (2001) Leadership for the common good, tackling Public Problems in a Shared-Power World. San Francisco: Jossey - Bass.
  • Builders Merchants Journal (2006) UK Government Procurement Policy: Central Point of Expertise on Timber. Feb 20006, p. 57-57.
  • Chapman, L. (2006) 'My experience as a doctor is that, under PFI, profit not care comes first'. New Statesman; Vol. 135, Issue 4778, p. 12-14.
  • Corcoran, J. and McLean, F. (1998) The selection of management consultants. International Journal of Public Sector Management; Vol. 11, Issue 1, p. 37.
  • Cox, A. Chicksand, D. and Ireland, P. (2005) Sub-Optimality in NHS Sourcing in the UK: Demand-Side Constraints on Supply-Side Improvement. Public Administration; Vol. 83, Issue 2, p. 367-392.
  • Demeterio III, F. P. A. (2001) Introduction to Hermeneutics. Diwatao, Department of Philosophy and Human Resource Development, San Beda College, Mendiola, Manila, Philippines. Vol. 1. Issue 1.
  • Dixon, T. Pottinger, G. and Jordan, A. (2005) Lessons from the private finance initiative in the UK: Benefits, problems and critical success factors. Journal of Property Investment & Finance; Vol. 23, Issue 5, p. 412-423.
  • Erridge, A. and Greer, J. (2002) Partnerships and public procurement: building social capital through supply relations. Public Administration; Vol. 80, Issue 3, p. 503-522.

18. Gilbert. N, (2002). School of Human Science, University of Surrey. Assumptions Underlying Quantitative and Qualitative Research:

19.Gragan, D. P. (2005) Harnessing Procurement Transformation in the Public Sector. Government Procurement; Vol. 13, Issue 1, p. 18-19.

  • Hailstone, L (2002) NFB calls for league tables to go public. Contract Journal; Vol. 413, Issue 6375, p. 3.

21. Hughes Michael (2006) Best Value Making Choices, Volume 1: A Manager's Guide to the Strategic Framework for Best Value, Procurement and Competitiveness

  • International Journal of Operations & Production Management (2006) Supply chain management: theory, practice and future challenges. Vol. 26, Issue 7, p. 754-774.
  • IRS Employment Review (2002) Best Value takes centre stage. Issue 744, p. 6.
  • Jost, G. Dawson, M. and Shaw, D. (2005) Private Sector Consortia Working for a Public Sector Client -- Factors that Build Successful Relationships: Lessons from the UK. European Management Journal; Vol. 23, Issue 3, p. 336-350.
  • Li, B. Akintoye, A. Edwards, P. J. and Hardcastle, C. (2005) Perceptions of positive and negative factors influencing the attractiveness of PPP/PFI procurement for construction projects in the UK: Findings from a questionnaire survey. Engineering Construction & Architectural Management; Vol. 12, Issue 2, p. 125-148.
  • Lian, P. C. S. and Laing, A. W. (2004) Public sector purchasing of health services: A comparison with private sector purchasing. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management; Vol. 10, Issue 6, p. 247-256.
  • Loveday, T. (2005) Price hikes strip £1bn from UK businesses. Utility Week; Vol. 23, Issue 20, p. 7.
  • Lye, J. (1996) Some Principles of Phenomenological Hermeneutics. Department of English, Brock University.

http://www.brocku.ca/english/courses/4F70/ph.html Accessed 7th December 2007.

  • Male, S. Kelly, J. Gronqvist, M. and Drummond, G. (2007) Managing value as a management style for projects. International Journal of Project Management; Vol. 25, Issue 2, p. 107-114.
  • Nollet, J. Ponce, S. and Campbell, M. (2005) About "strategy" and "strategies" in supply management. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management; Vol. 11, Issue 2/3, p. 129-140.
  • Palaneeswaran, E. Kumaraswamy, M. and Ng, T. (2003) Targeting optimum value in public sector projects through "best value"-focused contractor selection. Engineering Construction & Architectural Management, Vol. 10, Issue 6, p. 418-431.
  • Phillips, W. Knight, L. Caldwell, N. and Warrington, J. (2007) Policy through procurement - The introduction of digital signal process (DSP) hearing aids into the English N

    To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

    Reference Copied to Clipboard.
    Reference Copied to Clipboard.
    Reference Copied to Clipboard.
    Reference Copied to Clipboard.
    Reference Copied to Clipboard.
    Reference Copied to Clipboard.
    Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Get help with your dissertation
Find out more