Print Email Download Reference This Send to Kindle Reddit This
submit to reddit

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON OPTICAL FIBER SENSORS AND CONVENTIONAL SENSORS

ABSTRACT

This study deals with the comparison of the two types of sensors which are widely used in civil engineering, namely, conventional sensors and optical fiber sensors. Temperature and displacement are the two principal parameters which are measured with the aid of Fiber optic sensors. Bragg Grating, Interferometric, Intensity Sensors, and optical time domain reflectometry (OTDR) are some of the techniques which are used for sensing. In this study, various case studies have been undertaken and have been analyzed. With the aid of these case studies, a detailed analysis and comparison of the sensors is carried out.

Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION

In the last two decades, the world has witnessed a revolution in the sectors of optoelectronics and fiber optic communications. Various products such as laser printers and bar code scanners which have become a part of our daily usage, are a result of this technical revolution only. The reasons for the phenomenal growth of the fiber optics are many. The most conspicuous reason being the ability of the fiber optics to provide high performance and highly reliable communication links and that too at a very low bandwidth cost. As we see that optoelectronic and fiber communications industry has progressed a lot, and along with these industries fiber optic sensors have also benefited a lot from these developments. Due to the mass production in these industries, availability of fiber optic sensors at a low cost has been made possible in recent years. With their availability at affordable costs, fiber optic sensors have been able to enter the domain which was otherwise being ruled by the traditional sensors.

In recent years, the demand for the development of new materials to strengthen, upgrade and retrofit existing aged and deteriorated concrete structures has increased rapidly. The continuing deterioration and functional deficiency of existing civil infrastructure elements represents one of the most significance challenges facing the world's construction and civil engineers. Deficiencies in existing concrete structures caused by initial flawed design due to insufficient detailing at the time of construction, aggressive chemical attacks and ageing of structural elements enhance an urgent need of finding an effective means to improve the performance of these structures without additionally increasing the overall weight, maintenance cost and time. In the last 50 years, a large number of civil concrete structures have been built; many of these structures, particularly in off-shore regions have now deteriorated and require repair in a short period of time.

Moreover, the increase of traffic volume and population in many developing countries is causing the demand to upgrade existing concrete structures to increase. The damage of reinforced concrete (RC) structures through reinforcement corrosion and residual capacity are the most important issues that concern engineers. These problems occur not only in constructed concrete structures but also in structures strengthened by externally bonded steel reinforcements.

In the past, the external steel plate bonding method has been used to improve strength in the tensile region of concrete structures with an epoxy adhesive and has proved to be successful over a period of 20 years. However, the use of steel reinforced plates and bars has its disadvantages including high corrosion rates, which could adversely affect the bond strength and cause surface spalling of the concrete, due to volumetric

change in the corroded steel reinforcements. Since the early 1980s, fibre-reinforced plastic (FRP) materials have been used as a replacement for conventional steel materials for concrete strengthening applications. In recent years, the interest in utilizing FRP materials in the civil concrete industry in forms of rods, plates, grid and jacket has grown increasingly. When an FRP plate with high tensile strength properties bonds on the concrete surface, it can strengthen the structure with minimum changes to its weight and

dimensions. FRP offers substantial improvement in solving many practical problems that conventional materials cannot solve to provide a satisfactory service life of the structure. Unlike the conventional steel materials, FRP is corrosion resistant. The beneficial characteristics of using the FRP in concrete construction include its high strength-to-weight ratio, low labour requirement, ease of application, reduced traffic interruption during repair, cost reductions in both transportation and in situ maintenance for a long-term strategy. Its high damping characteristic also attracts more structural engineers to use these materials for seismic retrofitting. Due to the increasing use of FRP-plate bonding techniques in strengthening civil concrete structures, the interest in finding a suitable means of monitoring the structural health conditions of these strengthened structures has therefore increased substantially. Since strengthened structures are covered by the FRP plates, the mechanical properties of the concrete may not be measured or detected easily through conventional nondestructive evaluation (NDE) methods, such as strain measurements using surface mounted strain gauges or extensometers, radiography, thermography and acoustic emission methods, particularly in areas with microcracks

and debonds underneath the externally-bonded plate. Besides, these structural inspection technologies, in certain cases, require special surface preparations or a high degree of flatness in the concrete surface. These requirements may be hard to achieve, particularly

for an area that is exposed to a harsh environment. During the 1990s, a multi-disciplinary field of engineering known as ‘Smart Structures' has developed as one of the most important research topics in the field.The structure is formed by a marriage of engineering materials with structurally-integrated sensor systems. The system is capable of assessing damage and warning of impending weakness in the structural integrity of

the structure. Fibre-optic sensor technology is a most attractive device currently used in the aerospace and aircraft industry for on-line monitoring of large-scale FRP structures. The development of distributed fibreoptic sensors, which provides information on a large

number of continuously distribution parameters such as strain and temperature is of great interest in most engineering applications.11,12 The sensors are embedded into a structure to form a novel self-strainmonitoring system, i.e. the system can self-detect its

health status and send response signals to operators during any marginal situation during service. The embedding sensor, due to its extremely small physical size, can provide the information to a high accuracy and resolution without influencing the dimension and

mechanical properties of the structure. Fibre-optic sensors present a number of advantages over the conventional strain measuring devices: (a) providing an absolute measurement that is sensitive to fluctuation in irradiance of the illuminating source; (b) enabling the measurement of the strain in different locations in only one single optical fibre by using multiplexing techniques;(c) having a low manufacturing cost for mass

production; and (d) its ability to be embedded inside a structure without influencing the mechanical properties of the host material.

A new development of ‘Smart materials and structures' was driven by a strong demand for high performance over recent years. A system integrated into structures and being able to monitor its host's physical and mechanical properties such as temperature and

strain, during service is appreciated as a ‘Smart structural health monitoring system'. The term smart material and structure is widely used to describe the unique marriage of material and structural engineering by using fibre-optic sensors and actuation control technology. The smart structure is constructed of materials that can continuously monitor their own mechanical and physical properties, and thereby, be capable of assessing damage and warning of impending weakness in structural integrity. This design concept results in improved safety and economic concerns regarding the weight saving and avoidance of over-designing of the structure in the long run. In Fig. 1, a schematic illustration of the structure's possibilities created by the confluence of the four disciplines is shown. In the figure, a structure invested with actuating, sensing and neutral networking systems to form a new class of adaptive structures is shown. A structure with integrated sensor or actuator systems is able to provide a self-structural health monitoring or actuating response, respectively. If both systems are integrated together into a structure, the sensor and actuators can act as nervous and muscular systems, like a human body, to sense the conditions such as mechanical strain and temperature of the structure

(a smart structure) and to provide control of such changes of stiffness, shape and vibration mode (a controlled structure). The combination of these two systems

into one structure is called a ‘Smart adaptive structure'. This structure with a built-in neural networking system, like a brain, is then able to self evaluate the conditions, which are based on changes of structural parameters, thermal conditions and ambient environments to give an appropriate mechanical adjustment. This structure is commonly called an ‘Intelligent adaptive structure'.

1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

There has been an unprecedented development in the fields of optoelectronics and fiber optic communications. This in turn, has brought about a revolution in the sectors of telecommunication and various other industries. This has been made possible with the aid of high performance and reliable telecommunication links which have low bandwidth cost.

Optical fibers have numerous advantages and some disadvantages. The advantages include their small size, resistance to electromagnetic interference and high sensitivity. On the other hand, some of its disadvantages are their high cost and unfamiliarity to the end user. But its great advantages completely overshadow its minor disadvantages. So, in this study an attempt is being made to compare the modern age fiber optic sensors with the conventional sensors. Also, with the aid of the case studies, the impact of fiber optic sensor technology on monitoring of civil structures is studied (McKinley and Boswell 2002).

1.2 PROBLEM STATEMENT

In the past various kinds of sensors have been used in civil engineering for measuring temperature, pressure, stress, strain etc. And as the optical fiber sensors spread their wings, the civil engineering is bound to gain a lot from these modern sensors.

Presently, there exist a number of problems with the existing civil infrastructures. These civil infrastructures such as bridges etc. have a pretty long service period which may amount to several decades or maybe even hundred years. Thus, during this time period, these structures suffer from corrosion, fatigue and extreme loading. Since concrete is used mostly in these civil infrastructures, it degradation is a major issue all over the world.

The amount of degradation and the time when the degradation starts depends on various factors and is inevitable and unavoidable. Thus, in order to keep these civil structures in good condition, it becomes necessary that their condition be monitored and adequate steps be taken. Thus, we need sensors which can monitor these structures throughout the life of these structures. Thus, in this study the impact of fiber optic sensors is studied on civil structures.

1.3 OBJECTIVES

There are a few objectives that are planned to be achieved at the end of this project, these are:

  1. A general discussion on the present state of structural monitoring and the need of fiber optic sensors in this field

  2. A general study on Comparison between Conventional Sensors and Optical Fiber Sensors

  3. Review of Case Studies on Fiber Optic Sensors application in Civil Engineering Structures

1.4 WORK PLAN

Discussion, reading and observation

Literature Review

Case Study

Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendations

Chapter 2: APPLICATIONS

These days the fiber optic sensors are being used for a variety of applications, the most prominent of them being:

2.1 ADVANTAGES OF FIBER OPTIC SENSORS

Like with any other technology, there are both advantages and disadvantages using fiber optic sensors. The prominent advantages being:

2.2 DISADVANTAGES OF FIBER OPTIC SENSORS

But all this is just one side of the coin. Though on seeing these advantages, it might appear that fiber optic sensors are way too advanced as compared to the traditional ones, but it is not exactly true. These fiber optic sensors also have some disadvantages due to which their advancement in today's world has been somewhat curtailed. The major disadvantages of fiber optic sensors are:

From the above discussion, we can see that as is the case with any other new technology, there are both merits and demerits of fiber optic sensors. But, what is worth considering here is that the advantages of this technology are much more than its disadvantages and are able to outweigh them. Also, from the demerits which are mentioned here, it is clear that these demerits are bound to wither away as this technology develops and gains more prominence.

2.3 APPLICATIONS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING

Now we come to the discussion of the need and applications of the fiber optic sensors in the field of civil engineering structures. The monitoring of civil structures has a great significance in today's world. Today, we not only need to construct reliable and strong civil structures, but we also need to monitor these structures in order to ensure their proper functioning and their safety. Also, with the aid of the monitoring of various parameters of the structures, we can get knowledge about state of the building and by using this data, we can in turn plan the maintenance schedule for the structure (Mckinley, 2000). Also, this data can give us an insight into the real behavior of the structure and can thus take make important decisions regarding the optimization of similar structures which are to b e constructed in future.

The maintenance of the structures can be approached in one of the two ways, namely:

In the recent years most of the research work which has been carried out in field of optic sensors has been in the field of material monitoring rather than structural monitoring. It is also worth mentioning here that, more sensors are required in the case of material monitoring as compared to structural monitoring.

We know that civil engineering requires sensors that can be embedded in the concrete, mortars, steel, rocks, soil, road pavements etc. and can measure various parameters reliably. Also what should be taken into account is that these sensors should be easy to install and should not hamper the construction work or the properties of the structure in any derogatory manner. Also, it is common knowledge that at the sites of civil engineering, there exist the unavoidable conditions of dust, pollution, electromagnetic disturbances and of unskilled labor. Thus, the sensors to be used in these cases need to be rugged, should be inert to harsh environment conditions and should be easy to install and their installation could be carried out by unskilled labor. Along with all these things, it is imperative that these sensors are able to survive a period of at least ten years so that they can allow for a constant monitoring of the aging of the structure. Thus, we see that the fiber optic sensors can prove to be quite handful in civil engineering applications and structures. In the past various kinds of sensors have been used in civil engineering for measuring temperature, pressure, stress, strain etc. And as the optical fiber sensors spread their wings, the civil engineering is bound to gain a lot from these modern sensors (Vurpillot et al., 1998).

Chapter 3: LITERATURE REVIEW ON FIBER OPTIC SENSORS

Fiber optic sensors are of many kinds, but they can be broadly classified into two types, namely, extrinsic fiber optic sensors and intrinsic fiber optic sensors. There is a great deal of difference between these two types of fiber optic sensors and this difference is discussed in detail below.

3.1 EXTRINSIC FIBER OPTIC SENSORS

This type of fiber optic sensor is also known as hybrid fiber optic sensor.

As we can see in the figure above that there is a black box and an input fiber enters into this black box. And from this input fiber, information is impressed upon light beam. There can be various ways by which the information can be impressed upon. Usually this information is impressed upon the light beam in terms of frequency or polarization. This light which then posses the information is carried away by the optical fiber. The optical fiber now goes to an electronic processor. (Vurpillot et al., 1998) Here, in the electronic processor the information which is brought along by the fiber is processed. Though we can have separate input fiber and output fiber, but in some cases it is preferred to have the same fiber as the input fiber and the output fiber.

3.2 INTRINSIC FIBER OPTIC SENSORS

The other type of optic fiber sensors is the intrinsic fiber sensors. An example of an intrinsic fiber sensor is shown in the figure below. The working of the intrinsic fiber sensors is somewhat different from the working of the extrinsic fiber sensors. In the intrinsic fiber sensors, the light beam is modulated and we rely on this modulation in the fiber in order to carry out the measurement.

In the figure above, we can see an intrinsic fiber sensor or what is also known as all fiber sensor.

Intrinsic fiber optic sensors

Extrinsic fiber optic sensors

In this sensor, the fiber itself acts as the sensor medium

In this sensor, the fiber does not act as the sensor medium. It merely acts as a light delivery and collection system

In this fiber optic sensor, the light never leaves the medium and always stays inside the medium

In this fiber optic sensor, the light leaves the medium, then it is altered in some way and is collected by another fiber.

3.3 INTENSITY BASED FIBER OPTIC SENSORS

While there exist various kinds of fiber optic sensors today, but the most common of these sensors is the hybrid type fiber optic sensor which depends upon intensity modulation in order to carry out the measurements (Zako et al., 1995)

In the figure below, we can see a vibration sensor. In this vibration sensor, there exist two optical fibers.

The functioning of this fiber optic sensor is quite simple. In this fiber optic sensor, light enters from one side. And when this light exits from the other side, it exits in the form of a cone and the angle of this cone depends on two parameters. The two parameters upon which the angle of this cone depends are:

Also, the amount of light captured by the second optic fiber depends on a number of factors.

The prominent factors on which the amount of light captured depend are:

Another type of fiber optic sensor is the flexible mounted mirror sensor. The important characteristics of this sensor are:

3.4 LINEAR POSITION SENSORS

In today's world, linear position sensors have become widely applicable. They are being used for various purposes (Zako et al., 1995). In many of the linear positioning sensors, wavelength division multiplexing is used. An illustration of the linear position sensor is shown in the figure below.

The various components of this linear position sensor are:

  1. It consists of a broadband light source

  2. It consists of various detectors as shown in the figure above

  3. It also consists of wavelength division multiplexing element which acts as the principal component of this instrument.

  4. It also consists of an encoder card

In the example above, a broadband light source is utilized. The light from this broadband source is carried to a wavelength division multiplexing system with the aid of a single optic fiber. The wavelength division multiplexing system is used to determine the linear position.

Another linear motion sensing method which is very widely used today and is quite similar to the method discussed above is known as the time division multiplexing method. This method is illustrated with the aid of a figure shown below.

In this method instead of a broadband light source a light pulse is used. Here, the combination of the returned signals takes place. As a result of this combination of the returned signals, the net signal which is produced moves onto the position of the encoder card.

The main areas in which these intensity based fiber optic sensors have found application are:

In these applications these modern sensors have performed quite well and are at par with the performance of the conventional sensors. But, because of the various advantages these sensors enjoy over and above the conventional sensors, these modern sensors are bound to replace the conventional sensors in the years to come.

3.5 LIQUID LEVEL SENSORS

This is another type of intensity based fiber optic sensor. In the functioning of this sensor, the principle of total internal reflection is utilized. Thus, in these sensors the refraction index of the glass and the fiber occupy the pivotal role.

These sensors can be utilized for a variety of purposes. The most prominent of its applications are:

These sensors have an accuracy of about 5 percent and are gaining importance in various industries for their usefulness.

3.6 SOFO SENSORS

These are fiber optic sensors which are utilized for strain measurement. These sensors have become quite popular owing to their innate merits. Out of all the fiber optic sensors, these sensors are the ones which are being used most extensively today. These sensors are being used to measure curvature and various other parameters in giant civil structures. These sensors form a part of the interferometric system (Vurpillot et al., 1998). Also, these sensors have the ability of measuring the parameters in an absolute manner using low-coherent light. The important properties of these sensors are:

The SOFO system setup consists of a number of equipments. The main components of the SOFO system setup are:

These sensors can be utilized in two ways. They can either be embedded in the structure at the time of the construction of the structure. Or, they can used to measure the various parameters externally.

Though in both the cases, that is, in case of embedding or in the case of external anchoring, the performance of the sensors remains the same, but still, in modern smart structures, embedding is preferred (Perez 2001).

This is because, in the case of embedded sensors, the sensors continuously measure the parameters and are easy to manage. Whereas in the older structures, where embedding is not preferred, external anchoring is used.

Chapter 4: CASE STUDIES

Case study 1: Monitoring of San Giorgio pier

San Giorgio pier is a massive concrete structure. Its length is about 400metres. It is very essential to carry out its monitoring in order to know about its deformation. This in turn, is very useful in determining the safety of this pier. At this pier, it was earlier proposed to use the conventional methods to monitor the deformation. This involved the use of conventional sensors for measurement. But, the problem with this method was that in the case of conventional sensors, we could get the data of the various parameters of the pier for only a short period. And, as we know that in order to determine anything conclusively about such large concrete structures we need data for a very long period. But, here as it was the case with the conventional sensors, we could get data only for short periods. Thus, with the aid of the conventional methods which were employing conventional sensors, we could not say anything conclusively. (Andrea Del Grosso et al.) Thus, there existed the need to employ fiber optic sensors in order to determine the deformation of this massive pier. It was possible to measure the deformation of this pier with the aid of the fiber optic sensors because of the following advantages which the fiber optic sensors enjoy over and above the conventional sensors:

Because of all the above factors and also because of the inherit advantages of the fiber optic sensors over the conventional sensors, it was decided that fiber optic sensors would be used in this case. Thus, the study was carried out with the aid of fiber optic sensors.

Before going further, it is imperative to look at the structural parameters of this giant structure. As already mentioned, the total length of this pier is around 400 meters. This giant pier was built around 1920 and since then has been used for the import of coal. Also, it has a nearby basin and it has been decided to dredge the basin. The dredging of the basin will put further pressure on the wall. So, it became essential to strengthen the wall so that it could stand erect even when dredging is carried out. (Andrea Del Grosso et al.)

The highlights of this study carried out on the San Giorgio pier are:

Case study 2: Monitoring of Mjosundet Bridge

Fiber optic sensors have been utilized for various purposes in the recent past. Along with monitoring of large structures such as buildings, piers etc. , fiber optic sensors have also been utilized in the monitoring of even bridges. These fiber optic sensors have been used to determine the amount of deformation, curvature etc. of the bridges. This in turn helps in the analysis of the bridges. It helps in determining the safety and workability of the bridge. Also, this analysis helps us in understanding the working of the bridges better and gives us a useful insight into the working of the bridge. The bridge under consideration in this case study is a massive bridge which is in Aure, in the north-west coast of Norway. It is a vast structure and is about 350 meters in length. This study of this massive bridge structure was taken up the EU under the project “MILLENIUM”. In order to carry out this project, two fiber optic sensor based monitoring systems were developed. These monitoring systems were tested under a lot of conditions. It was proposed that these monitoring systems should be tested in labs as well as in real conditions. In the labs, the real life situations were simulated and the monitoring was done (Mckinley, 2000). Along with this, these monitoring systems were exposed to real situations whose monitoring results were already known. As a result of this, the results from this monitoring package were compared with the already available results. Also, the results of this monitoring system were compared with the lab results. By the comparison of the actual results with the laboratory results, a sort of correlation was obtained between them and this correlation was used in further applications.

The main highlights of the study carried out on this concrete structure are:

Case study 3: Spatial deformation monitoring of the Lutrive bridges

This project was carried out in Vaud Canton (Switzerland) from 1996-2000. The aim of this study was to determine the spatial deformation monitoring of the bridges. The Lutrive bridges are a set of 2 bridges. These bridges are parallel to each other and are about 400 meters in length. The important points regarding this project were:

Chapter 5: RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

Results from Case study 1:

A lot of stress has been given by the team to correlate the various parameters measured by the fiber optic sensors. Two of the most important parameters that are measured by the fiber optic sensors in this case are:

  1. Temperature at the various locations along the pier

  2. Curvature of the walls of the pier. In order to determine the curvature of the walls, it was decided to take the readings from a lot of points along the wall instead of just few readings in order to get a fairly accurate value of the curvature of the walls of the massive structure

From the data which was collected, it was tried to correlate these two important parameters. To correlate these parameters a lot of software tools were utilized. A lot of plots were drawn between these two parameters. From the data collected by the different sensors, different plots were drawn. Though these plots were somewhat different, but all of these plots had some basic underlying features. An example of the plot which was drawn in order to correlate these two parameters is shown in the figure below.

As it is evident from the plot above, there seems to be some sort of correlation between these two parameters. Both the temperature and the curvature of the walls seem to have a similar trend. From the data collected by 72 SOFO sensors placed all along the structure a variety of such plots were drawn and the relation between the temperature and curvature was analyzed. With the aid of such analysis, the safety, operability and the effect of retrofitting was analyzed.

Results from Case study 2:

In this case study, conventional as well as fiber optic sensors was utilized. Thus, it was imperative that the results from these types of sensors be analyzed and compared. The following results were obtained on comparison of the results from the conventional sensors and fiber optic sensors:

Thus, this study shows that in terms of accuracy, precision and stability in extreme conditions, fiber optic sensors are as good as and in some instances even better than the conventional sensors. Also this study proved that in the case of fiber optic sensors, it is possible to manufacture sensor trees which are up to thousand meters in length. While, such long sensors are not possible in the case of conventional sensors. Thus, it is shown, that in the case of monitoring of large structures, fiber optic sensors appear to be the natural choice over the conventional sensors.

Results from Case study 3:

  1. The data collected by the fiber optic sensors was compared with the results produced from the hydrostatic leveling system. This comparison is shown with the aid of a graph shown below. The solid line refers to the results obtained from the fiber optic sensors, whereas, the dotted line refers to the data from the hydrostatic leveling system.

  1. With the comparison of these data from the two sources, the precision of hydrostatic leveling system could be found out. It was found out to be about +/- 0.5 mm.

  2. The fiber optic sensors were found out to be more precise than the conventional sensors. In the case of fiber optic sensors, the precision was found to better than the conventional hydrostatic leveling system by +/- 0.1mm.

Chapter 6: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

From this study, it is clear that fiber optic sensor technology has gone miles in the last few decades. It has grown significantly in the last few years. More and more scientists are working in the field of fiber optic sensor technology and new findings are being made in this sphere. It should be noticed that in the last few years, industrial applications of fiber optic sensors has also increased. Earlier, while this technology was in the nascent stage, the industries which traditionally use conventional sensors for the purpose of measurement of various parameters, didn't show much faith in this new technology of fiber optic sensing. But with time, as it has been proved again and again that fiber optic sensors are superior in their working, accuracy and in precision as compared to the conventional sensors, the industries have also started showing faith in them. In the field of monitoring of civil engineering structures, the fiber optic sensors have occupied a strong position today. In just a span of few years, they have made SOFO sensors a viable option in various applications. Also, another point to ponder over is regarding the placing of the fiber optic sensors in the civil structures. It should be noted that there are two options available to us in this respect: embedding of the fiber optic sensors and external anchoring of the fiber optic sensors. Both of these techniques have their inherent advantages and disadvantages. In most cases, the embedding of the sensors is not possible because of various reasons. It should be noted that that though embedding of the fiber optic sensors is a very tough task, but at the same time, it is very rewarding. In terms of the quality of the data collected and the easiness in terms of collection of data, embedded fiber optic sensors enjoy a great advantage over fiber optic sensors which are anchored externally. From this study, we have tried to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of fiber optic sensors. Also, we have tried to see the extent of their applications in various fields, especially in monitoring civil engineering structures. It has been shown that the fiber optic sensors enjoy inherit advantages over the conventional sensors and these outweigh some of the disadvantages which they have. Also, from the case studies it is evident that in terms of performance and durability, the fiber optic sensors are as good as the conventional sensors. Also, in some cases it is indispensable to have fiber optic sensors. But, it is also realized that though fiber optic sensors have brought about a revolution in the last few decades, but still they haven't been able to completely outperform the conventional sensors. The main reason for this being the high cost of these fibers optic sensors as compared to the conventional sensors. But in the years to come, as mass production of fiber optic sensors gains momentum, these sensors are bound to become cheap and it is envisioned that at that stage these sensors will completely replace conventional sensors. But, till this stage is reached it is recommended that it would be quite economical if these fiber optic sensors are used alongside conventional sensors. This will not only prove to be economical but will also provide further opportunities to compare these two sensors. Also, it is worth noting that many of the industries which today use fiber optic sensors, use only one kind of fiber optic sensor for all their purposes. Due to the recent development which has taken place, there a many kinds of fiber optic sensors which have been developed. So, it is advisable that instead of using only one kind of fiber optic sensor for all the purposes, use should be made of the different kinds of fiber optic sensors that are available today. Along with all this, it is worth mentioning that in the recent past, sensor multiplexing has become quite important. And as this technique is of great value proposition, it should be taken forward and developed further.

References

  1. J. Dakin and B. Culshaw, 1988, “Optical Fiber Sensors: Principals and Components”, Volume 1, Artech

  2. E. Udd, 1991, “Fiber Optic Sensors: An Introduction for Engineers and Scientists”, Wiley

  3. Zako, Uragaki and Kodate, 1995, ‘‘On intelligent structures using optical fiber ~crack sensing with optical fiber!.''

  4. Vurpillot, Gaston, Benouaich, Clement and Inaudi, 1998, ‘‘Vertical deflection of a pre-stressed concrete bridge obtained using deformation sensors and inclinometer measurements.''

  5. McKinley, 2000, ‘‘Large-scale bridge model construction and test results.''

  6. McKinley and Boswell, 2002, ‘‘Optical fiber systems for bridge monitoring.''

  7. Andrea, Inaudi and Bergmeister, 2002, “Monitoring of bridges and concrete structures with fiber optic sensors in Europe”

  8. Vurpillot et al., 1996, "Bridge Spatial Deformation Monitoring with 100 Fiber Optic Deformation Sensors"

  9. Bergmeister and Santa, 1999, "Global Monitoring Concepts for Bridges"

  10. Del Grossoet al.,2000, "Strain and Displacement Monitoring of a Quay Wall in the Port of Genoa by means of Fiber Optic Sensors"

  11. Thevenaz L., 1998, "Truly Distributed Strain and Temperature sensing Using Embedded Optical Fibers"

  12. Inaudid et al., 1998, "Structural Monitoring by Curvature Analysis using Interferometric Fiber Optic Sensors"

  13. Inaudid, Elamaria et al.,1994 , “Low-Coherence Deformation Sensors for the Monitoring of Civil Engineering Structures”

  14. Karashima , 1990, "Distributed Temperature sensing using stimulated Brillouin Scattering in Optical Silica Fibers"

  15. Nikeles et al., 1994, "Simple Distributed temperature sensor based on Brillouin gain spectrum analysis"

  16. Aktan et al., 1997, "Structural Identification for Condition Assessment: Experimental Art"

  17. Inaudid, 2000, "Application of Fibre Optic Sensors to Structural Monitoring"

  18. Ansari F., 1998,” Fiber Optic Sensors for Construction Materials and Bridges”

  19. Culshaw B.,1996, “ Smart Structures and Materials”

  20. Inaudi, 2002 , “ Photonic Sensing Technology in Civil Engineering Applications”

  21. Lienhart W., Brunner F.K., 2003, “ Monitoring of Bridge Deformations using Embedded Fiber Optical Sensors”

  22. Measures R.M., 2001, “ Structural Monitoring with Fiber Optic Technology”

  23. Karbhariv and Seible, 2000, “ Fiber Reinforced composites -advanced materials for the renewal of civil infrastructure”

  24. Lau K. T. and Yuan, 2002, “Applications of composites, optical fibre sensors and smart composites for concrete rehabilitation”

  25. Martinola et al., 2001, “Numerical model for minimizing risk of damage in repair system”

  26. Czarnek et al., 1989, “Interferemetric measurements of strain concentrations induced by optical fiber embedded in a fiber reinforced composite”

  27. Luo F. et al., 1999, “ A fibre optic microbend sensor for distributed sensing application in the structural strain monitoring”

  28. Lau K. et al. , 1999, “Strain evaluation on strengthened concrete beam by using FBG sensor”

  29. Meissner J. et al., 1997, “Strain monitoring at a pre-stressed concrete bridge”

  30. Bascom W. D. and Jensen R. M., 1986, “ Stress transfer in single fiber/ resin tensile tests”

  31. Yuan L. and Zhou L. M., 1998, “Sensitivity coefficient evaluation of an embedded fibre optic strain sensor”

  32. Yuan and Ansarif, 1998, “Embedding white light interferometer fibre optic strain sensor for concrete beam crack-tip opening monitoring”

  33. Yuan L. and Zhou L. M., 1998, “ Temperature compensated fiber optic strain sensor using differential white-light interferometric technique”

  34. Claus R. O. et al., 1993, “Extrinsic Fabry-Perot sensor for structural evaluation”

  35. Kattsuyami et al., 1981, “Low-loss single-mode polarization fibers”

  36. Ansarif and Wangj, 1995, “ Rate sensitivity of high birefringent fiber optic sensors under large dynamic loads”

  37. Yuan L. B. et al., 2001, “ The temperature characteristic of fibre-optic pre-embedded concrete bar sensors”

  38. Kersey and Morey W. W. , 1993, “Multiplexed fibre Bragg grating strain sensor system with a fibre Fabry-Perot wavelength filter”

  39. Tated A M. and Horiguchi T., 1989, “ Advances in optical time domain reflectometry”

  40. Kersey A. D. and Morey W. W., 1993, “Multiplexed Bragg grating fiber-laser strain sensor system with mode-locked interrogation”

  41. Dewynters and Balageas, 1998, “Embedded fibre Bragg grating sensors for industrial composite cure monitoring”

  42. Kalamkarov A. L., 2000, “Processing and evaluation of pultruded smart composites with embedded fibre optic sensors”

  43. Measures R. M. et al., 1994, “Bragg Grating structural sensing system for Fibre-optic sensors and smart composites for concrete applications”

  44. Saouma V. E. et al., 1998, “Application of fibre Bragg grating in local and remote infrastructure health monitoring”

  45. Kersey A. D. et al., 1996, “Progress towards the development of practical fibre Bragg grating instrumentation systems”

Print Email Download Reference This Send to Kindle Reddit This

Share This Essay

To share this essay on Reddit, Facebook, Twitter, or Google+ just click on the buttons below:

Request Removal

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please click on the link below to request removal:

Request the removal of this essay.


More from UK Essays