A Study On Business Forecasting Statistics Essay

✅ Paper Type: Free Essay	✅ Subject: Statistics
✅ Wordcount: 4586 words	✅ Published: 1st Jan 2015

Reference this

Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp

The aim of this report is to show my understanding of business forecasting using data which was drawn from the UK national statistics. It is a quarterly series of total consumer credit gross lending in the UK from the second quarter 1993 to the second quarter 2009.

The report answers four key questions that are relevant to the coursework.

In this section the data will be examined, looking for seasonal effects, trends and cycles. Each time period represents a single piece of data, which must be split into trend-cycle and seasonal effect. The line graph in Figure 1 identifies a clear upward trend-cycle, which must be removed so that the seasonal effect can be predicted.

Get Help With Your Essay

If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!

Essay Writing Service

Figure 1 displays long-term credit lending in the UK, which has recently been hit by an economic crisis. Figure 2 also proves there is evidence of a trend because the ACF values do not come down to zero. Even though the trend is clear in Figure 1 and 2 the seasonal pattern is not. Therefore, it is important the trend-cycle is removed so the seasonal effect can be estimated clearly. Using a process called differencing will remove the trend whilst keeping the pattern.

Drawing scattering plots and calculating correlation coefficients on the differenced data will reveal the pattern repeat.

Scatter Plot correlation

The following diagram (Figure 3) represents the correlation between the original credit lending data and four lags (quarters). A strong correlation is represented by is showed by a straight-line relationship.

As depicted in Figure 3, the scatter plot diagrams show that the credit lending data against lag 4 represents the best straight line. Even though the last diagram represents the straightest line, the seasonal pattern is still unclear. Therefore differencing must be used to resolve this issue.

Differencing

Differencing is used to remove a trend-cycle component. Figure 4 results display an ACF graph, which indicates a four-point pattern repeat. Moreover, figure 5 shows a line graph of the first difference. The graph displays a four-point repeat but the trend is still clearly apparent. To remove the trend completely the data must differenced a second time.

First differencing is a useful tool for removing non-stationary. However, first differencing does not always eliminate non-stationary and the data may have to be differenced a second time. In practice, it is not essential to go beyond second differencing, because real data generally involve non-stationary of only the first or second level.

Figure 6 and 7 displays the second difference data. Figure 6 displays an ACF graph of the second difference, which reinforces the idea of a four-point repeat. Suffice to say, figure 7 proves the trend-cycle component has been completely removed and that there is in fact a four-point pattern repeat.

Question 2

Multiple regression involves fitting a linear expression by minimising the sum of squared deviations between the sample data and the fitted model. There are several models that regression can fit. Multiple regression can be implemented using linear and nonlinear regression. The following section explains multiple regression using dummy variables.

Dummy variables are used in a multiple regression to fit trends and pattern repeats in a holistic way. As the credit lending data is now seasonal, a common method used to handle the seasonality in a regression framework is to use dummy variables. The following section will include dummy variables to indicate the quarters, which will be used to indicate if there are any quarterly influences on sales. The three new variables can be defined:

Q1 = first quarter
Q2 = second quarter
Q3 = third quarter

Trend and seasonal models using model variables

The following equations are used by SPSS to create different outputs. Each model is judged in terms of its adjusted R2.

Linear trend + seasonal model

Data = a + c time + b1 x Q1 + b2 x Q2 + b3 x Q3 + error

Quadratic trend + seasonal model

Data = a + c time + b1 x Q1 + b2 x Q2 + b3 x Q3 + error

Cubic trend + seasonal model

Data = a + c time + b1 x Q1 + b2 x Q2 + b3 x Q3 + error

Initially, data and time columns were inputted that displayed the trends. Moreover, the sales data was regressed against time and the dummy variables. Due to multi-collinearity (i.e. at least one of the variables being completely determined by the others) there was no need for all four variables, just Q1, Q2 and Q3.

Linear regression

Linear regression is used to define a line that comes closest to the original credit lending data. Moreover, linear regression finds values for the slope and intercept that find the line that minimizes the sum of the square of the vertical distances between the points and the lines.

Model Summary
Model	R	R Square	Adjusted R Square	Std. Error of the Estimate
1	.971a	.943	.939	3236.90933
Figure 8. SPSS output displaying the adjusted coefficient of determination R squared
Coefficientsa
Model	Unstandardized Coefficients	Standardized Coefficients	t	Sig.
B	Std. Error	Beta
1	(Constant)	17115.816	1149.166		14.894	.000
time	767.068	26.084	.972	29.408	.000
Q1	-1627.354	1223.715	-.054	-1.330	.189
Q2	-838.519	1202.873	-.028	-.697	.489
Q3	163.782	1223.715	.005	.134	.894
Figure 9

The adjusted coefficient of determination R squared is 0.939, which is an excellent fit (Figure 8). The coefficient of variable ‘time’, 767.068, is positive, indicating an upward trend. All the coefficients are not significant at the 5% level (0.05). Hence, variables must be removed. Initially, Q3 is removed because it is the least significant variable (Figure 9). Once Q3 is removed it is still apparent Q2 is the least significant value. Although Q3 and Q2 is removed, Q1 is still not significant. All the quarterly variables must be removed, therefore, leaving time as the only variable, which is significant.

Coefficientsa
Model	Unstandardized Coefficients	Standardized Coefficients	t	Sig.
B	Std. Error	Beta
1	(Constant)	16582.815	866.879		19.129	.000
time	765.443	26.000	.970	29.440	.000
Figure 10

The following table (Table 1) analyses the original forecast against the holdback data using data in Figure 10. The following equation is used to calculate the predicted values.

Predictedvalues = 16582.815+765.443*time

Original Data	Predicted Values
50878.00	60978.51
52199.00	61743.95
50261.00	62509.40
49615.00	63274.84
47995.00	64040.28
45273.00	64805.72
42836.00	65571.17
43321.00	66336.61

Table 1

Suffice to say, this model is ineffective at predicting future values. As the original holdback data decreases for each quarter, the predicted values increase during time, showing no significant correlation.

Non-Linear regression

Non-linear regression aims to find a relationship between a response variable and one or more explanatory variables in a non-linear fashion.

(Quadratic)

Model Summaryb
Model	R	R Square	Adjusted R Square	Std. Error of the Estimate
1	.986a	.972	.969	2305.35222

Figure 11

Coefficientsa
Model	Unstandardized Coefficients	Standardized Coefficients	t	Sig.
B	Std. Error	Beta
1	(Constant)	11840.996	1099.980		10.765	.000
time	1293.642	75.681	1.639	17.093	.000
time2	-9.079	1.265	-.688	-7.177	.000
Q1	-1618.275	871.540	-.054	-1.857	.069
Q2	-487.470	858.091	-.017	-.568	.572
Q3	172.861	871.540	.006	.198	.844
Figure 12

The quadratic non-linear adjusted coefficient of determination R squared is 0.972 (Figure 11), which is a slight improvement on the linear coefficient (Figure 8). The coefficient of variable ‘time’, 1293.642, is positive, indicating an upward trend, whereas, ‘time2′, is -9.079, which is negative. Overall, the positive and negative values indicate a curve in the trend.

All the coefficients are not significant at the 5% level. Hence, variables must also be removed. Initially, Q3 is removed because it is the least significant variable (Figure 9). Once Q3 is removed it is still apparent Q2 is the least significant value. Once Q2 and Q3 have been removed it is obvious Q1 is under the 5% level, meaning it is significant (Figure 13).

Coefficientsa
Model	Unstandardized Coefficients	Standardized Coefficients	t	Sig.
B	Std. Error	Beta
1	(Constant)	11698.512	946.957		12.354	.000
time	1297.080	74.568	1.643	17.395	.000
time2	-9.143	1.246	-.693	-7.338	.000
Q1	-1504.980	700.832	-.050	-2.147	.036
Figure 13

Table 2 displays analysis of the original forecast against the holdback data using data in Figure 13. The following equation is used to calculate the predicted values:

QuadPredictedvalues = 11698.512+1297.080*time+(-9.143)*time2+(-1504.980)*Q1

Original Data	Predicted Values
50878.00	56172.10
52199.00	56399.45
50261.00	55103.53
49615.00	56799.29
47995.00	56971.78
45273.00	57125.98
42836.00	55756.92
43321.00	57379.54

Table 2

Compared to Table 1, Table 2 presents predicted data values that are closer in range, but are not accurate enough.

Non-Linear model (Cubic)

Model Summaryb
Model	R	R Square	Adjusted R Square	Std. Error of the Estimate
1	.997a	.993	.992	1151.70013

Coefficientsa
Model	Unstandardized Coefficients	Standardized Coefficients	t	Sig.
B	Std. Error	Beta
1	(Constant)	17430.277	710.197		24.543	.000
time	186.531	96.802	.236	1.927	.060
time2	38.217	3.859	2.897	9.903	.000
time3	-.544	.044	-2.257	-12.424	.000
Q1	-1458.158	435.592	-.048	-3.348	.002
Q2	-487.470	428.682	-.017	-1.137	.261
Q3	12.745	435.592	.000	.029	.977
Figure 15

The adjusted coefficient of determination R squared is 0.992, which is the best fit (Figure 14). The coefficient of variable ‘time’, 186.531, and ‘time2′, 38.217, is positive, indicating an upward trend. The coefficient of ‘time3′ is -.544, which indicates a curve in trend. All the coefficients are not significant at the 5% level. Hence, variables must be removed. Initially, Q3 is removed because it is the least significant variable (Figure 15). Once Q3 is removed it is still apparent Q2 is the least significant value. Once Q3 and Q2 have been removed Q1 is now significant but the ‘time’ variable is not so it must also be removed.

Coefficientsa
Model	Unstandardized Coefficients	Standardized Coefficients	t	Sig.
B	Std. Error	Beta
1	(Constant)	18354.735	327.059		56.120	.000
time2	45.502	.956	3.449	47.572	.000
time3	-.623	.017	-2.586	-35.661	.000
Q1	-1253.682	362.939	-.042	-3.454	.001
Figure 16

Table 3 displays analysis of the original forecast against the holdback data using data in Figure 16. The following equation is used to calculate the predicted values:

CubPredictedvalues = 18354.735+45.502*time2+(-.623)*time3+(-1253.682)*Q1

Original Data	Predicted Values
50878.00	49868.69
52199.00	48796.08
50261.00	46340.25
49615.00	46258.51
47995.00	44786.08
45273.00	43172.89
42836.00	40161.53
43321.00	39509.31

Table 3

Suffice to say, the cubic model displays the most accurate predicted values compared to the linear and quadratic models. Table 3 shows that the original data and predicted values gradually decrease.

Question 3

Box Jenkins is used to find a suitable formula so that the residuals are as small as possible and exhibit no pattern. The model is built only involving a few steps, which may be repeated as necessary, resulting with a specific formula that replicates the patterns in the series as closely as possible and also produces accurate forecasts.

The following section will show a combination of decomposition and Box-Jenkins ARIMA approaches.

For each of the original variables analysed by the procedure, the Seasonal Decomposition procedure creates four new variables for the modelling data:

SAF: Seasonal factors
SAS: Seasonally adjusted series, i.e. de-seasonalised data, representing the original series with seasonal variations removed.
STC: Smoothed trend-cycle component, which is smoothed version of the seasonally adjusted series that shows both trend and cyclic components.
ERR: The residual component of the series for a particular observation

Autoregressive (AR) models can be effectively coupled with moving average (MA) models to form a general and useful class of time series models called autoregressive moving average (ARMA) models,. However, they can only be used when the data is stationary. This class of models can be extended to non-stationary series by allowing differencing of the data series. These are called autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models.

The variable SAS will be used in the ARIMA models because the original credit lending data is de-seasonalised. As the data in Figure 19 is de-seasonalised it is important the trend is removed, which results in seasonalised data. Therefore, as mentioned before, the data must be differenced to remove the trend and create a stationary model.

Model Statistics
Model	Number of Predictors	Model Fit statistics	Ljung-Box Q(18)	Number of Outliers
Stationary R-squared	Normalized BIC	Statistics	DF	Sig.
Seasonal adjusted series for creditlending from SEASON, MOD_2, MUL EQU 4-Model_1	0	.485	14.040	18.693	15	.228	0

Model Statistics
Model	Number of Predictors	Model Fit statistics	Ljung-Box Q(18)	Number of Outliers
Stationary R-squared	Normalized BIC	Statistics	DF	Sig.
Seasonal adjusted series for creditlending from SEASON, MOD_2, MUL EQU 4-Model_1	0	.476	13.872	16.572	17	.484	0