Covid-19 Update: We've taken precautionary measures to enable all staff to work away from the office. These changes have already rolled out with no interruptions, and will allow us to continue offering the same great service at your busiest time in the year.

Review of Tools for Evaluating Personality Types

2594 words (10 pages) Essay in Psychology

18/05/20 Psychology Reference this

Disclaimer: This work has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work produced by our Essay Writing Service. You can view samples of our professional work here.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays.

Similarly, as every individual are brought into the world with a one of a kind unique mark, everybody has and shows a different sort of personality. In this essay I will use review four tools for examining someone’s personality and these are Big 5 personality test, Myers Briggs personality inventory, Emotional intelligence and social style. After examining using tools the outcomes made it clear It has different strengths and weakness which influence and impact my communication style, relationships and my preferences which are detailed and coordinated with the examination with the four tools. From increasing mindfulness of different weakness distinguished in the outcomes through finishing the examination tool, I could recognize systems to embrace to improve my good relationship abilities and positive communication style, in this manner enabling me to develop and get an edge over others in future.

Each individual has a one of a kind and distinctively formed personality that enables us to separate from others and the Myers Briggs Personality inventory is a survey that outlines a system of the preference we pick throughout everyday life (Berney, 2010). The outcomes show that I am ESFP; extroversion, sensing, feeling and Perceiving. In any case, when contrasting this with Big 5 test (BFT) this uncovered a few identical but few opposite results too.  The BFT structure conceptually positions personality into five large part of openness to experience, agreeableness, extraversion, neuroticism and conscientiousness, with all factor outlining characteristic of personality (John, 1999). This test showed openness to experience to be the highest score of 3.7 and followed by agreeableness with 3.4 in contrast with different measurements under MBTI, and in this way shows this is the most influential component as a part of my personality. This associates with the MBTI by giving more preference to  extraversion, feeling and sensing over judging  and thinking with one of the highest score of 4,5,5 which demonstrates a clear strength in these measurement and clear weakness in the judging and thinking measurement (Hogan, 1985).  These characteristic proofs that in my relationships I am bound to forgive and trust others and structure point of view dependent on empathy. Additionally, the two of them focus on the capacity to be warm and welcoming towards others before deciding, as opposed to concentrating on impersonal   success or objectives (Hogan, 1985). Through these discoveries, it has enabled me to understand the strenghts of my relationship and how I have dependable companionships since School as I effortlessly let go and see other circumstances in an empathetic way. This likewise uncovers I am bound to have interpersonal communicating way. One example of this is understanding what others are feeling and reacting to the situation as per that which helps to build interpersonal relationships while keeping into mind what others feel (Tynan, 2013). These outcomes infer that in future, I am probably going to construct firm relationships with workers with the help of coordination support needed in situation. Nonetheless, there are potential weakness in these measurements, where planning is expected to reinforce the ‘thinking’ dynamic. Being this way, I can be excessively acceptable and uncritical, and I cannot be guided by logic as being fair depend on emotions for me. Such ramifications mean I need directions and may not fulfil time constraints in my career as tasks won’t be finished on scheduled time (Hogan, 1985). In this manner in future, I should be increasingly logical, that is reason expected to build up an opinion, by becoming progressively confident. Being confident includes positive conduct and communication that shows clear preference and empowers individuals to state their very own perspectives and values while regarding the perspectives and preferences of others. Confidence helps bring clearness and helps to make values straightforward when communicating (Tynan, 2013). For instance, if overseeing, I must obviously define out the objectives and the strategies to accomplish them, so all workers know about these and there is less possibility of uncertainty. This will enable me to finish undertakings in time and convey more successfully and proficiently with others.

An extroversion is somebody who is outgoing, sociable and likes to meet others, is invigorated through others and managing the outside world and might become restless with broad and unrushed tasks (Hart, august 1994). Following the MBPI, my preference is toward extraversion aspects with a score of 4, demonstrating some strengths in this measurement and a few weaknesses in the introversion. Anyway, in correlation, I got one of the lowest scores in the BFTs extroversion measurement. This logical inconsistency shows that whether I portray extraversion or introversion relies upon the circumstance existing on the present day; it is an unforeseen trait. Introversion depicts an individual who settles on free choices from methods and likes to work alone in a disconnected environment. The inside mind serves to re-stimulate them more than the external world including individuals and occasions (Berney, 2010). There are conditions where I show these attributes more grounded than those of extroversion. For instance, in the BFT, I addressed neither agree nor disagree to whether I think about myself as shy or inhibited. For example, when I meet a huge gathering of new individuals, I become reserved and need trust in showing my actual character from awkward feeling. I additionally see myself as introverted when I need to finish something that I think is highly importance. For example, reading for year final semester tests, I liked to revise alone and was angry when disturbed by individuals. Be that as it may, with no outside weights or limitations, I think about myself to have highest strengths in the extroversion measurement where interacting and attaching with nature keeps me boosted and full of energy. I am friendly when meeting new individuals and when working in groups, I like to take responsibility to ensure everything is all together. Nonetheless, this trait could be unfavourable later when allotted to groups in workplace, as I must figure out how to effectively hear in to other people with the goal that they can contribute successfully to the task. The capacity to understand              messages and reacts as to motivate further communication is the act of active listening, is a significant aspect of interpersonal communication in all working environments (commer, 1999). Active listening leads to unity and share of ideas among workers, which further leads to employee’s morale upliftment and lack of it can lead to ineffective business (Rane, 2011). (Knippen, 1994) recommended a technique which is to give verbal signals back to person speaking to guarantee they realize the listener is locked in. For instance, I am mindful that I must limit inner diversions as I see that I tend consider different needs whist hearing in to individuals. A method to guarantee I am giving complete consideration to the speaker is to react and repeat what they have said, for example, words like ‘yes definitely’ and more straightforward prompts, for example, ‘why did he do that?’ (Rane, 2011). Being extroverted under group conditions, I must apply these listening skills in group circumstances with the goal that I don’t control and overrule the group from accomplishing the set objectives.

Social style give an understanding into the differences in the manner individuals work, they zone “collection of work that distinguishes and lights up intrinsic differentiations in the manner individuals work as entire frameworks that incorporate mental, emotional and physical dimensions” (Seagal, 2003). Social style test enables me to see how to improve communication and relationships to uplift my personality (Seagal, 2003). My test shows I am amiable, I am highly responsiveness with a score of 3.27 which means I am friendly and relationships, feelings and personal security matters to me the most.   Essentially to the MBTI ‘Feeling’ measurement, I want to interface with everyone around me and am likewise delicate to their sentiments (Seagal, 2003). What’s more, a developing topic has shaped being the normal is a steady concern and a high significance of looking after relationships (Seagal S. , 1997). This is valuable when groups are encountering struggle to guarantee it can be settled and nature of the job is kept up. Social style profoundly values various variety of individuals, anyway I discover this to cause inside worry for me as in specific circumstances I take an interest in something over the top and don’t give time to myself as an opportunity to reflect which shows why I have got a low score of assertiveness. I am unable to control a situation, people think I am very efficient, but the test made me realise I am not. For example, during orientation time, I pursued various clubs, while working part time and found that I very bad at maintaining time and controlling events in other words I am less efficient, causing pressure to complete undertakings on scheduled time. In my future profession, being too on edge will diminish my efficiency if I have various jobs or occupations to finish. Being sorted out is a fundamental methodology during these occasions when I must rethink my most pritorized needs to have the option to keep quiet and guarantee I have individual time to reflect. Again, like the MBTI and BFT, my communication style includes helping others on an individual basis and on feelings basis. Be that as it may, a weakness is that relationship turned out to be broken when there is no understanding or attention to social style of an individual. Coming to Australia, in my first year I had to work with other students who were all Chinese to complete different work, for example, group discussions. Since I am extroverted in group circumstances and like to have an action, I figured that it was hard to work with students here to finish the task as they appreciated working alone with no correspondence. (Seagal S. &., 2003) approves that these are physically focused qualities and are basic among the Chinese culture. In preparation for future, I should be aware of personality contrasts to comprehend and be able to work as an efficient group. This alludes to being aware of one’s thinking and intentions (Tynan, 2013).it was suggested by (Langer, 2014) envisioning your thoughts as straightforward, in that you don’t hold any biases when this kind of contention happens which permits you comprehend and understand different scenario. Through getting a better understanding of the Chinese students, being careful in this circumstance would have guided me to how I could acknowledge their methods for learning and working with them to finish the tasks in class, instead of getting to be disappointed and frustrated. By figuring out how to set aside these negative contemplations, I will be increasingly open to others’ thoughts and additionally ready to tune in and learn; “mindfulness fuels adaption” (Hunter, 2013)

Emotional intelligence (EI) is a moderately new zone of social examination as specialists presently concur that the individuals who are best in business have a high level of this EI (Weisinger, 2004). (Matthews, 2004)portray EI as the ability to distinguish, express, comprehend and acclimatize feelings personally and in others, that is, the wise utilization of feelings. Following the test, I got an EI score of 78 which is a generally solid score. Thusly having a few strengths in the extroversion measurement from the MBPI,  (Edgar, 2012) express that some theories partner high extraversion scores with increased affectability to positive emotional boosts and high neuroticism scores with uplifted affectability to negative feeling. In the BFTs neuroticism measurement was the second highest score in contrast with the components, in the EI test it uncovers that I have the lowest score of motivating oneself with a score of just 14 followed by managing emotions with just 15 which might bring down my EI. For instance, I got the most minimal score for loosening up when under strain and remaining quiet when I am the target, demonstrative of tension. This could be negative for my communication and destruct relationship, as I will in general get on edge when under strain and apply high feelings of anxiety, for example, in test circumstances which I may release onto others.  (Weisinger, 2004) tells about building up a high feeling of self-awareness when I feel negative feelings with the goal that I can monitor, watch and impact my activities in positive way. When aware, I should utilize a system to diminish nervousness levels, for example, Progressive Muscle Relaxation (PMR). This includes working from head to toe and straining a gathering of muscles while breathing in and loosening up them during exhalation (Burgess, 2014). (Burgess, 2014) likewise states, “when your body is physically relaxed, you can’t feel tensed” and through training, stress can be overseen effectively what’s more, emotions can be utilized beneficially. This training will help me in utilizing my EI in relations with others to determine conflicts as low feelings of anxiety will enable me to quiet down and communicate positively. (Weisinger, 2004) reasons tensed people are progressively distractible and increasingly helpless against impaired performance in unpleasant conditions. These impacts are for the most part credited to conditions of stress that redirect resources from the main job. Having a degree of self -awareness to feel I am encountering negative feelings during stress will enable me to utilize the system of PMR and be progressively gainful in accomplishing define objectives and have increasingly positive and compelling relationship with everyone around me.

Putting into action the different systems of active listening, self-awareness, PMR and assertiveness clarified, will all guide in strengthen and improving my various weakness portrayed in the preferences that characterize my personality. Each indicative tool enabled me to become aware of these different imperfections, yet additionally strengths that ought to be kept up all together for effective relationship and communication. This enables me to improve the manners by which I approach various circumstances with various individuals, and consequently broaden my own abilities and capacities. Not one individual is indistinguishable, and it is this mindfulness and understanding of these decent varieties that will improve my own skills as well as those associations with others around me.

References

  • Berney, L. (2010). Using the Mbti to Enhance Workplace Communication. The Stepping Stone (39).
  • Burgess, P. (2014). Stress Management: Doing Progressive Muscle Relaxation from. Retrieved from http://www.webmd.com/balance/stress-management/stress-management-doing-progressive-muscle-relaxation
  • commer, L. ,. (1999). Active Empathetic Listening and Selling Success: A Conceptual Framework. [Article]. journal of personal selling and & sales management, 19(1), 15-29.
  • Edgar, C. M. (2012). Emotional Intelligence, Personality and the Decoding of Non-Verbal Expressions of Emotion. . Personality and Individual Differences,, 52(3), 295.
  • Hart, M. (august 1994). understanding your scores on the Mbti. PA consulting group, 1.
  • Hogan, R. C. (1985). Personal style inventory . organisation design and development.
  • Hunter, J. (2013). Is Mindfulness Good for Business? Mindful.
  • John, O. P. (1999). The Big Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Theoretical Perspectives. handbook of personality: Theory of research , 2, 102- 138.
  • Knippen, J. T. (1994). how the manager can use actice listening [Article]. public personal management, 23(2), 357.
  • Langer, E. (2014). Mindfulness in the Age of Complexity, The Age. Retrieved from. Retrieved from http://hbr.org/2014/03/mindfulness-in-the-age-of-complexity/ar/1
  • Matthews, G. Z. (2004). Emotional Intelligence: Science and Myth: MIT Press.
  • Rane, D. (2011). good listening skills make efficent business sense [Article]. IUP. Journal of soft skills, 5(4), 43-51.
  • Seagal, S. &. (2003). Human Dynamics for the 21st Century.
  • Seagal, S. (1997). Basic Principles: A New Paradigm.
  • Tynan, L. W. (2013). communication for business. oxford university press.
  • Weisinger, D. H. (2004). Emoting Intelligently.On Wall Street.
Get Help With Your Essay

If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!

Find out more

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please:

Related Lectures

Study for free with our range of university lectures!