Covid-19 Update: We've taken precautionary measures to enable all staff to work away from the office. These changes have already rolled out with no interruptions, and will allow us to continue offering the same great service at your busiest time in the year.

The Effects Social Media has on Politics

2759 words (11 pages) Essay in Politics

08/02/20 Politics Reference this

Disclaimer: This work has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work produced by our Essay Writing Service. You can view samples of our professional work here.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays.

Donald Trump adopted Twitter heavily in his 2016 presidential campaign and adopted Twitter when he tweeted, “I love it as a result of I will get additionally my purpose of readout there, and my purpose of reading is extremely necessary to heaps of individuals that measure gazing me.” In other words, a campaign may accommodate those of older age, while others are targeted at younger adults. Political campaigns can tap into a wealth of information or analytics regarding the people who are following them on social media and customize their messages based on hand-picked demographics.

In a political environment defined by widespread polarization and partisan ill will, even simple conversations will go awry when the subject turns to politics. In their in-person interactions, Americans often attempt to stay clear of those with who they strongly don’t agree. In these spaces, users can encounter statements they could consider highly contentious or extremely offensive – even when they create no effort to actively seek out this material. Similarly, political arguments can encroach into users’ lives when comment streams on otherwise unrelated topics devolve into flame wars or partisan fuss. Navigating these interactions can be particularly fraught in light of the complex mix of close friends, family members, distant acquaintances, professional connections and public figures that structure many users’ online networks. Meanwhile, half of the users feel the political conversations they see on social media are angrier, less respectful and less civil than those in different areas of life. Simultaneously, a minority, stood out feeling like the political debates they see all over social media are reflective of the political debates they watch in different times of their lives: for example, thirty nine percent of users feel that these interactions aren’t any less respectful than different political interactions they encounter. And a small share discovers political debates on social media to be more diplomatic, more informative and more focused on important policy issues than those they see elsewhere.

When ignoring problematic content fails, social media users tend to utilize technological tools to remove difficult users from their feeds entirely. Nearly one-third of social media users say they have changed their settings in order to examine fewer posts from someone in their feed attributable to one thing related to politics, while twenty-sevenths have blocked or unfriended somebody for that reason. Taken together, this amounts to thirty nine percent of social media users – and sixty minutes of them indicate that they took this step because someone was posting political content that they found offensive. Drawing from a recent professional discussion hosted by the Center for Technology Innovation, West outlines ten ways that social media can improve campaign engagement and re-invigorate American democracy.

Social media is the ultimate in disruptive technology – they modify data delivery, business organization, online content, news coverage, and therefore the manner in which individuals process new developments. As displayed in the 2008 campaign, these digital tools stood for a textbook example of the ability for the voter to get around and electoral impact. They were, in the words of engaging Partner Mindy Finn, the “central nervous system” of campaign organizations. victimization social networking outreach tools such as Facebook, MySpace, YouTube, and Twitter, a number of Democratic and Republican candidates raised money, known supporters, engineered electoral coalitions, and brought individuals in closer touch with the electoral process. Looking at these, someone would notice two distinct ways that social media have changed the method we tend to discuss with each other regarding politics. Clearly, they have changed plenty, everything, but two fairly new phenomena stand out.

Regarding all of your friends are posting about the election, are a number of United Nations agency brag regarding deleting friends, or United Nations agency urge friends to unfriend them over their political standings, “Just unfriend Maine currently.” Or, “If you cannot support candidate X/Y, we do not ought to be friends any longer.” Or, “Congrats, if you are reading this, you survived my friend purge” (UN) and continues on like this. This public declaration, if not celebration, of the tip of friendships as a result of politics. On Twitter, there is the general public shaming of these United Nations agency dare pain or insult you. When someone tweets with something incendiary, bashing the article the author only shared or the purpose they only created, mocking something they said concerning politics and vocation. They quote the tweet, sarcastically, to prove it does not affect the user. However, it does, they tweeted it back, to all of their followers. It’s an odd cycle. An argument of political exchanges by highlighting political exchanges between each politician.

At its core, Twitter is an electronic communication service allowing users (who will remain anonymous) to tweet out information, or opinions, or whatever, in 140-character bursts. for many critics, that DNA makes Twitter different to stylish, thoughtful political conversation. Bride Coyne, a senior manager at Twitter, points to several features the company has added to those 140-character tweets: polls, photos, video, moments and more. She also told NPR that the 140-character limit reflects the app’s start as a mobile-first platform which it’s completely different now. “We’ve evolved into a website and lots of alternative platforms from that” (Sanders). She, like every different voice for any major social media platform, argues that sites like Twitter have democratized the political conversation, helping offer everyone a voice, and that’s an honest factor. One exchange in particular between Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush illustrates a new political reality. Clinton’s Twitter account announced a graphic with the words: “$1.2 trillion, the number forty million Americans owe in student debt” (Sanders). Although there are questions about the number of bots on Twitter, the tone of the conversation there increasingly cannot be denied. A recent report from the Anti-Defamation League found out that “a total of 2.6 million tweets containing language often found within the anti-Semitic speech were announced across Twitter between August 2015 and July 2016,” (ADL) targeting political journalists. A Bloomberg report found angling on the service is keeping the company from finding a buyer.

Zuckerberg also pointed out studies showing that increasingly, additional youth have gotten their news primarily from sites like Facebook which youth have conjointly said it helps them see a “larger and additional various set of opinions.” Zuckerberg said the company is trying to try and do an improved job of sifting out fake news. Ending this campaign season with social media platforms hardwired for political argument, obfuscation, and division. Individuals tend to associate with the public and would rather get involved with scandal than policy, according to social media data. The candidates for a higher workplace, led by Trump, seem more inclined to adopt the combative nature of social media than ever before. Peter Hamby, head of reports at Snapchat, says the platform is a “fundamentally different” (Hamby) experience that different social media platforms, partially because, he says, on Snapchat, privacy is vital. “I assume that individuals need to own an area wherever they will communicate with their friends and rejoice, however additionally feel safe,” Hamby said. Instead, they retreated from their battle positions for a few hours at best, never progressing to grasp the stranger they insulted. and I moved on, and just kept tweeting.

Overall, two-hundredths of social media users say they’ve modified their stance on a social or political issue because of material they saw on social media, and the terrorist organization says social media has helped to vary their views a few specific political candidates. Among social media users, Democrats – and liberal Democrats in particular – are a small amount more seemingly than Republicans to say they have ever modified their views on social and political issues, or a certain political candidate, because of what they watched on social media. Democrats and Republicans include independents and nonpartisans United Nations agency “lean” toward these parties. “Originally, I planned on a ballot for mountain climber Clinton in the election, but then I found out about Bernie Sanders through social media. I made a decision I might vote for him instead” (Suh). While reading this, you can see the effects social media has on politics in today’s day of age.

The ever-growing digital native news world now boasts regarding five thousand digital news sector jobs, according to our recent calculations, three thousandths of which are at thirty huge digital-only news retailers. A majority of these digital organizations focus on the importance of social media in telling a story and being involved with their audiences. As journalists gather for the annual Online News Association conference, here are answers to five questions on social media and therefore the news. How does social media websites stack up on news? When you consider both the total the entire the United Nations agency, the full the overall reach of a site is the share of American citizens United Nations agency use it and the size of social media users who receive news on the site, Facebook is clearly the news powerhouse among the social media sites. Two-thirds of U.S. adults use the site, and half of those users get their news there — amounting to 30 minutes of the general population.

YouTube is the next biggest social news pathway — about half of Americans use the site, and a fifth of them get news there, which translates to one hundred percent of the adult population and establishes the site on equilibrium with Twitter. Twitter reaches Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire of American citizens and half of those users say they get news there or V-day of citizens. And although only three-dimensional of the U.S. population utilize Reddit, for the individuals that do receive news, there is a huge draw for those who have gotten news from the site.

A recent survey revealed social media doesn’t always facilitate conversation around the important issues of the day. In fact, Americans tend to find individuals were less willing to discuss their opinion on the Snowden-NSA story on social media than they were in person. And Facebook and Twitter users were less probably to require sharing their opinions in several face-to-face settings, especially if they felt their social audience disagreed with them. A few days before the election Silverman and fellow BuzzFeed contributor Lawrence Alexander copied one hundred pro–Donald Trump sites to a town of forty five percent in Macedonia. Some teens there realized they could create money off the election, and just like that, became a node in the information network that helped Trump beat Clinton. A Guardian reporter United Nations agency looked into Russian military doctrine around information war found a handbook that described how it might work. “The reading of data weapons, suggests, ‘acts as AN invisible radiation’ upon its targets: ‘The population doesn’t even feel it’s being acted upon. So, the state doesn’t turn on its protection mechanisms,’” wrote Peter Pomerantsev. It is important to note, though, that those at either end of the ideological spectrum are not isolated from negative views regarding politics.

 Half of across-the-board conservatives – and the other half of across-the-board liberals – say they at least sometimes disagree with one among their closest political discussion partners. The rise of philosophical uniformity has been much more pronounced among those who are the most politically active. Today, almost four-in-ten politically engaged Democrats are consistent liberals, up from just V-day in 1994. The change among Republicans since then appears less dramatic – thirty three percent consistently had conservative views, up from twenty third in the midst of the 1994 ‘Republican Revolution.’ However, a decade ago, just one hundred percent of politically engaged Republicans had broad conservative attitudes. To chart the progression of ideological thinking, responses to ten political values questions asked on multiple pew research surveys since 1994 have been combined to create a life of ideological consistency. Over the past twenty years, the number of American citizens in the ‘tails’ of this ideological distribution has doubled from one hundred percent to twenty-first. Meanwhile, the center has shrunk: thirty-ninth currently takes an equal number of liberal and conservative positions. that’s down from about half of the public in surveys conducted in 1994 and 2004. Most Americans, regardless of their ideological preferences, value communities in which they’d live close to extended family and high-quality schools. However, far more liberals than conservatives suppose it’s important that a community have racial and ethnic diversity. 76% of racial and ethnic diversity vs. simultaneously, conservatives are more prone than liberals to connect importance to living in a place where many individuals practice their religious faith.

While Barack Obama was in the White House, biased hostility is more well-known among Republicans, especially consistently conservative Republicans. Overall, more Republicans than Democrats see the opposing party’s policies as a threat and the differences are even greater when ideology is considered. totally sixty-six of consistently conservative. Republicans believe that the Democrats’ policies jeopardize the nation’s comfort. With comparing half of consistently left Democrats to say Republican policies ruin the nation being better off. Conservatives also display more bias behavior in their personal lives; they are the most likely to possess friends and like communities of like-minded people.

Political campaigns can tap into a wealth of information or analytics concerning the people who are following them on social media and customize their messages based on selected demographics. In Brooklyn, New York, to learn from legends like Danica Patrick and Maria Sharapova, pitch our editors, meet with investors, and potentially walk away with funding. The most standard election-related tweet being Hillary Clinton’s motivational words encouraging women to never give up after she lost the election. Internet users who don’t trust news that friends and family share on Facebook as of 2016 nineteen most common traffic source for fake news in the united states in 2017 Social source of fake news stories in the united states as of January 2017 Facebook.

Technology itself brings new issues to the debate floor that candidates must know about, speak about and take an edge on. They apologized to each other and to Maine, and they both promised to sign off for a bit. They were, in the words of engaging Partner Mindy Finn, the “central nervous system” of campaign organizations. They pointed out, the 2000 presidential election was decided by less than zero percent of the vote in Florida. In addition, some federal employees are considered ‘further restricted,’ which means they are prohibited from taking an active part in the partisan political management or partisan political campaigns. Thus, they may not engage, via social media and email, during any political activity on behalf of a partisan group or candidate in a partisan race. Further confined employees are employed with law enforcement or intelligence agencies. However, does social media impact the discussion of news events?
 

Works Cited

  • Anderson, Monica, and Andrea Caumont. “How Social Media Is Reshaping News.” Pew Research Center, Pew Research Center, 24 Sept. 2014, www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/09/24/how-social-media-is-reshaping-news/. Accessed 3 Nov. 2018.
  • Anderson, Monica. “Social Media Leads Some Users to Rethink a Political Issue.” Pew Research Center, Pew Research Center, 7 Nov. 2016, www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/07/social-media-causes-some-users-to-rethink-their-views-on-an-issue/. Accessed 3 Nov. 2018.
  • Duggan, Maeve, and Aaron Smith. “Americans, Politics and Social Media.” Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech, Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech, 3 Jan. 2018, www.pewinternet.org/2016/10/25/the-political-environment-on-social-media/. Accessed 3 Nov. 2018.
  • Media.defense.gov Staff. “The Hatch Act: Frequently Asked Questions on Federal Agencies and the Use of Official Social Media Accounts.” Media Defense, Media Defense, Nov. 2015, https://media.defense.gov/2018/Jul/11/2001941031/1/1/1/FAQ%20HATCH%20ACT%20AGENCIES%20AND%20SOCIAL%20MEDIA%20NOV%202015.PDF. Accessed 2 Nov. 2018.
  • Murse, Tom, and Nieman Foundation. “Social Media in Politics – Twitter and Facebook as Campaigns Tools.” ThoughtCo, .Dash, 1 June 2018, www.thoughtco.com/how-social-media-has-changed-politics-3367534. Accessed 3 Nov. 2018.
  • Ray444. “Ten Ways Social Media Can Improve Campaign Engagement and Reinvigorate American Democracy.” The Writing for the Web Social Media Reader, 26 Mar. 2018, thewritingforthewebsocialmediareader.wordpress.com/2018/03/26/ten-ways-social-media-can-improve-campaign-engagement-and-reinvigorate-american-democracy/. Accessed 3 Nov. 2018.
  • Sanders, Sam. “Did Social Media Ruin Election 2016?” NPR, NPR, 8 Nov. 2016, www.npr.org/2016/11/08/500686320/did-social-media-ruin-election-2016. Accessed 3 Nov. 2018.
  • Suh, Michael. “Political Polarization in the American Public.” Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, 11 Oct. 2016, www.people-press.org/2014/06/12/political-polarization-in-the-american-public/. Accessed 3 Nov. 2018.
Get Help With Your Essay

If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!

Find out more

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please:

McAfee SECURE sites help keep you safe from identity theft, credit card fraud, spyware, spam, viruses and online scams Prices from
£124

Undergraduate 2:2 • 1000 words • 7 day delivery

Order now

Delivered on-time or your money back

Rated 4.6 out of 5 by
Reviews.co.uk Logo (199 Reviews)