Issues And Controversies Of Capital Punishment Philosophy Essay

Published: Last Edited:

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Capital punishment also known as death penalty is described as a planned and pre-meditated taking of human life by the authority in reaction to crimes committed by that lawfully convicted person. In over half of all the states in the world regard capital punishment to be such an inhumane and cruel penalty that they no longer put it into practice. The countries that comprise the other half are most dictatorships with low principles of human rights. The exception to this statistic is The United States.

Despite the fact that the United States has a very high criterion of human rights in most cases, it is still supporting the utilization of capital punishment. One thousand prisoners have been carried out by the United States government from the time the death penalty was reinstated in 1976. Although the death penalty has constantly been well sustained by the American people, its support has time after time declined over the years. Today the support of death penalty is at its lowest. During the past ten years, the number of people who were in support of capital punishment declined from eighty percent to around sixty-four percent. A survey conducted on Americans showed that sixty four percent consented to supporting death penalty. Nevertheless, when enquired to factor in life in prison as a substitute punishment, the percentage in support of death penalty dropped below forty percent.

The execution of Capital punishment leaves no room for error, and this has made several people to assume that no errors made. On the other hand, in a flawed world you cannot rule out mistakes. As an issue of fact mistakes, in this method are not exceptional. Over the past 25 years, more than seventy people have so far been confirmed innocent and free from death rows. Statistics have shown that one prisoner in every seven executions carried out, one prisoner is found innocent. While no one has legitimately been affirmed innocent after the death sentence, predominantly due to the reality that most don't inspect someone's blamelessness following their death, several realistic claims have been raised. The majority of claims of innocence after capital punishment are very severe. In an article printed by the Huston chronicle on November 21 2005 an already executed man's innocence proclaimed. Both the co-defendant and the eyewitness in the prosecution of Ruben Cantu appeared before a judge and confessed that they lied. The eyewitness claimed that Cantu was not present at the crime scene and he only testified against him for the reason that he was pressured by the authorities as well as afraid. Through a sworn affidavit signed by Cantu's co-defendant, he stated that he allowed Cantu to be sentenced and prosecuted for a crime he did not commit. (Huston Chronicle)

Capital sentence is in no means mistake proof, and has ultimately led to the demise of quite a lot of blameless people, alongside unlawful period served by the majority. The maintenance of the fatality penalty by the American people continues to fall as more individuals are more knowledgeable about it. Moreover, capital reprimand is practically unproductive at preventing felony, and consequently serves no rationale other than revenge. Revenge is a result of extreme dislike, it serves no excellent intention. It should not be taken as a sufficient reason to take an individual's life. The United States is said to have an extremely high benchmark of human rights. Nevertheless, on the subject of capital punishment the United States is classified with countries whose normal standard of human rights would infuriate each citizen of the United States. The entire refined world is moving forward at a rapid rate on the question of human rights. We presently oblige to accelerate and catch up or we will be lagging behind.

Susan Sarandon, who starred in a movie regarding capital punishment called Dead Man Walking, had a fascinating dialogue with her daughter concerning the movie. Sarandon was elucidating to her little daughter how capital sentence is facilitated: Initial Billy murders Steve, and then the government kills Billy, to reprimand him for assassinating Steve. To this the young daughter replied, fine then who assassinates the government? The little lass innocently stumbled into one of the generally contentious topics in the globe, capital retribution. In the speech Sarandon bestows some background in relation to capital chastisement then by means of data and evidence, she shares why she supposes that the death consequence is erroneous. She comprehends that some of people may possibly deviate with her opinion, which is reasonable, but all she asks is that people should pay attention to the evidence before they settle on siding with her or not. Before hearing the point of view with reference to capital punishment one must appreciate some of the accounts and fundamental information. Capital Punishment according to Webster is imposition of a punishment of death by the state.

The initial recorded capital punishment was 1750 B.C. From the descend of Rome to the early stages of the contemporary age, capital punishment was employed all through Western Europe. The current association for the elimination of capital punishment began in the 18th century with the inscriptions of Montesquieu and Voltaire. Some of the earliest countries to put an end to capital punishment incorporated Venezuela (1863), San Marino (1865), and Costa Rica (1877). At of the commencement of 1992, 44 countries had eliminated the fatality penalty, while 16 other countries, together with the United Kingdom, Canada, and Israel, reserved capital punishment merely for treachery and warfare crimes. There are 106 states and territories that hold on to the death penalty for common crimes like robbery, with numerous countries in the Caribbean, Africa, Asia, and Eastern Europe, in addition to the republics of the earlier Soviet Union.

Since the 1970s, approximately all capital sentences in the United States have been obligatory for slaughter. There has been extreme dispute amongst Americans on the subject of the constitutionality of capital penalty. Critics allege that executions are violations of the malicious and bizarre retribution stipulation of the Eighth Amendment; followers of the death penalty contradict that this section was not anticipated to forbid lawful executions. Scores of people fall short to recognize that in 1972 the U.S. highest court decided that capital punishment was not officially permitted from then onwards. It eliminated the Central and state death sentence laws of the moment, except that it left the system open for parliament or state legislatures to endorse innovative capital sentence laws in the outlook. Several states enacted latest capital castigation laws shortly subsequent to the declaration. In Gregg v. Georgia (1976), the court authorized capital punishments to carry on in particular states. Since then, 38 countries have reinstated the demise punishment.

Sequentially, to establish if or not the death punishment should be present, we should confirm if it is gratifying its deliberate intention. The death sentence is employed for two major functions: to discourage offence and to convey felons to impartiality and fairness. As to whether it brings the felons to integrity or rather justice is controversial, but it is not necessary to get into that speech. Scores of people think that the intimidation of death also prevents individuals from committing brutal crimes such as massacre, however the statistics enlighten a diverse tale: we ought to obtain a keen glance to perceive if capital sentence essentially does discourage offence, authors Victoria Brewer, Robert Wrinkle, John Sorenson, and James Marquart looked into executions in Texas in the years amid 1984 and 1997. They suspected that if a restrictive outcome were to be present, it would be established in Texas because of the towering figure of death penalties and executions contained by the state. Nevertheless, the authors found extremely no confirmation of a limiting cause.

A comparable research was made in Oklahoma and it gave even more astonishing outcome. There was a considerable enhancement in foreigner assassinations and non-criminal alien murders after Oklahoma passed the death sentence. In the 15 year episode in which California approved of an implementation each other month (1952-1967) massacre rates amplified by 10% per annum. Between 1967 and 1991, at the time when there were no executions in California, the slay rates improved simply by 4.8% yearly. In an extra research, the Bureau of Justice- informed that the South frequently has the uppermost execution rates in America. Possibly not unintentionally, the south is responsible for 80% of all murders. The northeast, which holds less than one percent of the entire executions in the US, has the least massacre rate. We are yet to find out if this is simply a twist of fate!

Generally in the state the non-death sentence states have an execution rate of 3.5 of each 100,000 citizens. The demise sentence countries have a massacre rate of 6.6 of each 100,000. The murder rate in demise punishment states is approximately twice the rate in non-death punishment states. There are numerous studies illustrating that the death punishment does not prevent offence. In other words, capital reprimand is an absolute failure in fault avoidance; in various occasions it has the contradictory consequence. It makes felony rates to augment rather than go down. We would generally imagine that if somebody is confronted by death intimidation, he might reconsider homicide, but it hardly works that way in reality.

Felony avoidance may not be the only spot in which the death punishment fails. Lots of individuals suppose that basically killing a murderer is an excellent technique to spare cash. Nevertheless, if the person is deceased you are not obligated to pay to maintain him alive in reformatory. So it should logically pursue that the death sentence is more economical than offering a life verdict. Well, this may not be true, since there is evidence to attest it: North Carolina pays 2.16 million per capital punishment over the expenses of a non-death sentence slay case with a life decree. Most of this superfluous expenditure in incurred in the courtroom. Death sentence cases are frequently appealed time and again, costing the taxpayers millions every instance. The Death punishment overheads in California amount to 90 million per annum past the regular expenses of the fair dealing method where 78 million of that sum is exhausted in trials. Furthermore, Florida averaged almost 3.2 million dollars per sentence implementation from 1973-1988. That totals to 57 million dollars for 18 executions.

Several death punishment supporters still concur that it is expensive to kill individuals. Prosecutor Phil Haney, who habitually advocates for the death sentence, says that if he might be definite that life in jail actually meant life in jail, he would support the idea of deteriorating the death punishment. He said that it's a subject of money matters since it just costs extravagantly to implement execution on somebody. Not only is the death punishment ineffective in eliminating misdeed and saving funds, it is moreover ethnically prejudiced. Most people get flabbergasted when they see these statistics. It's extremely appalling to imagine that even in this present era, you are virtually 80% more probable to be murdered for assassinating a white man; compared to if you had slain a black man. The scheme is xenophobic. There is definitely no better means of putting it. Ever since 1976 barely 11 white men have been sentenced for murdering black men. In that similar period of time, 145 black men have been executed for murdering white men. This is definitely not justice, rather pure racism.

Ruben Cantu's case is presently one of the several other similar cases. Even Though the number of people found to be innocent may seem small as compared to the number of guilty people essentially punished, we have to solicit how many is too many. Gerald Kogan - a former chief justice of Florida Supreme Court stated that "If one innocent person is executed along the way, then . . . capital punishment." (U.S. News) can no longer be justified. The act of punishing criminals is intended to serve two major purposes. First of all criminal punishment is supposed to act as a form of protecting the society from similar criminal acts, and therefore acts as a deterrent from other aspiring criminals. The subsequent reason is that punishment acts to reform the criminal so as he/ she can turn out to a productive member of our society.

Capital penalty has failed in most of the situations. For once it does not prevent the criminal from engaging in the criminal act again. on the other hand, it is established that most atrocious crimes commendable of the death penalty are personal and dedicated in the heat of the instant and are very implausible to be repeated be the same person. While we may deem that capital punishment might act as a deterrent to scare away other criminals of crime, then that is not the case. When we take a close comparison between crime rates related to murder and other forms of heinous crimes worth of a death penalty, you will notice little or no significant difference between the two countries, one that uses death penalty and the one that does not.

The grounds for this are that the majority of murders are acts of fervour in the instant, when people cannot consider or reason the consequence. Also, individuals who plan to exterminate usually do not have plans of being caught in their mind, and actually believe they won't be caught. Thus, they have no basis to fear capital penalty. The execution of Capital punishment gets rid of the likelihood to reform a criminal. From that perspective, the government is supposed to regard that it is its duty to try to reform criminals. The government has the ability, capabilities as well as resources necessary to reform prisoners, and the plan can has proved to be successful with average criminals.

Nevertheless, reform programs have not been made available to those on death row. Therefore in this case if a criminal on death row is transformed, they do so from their own willingness. By putting a criminal's life to a halt, we shut the door on chance to help that person better themselves as well as depriving them a chance to turn into a good people. When criminals in prison follow the steps presented to them to reform themselves and do a good job, they are compensated. In most of the case, their time to serve is reduced. Conversely, despite the fact that most criminals on death row are not handed aid to reform, several do. A lot of prisoners on death row reform themselves into remorseful, decent people. However, no matter how transformed they may be, it is not considered for their sentence, and they are in the long-run still executed.

Capital punishment is not simply about the prisoner or yet the casualty of the capital crime. It is not just in relation to the parties or families implicated; on the opposing it is about each child, woman or man in the United States. When Timothy McVeigh was executed by the Federal Government, the execution was carried out in the name of the people. The prevalent use of death penalty has really diminished us as human beings. A great poet once declared that "No man is an island entire of it [and] any man's death diminishes [us] since we are mixed up in mankind."James Holmes. It turns out more diminishing especially when a man is sentenced to death on our behalf. In person I am disgusted that the Government believe it must take the life of one more human being do so in my name. "The increasing reliance on the death penalty diminishes all of us, it increases disrespect for human life, and offers the tragic illusion that we can teach that killing is wrong by killing." (United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.)

Passions in the US are brusquely alienated, and evenly strong in the midst of both protesters and supporters of the death penalty. Arguing in opposition to capital penalty, Amnesty International believes that "death sentence is the definitive denunciation of human rights" As well as the cold-blooded and deliberate killing of a human being by the country in the disguised in the name of justice to the people. Capital punishment simply infringes on a person's right to life. It is the eventual inhuman, cruel and demeaning punishment. There can never be any good reason for persecution or for vindictive treatment. On the other hand arguing for capital penalty, the Clark County, Indiana Prosecuting Attorney states that "...there are some defendants who have gone through the eventual sentence offered by the society." by committing murder with infuriating conditions present. According to the Attorney, life is sacred. It denigrates the life of a guiltless murder victim to articulate that society does not have the right to keep the killer from ever committing murder again. In this case society, does not only have the right In this case society, does not only have the right In this case society, does not only have the right In this case society, does not only have the right In this case society, does not only have the right In this case society, does not only have the right In this case society, does not only have the right In this case society, does not only have the right, but also the duty to act in self defence to guard the innocent.

According to Cardinal McCarrick, a Washington Catholic Archbishop, the execution of death penalty diminishes all humankind, aggravates the disrespect for human life as well as offering the tragic misapprehension that we can justify that killing is wrong by killing. The death punishment has not always been in practise in the unites states, even though a religious organization on tolerance states that in the U.S. only approximately 13,000 people have been officially put to death since colonial times. The peak of the executions is recorded to be during the Depression era of the1930s followed by a remarkable decline in the 1950s and 1960s. No executions are reported to have occurred in the US from 1967 to 1976. In 1972, the Supreme Court successfully nullified the death sentence, and transformed the death sentences of hundreds of death row prisoners to life in prison. On the contrary, another Supreme Court verdict established capital punishment to be lawful. And therefore from 1976 through June 3, 2009, 1,167 individuals have been executed in the United States. Most of the democratic countries in Latin America and Europe have put an end to capital punishment over the last fifty years, except for the United States, most states in Asia, and approximately all autocratic governments still retain it.

In conclusion there exists key facts and statistics to that clearly indicate that execution of death penalty is unsuccessful in deterring crime, being fair to minorities as well as saving money. It is moment in time for a change. I don't anticipate everyone to agree with me completely, I simply request that you analyze all of the information about capital retribution prior to deciding to oppose or support it. The reality is out there and It s our task to look for it. With all the available facts regarding the ineffectiveness of the death penalty, let's take an additional look at the logic following the death penalty. Killing is incorrect. Killing is so incorrect that if you exterminate someone else, the Government will execute you. For that case no one is allowed to kill, except for the Government, it s absolutely fine for them to execute people. It makes no logic. Are rapists castigated for their offence by being raped? Are robbers disciplined by being robbed? No. I suggest that the death penalty be eradicated. I would also recommend tougher sentencing laws for killers. They must not be sanctioned parole under any conditions.