This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.
To fully understand the influence the Kings or the Pharaohs of Egypt had on its success and failure one must study the civilization of Ancient Egypt. Stretching back more than 4000 years, it was one of the largest and most successful empires in history. (Polletta) . Ancient Egypt was an oasis in the desert of northeastern Africa, stretching from the modern day Aswan to the fertile plains of the Nile river valley. The civilization that thrived in this region was had its genesis because of drought forcing nomadic hunter gatherers towards the Nile's floodplains (Polletta). The country's chief wealth came from these fertile floodplains that the people were able to adapt to their benefit (Kuiper, 2010). The predictable flooding and controlled irrigation of the valley produced surplus crops and pasture for grazing. This utopia then fuelled social development and culture through pottery, artistry and masonry (Ancient Egypt, 2010). Being the most advanced civilization between 3150 BC and 30 BC Ancient Egypt was at the forefront of mathematics and sciences. They had developed an independent writing system and took up implausibly multifaceted construction projects such as the great pyramids. Their agricultural techniques were far beyond their time along with their knowledge of minerals and quarrying (Polletta).
As in cases with most civilizations this success eventually ceased. The empire began to decline and a series of political and natural disasters brought this mighty empire to its knees. I propose that the main reason for this downfall is the Pharaohs who with their god like stature in society misled the civilization into a false sense of security. Coupled with the threat of drought because of the failure of the Nile River to flood the downfall of the empire was inevitable.
3. The Pharaohs
The title of "Pharaoh" originates from the Greek language through its usage in the Bible. It is derived from the Egyptian word Per-aa which means "Great House," a title of the palace, first used in 1450 BC, and became common usage some centuries later. The usual word for the king of ancient Egypt at the time was nesu , but a multitude of labels were given to the king so as to describe his duties and powers (Dunn). Some of the names include 'Lord of the two lands' and 'Priest of every temple' (Pharoah, 2010)
The hierarchy in ancient Egypt was such that at the top was the pharaoh followed immediately by multitude of learned bureaucratic nobles and priests who made decisions that were not of major importance. Below them were the horde of common people who led a very agrarian bucolic life. The nobles directly below the pharaoh were the viziers who acted as advisors and were also held positions similar to a present day minister. The Pharaoh was the leader around whom the government functioned. These kings with their god like stature controlled the empire's vast amounts of resources and people (Dunn).
The power that a pharaoh held in Egypt and the reserves he controlled seems staggering. Excellent paradigms of this are the Pyramids, the large treasuries full of gold and the temples. They resources they commanded could compete with those of many modern day states, and this is an amazing feat because at the time the pharaohs reigned much of the world was still struggling for its basic survival.
The Pharaoh is viewed as a god king who exists as the manifestation of Horus, a god who takes the shape of a falcon, and is also the son of the divine king Osiris. (Dunn)
As is shown in a variety of primitive civilizations, religious ceremonies are important for unity and a long lasting empire. Countries may be united under a single ruler with a reasonable body of law, legal and taxation system, but the people could only be successfully unified by a unique religion. The collection of cultural festivals, ceremonies and communal acts of worship is what really made people belong to a community (Humphries). As kingdoms got bigger each Pharaoh had to be equal in stature to the neighboring state's monarch, because his followers would otherwise defect to the superior king and overthrow him. It is obvious that no one would want to be ruled by a lesser king and the idea of divine kingship was thus developed. Priests aided this by supporting the King as they didn't want to get blamed for anything that went wrong. The king being divine could then not be ousted unless fell from the grace of the gods. As the king and the religious leader the Pharaoh conducted the most prominent religious rituals which helped reinforce his position (Humphries).
Another aspect of the Pharaohs divinity was their ascension to heaven after death. The Egyptians took great care to bury their dead according to convention and supplied the grave with things that the departed would need for a pleasant life after death. The pharaoh and some nobles had their bodies preserved in a process of mummification and the tombs were decorated with paintings while food was provided at burial and after. In the beginning the right to immortal life was believed to belong only to the Pharaoh but eventually this belief was extended to both the priests and the common people (Kreis, 2006). This was one of the winning factors the Pharaohs had going for them because at that time the people were most afraid of death and by promising them immortality, unity and submission could be easily achieved.
5. Timeline of the Pharaohs
The first real king of Egypt, who ruled over the united land, was Menes, who lived around 3100 years BC, but there is little archaeological proof for this name. Most scholars believe that this kings real name was Narmer or Aha, who are both that are better verified in archaeological records (Dunn). The major events of Egypt's history during the time of pharaoh are listed below.
2700 B.C - First Pyramids were built
2100 B.C - Mentuhotep II United Egypt
(2920 - 2770 BC) - During this time Memphis was made capital city.
(2420 - 2258 BC) - The period of Pepi I and Pepi II rule - the government weakens because of their incompetence.
2160 BC - Capitol city is moved from Memphis to Herakleopolis while Upper Egypt comes under Theban control.
(2150 - 2135 BC) - the Old Kingdom collapses while famine and civil disorder kill a lot of people.
(2135 - 1986 BC) - Egypt gets split into two regions; the north is governed from Herakleopolis, and the south, ruled from Thebes.
(2074-1937 BC) - Egypt gets united again under the governance of Metuhotep.
(1900 - 1400 BC) - War breaks out in Egypt (both civil and foreign)
(1336 - 1327 BC) - Reign of the famous Pharaoh Tutankhamen
(1070-945 BC) - The Pharaoh's power is weakened. Civil war and foreign marauders destroy the civilization.
(Ancient Egyptian Timeline)
6. Fall of the pharaohs
The well-developed central administration that was setup during the time of the old kingdom began to crumble during the time of the Pharaoh Pepi I and II. The main reason behind this was the diminishing economic power that the state possessed because of its feudal practice of granting land to the scribes and officials. In addition to this the Pharaohs also granted the land and other resources to cults and local temples to ensure that these institutions possess the necessary resources to worship the pharaoh after death. The belief that the Pharaoh being a god king and was thus able to control the flooding of the Nile was the next stepping stone to complete failure. Recent evidence shows the Nile began to dry up because of climate change and the people who had put their trust in the Pharaoh were not able to sustain themselves (Polletta). The state could not afford a centralized administration because of these factors and the power of the pharaoh eventually diminished. Regional governors began to challenge the pharaoh and started establishing their own states. Once in control of their own resources these provincial nomarchs began to compete with each other for territory and political power. This went on until the time of Metuhotep who after a lengthy civil war united the country again. This was followed by a reign of prosperity and growth but the pharaoh's power was diminished. This was followed by periods of war and peace with neighboring countries which left its mark on the empire. With the diminishing power of the pharaohs and the incompetence among the new generation Egypt was torn apart by foreign invaders (Ancient Egypt, 2010).
One of the greatest strengths of the ancient Egypt civilization was the Pharaoh because of his or her ability to unite the country into a single nation. On the other hand this was also their greatest weakness.
The delusional narcissistic notions of the pharaohs eroded the economy over time. By conjuring ideas of god like grandeur these self-righteous monarchs began to waste precious resources on vain projects such as the pyramids. In addition to this by perpetrating to be the god king who could control the flooding of the Nile these pharaohs destroyed the empire as necessary precautions for drought were not taken. I propose that the reason the Egyptian civilization fell is because they believed too much in the power of a single man and didn't invest enough time in researching options in case of drought. I base this argument from the data discussed in Gabriella Polletta's Movie, why ancient Egypt fell, where Dr Faker Hassan explains how the Pepi I and II signed pacts with the people to maintain the flooding of the Nile on which their livelihood depended. By keeping the people in a state of confidence no precautionary measures were taken to survive a drought. This was the beginning of the downfall.
Last but not the least as an addition seal to the fall of Egyptian civilization the Pharaoh was able to influence the people's actions indefinitely. Though this would warrant un-questioned submission it presented problems in the face of incompetency. The last few Pharaohs guaranteed the end of the empire because of their obsession with harems and apathy towards state affairs. Eventually the government was run by priests who were only after their own benefit thus leading to a complete downfall after a period of chaos (Rawlinson, 2008).