This is an excellentÂ observation in regard to the play, and one that Miller surely noted. Even the title of the play suggests it. When metal isÂ subjected toÂ intense heatÂ in a crucible, the pure elements rise to the surface, while the drossÂ elementsÂ sink to the bottom. The thematic parallel is obvious. The witch trials throw the people of Salem into a crucible of fear and moral conflict. Their charactersÂ are tested. Rebecca Nurse, Giles Cory, Rev. Hale, John Proctor, and Elizabeth Proctor, respond to the fear and conflict by acting with moral courage and integrity. Others, like Rev. Parris, Abigail Williams, Mary Warren, and Judge Hawthorne, are variously revealed to be weak, greedy, selfish, cowardly, and arrogant. In the figurative crucible of the events in Salem, just as in theÂ literal crucible itself, the pure is separated from the impure. A person's true character is revealed.
Get your grade
or your money back
using our Essay Writing Service!
In general terms, conflict does generally show the true nature of a person.Â You use the term worth, and so many of the characters inÂ The CrucibleÂ do show themselves to be people of honor and integrity in the face of conflict.Â I would include Rebecca and Francis Nurse, Giles and Martha Corey, and John and Elizabeth Proctor, along with Reverend Hale, in this category.Â Others show themselves to be moral cowards--or worse--in the face of conflict.Â This list would include Abigail and Mercy, Judge Hathorn, and Rev. Parris.Â When things get hard, people's true nature is revealed.Â As mentioned above, this crucible shows the characters' characters, both the good and the bad.Â
The evolution of John and Elizabeth Proctor's relationship.
In Arthur Miller's play The Crucible, John and Elizabeth Proctor are introduced as a young, married couple whose relationship had a tense undercurrent. Their actions and reactions towards one another prove that they are at odds with each other. John and Elizabeth seem to be trying to smooth out the bumps in their relationship, but for the most part they only succeed in driving themselves further apart. Now at a time when communication is crucial, John and Elizabeth learn the mistake they made in not getting to know each other better.Â
After months in jail, Elizabeth Proctor was called into the courtroom to answer a series of questions that could determine the fate of her husband, herself, and Abigail Williams. Elizabeth Proctor was asked to accuse her husband of lechery. The hesitation in Elizabeth's response to this question was not a surprise. She was fighting a battle inside of herself that only she knew the depth of. It was up to her to make a decision that she know would change her life and the lives of others. To the question of lechery put before her, Elizabeth Proctor chose to answer "no".Â
Elizabeth answered "no" for a number of reasons. The biggest was the respect she had for her husband. She wanted John to reveal his sin on his own. She felt it wasn't her place to reveal the wrong in his life. Elizabeth also believed that she was part of the reason John chose to have an affair with Abigail. Before John was to sign his confession, Elizabeth asked him to forgive her for being a cold wife. Elizabeth truly believed she was the reason behind John's affair with Abigail. This proves that Elizabeth really did love John although there were times hen it wasn't evident in her words and actions. She respected and trusted him to such an extent that she allowed him to decide when he would let the community know of his sin.
John Proctor also loves his wife deeply. This is shown through his actions...
The characterÂ John ProctorÂ from Arthur Miller's; The Crucible is a model example of a tragic hero. Proctor is initially made out to be a character that has committed the sinful crime of adultery and is struggling to re-establish his trustworthiness in himself and his wife. As The Crucible progresses a great transition in nature and character occur inÂ John Proctor, making the audience sympathize with him when his downfall occurs. AÂ tragic herois defined as someone usually of great stature that falls into a condition of sheer depression. As the audience witnesses the fall of this character they would feel helpless understanding that the fall of this hero was caused by chance, fate or a critical flaw in his character. This essay will outline howÂ John ProctorÂ is initially portrayed by Arthur Miller, what the chinks in his armour are, how his character strengthens, and howÂ John Proctor's inner strength prevails towards the end of the play.The audience first seeÂ John ProctorÂ as a man of great stature and impeccable wit that has committed a degrading act, which now makes him weaker in personality and filled with guilt. A sense of suspicion also lingers about him, since his wife does not completely trus
Always on Time
Marked to Standard
Within the same act the audience see Proctor in the light of a stern irritable man trying his utmost to erase his sin ofÂ committing adultery. When he is confronted with Abigail, he is forced to hold back whatever is left of his desire toward her and he seems to struggle to make the right choices. In the endÂ John ProctorÂ is accused and convicted, this in turn will reveal his true character. The redemption of Proctor"tms character has begun. John when given the choice to make a public confession, bring shame on those who stand by the truth, and live or to stand by the truth and others that believe in it, and be hanged. He realises that he must help the community and that he also must put aside his pride for the good of others to stop Abigail. Alternatively, Proctor could have taken a more active part in the congregation to oppose Parris. Proctor now challenges the hypocrites and shows to the audience that maybe those Christians who follow exactly to code maybe the ones who are really afflicted with the devil. To overcome the two people, Proctor will require self-humiliation. Proctor becomes less liked with the audience. This action, in a tense situation reveals to the audience that Proctor though flawed is deep down a good man. He informs Abigail "ï¿½I will cut off my hand before I ever reach for you again"tm. Proctor now accepts that he must face the court and Abigail for his wife now stands to hang. He almost yields into the offer, signing a document of confession. Now theÂ audience feelÂ for Proctor as they see his desperation and willingness to do good, stand out against his flaws.
Arthur Miller'sÂ The CrucibleÂ tells the story behind the Salem witch trials of 1692, centering our attention on the repercussions these trials had on the Proctor family as well as making an analogous critical commentary on the actions ofÂ HUAC. The printed play contains extensive notes detailing the historical background of Salem society in the 1690s and detailed facts regarding the actual lives of the main characters involved. Miller wanted his critics to know that he had not made up these events, but that people really allowed such things to occur, although he does not intend the play to replace historical record, for it is a dramatization and not a retelling.
Miller initially resisted the idea of depicting theÂ HUACÂ hearings in the form of an old-fashioned witch trial as too obvious. However, as theÂ HUACÂ hearings grew more ritualistic and cruelly pointless, he could no longer resist, despite the obvious risks, for the parallels were far too apt to ignore. He saw how both sets of hearings had a definite structure behind them, designed to make people publicly confess. In both cases, the "judges" knew in advance all the information for which they asked. The main difference was that Salem's hearings had a greater legal force, as it was against the law in America to be a witch in the seventeenth century, but it was not against the law to be a communist in the twentieth century. Miller does not attempt a one-to-one analogy between his characters and those involved inÂ HUACÂ because that would have made the play too tied to its time. The reason the play has remained so popular is that it offers more than a simple history lesson about either the original 1629 Salem witch trials or about HUAC-what Miller explores are the prevailing conditions that cause such events.
InÂ The CrucibleÂ , Miller draws our attention to the process and the ways in which the law, when used for political and private ends, can destroy the lives of others. We never actually step inside the courtroom as the site of the play's action, but hear secondhand what goes on and see how it affects the lives of everyone in Salem. Miller is concerned with the tension people experience between conscience and their predilection toward selfishness, and the inevitable moral consequences of allowing the latter an upper hand.Â The CrucibleÂ exposes the extent to which many people use troubled times, such as those that gave rise to the witch trials, to pursue selfish ends. In contrast to these types, Miller elevates and celebrates people of individual conscience, such as the Nurses and the Proctors, who refuse to do this.
This Essay is
a Student's Work
This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.Examples of our work
Read more:Â Law and Justice - Cates, Trial, Drummond, and BradyÂ http://encyclopedia.jrank.org/articles/pages/3545/Law-and-Justice.html#ixzz13UzX2dp2
John ProctorÂ is a character from the Crucible, a play by Arthur Miller, Throughout the play he changes from being a troubled, self-exiled, sinner to becoming a person of high moral standards. The characters in this play are simple, common people that live in the town of Salem in the year 1692. There is a rumor of witchcraft floating about in the town that has led to accusations about many of the townsfolk. The accused are charged and convicted of a crime that is impossible to prove (witchcraft). The reasons the villains select the people they do for condemnation are both simple and clear because all of the accusers have ulterior motives, such as revenge, greed, and covering up their own behavior. The three major points I will be talking about in my essay about are as follows: 1 His entrance into the play where he is talking alone to Abigail and trying to convince himself that he is not an adulterer and that they did not have an affair. 2 when John is reciting theÂ Ten Commandments. 3 where John tells Elizabeth that he are going to confess. In the beginning of the playÂ John ProctorÂ is introduced as a farmer in his mid thirties, that is not a partisan of the town, and shows a very strong sense of self-preservation. The first re