Looking At Dickens Hard Times English Literature Essay

Published: Last Edited:

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

"It was a town of unnatural red and black like the painted face of a savage. It was a town of machinery and tall chimneys, out of which interminable serpents of smoke trailed themselves forever and ever, and never got uncoiled...where the piston of the steam engine worked monotonously up and down like the head of an elephant a state of melancholy madness...inhabited by people equally like one another, who all went in and out at the same hours, with the same sound upon the same pavements, to do the same work and to whom everyday was the same as yesterday and tomorrow."

This description contains both metaphor and connotation, with the serpents being a biblical metaphor for sin and evil. The scorched and stained chimneys giving the image of hell whilst the very notion that each building is twinned by the next is reflected in the way that everything in Coketown abides by a strict uniform. The depressed citizens mirror this miserable setting as they go about their daily routines.

Both social and contemporary issues are appraised throughout Dickens condition of England novel and Dickens echoes many of Carlye's arguments against the power of materialistic views; however, Hard Times also shows that human nature is a strong force and the positive traits that it holds such as hope, compassion and imagination are not easily destroyed. These qualities are preserved in characters such as Rachael, Sleary and Sissy, even Mr Gradgrind eventually reveals some elements of humanness.

In truth, Hard Times is an attack on the Manchester school of economics and is critical of the way society basis itself on the lassie-faire system of capitalism. The 1800s witnessed the Industrial Revolution sweep across England. Dickens saw the industrial revolution as a negative event and one that stripped people of their rights in favour of profit. The lower class workers began to face even more poverty as the callous factory owners exploited them for as much money and production as possible. Fines were a regular occurrence for any worker who dared to take a rest, even if pregnant. Dickens viewed the industrial revolution through humanitarian eyes and believed the generalisation of workers a merely 'hands' took away any form of individuality as they became a voiceless and powerless number who would never be right in the eyes of the factory bosses. Stephen Blackpool expresses this view "look how we live, an' wheer we live, an' in what numbers...and how yo are awlus right and how we are awlus wrong"

Although the laissez-faire system was supposed to offer the individual freedom of choice whilst providing society with the greater good for the majority, Dickens uses Stephen Blackpool to show that this is not the case because although he could quit his job he would not be free as there was no benefit system in place to take care of the unemployed. A new job would have to be acquired and inevitably, it would come with the same cruel conditions and the same oppressive attitude from another self-serving boss doing their upmost to obtain as much work for as little pay as possible.

Dickens as his spokesperson essentially uses Blackpool as he portrays the oppressed, unappreciated worker, his sacking at the hands of Bounderby highlights this in an attempt to show the power he holds over his employees. Bounderby in a sense personifies the laissez-faire system; he preaches the ideology of facts over imagination by demonstrating himself as the perfect example of somebody who has come through adverse poverty to be a self-made man. Yet he is living in his own imaginary world as none of his fables of a poor upbringing holds any truth therefore Bounderbys beliefs and his actual life make an interesting paradox.

Because of the industrial revolution society changed with a new middle class emerging whose moral duty, in Dickens eyes, was to fight for the rights of the powerless lower class. Many of these new middle class individuals would start trade unions and even join parliament in an attempt to change the laws to benefit the poor, however the notion that workers should join in trade unions was not something Dickens embraced. In Hard Times, the trade unions lead by Slackbridge is not portrayed in an attractive light. As much as Dickens disagreed with the social divides, it is not mentioned very heavily in Hard Times.

Dickens does however suggest that love could diminish exploitation and this is symbolised by the union of Sissy and Louisa that also shows that no matter where a person comes from nor what class they are labelled as, they are equal and should be afforded the dignity of basic human rights.

Dickens also challenges the drudgery of the education system, the opening lines of the novel, spoken by Mr Gradgrind

"Now, what I want is facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing but facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else, and root out everything else"

Is a reflection of the oppression children faced within the classroom. Mr Gradgrind based his beliefs on the utilitarian theory and made it the foundation and philosophy for his school. This resulted in the children being viewed as empty vessels to be filled with facts. Mr Gradgrind reflected this philosophy through his persona

"He seemed like some kind of cannon loaded to the muzzle with facts and prepared to blow them clear out of the regions of childhood in one discharge"

This description of the schools philosophy is ironically contained within the chapter 'murdering the innocents'.

The problems with such a philosophy is shown through Louisa who is a perfect product of the school of facts yet lives an unfulling life as she is incapable of enjoying or appreciating what she has in an emotional manner as she has suppressed her emotions long ago. Too much emphasis was placed on filling the children with facts whilst neglecting all other aspects of their development. This is the key failure of Gradgrind's school and is shown via the satirical portrayal of Mr M'Choakumchid, one of the teachers charged installing the facts into the children. The very name M'Choakemchild is a word play as he literally choked the child with facts.

Gradgrind's school dehumanises the children whereas the circus restores humanity, this divide of fact and fancy symbolises an adult's attitude on life. This is not the only binary opposition in Hard Times as we see Sissy as a happy, imaginative and colourful child, opposed by Bitzer who is devoid of all imagination and colour, he is a dull person and this is shown in his appearance.

It was Dickens belief that a life without imagination and joy is a life of inadequacy and misery.

This is a weakness within the utilitarian education system that Dickens highlights, however he fails to recognize that without this system many children would receive no education and would be forced to either work in the coalmines or be incarcerated, much the way a 12-year-old Dickens was, to work in the workhouses.

Dickens, through Hard Times shows that there is a great stratification between the working class and the higher class, there was indeed, as Disraeli stated, "two nations of England, the rich and the poor"

The utilitarian system, Industrial revolution and laissez-faire capitalism all come under harsh criticism from the pen of Dickens because these systems allow for no compassion nor nurturing of human qualities that enables people to love and live life rather than go through life as a stereotype regurgitating facts.

The overriding message to the public is that people born in squalor are not only exploited but also void of any rights and privileges and this is a social ill that needs addressing.

Hard Times is

"Essentially an exploration of economic and ideological systems...Dickens stylistic extravagancies in themselves challenges the heartless abstractions of utilitarianism. " (Foster 107)

Gaskell, like Dickens, used her bildungsroman novel North and South to draw attention to the condition of England and address the social issues of the time. Through the main protagonist, Margaret, she shows the divides in society and the attitude and contempt the lower class is held in.

Margaret moves from the sleepy Southern town of Helstone to the Northern industrial town of Milton, which is set in the middle of the industrial revolution, due to her father's decision to leave his post as a pastor and move north on the advice of his good friend Mr Bell. These two very differing climates serve as a metaphor for the experiences and people by whom Margaret is surrounded. With her father now viewed as a dissenter, he takes the role of a tutor. This shows the nineteenth century concern of the crisis of the church.

Margaret is an independent strong minded and out spoken women who detests one of her father's pupils, John Thornton who is a mill master as she sees him as a cold callous man whose only interest is money. As Margaret faces great hardship in Milton, she learns to empathize with the plight of the lower class worker

"Elizabeth Gaskell describes a kind of apartheid in early Victorian Manchester, where members of the middle class can walk the streets of the town without ever entering the slum districts, thus remaining ignorant of poverty in their own zone" (Wheeler 38)

Gaskell looks at both sides of unrest between master and worker; she witnesses the workers going on strike due to Thornton reducing the wages because of pressure coming from America. To compound issues he does not give an explanation to the workers for this wage reduction.

However, he does give an explanation to Margaret

"Do you give your servants reasons for your expenditure, or your economy in the use of your own money? We, the owners of capital have a right to choose what we will do with it" (Gaskell 468)

Contrary to Thornton Margaret does try to build some empathy with the workers as she tries to explain the situation of the capital holders and farmers to the workers during the strike.

As money become short so too did the supply of food with the workers meals often been replaced by tea as this gave the body the impression it had eaten due to the caffeine and sugar content. This was cheaper for the mill owners but resulted in an increase in malnutrition. The main source for nutrition such as bread and potatoes became a luxury the worker could not afford and an unnecessary expense in the eyes of the employer.

The tea symbolises the class divisions with the poor drinking it simply to survive whereas the higher class would drink the tea as a luxury commodity, which is significant as Victorian society based a lot of social judgement on how one would take their tea/meals.

Throughout the novel, Gaskell uses dialect speech to show that she understands the world of which she writes.

Margaret forges friendships with both upper and working class families and as she is unfamiliar with the trouble between classes, she has an unbiased view on the people and acts as a mediator within her small circle trying to highlight the problems caused by the class conflict.

Gaskell, through Margaret, empowers the 'weaker sex' and regardless of the social standing of each character, she examines the role of women in Victorian England, industrialization and the effects it has on class divisions.

Throughout the novel, Margaret has to accept the social effects of the Class system but through Higgins and Bessy, she learns that no matter what people are still people regardless of the class they have bestowed upon them.

Gaskell demonstrates that although there are class divides within Victorian society it is still possible for these people to communicate with one another and even make decisions together. For Gaskell communication between the classes is the only way to achieve harmony within society. Although class struggle cannot be distinguished totally, it can be reduced for the mutual benefit of each class.

Gaskell like Dickens was "writing the kind of novel that asked all the questions and was at least aware of a whole range of possible answers." (Pollard 193)

Through Margaret's unspoken resolution to marry Thornton, Gaskell signifies the resolution of the novel, the binding of the two genders, the binding of the two halves of England, the binding of individuals and the social classes, essentially the binary oppositions are united.

Gaskell used the novel to highlight the plight of women and the underprivileged workers and demanded that the wealthy mill owners address the ills of the industrial age; she believed that their Christian charity and good heartedness could bring about the much-needed social change.

Dickens was also concerned with the predicament of women and their struggle to survive in a man's world. Victorians strongly believe that a woman's place was in the home, thus she was known as the 'angle of the house'.

Both Dickens and Gaskell represented the deprived society as well as attacking the oppressive nature of Victorian society and its failure to assist the poor. Aware of their ability to reach out to middle class readers and motivated by their sense of social conscience, both wrote in an informative and moving way about the working class struggles, both however "sidestep the case for radical change to class structures, relying instead on the reconciling plots of marriage and reunited families." (Tucker 83)

However, it has to be said "from their middle-class world-view, neither writer could possibly see the class system as intrinsically oppressive and exploitative, a social construction that might need deconstruction." (DeVine 5)

Conversely Jane Stevenson claims that Gaskell's "direct knowledge of the lives of the poor probably exceeded that of Dickens." (Stevenson

Both of these conditions of England novels "specifically demands some kind of response from the reader to the wrongs which it exposes." (Wheeler