An Overview On The Global Warming English Language Essay

Published:

This is a project about the Global Warming between U.S and China. I have worked too fine how U.S and China working together, how they will stop the global warming, and help eachother to stop the global warming.

I have worked much one internet, too fine how i should right this down, and make it like a project. I have found much intresting about this, one several pages, so it is much intresting In this text.

I pick this because I will learn about it, it is so much we cane do, too make this better. If we don't do something, we will die. All of the bad air. So I will learn much about this, and I have. So my project have gone very good.

Internet pages:
  1. www.globalwarming.org
  2. http://www.climatehotmap.org/
  3. http://www.nrdc.org/globalwarming/Default.asp
  4. http://environment.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/gw-overview.html
  5. http://www.worldviewofglobalwarming.org/
Lady using a tablet
Lady using a tablet

Professional

Essay Writers

Lady Using Tablet

Get your grade
or your money back

using our Essay Writing Service!

Essay Writing Service

This is internet pages I have used when I have found facts too this project

Global warming is a problem that spans the entire world, but when it comes to figuring out how to stop it, the burden will largely fall on two countries: the U.S. and China. The U.S. is the world's largest historic carbon emitter, responsible for putting more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere over the past century and a half than any other nation. China recently surpassed the U.S. as the top emitter and will be responsible for more greenhouse gases in the future than any other country. "These two countries hold the key to sustainability or catastrophe," says Jake Schmidt, international climate policy director for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).

If that's the case, it might seem as if the world is headed toward catastrophe. Over the weekend, world leaders at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit made explicit what had long been expected that a legal, global treaty to reduce carbon emissions was no longer possible at next month's U.N. summit in Copenhagen. The deadlock between the U.S. and China is a big reason: Beijing expects Washington to take the lead on cutting carbon, but the U.S. won't sign on to a deal that doesn't including measurable action from the Chinese. From that perspective, climate change is one more competition between the world's reigning superpower and its No. 1 challenger.

But the U.S.-China relationship is never as simple as it seems and that includes their positions on climate change.

Most important, cooperation is beginning at the top: both U.S. President Barack Obama and Chinese President Hu Jintao have put energy and climate change high on their agendas. "As the two largest consumers and producers of energy, there can be no solution to this challenge without the efforts of both China and the United States," said Obama in Beijing. "That is why we've agreed to a series of important new initiatives in this area."

There were no agreements for specific numbers or emissions cuts at Obama and Hi's meeting. The White House has made clear that the Senate must take the lead on setting emissions levels, and China has been loath to name numbers for its own emissions. But the two Presidents did agree to establish a joint clean-energy research center, supported by at least $150 million in funding over five years, a partnership on developing electric vehicles, a renewable-energy road map and an action plan on energy efficiency. It fit the expectations of observers before the summit-broad cooperation on technology, but with little specificity. "The big chance for cooperation is on technology," says Michael Levi, director of the program on energy security and climate change for the Council on Foreign Relations. "Early-stage cooperation can help defuse some of the tensions of later-stage technology transfer."

Despite being years apart in economic development, with U.S. per capita carbon emissions nearly 10 times the number of Chinese levels, the two countries have similar concerns on energy. Both are major coal users, with half of U.S. electricity and 70% of Chinese energy derived from the carbon-intense fuel. Carbon capture and sequestration technology where coal could be burned but carbon could be buried in the ground is a perfect example of where the two countries' interests overlap, environmentally and economically. Indeed, Hu and Obama introduced a program called "21st Century Coal" to promote the development of large-scale clean-coal programs, which includes separate agreements among several Chinese and American companies on the issue.

Lady using a tablet
Lady using a tablet

Comprehensive

Writing Services

Lady Using Tablet

Plagiarism-free
Always on Time

Marked to Standard

Order Now

Another area where the two countries can combine forces is in the development of a smart grid, which would marry electrical distribution to the intelligent-networking power of the Internet. China has embarked on a vast expansion of its electrical grid, as it seeks to power its enormous manufacturing engine. At the same time the U.S. is slowly overhauling its own grid, turning it smart the White House channeled over $3 billion to smart-grid projects last month. The cooperation is natural. China is now the world's biggest industrial canvas, and it has a government willing to pay big money for big infrastructure projects. At the same time, the U.S. still has the lead on green innovation. U.S. corporations like Duke Energy are going to China because the People's Republic is betting on a future of green tech, for better or worse. The country already has some of the biggest manufacturers of solar panels and wind turbines. Though most of those products are exported to the West, China is emerging as a major consumer market for clean tech as well. It helps that Beijing, more than Washington, is willing to spend long-term on clean tech China's green stimulus funding this past spring ran into the hundreds of billions of dollars. "U.S. companies are having considerable success in China," says Jonathan Lewis, staff attorney and climate specialist for the Clean Air Task Force. "China has the institutional capacity and it has the ready cash."

But for all the areas of potential cooperation and good feeling, there is a need for firm negotiation between the U.S. and China on climate change as there is in nearly every other aspect of their relationship. At some point, the two nations will have to sit down and figure out how to save the planet from the global warming that they, more than any other countries, have created. That didn't happen in Beijing this past week and it won't happen in Copenhagen in December. But it needs to happen soon. "This isn't like a Sputnik-style space race where one country wins and the other loses," says Barbara Finamore, China program director for the NRDC. "They both stand to benefit." And if they don't, the whole world loses.

Global warming has become perhaps the most complicated issue facing world leaders. On the one hand, warnings from the scientific community are becoming louder, as an increasing body of science points to rising dangers from the ongoing buildup of human-related greenhouse gases - produced mainly by the burning of fossil fuels and forests. On the other, the technological, economic and political issues that have to be resolved before a concerted worldwide effort to reduce emissions can begin have gotten no simpler, particularly in the face of a global economic slowdown.

After years of preparation for climate talks to be held in Copenhagen starting on Dec. 7, 2009, President Obama and other leaders announced on Nov. 15 what had already become evident - that no formal treaty could be produced anytime soon. Instead, the leaders pledged to reach a placeholder accord that would call for reductions in emissions and increased aid to help developing nations adapt to a changing climate and get and get access to non-polluting energy options.

This would in theory give the nations more time to work out the all-important details. Negotiators would then seek a binding global agreement in 2010, complete with firm emission targets, enforcement mechanisms and specific dollar amounts to aid poorer nations.