Published: Last Edited:

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.


What is learning? Are there different types of learning? What affects a students learning? Why do some learn differently than others? These are just a few of the questions that educators, parents, and students themselves have posed for centuries. It is without a doubt a very complicated topic. The author of this paper attempts to alleviate some of these questions by addressing the differences between behavioral and social learning theory along with the necessity of using cognitive strategies to aid in the learning process.

Behaviorist versus Cognitive Theories of Learning

What are the differences between the behavioral learning theory and that of the social learning theory? Which theory offers the best insight into how developing children learn? To determine answers to these questions, the factors of behavioral learning theories must be weighed against those of social learning theories.

Behavior learning theories are centered on the idea that learning takes place because of numerous opportunities to experience a particular event. This event is believed to permanently change the said behavior. Behavioral theories fall under one of two categories: classical or respondent conditioning and operant conditioning.

The classical/respondent conditioning theory, as demonstrated and made famous by Pavlov's experiment, believes the behaviors that we exhibit are one's that are learned by associating one thing to another (Cherry, 2005b). This idea of reflexive conditioning was happened upon by Pavlov as he studied dog's digestion (Cherry, 2005b). . Within his study of how much a dog salivated at the sight of various things, food and non-food items, Pavlov and his assistant noted the amount of saliva that was produced (Cherry, 2005b). . In doing so they found that dogs automatically or reflexively responded to the item placed in front of them, food or non-food, after being presented with them intermediately for some time (Cherry, 2005b). This response he believed was based on conditioning or automaticity, which made it purely physiological (Cherry, 2005b). . His idea of conditioning was extended to human conditioning by James B. Watson (Cherry, 2005b).

Watson and his associate Rosalie Rayner wanted to test the theory of classical conditioning on humans in regards to phobias, to see if they would elicit similar results. Watson's experiment was based on a little boy name Albert (Beck, 2001). When Watson and Rayner, first met Albert he was not afraid of a white rat, after a short time with them he was afraid of mice and other furry items (Beck, 2001). The experiment introduced a loud noise that startled the young boy as he played with the rat. This sound scared the young boy so much that he started to cry and subsequently exhibit fear when he saw a rat or anything furry. This proved for them that Pavlov's idea that an unconditioned stimulus would cause an unconditioned response and finally that this unconditioned response paired with a conditioned stimulus would elicit a conditioned response, or a reflexive action (Beck, 2001). They believed this made the Pavlovian theory of conditioning plausible and accurate for humans as well.

The operant conditioning theory of B.F. Skinner focuses on learning based on the behavior and the consequences of the behavior. Skinner's beliefs were greatly influenced by E. L. Thorndike's idea of Law of Effect. The Law of Effect, also a conditioning theory, was based on the premise that if an unconditioned stimulus's response is paired with a pleasant event than the response is stronger and more likely to be repeated. Likewise if the stimulus result is paired with a negative event, then the event is weaker and less likely to be repeated. Skinner found this a useful tool in understanding reflexive behaviors that occurred and further strengthened his idea that behavior was strengthened by a reinforcer or weakened by a punisher (Cherry, 2005a).

Reinforcers are either positive or negative. Positive reinforcers occur after said behavior and are positive outcomes for the behavior; whereas negative reinforcers are negative outcomes as the result of a behavior (Cherry, 2005a). Whether negative or positive the behavior will increase. Punishers whether negative or positive will decrease a behavior (Cherry, 2005a). Positive punishers employ using an unfavorable event to decrease behavior; negative punishers happens when the event is taken away in order to weaken the behavior that has occurred (Cherry, 2005a).

Social learning theories contrary to behavioral theories focuses on learning that takes place due to the observation and modeling of behaviors, attitudes, and emotions exhibit by others around them. Albert Bandura, considered one of the authorities within this theory, believed that behavioral learning could not explain all the types of learning (Cherry, 2005c).He said, "Learning would be exceedingly laborious, not to mention hazardous, if people had to rely solely on the effects of their own actions to inform them what to do (Cherry, 2005c).". He further argued that learning had to have some social element to it to be successful. He stated that, "Fortunately, most human behavior is learned observationally through modeling: from observing others one forms an idea of how new behaviors are performed, and later occasions this coded information serves as a guide for action (Cherry, 2005c)." The ideals of Bandura and other social theorists are broken down into three basic concepts that explain the various types of behavior: observational learning, modeling process, and intrinsic reinforcement (Cherry, 2005c).

Observational learning states that learning takes place through observation (Cherry, 2005c).The author's three-year-old nephew learns much of his mannerism and behaviors by watching his family around the house and others at church. He has learned to work on a computer by watching her do her work weekly, to the point of imitating exactly how she holds her hands when typing and the tapping of her fingers at her desk when she is in deep concentration. This idea of observational learning is so strong according to theorists that it can be achieved through live observation, verbally through instruction, or symbolic (displayed through another media) means.

Intrinsic Reinforcement goes against the ideal that behavior is reinforced by extrinsic reinforcement only (Cherry, 2005c).Social theorists believed that a great deal of behavior and learning will be based on intrinsic factors, which give the learner a sense of pride and accomplishment. Bandura believes this is one of the most important factors that separates the social learning theory from behavioral theories and makes it more of a cognitive social approach (Cherry, 2005c).

The Modeling Process hinges on the person that is doing the modeling of a said behavior and the observer and must follow certain steps. Firstly, in order for a person to learn they must pay attention to the model otherwise there will be negative ramifications. Therefore the modeling must be memorable and hold the attention of the observer. Next, the observer must have the ability to retain the information that is observed. Thirdly, one must be able to pull the information from their memory in order to practice the skill further. Lastly, the learner must be motivated enough to use the behavior they saw modeled (Cherry, 2005c).This step models show some similarities to behavior thoeries in that the use of reinforcers and punishers are cruicial to motivating the learner. For example, if a students observes another student receiving class bucks for participation they are more likely to participate as well (Cherry, 2005c).

Social theories and behavioral theories are similar yet different. Both of the theories believe that learning and behavior are connected yet each feel differently about whether the learning that each elicit is permanent. Social theories disagree that all learning leads to a change in behavior, in fact they believe that new things can be learned without forming new behaviors (Cherry, 2005c).

Learning is a complex process by that requires much of the learner. All of the learners' behaviors, attitudes, knowledge and gained information factor into whether true learning has taken place. The study of cognition aims to help us understand how learning takes place and the various processes that we go through to achieve it. Students may not understand the how and why of cognition, so it is the teacher's job to teach them strategies to make certain that they have good cognitive skills or skills for thinking about learning. The chart above has outlined the various strategies that students can use before, during, and after reading to strengthen comprehension, but how does this cognitive strategies in general help students learn?

In order for strategies to work for students they must be aware of why they need to think about the thinking that takes place as they learn (as cited in Purdue, n.d., ch.7). Simply put, it is the way that they can take ownership of their own learning and it is what makes them good and great learners. Garner further establishes that setting purposes for learning, solving problems, self-regulating, monitoring, and self-assessment of their learning are all ways in which students can show that they have good cognitive skills (as cited in Purdue, n.d., ch.7).. The above strategies are just some of the ways that Garner says that students are able to organize, study, review, practice, and finally master various skills (as cited in Purdue, n.d., ch.7). Teachers must show them how to use these strategies to their advantage to learn. There are some things that educators can do to help them students develop these cognitive skills, thus helping them become independent thinkers and learners.

Garner believes that the first thing that they can do is to teach students to monitor their thinking effectively (as cited in Purdue, n.d., ch.7). This can be done through showing them how to analyze the process of thinking as they work. They teach them to questions themselves on ways that they can improve upon their thinking as they try to accomplish their goal or whether or not they need help to accomplish these goals. According to Garner, students must know when they are learning and when they are not learning (as cited in Purdue, n.d.). Furthermore, Garner says that when they realize that they are not learning they should be able to choose another cognitive strategy to help them achieve their goal (as cited in Purdue, n.d., ch.7).

Secondly, Garner believes students need to be taught to use more sophisticated strategies to show that they are thinking (as cited in Purdue, n.d., ch.7). Teachers should not accept the simply retelling of the text, they should require that student synthesize the information and are able to offer legitimate summaries of the material (Purdue, n.d.).

Thirdly, teachers must teach students the appropriate strategies to use with the various texts and content (Purdue, n.d.). This is pertinent since it sets the stage for student learning. Think of it like building a house, if there is no foundation the house will not stand; with a solid foundation the house could burn done, but the base from which to start over is still there. Students might need to reevaluate the strategies that they choose, but they can start over if they have the foundational knowledge of the strategies (Purdue, n.d.).

Fourthly, students must be taught to set personal goals for their learning. When students set their own goals they are more likely to carry through with the strategies to see the success with them. Borkowski, Carr, and Pressley say "students with low self-esteem who attribute success and failure to something other than effort are unlikely to initiate or persist in the use of cognitive strategies" (cited in Purdue, n.d., ch.7). If they do so, they fall into not using their metacognitive skills to comprehend the concepts (Purdue, n.d.).

Lastly, when teachers model for students how to use cognitive strategies they are helping them develop higher order thinking skills. When they are taught to engage in higher order thinking, they are taught how to identify how they learn, think about textual problems as they learn about them, figure out how to solve them, and finally synthesize all the information at the end of the text.


  • Beck, H. (2001, January 1). Watson, Rayner, and Little Albert. Retrieved from General Psychology: http://www1.appstate.edu/~beckhp/littlealbert.htm
  • Chamot, A.U., O'Malley, J.M. (1994). The calla handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approachhttp://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=strategiclear-20&l=as2&o=1&a=0201539632. White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
  • Cherry, K. (2005a). Introduction to operant conditioning. Retrieved from About.com: http://psychology.about.com/od/behavioralpsychology/a/introopcond.htm
  • Cherry, K. (2005b.). Pavlov's dogs: How Ivan Pavlov discovered classical conditioning. Retrieved from About.com: http://psychology.about.com/od/classicalconditioning/a/pavlovs-dogs.htm
  • Cherry, K. (2005c). Social Learning Theory: An overview of Bandura's social learning theory. Retrieved from About.com: http://psychology.about.com/od/developmentalpsychology/a/sociallearning.htm
  • Harvey, S. (1998). Nonfiction matters: Reading,writing, and research in grades 3-8. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
  • Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2000). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension to enhance understanding. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
  • Purdue. (n.d.). Teaching thinking skills: Development of thinking skills. Retrieved from Educational Pshychology Book: http://education.calumet.purdue.edu/vockell/EdPsyBook/Edpsy7/edpsy7_intro.htm
  • Purdue. (n.d.). Development of thinking skills. Retrieved from Educational Pshychology Book: http://education.calumet.purdue.edu/vockell/EdPsyBook/Edpsy7/edpsy7_intro.htm