The development of the enlightenment

Published: Last Edited:

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

1. How significant was Denis Diderot (1713-1784) in the development of the Enlightenment?

The Enlightenment which is centred around the seventeenth and eighteenth Century is used to describe a time in Western Philosophy and cultural life where a series of changes in European thought and letters. The enlightenment was an intellectual movement which is an in the Free from feudal obligations that bound the peasants and the nobles their land, members of the new urban middle class wanted to develop their individual potentials. The Enlightenment also had a significant influence on the scientific revolution and by the aftermath of the long religious conflict that followed the Reformation. It also led to developments in art and philosophy which was mainly seen in the works of Denis Diderot.

One of the most radical philosophers of the Enlightenment was Denis Diderot. Diderot was a French philosopher, art critic and writer in the 18th century. Diderot is argued amongst historians as to how much of a significant role he played in the enlightenment was considered to be a important figure for the enlightenment. Diderots effect can be seen to have affected all aspects of society by the enlightenment.

One factor why Diderot was the most significant leader of the Enlightenment can been seen here with a passage take from one of diderots early philosophical works.That, says the atheist, is my case; what have you say to it? That I am a miserable wretch and if i had nothing to fear from God, I should not be debuting his existence. Let us leave such an answer to orators; it may be untrue; politeness forbids it and it has no savour of charity about it. Because a man is mistaken in his denial of god, should we insult him? People only take refuge in invective when they are run short of proofs[1] Diderot also had created religious tensions but on the other hand this was positively significant. The source of Diderot above is an example of Diderots idea of free will and that people can believe what they want to believe and that proof needs to be provided in order for things to be believed. When Diderot takes his standpoint its clear, in that seizes his hypothesis and will take it to the end regardless of its consequences.

Denis Diderot was clearly the one of the most significant people to contribute to the enlightenment. An example of Diderots significance in the Enlightenment is the fact he had to be imprisoned at Vicennes for 3 months in 1749 because of his Lettre sur les aveugles (An Essay on blindness) which was one of his popular early works. This also shows one that impression of taking his standpoint . The Lettre sur les aveugles It was an attempt to teach the blind how to read through the sense of touch along lines. It was also an attempt which questioned God and supported Lockes theory. "Diderot recognises the determining effects of the market on culture during his own time and anticipates the appearance of mass markets in the late nineteenth century. In this respect he shares with Rousseau an anticipatory vision of cultural modernity"[2] Diderot was clearly a significant figure in the enlightenment positive social and cultural improvements were unconscious motives can be seen in his work. Whether he was seeking to help others or just for his own interest Diderot was significant in the enlightenment.

Another factor of Diderot significance is In 1745, when Diderots published his first piece of work was the Essai sur le merite et la vertu. The same year that he began working on the encyclopede. Emmet Kennedy cites Diderot as a turning point in the eighteenth- century scientific theory as well as philosophy. He writes In 1754 Diderot predicted that we are approaching the moment of a great revolution in the sciences...I would dare almost to assert that before one hundred years are up, we will not count three great geometricians in Europe. this has often been interpreted as the clue to a change, around mid-century, when a mechanistic, natural philosophy like that of laplace gave way to vitalistic biology like that of lamarack [3] Diderot, nonetheless, owes a tremendous dept to his contemporaries. "From fanaticism to barbarism is only one step."[4]Here is an example of the radicalism of Diderot which affected the religious aspects of the world yet his attitude to religion is a poor one. The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has killed a great many philosophers.[5] This is an example of how the church despised his writings on questioning god following Locke and on the thought of evolution.

if ever a philosopher, blind and deaf from his birth, were to construct a man after the fashion of Descartes, i can assure, madam, that he would put the seat of the soul at the fingers ends, for thence the greater part of the sensations and all his knowledge are derived. Who is to inform him that his head is the seat of thoughts? If the labours of the imagination tire our brain, this is because the effort we make to imagine is somewhat similar to that to perceive very near or very small objects. But this would not be the case with a man blind and deaf from birth, for the sensations which he gathered from touch will be their world

Another reason why Diderot was the most significant figure of the enlightenment can be found in the interpreatation made by specialist historian Daniel Brewer who comments on the depth which Diderot goes to into when he writes which makes him the significant figure of the enlightenment. Diderot cannot just write about it, that is, as if he were outside it, as if the subject of knowledge occupied some transcendental position from which to survery, master, and comprehend nature. Rather, Diderot will write de la nature, from within it, so to speak, thereby marking the link between knowledge and its object. Diderots insight here is to refuse the kind of knowledge that claims to know nature as such, and he does so in the name of another kind of knowledge, that of nature as representation[6] Diderot was a very significant writer of the Enlightenment with dedicating his life to the enlightenment. The interpretation made by Daniel Brewer is a fair interpretation on the enlightened way of thinking that Diderot had and this is why he was one of the most significant people of the enlightenment.

One must begin to understand that Diderot dedicated much of his life to writings of the enlightenment More famously known for being the editor to the Encyclopdie, Diderot also did many other writings on the enlightenment and especially having a philosophical look into the ideas of free will .Yet can one consider him of major significance to the Age of enlightenment.

One of the most significant factors that Denis Diderot is one of the most influenced characters of the enlightenment is the fact that he was the main Editor for the Encyclopdie. The Encyclopedia began forming in 1745 and was finally published in 1772 qith 17volumes and 11 engravings by varuoous authers .The Encyclopdie was a main contribution to the enlightenment of Europe, it was considered the French Enlightenments real breakthrough by historian T.C.W Blanning[7]. B Diderot had dedicated his life to helping others expand their knowledge this therefore shows one he was one of the prime initiators of the enlightenment. Before the Encyclopaedia there was no real collection of knowledge, rather it was in separate place. It was also an epoch-making-and very profitable- venture in publishing. Its 4,000 copies were widely disseminated throughout France, although the initial subscription price of 280 livres (about 14), restricted its circulation, even amongst historians[8]

Another aspect of this is that the encyclopedie would have contributed to the geographical spread of the enlightenment. The enlightenment would reach those small towns and villages but it would depend on the interests of the squire and the parson. Even at this level there may have been more individual activity than one might suppose: of the forty copies of the Encyclopedie know to have existed in Perigord, twenty- four belonged to the parish priests[9] This then shows that Diderots work was of much significance in Europe show by his spread even to those smaller poorer towns.

Another point of Diderots significance is his role especially in literature was in the Jacques le fataliste et son matre which examined philosophical ideas of free will and his articles had many topics on the enlightenment. What is a sceptic? A philosopher who has questioned all he believes, and who believes what a legitimate use of his reason and his senses has proved to him to be true. Do you want a more precise definition? Make a pyrrhonist sincere, an you have to be sceptic.[10]

One day somebody asked a man if real atheists existed. Do you think, he responded that real Christians exist?[11]

We have seen the ideas of how significant Denis Diderot was in the Enlightenment with his life dedication to the interest of the enlightenment. We will now look at the ways that some may have found he was less significant and the weakness he had that historians have commented on him being too radical and he struggled.

Also one must be aware that the encyclopedie attracted many scholars from around the world the encyclopedie was not just diderots work who contributed text including: Ben Franklin, Benjamin Rush, Thomas Jefferson, Voltaire Chevalier de Jaucourt, and many others.

Another point that Diderot was not a significant role in the enlightenment was that many of his writing was not published after his death thus suggesting that Diderot was too radical. Diderot penses sur linterprtation de la nature did not achieve more than two editions. On the other hand one might see this as it was something like his encyclopedie that needed to get him an interest by the public as the pensees sur

Diderot had acquired merely by being born at the proper time and place owed its main impetus

Blanning also comments on the radical parts of the enlightenment such as in the Histoire philosophique et politique des deux indes(The Philosph

To conclude one can see that Denis Diderot was one of the most significant figures of the Enlightenment he had a strong effect on aspects within the world, some may have considered him radical but one might just call this committed as Diderot was a man who dedicated his life to the study of the enlightenment. One can the effects of Diderot as momentous, it created a enlightened world along with the other philosophers who contributed there parts in the enlightenment. This is especially evident in the examples however the whole period of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries which one might argue as the age of reason, as you clearly see a gradual change in thinking. It appeared with hindsight that Denis Diderot appeared to be most accurate and followed great philosophers like John Locke or in his thinking as he created the foundations for today.

[1] Page 33 Diderot Early Philosophical works translated and edited by Margaret Jourdain

[2] page 101 mass enlightenment critical studies in rousseau and diderot

[3] Mass Enlightenment Critical studies in Roussea and Diderot page 63-64 emmer kennedy

[4] Denis Diderot, Essai sur le Mrite de la Vertu (1745)

[5] Denis Diderot, Observations on Drawing Up of Laws (1774), repr. in Lester G Crocker, ed, Selected Writings, ed. (1966), quoted from The Columbia Dictionary of Quotations

[6] Page 89 The discourse of enlightenment in eighteenth-century france- Daniel Brewer

[7] Page 155 the eighteenth century tcw blanning

[8] Page 86 The enlightenment- the pelican history of European thought 4 norman hampson+

[9] Page 18 daniel Brewer The discourse of the enlightenment in the eighteenth century in france

[10] Page 45 Diderot early philosophical thoughts marget

[11] Page 34 diderot early philosophical works

[12] Page 63-4 Mass Enlightenment critical studies in Rousseau and Diderot Emmet Kennedy