"Being smart is no longer determined by a score on a test; being smart is determined by how well students learn in a variety of ways" (Hoerr, 2000, p. 1). So, it is importance that we identify and improve all of the different human intelligences, and all of the structures of intelligences. Therefore, we are all having big difference because we all have different types or styles of intelligences. Gardner thinks that if we identify this, we will have a good opportunity for dealing appropriately with the many problems that we live in the real life (Gardner, 1987).
There are many definition of intelligence. Ormrod defines intelligence is the ability to apply prior knowledge and experiences flexibly to accomplish challenging new task. On other hand, in Frames of Mind Howard Gardner (1983) describes intelligence as the ability to solve problems, or to create products, that are valued within one or more cultural settings. Also Wechsler says "Intelligence is the aggregate or global capacity of the individual to act purposefully, to think rationally and to deal effectively with his environment (1944, p. 3)."
Gardner described a set of criteria to identify what types of skills develop intelligence. The theory of Gardner defines a starting point for thinking about human intelligence and to discuss why a student does well in one kind but not in another. He suggests that people have a ninth distinctly different abilities that are relatively independent of one another called multiple intelligences. Multiple intelligence theory (MI) illustrates a practical method to how we identify intelligence and encourage us to use our students' strengths to learning (Hoerr, 2000).
My research paper describes Gardener's theory of multiple intelligences (MI theory), the purpose of study is how can improve students' learning performance through use of multiple intelligences. In fact, MI theory explained seven types of intelligences. After that, Gardner suggests two more intelligences in Intelligence Reframed (1999). The ninth intelligences: Verbal/Linguistic, Logical/Mathematical, Visual/Spatial, Bodily-Kinesthetic, Musical, Interpersonal, Intrapersonal, Naturalistic, and Existential.
Gardner defines intelligence as the ability to solve problems or to fashion products that are valued in one or more cultural or community settings. He relates intelligence to societal expectations and values and sees such terms as giftedness, creativity, and genius as labels given to those who exhibit high achievement in areas that the culture values. He does not deny that biological factors have an influence on intelligence but suggests that family and cultural influences play an important role in the development of the child's intellect (Oliver, 1997).
According to Lazear (1994) found that the teachers need to focus in students' thinking and learning skills; their intellectual and social progress; their capacity to transfer and apply classroom learning to life; and their creative problem-solving abilities in their assessment of students' achievement.
Gardner (1991), cognitive research documents the extent to which students possess different types of intelligences and therefore learn, remember, apply, and understand in different methods. These differences challenge an educational system that assumes that everyone can learn the same materials in the same way and that a uniform, universal measure suffices to test student learning.
Kagan and Kagan (1998) described MI theory as a powerful "catalyst" in education, "It is revitalizing the search for more authentic, student-centered approaches to curriculum, instruction, and assessment" (p.23). In other word, MI theory can be used to meet three visions: "(a) to match teaching to the ways student learn, (b) to encourage students to "stretch" their abilities to develop all their intelligences as fully as possible, and (c) to honor and celebrate diversity".
In addition, MI makes its contribution to education by suggesting that teachers expand their repertoire of techniques, tools, and strategies beyond the typical linguistic and logical ones predominantly used in U.S (Campbell, 1997).
Standford (2003) argue that MI theory provides an avenue for accomplishing what good teachers have always done: Research beyond the text to provide varied opportunities for students to learn and show evidence of learning. MI theory provides a framework for teachers to reflect on their best teaching methods and to understand why these methods work or why they work well for some students but not for others.
It also helps teachers expand their teaching repertoire to include a broader range of methods, materials, and technique for reaching an ever-wider and more diverse range of learners. However, Gardner (2004) points out that it may be timely to reconsider the relationship between IQ (general intelligence) and multiple intelligences theory.
Armstrong (1994) suggests that four elements be considered. First, each person possesses all eight intelligences. Each person has capacities in all eight intelligences. Second, the eight intelligences function together in ways unique to each person. Third, some people appear to possess extremely high levels of functioning in all or most of the eight intelligences, yet others appear to lack all but the most basic aspects of the intelligences. Fourth, Most fall somewhere in between highly developed in some intelligences, mostly developed in others, and relatively underdeveloped in the rest.
Thomas Hoerr argues that the theory of multiple intelligences (MI) is more than a theory of intellect. For us, it has become a philosophy of education with implications for the roles of educators, parents, and community members. "MI has helped us frame our curriculum, develop new assessment techniques, work closely with our students' parents, and grow together as a faculty" (p. 8).
Sauer (1998) noted that the popularity of Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences within the field of education has led many teachers to adopt it as a framework for the development of curriculum and classroom methodology. Wu & Alrabah (2009) says:"One of the major differences between traditional methods of teaching and more contemporary ones is that modern teaching methods always strive to better accommodate individual differences among learners. Intelligence was once seen as the ability to perform well on linguistic and logical mathematical problem solving" ( P. 395). Su-ching Lin 2009 â€¦
The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Since that time, educators have become interested in the theory as a means to improve teaching and learning in a multiplicity of ways. Each of the eight intelligences is present to different degrees in a person, with some intelligences being better developed than others.
Gardener's Theory of Multiple Intelligences (MI Theory)
Howard Gardner defined the first seven intelligences in frames of mind (1983). He added the last two in intelligence reframed (1999). Howard Gardner claims that all human beings have multiple intelligences. These multiple intelligences can be nurtured and strengthened, or ignored and weakened. He believes each individual has nine intelligences
The eight multiple intelligences put forward by Gardner include the following (Armstrong, 2000):
Verbal/Linguistic intelligence: The capacity to use words and languages effectively, whether orally (e.g., as a storyteller, orator, or politician) or in writing (e.g., as a poet, playwright, editor, or journalist). Teachers can improve that intelligence by play word games and encouraging discussion.
Logical-mathematical intelligence: The ability to use numbers effectively: collect and organize, analyze and interpret (e.g., as a mathematician, tax accountant, or statistician) and reason well (e.g., as a scientist, computer programmer, or logician). Teachers can strengthen this intelligence by using computer programming languages, critical thinking activities, logic puzzles.
Visual/Spatial intelligence: The ability to perceive the visual-spatial world accurately (e.g., as a hunter, scout, or guide) and perform transformations on those perceptions (e.g., as an interior decorator, architect, artist, or inventor).People with this kind of intelligence like to draw, paint, or sculpt their ideas and often express their feelings and moods through art. They are good at reading diagrams and maps and enjoy solving jigsaw puzzles. Teachers can foster this intelligence by utilizing charts, graphs, diagrams, graphic organizers, videotapes, color, art activities, microscopes and computer graphics software.
Bodily-kinesthetic: Expertise in using one's body to express ideas and feelings (e.g., as an actor, a mime, an athlete, or a dancer) and facility in using one's hands to produce or transform things (e.g., as a craftsperson, sculptor, mechanic, or surgeon).These people like to move around, touch the people they are talking to and act things out. They are good at small and large muscle skills; they enjoy all types of sports and physical activities. They often express themselves through dance. Teachers may encourage growth in this area of intelligence through the use of touching, feeling, movement, improvisation, "hands-on" activities, permission to squirm and wiggle, facial expressions and physical relaxation exercises
Musical intelligence: The capacity to perceive (e.g., as a music aficionado), discriminate (e.g., as a music critic), transform (e.g., as a composer), and express (e.g., as a performer) musical forms. Teachers can integrate activities into their lessons that encourage students' musical intelligence by playing music for the class and assigning tasks that involve students creating lyrics about the material being taught.
Interpersonal intelligence: The ability to perceive and make distinctions in the moods, intentions, and feelings of other people. Interpersonal intelligence also requires good communication and interaction skills, and the ability show empathy towards the feelings of other individuals. Teachers can encourage the growth of Interpersonal Intelligences by designing lessons that include group work and by planning cooperative learning activities.
Intrapersonal intelligence: Self-knowledge and the ability to act adaptively on the basis of that knowledge and ability to know oneself. Teachers can assign reflective activities, such as journaling to awaken students' Intrapersonal Intelligence.
Naturalist intelligence: Expertise in the recognition and classification of the numerous species- the flora and fauna- of an individual's environment. Naturalistic intelligence is seen in someone who recognizes and classifies plants, animals, and minerals including a mastery of taxonomies. Teachers can best foster this intelligence by using relationships among systems of species, and classification activities. Encourage the study of relationships such as patterns and order, and compare-and-contrast sets of groups or look at connections to real life and science issues.
Existential Intelligence -- sensitivity and capacity to tackle deep questions about human existence, such as the meaning of life, why do we die, and how did we get here ( Armstrong, 2009).
Multiple intelligences and improve students' learning:
Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences resonates so strongly for many educators because it offers a model for acting on what we believe: all children have strengths. Many of us were taught to focus on the curriculum as we planned and taught, to concentrate on helping students respond to the curriculum; MI, however, is a student-centered model in which the curriculum is often modified to fit the students. Rather than relying upon a linguistic filter and requiring students to write to show their grasp of skills and information, teachers using MI can allow students to use their strengths to demonstrate what they have learned. (Hoerr,2000, p. 5).
Believing in and using MI means that educators must be aware of students' strengths and weaknesses in the various intelligences; in short, educators must know their students. MI becomes a tool to help students learn information and skills and to enable them to demonstrate their understanding. To use MI effectively, teachers need to know each student's strongest and weakest intelligences. Knowing each student, teachers can design curriculum and present instruction in ways that allow students to use their strengths, although few lessons will offer eight routes to learning. (Hoerr, p. 18)
The Teacher's Role and MI as a way to help more students succeed, the other reason that educators have been so receptive to the theory is that it validates their role as professionals. Using MI is at the other end of the spectrum from working with "teacher proof" materials that direct teachers' every action. Teachers who use MI develop curriculum and assessment tools and are creative in their pedagogy. And teachers who use MI usually do so with others, working and learning as colleagues. In this way, "implementing MI becomes a route to developing or extending professionalism among teachers" (P.78). Consequently, an important step in using the theory of multiple intelligences is to determine the nature and quality of our multiple intelligences and seek ways to develop them in our lives (Armstrong, 1994).
Assessing students multiple intelligences
No test can accurately determine the nature or quality of a person's intelligence. As Howard Gardner has repeatedly pointed out, standardized tests measure only a small part of the total spectrum of abilities. The best way to assess your own multiple intelligences, therefore, is through a realistic appraisal of your performance in the many kinds of tasks, activities, and experiences associated with each intelligence.p.21 Armstrong, T. (1994).
the single best tool for assessing student's multiple intelligences, however, is probably one readily available to all of us: simple observation. He suggested to teachers that one good way to identify students most highly developed intelligences is to observe how they misbehave in class. The strongly linguistic student will be talking out of turn, the highly spatial student will be doodling and daydreaming, the interpersonally inclined student will be socializing, the bodily - kinesthetic student will be fidgeting, and the naturalistically engaged student might well bring an animal to class without permission! A second way to know how student can learn most effectively is observing students activities and how they spend their free time in school. In other words, what do they do when nobody is telling them what to do? Armstring,2009.34
In addition to observation, there are several other excellent ways to get assessment information about students multiple intelligences:
Collect documents: photos, school works and audio and vedio sample
Look at school records
Talk with other teachers
Talk with parents
The table provides brief descriptions of the capacities of children who display proclivities in specific intelligences, keep in mind, however, that most students have strengths in several areas, so you can should avoid pigeon holing a child in only one intelligence. You will probably find each student pictured in two or more of these intelligence dscriptions.
Eight ways of learning
Children who are highly..
Reading, writing, playing word games
Experimenting, questioning, logical puzzles, calculating
In mages and pictures
Drawing, designing, visualizing
Through somatic sensations
Dancing, running, building
Via rhythms and melodies
Singing, listening, tapping feet and hands
By bouncing ideas off other people
Leading, organizing, mediating, partying
In relation tom their needs, feeling, goals
Setting goals, dreaming, planning, reflecting
The theory of multiple intelligences is an especially good model for looking at teaching strengths as well as for examining areas needing improvements. Perhaps you avoid drawing pictures on the board or stay away from using highly graphic materials in your presentations because spatial intelligence is not particularly well developed in your life. Or possibly you gravitate toward cooperative learning strategies activities because you are an interpersonal or naturalist sort of learner/ teacher yourself. Use Mi theory to survey your own teaching style, and see how it matches up with the eight intelligences. 21 Armstrong, T. (1994).
Gardner's theory of Multiple Intelligences is a wonderful and meaningful way to account for the knowledge that: "we are not all the same, we do not all have the same kinds of minds, and education works most effectively for most individuals if...human differences are taken seriously" (Gardner, 1995, p.208). When viewing the classroom through the framework of MI theory, teachers can better identify children's strengths and present instruction to students which incorporates the ninth Intelligences into their lessons. Children are then afforded a variety of experiences which can be translated into greater learning outcomes
Introducing Gardner's Multiple Intelligences into the classroom provides opportunities for meaningful learning and gives the gift of wholeness to all who pass this way. Moreover, MI theory is a way of thinking; it is an attitude about people which allows for similarities and differences. It allows for inclusion and enrichment, for self-esteem building and the development of respect for each individual and the giftedness in classroom. MI can be a powerful tool for motivate students, but using it effectively requires teachers to devote the time and energy to understand MI theory and then decide how it can be used in curriculum development, instruction, and assessment. (Hoerr, 2000)
As a result, some teachers have developed the view that some students are unteachable, and their major focus becomes maintaining discipline. To solve this problem, we need to encourage teachers to think about how to teach through different entries and how they can evaluate students using multiple approaches to assessment, rather than using only pencil and paper tests.
The focus of this part of the chapter will be on lesson design using the theory of Multiple Intelligences, and providing various resources that educator's may use to implement the theory into their classroom activities. Second, it allows educators to design classroom and school environments that accommodate a growing diverse group of student learners.
I think MI theory describes a set of important points which teachers can create interesting curriculum. In fact, the theory provides a context within which teachers can address any skill, content area, theme, or instructional objective and develop at least eight ways to teach it. The best way to develop curriculum by using the theory of multiple intelligences is by thinking about how can convert the material to be taught from intelligence to another. For example, how can we take a linguistic symbol system and convert into the languages of other intelligences such as pictures, physical or musical, logical concepts, social interactions, intrapersonal connections and naturalistic associations.
We can use MI theory as tools for effective learning and teaching method to change what happen today in the most of schools beyond the traditional methods such as: lecture, textbooks, assignments and memorization. Gardner's theory can provide a teacher the direction to improve a student's learning styles in any given intelligence but before that I think teachers start to know students strengths and weaknesses in classrooms. However, teachers begin to plan lessons in terms of meeting the needs of different of the intelligence that is mean, draw new lesson plan by using MI strategies.
From this new method, any school wants to reach for learning community try to apply a multiple intelligences curriculum with a high degree of collaboration between leadership and teachers to developing learning.
Talking about students from the viewpoint of multiple intelligences is a good way to focus on how they learn best. Each teacher has a different perspective, and by sharing their observations teachers can more quickly get to know their students' strengths. Sometimes the easiest way to identify students' strongest intelligences is to give them choices and observe what they select. Most students, indeed most people, choose the route that allows them to use their most developed intelligences.