This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.
Affleck, Madge, Adams, and Lowenbraun. Integrated Classroom versus Resource Model: Academic Viability and Effectiveness. Exceptional Children (1988): 339-348. Allington, Richard L., and Anne McGill-Franzen. Comprehension and Coherence: Neglected Elements of Literacy Instruction in Remedial and Resource Room Services. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International (1990): 149-182.
Arnold, Jean B., and Dodge, Harold. "Room for All." The American School Board Journal (October, 1994): 10.
Baker, E.T., Wang, M.C., and Walberg, H.J. "The Effects of Inclusion on Learning." Educational Leadership (1994-1995): 33-35.
Bogdan, R., and Taylor, S.J, "Relationships with Severely Disabled People: The Social Construction of Humanness." Social Problems (1989): 36,2:135-148.
Carlberg, C., and Kavale, K. "The Efficacy of Special Versus Regular Class Placement for Exceptional Children: A Meta-Analysis." The Journal of Special Education (1980): 295-305.
The Council on Exceptional Children, Position Paper (1993).
Elliott, Barbara, and Riddle, Margaret. "An Effective Interface Between Regular and Special Education: A Synopsis of Issues and Successful Practices." Indiana University, Bloomington. Council of Administrators of Special Education, Inc., 1992.
Guess, D., and Thompson, B., "Preparation of Personnel to Educate Students with Severe and Multiple Disabilities: A Time For Change?" Critical Issues in the Lives of People with Severe Disabilities, 1989.
Gordon, Stacey. "Making Sense of the Inclusion Debate Under IDEA." 2006 B.Y.U. Educ. & L.J. 189 (2006).
Heshusius, Lous. "The Arts, Science, and the Study of Exceptionality." Exceptional Children (September 1988): 60-65.
Heshusius, Lous. " Reading Meaning Into Texts." Exceptional Children (March-April 1992): 472-475.
Howard, Patrick. "The Least Restrictive Environment: How to Tell?" 33 J.L.& Educ. 167 (April, 2004).
"The Inclusive School." Educational Leadership (December 1994/January 1995: 4.
The Integration of Students with Special Needs into Regular Classrooms: Policies and Practices that Work. Washington, DC: National Education Association, 1992.
Kaufman, J. "The Regular Education Initiative as Reagan-Bush Education Policy: A Trickle-Down Theory of Education of the Hard-to-Teach."Journal of Special Education (1989): 3.
Kavale, K.A., and Glass, G.V. "The Efficacy of Special Education Interventions and Practices: A Compendium of Meta-Analysis Findings." Focus on Exceptional Children (1982): 1-14.
Madden, N.A., and Slavin, R.E. "Mainstreaming Students with Mild Handicaps: Academic and Social Outcomes." Review of Educational Research (1983). 519-569.
McLaughlin, Margaret. "What Makes Inclusion Work?" Doubts and Certainties, (January/February, 1995). Volume IX, Number 3. Washington, DC: National Education Association Center for Innovation.
Murray-Seegert, C. "Nasty Girls, Thugs, and Humans Like Us: Social Relations Between Severely Disabled and Nondisabled Students in High School." Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 1989.
Osborne, Allan G. "Is the Era of Judicially-Ordered Inclusion Over?" 114 Ed. Law Rep. 1011 (February, 1997).
Peck, C .A., Carlson, P., and Helmstetter, E. "Parent and Teacher Perceptions of Outcomes for Typically Developing Children Enrolled in Integrated Early Childhood Programs: A Statewide Survey." Journal of Early Intervention (1992): 53-63.
Pinnell, G.S. Restructuring Beginning Reading with the Reading Recovery Approach. Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa, 1991.
Piuma, Mary F. Benefits and Costs of Integrating Students With Severe Disabilities Into Regular Public School Programs: A Study Summary of Money Well Spent. San Francisco: San Francisco State University, 1989.
Rogers, Joy. The Inclusion Revolution. Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa, 1993.
Silver, Larry B. The Assessment of Learning Disabilities: Preschool Through Adulthood., Boston: Little Brown, 1989.
United States Department of Education Response to NEA Questions, OSERS, Inclusion (Spring 1992), IV, 4.
Wang, M.C., Reynolds, M.C., and Walberg H.J. "Serving Students at the Margins," Educational Leadership (1988): 12-17.
Webb, N. "With New Court Decisions Backing Them, Advocates See Inclusion as a Question of Values." The Harvard Education Letter (1994). 4.
Weiner, R. Impact on the Schools. Capitol Publications. (1985).
Weisman, M.L. "When Parents Are Not in the Interest of the Child." The Atlantic Monthly (July 1994): 43-44, 46-47, 50-54, 56-60, 62-63.
Winners All: A Call for Inclusive Schools. Alexanderia, VA: National Association of State Boards of Education, 1992.
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, Bulletin Number 93.12. (1993).
Working Forum on Inclusive Schools. Creating Schools for All Our Students: What 12 Schools Have to Say. (1994).
York, Jennifer, et.al., Creating Inclusive School Communities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 1993.
If you treat people as if they are what they ought to be, you help them become what they are capable of being. -Goethe
Where after all, do universal human rights begin? In small places close to home-- so close and so small that they cannot be seen on any map of the world . . . Such are the places where every man, woman and child seeks equal justice, equal opportunity, equal dignity without discrimination. Unless these rights have meaning there, they have little meaning anywhere. --Eleanor Roosevelt, March 27th, 1958, Remarks at the United Nations Commission on Human Rights
http://www.newhorizons.org/spneeds/inclusion/teaching/inclusion_review_block.jpg Recommended Reading
A Teacher's Guide to Including Students with Disabilities in General Physical Education
by Martin E. Block
Martin Block is an Associate professor of Kinesiology in the Curry School of Education at the University of Virginia and has been co-director of the Adapted Physical Education Program at the university since 1992. His book is based on the IDEA Amendments of 1997, and helps educators make the mandated changes necessary for successful inclusion.
This is a practical handbook for any physical education teacher! It includes a description of what a quality physical education program should include, and reviews the history and key characteristics of inclusion. Block points out that "the least restrictive environment" may not always be the general classroom for some students who would benefit from a smaller, quieter environment. He suggests, however, that both special education students and their peers can benefit highly from being in general classes.
Block describes the importance of collaborative teaming, provides new information and assessment tools to determine who qualifies for physical education, shows how to complete the individualized education program (IEP), and provides information, models, and examples of how to implement instructional, curricular, and game modifications to facilitate inclusion.
He describes how the general physical educator can create a welcoming environment and prepare children without disabilities for inclusion. He examines the important issue of safety, focusing on legal issues as well as practical ways to create appropriate environments for all children. He also offers suggestions on how to cope with children who display behavior problems, and includes materials written by Ron and Lisa French, two leaders in behavior management. Another area, co-authored by Phillip Conatser, a leader in adapted aquatics, offers information on how to include children with disabilities in general aquatics programs, including safety considerations and adaptive equipment.
Block notes that "with appropriate supplementary aids and services, most children with disabilities can be included in general physical education alongside children without disabilities."
So what is inclusion and how does it affect your child's education? The subject is surrounded by misunderstanding and controversy and it is important for both educators and parents to understand the concept.
All students are members of the community. Inclusion is based on the philosophy that all students, regardless of disability, are and should be a part of the school's culture. The belief is that a student that requires special services should have the services brought to the student, not the other way around.
Special needs students are educated in their least restrictive environment (LRE). Most special needs students are capable of receiving education in a regular classroom. Placement of special needs students into special education classes puts them outside the school culture and creates division, fear, and ignorance.
Special needs students are not necessarily required to meet the same standards as other students. They participate in activities with the rest of the class though may be given special considerations for their disabilities. For example, a student who is unable to speak would not be able to give an oral report when the other students do, but could make some other kind of presentation. A student who has difficulty writing, perhaps due to fine motor skill problems or vision problems, could be given extra time on a test or allowed to take the test verbally.