Instructions To Students With Learning Disabilities Education Essay

Published: Last Edited:

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.


This study addressed the problem of how can regular education teachers improve word problem-solving skills with learning disabilities in Turkey. One special education teacher and one counselor responded to open-ended surveys for this ethnographic research. Besides this interviews were done with two regular education teachers. Respondents reported that teachers should know these students' needs well and link the problems with students' interests and visualization methods such as graphing representations, mind-mapping should be used to improve problem-solving skills. One of the regular education teachers indicates that the size of the classes should be decreased and the number of the students with learning disabilities shouldn't be more than two in classes to help these students.


"Can you do addition?" the White Queen asked. "What's one and one and one and one and one and one and one and one and one and one?"

"I don't know," said Alice. "I lost count."

-Lewis Carroll Through the Looking Glass

We don't want students to get lost in math, says NINCHY's Evidence for Education. NINCHY (National Dissemination Centre for Children with Disabilities) tries to find answers to their important question: What can we do when disability affects a student's ability to learn math skills? (Steedly & Dragoo, 2008).

Many students have found that word problems are difficult, but for students with learning disabilities these problems are particularly challenging. Secondary students with LD have difficulties with higher level thinking skills/concepts and problem solving. (Babbit and Miller,1996).

There is another issue that students with special needs receive special education according to their needs. In an article by Cavkaytar (2006), special education programs in Turkey and services for special education is provided by Ministry of Turkish National Education are presented. There are ten undergraduate special teacher education programs in Turkey for different special education categories. Also special education programs include courses such as "Teaching Mathematics to the Mentally Handicapped", "Preparing Integration Programs", "Developing Individualized Education Programs and Evaluation". In addition to that there are three services in Turkey. First one is that special education is given as formal education in private schools. Another possible service is that children with special education needs are educated in mainstream schools and special classrooms. Besides these many kinds of supporting services such as physical therapy, speech therapy, and occupational therapy are given in rehabilitation centers. Second service which is available in Turkey is related to this study. Nowadays mainstreaming is known as Individualized Education Program in Turkey. Students with special education needs have a chance to take courses in general classrooms. Therefore teachers should know these students' interests and needs. However an important conflict is stated in the article. Research indicates that special education teachers take courses to teach math to students with LD. By contrast regular education math teachers don't take any courses special to these students. As a result of this, teachers don't know how to approach to these students and integrate them to lessons well. Therefore this study researches about effective math problem-solving instructions to secondary level students with LD who receive education in mainstreaming classrooms in Turkey.

In response to the given importance on problem solving and failure of students with LD in this issue, this research tries to find an answer to the question "How can regular education teachers improve word problem-solving skills of students with LD in Turkey?"

Research questions are given as following for this study:

What are the characteristics of students with LD?

What kind of learning disabilities do these students have and how does it affect their learning about problem solving?

What are the current teaching methods for problem-solving and are they sufficient to improve students' skills in this way? If they are not, what are techniques lacking?

What are regular education teachers' attitudes to students with LD in classrooms?

Learning disability is a very wide topic because there can be several reasons which cause the learning disability. For example mentally, emotionally or physically problems can cause learning disabilities. This study cannot answer all types of learning disabilities but sample of the study can find a way to help some students with LD in problem-solving lessons. 1st and 2nd questions serve for this purpose. 3rd and 4th questions try to describe the currently methods teachers use and determine what is the lacking or insufficient sides of these methods. Also questions try to find an answer for how teachers can teach problem solving better to students with LD.

Teachers and students will benefit from this research. Teachers can find more learning strategies than are used by themselves currently and indirectly students will benefit as a result of teachers' new approaches.


What are the characteristics of students with LD? How are they integrated to regular education classrooms? What is special education and how is it applied in Turkey? What is the general and special education teachers' role in teaching process to students with LD? These are the first questions that interest me for this research project. This study needed the answers of these questions indicated above to reach its purpose. Articles related to history and current status of special education in Turkey, special teacher training in Turkey served to be realized the situation of special education in Turkey. This literature review also includes articles to indicate the current strategies used in problem-solving, alternative solutions to teach more effectively.

Research indicates that teachers should receive adequate education to understand students' psychological and academic needs. One of the articles in this literature review helped to notice a possible gap which can be investigated further. This article is related to special and general education teachers' perceptions about NCTM Standards for students with LD. It can be modified to MEB Standards and investigated special and regular education teachers' perspectives to this issue because the last article in this literature review states that general education teachers are unaware of teaching strategies for students with LD.

In an article by Borkowski (1992), three research studies are brought together and four important points were addressed for guiding the study. First, is the importance of self-regulation and motivational beliefs which are two great components of meta-cognitive theory to solve word problems and how does the lack of these skills affect students with LD? Second is the teachers' own working models which can be updated based on classrooms' needs. The last one is applications to the teachings of literacy, writing and mathematics.

Borkowski characterizes of students with LD and gives tips for teaching effectively in math and literature. Likewise in an article by Babbitt, B. C., & Miller S. P. (1996) deficits of students with learning disabilities cause difficulties in problem-solving process because language difficulties are common among students with LD. Language disorders can get confuse about math vocabulary. For instance they cannot easily understand that take away means minus or add means plus. Problems about language skills such as understanding words and sequencing make word problems more difficult.

One of the main goals of this study is to offer helpful tips for regular education teachers to teach effectively word problem solving to students with LD within the light of current studies. This article discussed strategies which are used for problem-solving. According to the article there are three important strategies for problem solving. First one is cognitive and metacognitive in nature. Second one is using computers to teach math to students with LD. Third one is applying hypermedia to problem-solving instruction. Hypermedia is multimedia information linked accessed by a computer. (Lynch, 1991). In other words hypermedia includes graphics, sound, animation and video. Hypermedia can be used in a wide range in mathematics from simple diagrams of mathematical shapes to visualization of complex topics such as trigonometry (Babbitt and Miller, 1996).

In a research article by Maccini and Gagnon (2002), teachers' perceptions about applications and limitations of National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Standards with students LD and emotionally disturbed (ED). 129 secondary general and special education teachers participated in a mail survey in USA. This report points out that most of the special education teachers didn't know about NCTM standards, participants also reported that instead of teaching NCTM standards to students with LD and ED, they teach basic math skills to these students. The reason for not being able to apply activities successfully based on NCTM standards is inadequate materials. Moreover teaching basic math skills versus teaching higher level math such as algebra and geometry is discussed by teachers who participated in a survey. Basic math skills are very important; on the other hand teaching higher level math to students with LD can be possible by using appropriate tools.(Maccini and Gagnon, 2002). These results were from USA however this research gives an idea to think about perceptions of special and general education teachers in Turkey. Is there a possible way to teach MEB standards to students with LD? The last two research replies this question.

Supporting Cavkaytar (2006), Melekoglu, M. A., Cakiroglu, O., & Malmgren, K. W. (2009) describe progression of special education and problems faced within Turkey in this area. Since 1983 Ministry of Turkish National Education has supplied a policy of incorporating students with special needs into the regular education classrooms by providing students with support services. After this policy, special education developed very fast. Yet there are still some conflicts in this area. Research indicates that the number of special education teachers and suitable schools are not enough for special education teachers. The next conflict is general education teachers in classrooms instruct students with LD (These classrooms are called as "inclusive classrooms") yet don't receive adequate training in special education. Furthermore another important conflict is newly graduated special education teachers choose to work in private schools rather than public schools, because their salaries and conditions are better. The last issue is education of all students in regular education classrooms is not as common as it is in other countries. After problems are stated, authors suggest that regular education teachers should get sufficient experiences in inclusive teaching. Schools should be supported financially to provide better services for students with disabilities. Also teachers' economical situations should be improved.

A booklet published by MEB makes detail explanations about what are the mainstreaming and special education, what are the characteristics of students with LD and other types of special needs and how these students' needs can be satisfied. To answer students' needs school administration manages the classrooms. The number of the students must be 25 with two students who have special needs in one class or 35 with one student with special needs. This arrangement is done to make teachers' work easier. (Gürkan, Ã-ztürk, Kılıç & Güney, 2010).

As stated in introduction part except from mainstreaming schools students can go to special education schools however nowadays the number of students who receive education in mainstreaming classrooms increase. While the number of students who take inclusive education is 10.516 in 1997/1998 academic year, this number raised to 76.204 in 2009/2010 academic year. (Nal, A. & Tüzün, I. (Eds.), 2010).

Taken together students with LD whatever their special needs have problems in word problem solving topic very commonly. Word problem solving skills is closely related to language skills and strategy based learning. (Babbitt & Miller, 1996) To develop these skills teachers should teach self-regulation and make problems more concrete. There is an Individualized Education Program in Turkey for students with special needs to support these students in regular education classrooms. (Cavkaytar, 2006) These students continue to regular education classrooms and the number of students in inclusive teaching classrooms is increasing. (Nal, A. & Tüzün, I. (Eds.), 2010). However regular education teachers' knowledge is inadequate in special education area and they don't have appropriate materials.( Melekoglu, M. A., Cakiroglu, O., & Malmgren, K. W.,2009) Thus most of them don't know how to involve students in lessons. It can be assumed from these five literature reviews that lack of teachers' equipment is the biggest obstacle to get involved these students into not only math but also other courses. Therefore research for how regular education teachers have sufficient equipment should be done. Also a specific research about problem solving strategy for students with special needs should be done too.


Ethnography is a scientific research method often used in the field of social sciences particularly in anthropology. It generally studies people; ethnic groups and their cultures. However ethnographic research can be used for many subject areas, including education and it is a useful tool for understanding how other people see their experiences. (Ethnography. (2009). In Encyclopaedia Wikipedia online. )

Students with LD are supported by teachers, parents, counselors and special education teachers which give this research topic a broad view. In order to give a comprehensive response to the research questions, looking from different perspectives would be useful. Ethnography implies "learning from people". Therefore a small ethnography gives an opportunity to reach the purpose in this project.

My informants will be secondary school regular education math teachers, a special education teacher and a counselor. The counselor is an instructor in Bilkent University and has experienced helping students with LD. At her school there is an "Individualized Education Program" for these students to enhance their understanding and learning. This program also can help teachers to understand these students well and develop different strategies on problem-solving. The special education teacher is working in a private rehabilitation service and she has experiences with many students with special needs including students with LD. My other informants are regular education math teachers who have experiences with students with LD. One of the regular education teacher is working at Ä°hsan DoÄŸramacı Vakfı Ã-zel Bilkent Ä°lköÄŸretim Okulu (Ã-BÄ°O) in Ankara and she has been teaching for 7 years. The other teacher is working at Çubuk Türk Telekom Ä°lköÄŸretim Okulu (ÇTTÄ°O) and she has been teaching for two years. Her school is in rural area in Ankara. One teacher is working in a private school and the other is working in a public school. Both of the schools have Individualized Education Program (IEP) for students with special needs.

Actually this research is focused on teaching strategies about problem-solving in math for students with LD. Therefore teachers' opinions and their diagnosis about this issue will help directly to make the situation clear.

Most common methods for data collection in ethnography is interviewing and surveys to learn different people's thoughts, to explain their stories. In addition to that an interview guide approach was more useful to gather information. Topics and issues are specified in advance, in outline form in this type of interview and I can change sequence and wording of the questions during the interview.

I made interviews with middle school teachers. The counselor and special education teacher responded to open-ended surveys. As I mentioned above, students with LD work with a wide team, thus I wanted to learn the team's experiences, feelings about problem-solving strategies. Therefore questions were generally constructed as open-ended. I had to ask different questions to them because they have different perspectives, different backgrounds. However different responses from different perspectives reduce the comparability of responses.

There are also limitations of using interview and open-ended surveys as a tool. Representing each informant's stories, thoughts without imposing my own opinions were difficult.


Two regular education teachers replied to the same questions in their interviews. However counselor and special education teacher replied different questions. One of the regular education teacher who works at ÇTTÄ°O called as "SA" and the other one who works at Ã-BÄ°O called as "ZT". The counselor called as "JA" and the special education teacher called as "NÇ" in the interviews and open-ended surveys

The responses of two regular education teachers can be grouped into four different categories: percentages of students with LD in their classrooms, types of these students' needs, programs used in schools for students with LD and teaching styles of teachers for these students. There are only 1 or at most 2 students with LD in ZT's classes. On the other hand there are 3 students with LD in SA's class. In addition to that there are 20 students at Ã-BÄ°O in classes but there are 30 students in classes at ÇTTÄ°O. The number of the students in class affects the lesson in positive or negative manner. Besides this, students' needs affect the teachers' methods they used. SA has two students who have mentally developmental delay and one student who has behavioral disorder. However ZT has students with learning disorder and attention deficit disorder. Therefore their techniques are different from each other. Nevertheless there are some similarities in their techniques to involve students to problem-solving lessons. Both of the two teachers emphasize that knowing the students' needs and interests make it easier to involve them to lessons.

As mentioned above counselor replied different questions in her interview. For this reason I interpreted her responses separately. JA's responses can be categorized into four titles: Types of students' needs, role of guidance centre during teaching process, suggestions for enhancing students' problem-solving skills and teaching assistant issue.

Analysis of Regular Education Teachers' Responses

Percentages of students with LD in their classrooms: 10% of students have LD in SA's class but 5% or at most 10% of students have LD in ZT's classes. Also SA's size of class is 30 but ZT's is 20. SA emphasizes that she can't help students with LD enough because of the numbers of students in the class while ZT doesn't have similar problem.

The class is crowded. In addition to that 3 students who have learning disability make my job more difficult. Even I cannot take care of other students; to be honest I cannot take care of students with LD enough. They are doing other works during the lesson they cannot catch their peers. (SA, 30 March 2011)

Individualized Education Program offers one or two students with special needs in classes. Each of them has special needs and teachers have to prepare appropriate tasks for these students. Also teachers have to monitor each student in the class. SA's words show that to be helpful to students with LD, the sizes of classes should be reduced.

Types of students' needs: SA has two students who have mentally developmental delay and one student who has behavioral disorder. She describes her students' needs with following words:

"Students with mentally developmental delay just do four basic arithmetical operations. They are coming back from their peers. They have also difficulty in understanding what the text says. When I teach problems in class, I give them paper -which I prepared before and it includes arithmetic operations only - they deal with this paper. I cannot involve them to lesson because I don't know how I will do it."

"A student with behavioural disorder cannot stay in his desk during the lesson and he cannot focus on the lesson. Instead of this he walks around during the lesson, takes care of other things such as looking posters on the walls, sharpening his pencils. He can only focus on the things which he is interested in. Therefore I try to link the topic with his interests to involve him to the lesson." (30 March 2011)

ZT has students with learning disorder. They have learning difficulties in reading and mathematics. They have difficulty in understanding what problem text saying. Besides she indicates that most of students have learning disorder also have attention deficit disorder.

As can be seen from teachers' explanation, attention deficit disorder and difficulty in reading and understanding are common disorders among students of ZT and SA.

Programs used in schools for students with LD: Both of two schools apply Individualized Education Program prepared by Ministry of Turkish National Education to students with special needs. However in terms of application, there are some differences between two schools. In addition to inclusive classrooms there is a special education class in Türk Telekom Ä°lköÄŸretim Okulu whereas there are only inclusive classrooms at Ã-BÄ°O. There are only two students in special education class at TTÄ°Ã-. They are separated from the other students because their needs are more than other students with LD. SA said that she doesn't know what these students' needs are but they have a special education teacher. In fact she is not a special education teacher. She is working as a substitute teacher at TTÄ°Ã- and there isn't any special education teacher in the school. For this reason she is working as a special education teacher. Another difference is the support given to these students outside of the classroom.

Students with learning disorder take an extra hour support lesson per week from the teachers of the lessons which they have difficulty with. This extra hour is used for making practices about the topic or explaining the issues which student doesn't understand in the lesson. This support helps students to catch their peers. Moreover their exams are prepared differently from other students. Curriculum remains the same but questions are chosen according to students' capabilities. (ZT, 27 March 2011)

I made interview with ZT first. After I learnt that they give support outside the classrooms I asked to SA whether her school gives any support outside the classroom but I learnt that they don't. However they prepare different exam for students with LD.

It is clear that students with LD in private schools and students in public schools don't have equal opportunities. These students need more time than their peers to understand the topic. However in public schools classes are crowded and teachers don't help them enough even in the lessons. Apart from that they don't take any support from the teachers outside of the school. On the contrary students in private schools have more chance to catch their peers and attend the lessons effectively.

Teaching styles of teachers for students with LD: Although teachers don't have equal materials and technological equipments, techniques they used similar in problem solving lessons for students in 6th, 7th and 8th grade levels. Teachers explained the techniques they used for all class. Then they added special techniques for students with LD if they have.

I introduced students to George Polya´ s1 problem solving process. I expect from them to use it during problem solving lessons.

Figure 1. G. Polya's problem-solving process

Students also can find different solution methods during the lessons. They can draw pictures about what they understand from the problem or they can simplify the language of the problem. Moreover I am using group activities. They work in groups of two or three. Also I am using problem constructive activities. Students write their own problems in groups of two or three too. Students with LD try to understand the problem by using mind maps or drawing tables like understanding the reading text in Turkish lessons. They prefer reading the problem out and express what they understand. In particular they like real life problems rather than abstract ones. (ZT, 27 March 2011)

Figure 2. Mindmapping

Generally I teach to students how to transfer the words in the problem into mathematical language. For example I expect them to use x for the unknown in the problem. However I used this method for students who don't have any special needs. As I mentioned, I can't involve the two students who have mentally developmental delay because I don't know how I can achieve this. For the other student who has behavioral disorder, I rewrite the problem by considering his interests since he tries to solve the problem which is related to his own world. For example he is making shepherd in summers. If the problem is related to meat or sheep, he tries to solve the problem. But he doesn't like mathematical language. He likes dealing with numbers. (SA, 30 March 2011)

Both of two teachers' responses show that real life examples attract students' attention. Also understanding the problem is the main stage to solve the problem.

Analysis of Counselor's Responses:

Types of students' needs: JA said that there are 7 students with special needs and 5 of them have mathematical learning disorders. She told that guidance unit makes meetings with these students.

In these meetings we ask to a student how he is working math and how he feels during the lessons. We have also meetings with teachers about student's development and sometimes we bring together two sides to make the needs of the students clear. It shows that teachers and counselors take care of these students' needs, they allow time for them. (JA, 25 March 2011)

Role of guidance centre during teaching process: She mentioned about the works of guidance centre related to special education. Guidance unit prepare a seminar for all teachers informed about special education at the beginning of each academic year in Ã-BÄ°O. Unit gives information about what is IEP, learning disorder, attention deficit disorder. They organize one meeting with teachers of students with LD. Teachers are expected to prepare a special annual plan for these students.

Suggestions for enhancing students' problem-solving skills: Her suggestions for teachers in problem-solving lessons are not different from what teachers said. Her suggestions are, concrete materials can be used to make the problem meaningful and situations in students' life can be transferred into the problem.

Teaching assistant issue: I asked to JA about teaching assistant issue. There are teaching assistants in foreign countries, for example in USA, UK. They are not teachers but they are dealing with students who have special needs in classes and they are working as volunteers. It is very helpful for regular education teachers because it makes their job easier. With the help of assistant and teacher, student can understand easily. My question was can teaching assistant application be possible in Turkey.

It looks like a good idea but I think Turkish teachers are not ready for teaching the lesson with another person. They don't feel relax during the lesson. They are afraid of being criticized. Perhaps two teachers can teach the lesson together by considering the students' special needs. (JA, 25 March 2011)

It can be understood that passing through the teaching assistant application takes time.

Analysis of Special Education Teacher's Responses:

Types of students' needs: I asked to her which kind of difficulties she faced when teaching word problems in math.

She said that her students whose special needs are whatever they are have difficulties when they solve problems because to understand the problem, to choose the right operation for solution and following the operations in correct order are challenging for them. (NÇ, 28 April 2011)

The methods used in rehabilitation service: I asked to explain methods she used in problem solving lessons to compare her responses with regular education teachers'. The responses were nearly same. She said that she used concrete materials and made problems which can be seen and touched.

Communication with regular education teachers: I asked to whether she and other regular education teachers in rehabilitation centre keep in touch with students' regular education teachers or not and is there any common works done together for these students. She said that they communicate with their students' regular education classrooms but there isn't any common work except preparing exam questions according to students' level.

Unfortunately regular education teachers tell us that they don't have any extra time to deal with these students during lessons. We prepare projects and activities suitable for students' levels and send these activities to regular education teachers but they don't care about the documents we send. When they ask us to prepare exam questions for these students, they just use our documents at that time. (NÇ, 28 April 2011)

According to her responses regular education teachers don't have time to take care about these students however this cannot be a reason to not to help them.

Teaching assistant issue: I asked to the same question with JA about teaching assistant issue. She also said that it would be great and if people are informed enough, she believed that many volunteers can be found. Then she added if teaching assistants take their places in classes, regular education teachers cannot complain about the lack of time.

Evaluation of Individualized Education Program: I asked to her about mainstreaming schools and classrooms. My question was that is IEP beneficial for students with LD or are special education schools or classrooms more suitable for them? She said that she found this program useful and beneficial to these students' improvements.

I against nurturing students with special needs in isolated places and I think a mainstreaming+ rehabilitation services is the best formula for these students. The trend in special education is nurturing these students with their other peers. They should spend their time with other peers who don't have any special needs because by this way students can see right behavior models and it can help to fix their situations.(NÇ,28 April 2011)

In the light of responses of special education teacher it can be said that cooperative working between special and regular education can be useful for students with LD.


With respect to the findings in data, currently used methods in problem-solving lessons, characteristics of some learning disability types, affect of the percentages of the students with LD in regular education classrooms are discussed. The responses of informants give indicators for the research questions however they may not be generalizable. Because informants were from only two schools and special education is a broad topic. In addition to that my study was more specific rather than my findings. Instead of finding specific tips for effective problem solving teaching, I found general comments about the research which were similar to the findings in literature review.

Percentages of the students with LD in classes and the size of the classes affect the lesson negatively because these students have special needs and teacher has to monitor and look after them during the lesson. While the class is crowded monitoring and also controlling both the class and these students can be challenging. There are several types of learning disabilities and helping ways for the abilities changes according to the characteristics of learning disability. For that reason some generalizations may not apply to all situations. Teaching techniques used by teachers were transferring word problem into mathematical language, George Polya's problem solving strategy, mind maps, tables, figures, transferring the problem students' life, using real life applications. While currently used methods were enough for students with LD at Ã-BÄ°O, methods used in TTÄ°O were not enough. The latter teacher didn't know and hadn't been trained about which methods suitable for the students with LD in her classroom are.

To sum up, teachers should know students' needs well and they should be informed about their students' problems and solutions of these problems. The size of the classrooms should be reduced in public schools; they should be supported economically by the government. Making students with LD successful not only in math but also in all their lessons their studying and learning process and their feelings should be monitored. They should also receive support outside of the classroom. In particular using concrete materials, visualization methods, real life applications can be used in problem solving lessons.

The data gave some of the answers of the research. Yet there are still some areas that I recommend for further research. I mentioned that Individualized Education Program is performed by a big team in the introduction. However I didn't touch on the roles of parents about the contribution of understanding the problem solving in students' success. A research about students' and parents' aspects for problem-solving lessons and their interactions between regular and special education teachers can be investigated further. In addition to that which kind of cooperation between regular math and special education teachers can be done for problem solving lessons might be another research question to help students with LD in problem solving lessons.


Babbitt, B. C., & Miller S. P. (1996). Using hypermedia to improve the mathematics problem-solving skills of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, v29, p391-412.

Borkowski, J. G. (1992). Metacognitive theory: A Framework for teaching literacy, writing, and math skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities , v25, p253-57.

Cavkaytar, D. A. (2006). Teacher training on special education in Turkey. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology , volume 5 (Issue 3).

Ethnography. (2009). In Encyclopaedia Wikipedia online. Retrieved from

Gürkan, M., Ã-ztürk,V., Kılıç, Z., & Güney, N. (2010). KaynaÅŸtırma eÄŸitimindeki görev ve sorumluluklarımız nelerdir? In M. Gürkan (Ed.), Okullarımızda 3Neden,nasıl, niçin kaynaÅŸtırma yönetici-öÄŸretmen-aile kılavuzu. (pp.31-32) Retrieved from

Melekoglu, M. A., Cakiroglu, O., & Malmgren, K. W. (2009). Special education in Turkey. International Journal of Inclusive Education , v13, p287-298 .

Maccini, P. & Gagnon, J. C. (2002). Perceptions and applications of NCTM standards by special and general education teachers. Council for Exceptional Children , p325-344.

Nal, A. & Tüzün, I. (Eds.). (2010). Türkiyede kaynaÅŸtırma uygulamaları. Türkiye'de kaynaÅŸtırma/ bütünleÅŸtirme yoluyla eÄŸitimin durumu.(pp.25-30). Retrieved from

Steedly K., & Dragoo K. (2008). Effective mathematics instruction. Evidence for Education , 3 (1), 2-9.


Appendix A: Interview questions made by teachers

Appendix B: Interview questions made by counselor

Appendix C: Interview questions made by special education teacher