Education Is Significant For Every Country Education Essay

Published: Last Edited:

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Education is very significant for every country on earth. It is the unlocked code key to develop all fragments in countries' system. Economic growth, poverty reduction and human development are accelerated by education. Moreover, it has great influence on the human society-information and knowledge is transformed through education. Every nation cannot ignore the important of education. And its role in present time becomes even more vital as an absolute need for development in economic and social sectors in the time of globalization and internationalization-more effectively and more efficiently in work forces for educated people comparing to uneducated people. On the other hand, education is not widely reached and provided to all people. The causes why those things do not occur are that there are many concerns blocking. In order to solve those difficulties, global governments attempt to stimulate and produce many projects. Similarly, in Cambodia, education is one of the main aspects of the rectangular strategies which indicate that the Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sport plays an important role to improve economic, social and cultural domains of the country. In response to its role stated in the strategies, the MoEYS has made concerted efforts to improve quality and equity of education. However, many constraints have made it difficult for the MoEYS to implement the strategies. These constrains are gender inequality, low quality of education, dropout, financial constrain in maintaining educational processes, schooling problems, administration in education, policy making and curriculum design. I have noticed that student dropout is one of the many constrains that has an enormous impact on efficiency and effectiveness of the development of the country. To address this, many researches about dropouts have been conducted in primary and secondary school levels which EFA 2015 and Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) are the core of them; however, there is little or almost no research into student dropouts from higher education, especially at master level because the population of students at this level are small compared to general education level.

Particularly, this current proposal mentions about the dropout from higher education at master level. During doing master degree of education at one university in Phnom Penh, I have observed that master candidates of education here have dropped out gradually from term to term. Moreover, by questioning previous cohorts and MED staff about this issue, the unchanged experiences have existed. I ask myself why that issue occur. This encourages me to conduct this research.

1.2 Research problem

As mentioned earlier, dropout from master candidates is a new concern in Cambodian higher education. Time and money investment at this level is much more expensive comparing to the basic education sector. Furthermore, money and time is wasted if the dropouts continue to occur. Specifically, it takes two years and half to finish degree here. In addition, the school fee is 2100 dollars excluding academic materials and other academic services; however, other universities in general only 1500 dollars and two years in Cambodian context. As result, it becomes researcher's current interest. Moreover, that issue is likely to continue in the next cohort and so on if no solution to solve it. It will create dropout culture in the university, which is really not good in economic and the university culture.

1.3 Research objective

In this study, there are one main objective and two sub-objectives. The main objective is to ascertain the perspectives of the dropouts of the master candidates. Moreover, the first of the two sub-objectives is to determine difficulties that students who dropped out face. The second is to gather feedback from the dropouts to inform policy makers on student retention.

1.4 Research questions

All in all, this paper is going to be guided by the three following research questions:

What are the perspectives of the dropouts on the master training program?

How do they decide to drop out?

How do they feel after dropping out?

1.5 Significance of the Study

This study is significant for several reasons. First, it will reflect the perspectives of dropout candidates on the current training programs. Secondly, it will indicate challenges that make students drop out. Third, it will provide useful information to stakeholders who are involved in discussion on drop-out issues, especially at higher education level and to inform higher education policy makers in relation to student dropout in higher education in education. Fourth, it will help the students make an informed judgement on dropout. Last but not least, it will be one significant literature review for next generation researchers in dropout area at master level.

1.6 Definitions of the terms

Dropout refers to the students who do not complete their course to any circumstances. MED is master of education. The gate keeper refers the person who helps the researcher gain access to the samples researcher wish to conduct the research. The key informants are the people understand and have valuable information about the sample.

1.7 Proposed chapter outline of your research paper

There are five main chapters in the research papers. First of all, Chapter 1 Introduction shows the background, research problem, research objective, research question, significance of the study, the definition of key term.  According to Wilkinson (1991), the introduction provides readers with the background information for the research paper. It is important to make readers interested in the study, which is the broad description about the area under the study and the links for the problem that leads to the research study (Creswell, 1994). Chapter 2 The Review of the Literature provides the context and background for research problem. It shows the researcher is knowledgeable about the study area (Wiersma, 1995). The closely related studies and prior studies about the research topic are written down to share with the readers (Fraenkel & Wallen, 1990). It is the benchmark to compare the result of finding to other findings. Chapter 3 Methodology is the heart of research paper (Wiersma, 1995). It consists of research design; tool/instruments for data gathering; site, population, sample size and sampling method; data collecting procedures; data analysis; ethical consideration; and strengths and limitation of method. Chapter 4 Finding and Discussion is about the summarized writing obtaining from evaluation process of the data and the judgment the result whether that is consistent or not to the prior research to what extent. Chapter 5 is Conclusion followed by References and Appendix.



2.1 Theoretical framework

According to Rumberger and Lim (2008), theoretical perception that is still worthwhile in clarifying dropout conduct which is a broadly acknowledged theory of institutional departure at the higher education level developed by Tinto (1987). First, personal attributes-abilities and skills, family background, and prior school experiences, including goals (intentions) and motivation (commitments) to continue their schooling in Tinto's model as the process of departure which is influenced. Second, two separate dimensions, a social dimension dealing with social integration and an academic dimension dealing with academic integration, influence students by both informal and formal structure of the university. For instance, the formal systems of classrooms and the informal system of communications with university in other situations may be existed in academic integration. Moreover, the needs and attributes of graduate students as well as external factors make them dropout which the dimensions can have distinct and free impacts on how the students do. Third, student mobility is another aspect of persistence. It differentiates between the commitment to the goal of finishing university and the commitment to the university, and how these commitments can be influenced by students' experiences in university over time (p. 115). Furthermore, the theory suggests that universities can have various people or subgroups (p. 119) to provide unneeded accommodations and provision to students. Besides the theory grants the significance of external factors that have influenced student leaving (Rumberger & Lim, 2008).

2.2 Previous research

It is hard to find Research on dropouts at master level. If they exist, the results are not reliable and generalizable because of small population (Amber, 2010). However, many researches about dropout in higher education in undergraduate level are related or at least providing some idea.

A noteworthy number of studies has discovered the impact of financial support on university admission, achievement and dropouts (McPherson and Schapiro, 1991; Willet and Singer, 1991; Des Jardins, Ahlburg and McCall, 1999; Dynarski, 2002; Stinebrickner and Stinebrickner, 2008). A positive effect on enrolment and a negative effect on dropout have been found as result of financial aid in most of these studies. Even though the impact is varied since low-income and minority students are more thoughtful and sympathetic to financial support modifications than high or middle income students. Furthermore, poverty in higher education is another point to be considered (Letseka & Breier, 2008)-another study in South Africa.

Regarding the nature of financial status limits, the literature has been disagreeing over the relevance of two chief terms: short-term limits (Kane and Ellwood, 2000) as assessed by noticed family income at the time of admission decision and long- term limits, assessed by long-term standard of family income and wealth (Carneiro and Heckman, 2002). Moreover, several particular studies (For example, Smith and Naylor, 2000, for the United Kingdom, Cingano and Cipollone, 2007, for Italy, and Stinebrickner and Stinebrickner, 2009) have emphasized the significance of undergraduates' social and economic characteristics to describe dropouts, even in circumstances were credit limits were disappeared (Acuna et el2010). A significant procedural challenge confronted by these studies is the difficulty of variables between support suitability and university admission, achievement and dropout, since support suitability can be linked with numerous unobserved as well as observed undergraduates' characteristics that effect university-continuing and dropout chosen choices (Dynarski, 2002).

Besides "With their whole lives ahead of them: Myth and realities about why so many students fail to finish college" is a remarkable and noteworthy study in 2009 in United Sates. It is based on a telephone survey operating both landline and cellular phones. The sample was 614 young adults who aged 22 to 30 years ago who have experience with some post-secondary education. Furthermore, the interviews via phone took averagely 26 minutes in both English and Spanish and were conducted from May 7 to June 24, 2009-27 percent response rate for landline and 29 percent for cell phone. The sample were Americans, African-American and Hispanic respondents. The phone sample was created by Survey Sampling International, LLC (SSI). Standard list-assisted random digit dialling (RDD) methodology was used.

Public Agenda designed and interpreted reflected data in this report and Princeton Survey Research International in cooperation with Princeton Data Source, LLC conducted the interview. Moreover, qualitative exploration was done in five focus groups. They are adults who are between 22 and 30.

A mix of young adults, who neither complete a post-secondary education program nor post-secondary education familiarity in Erie, Pennsylvania;

Young adults presently in a technical program or two year in New York, New York ;

Young adults presently in a four year program in Phoenix, Arizona;

Young adults presently in a four year program in St. Louis, Missouri;

Young adults who did not finish a post-secondary education program in Seattle, Washington. (Amber et all, 2010)

The findings of this resurvey show that

Most undergraduates dropout university because they are working to support their livings and studying at the same time. To much extent, the pressure of work and study increase too hard to continue.

Young people who do not finish university are who often pay university fee by themselves.

Among undergraduates who are not qualified to hold degree, the university choosing method is narrower and frequently seems coincidence and unchanging.

Students who drop out university understand that a certificate is an advantage, but they might not completely understand the impact on their future as result of dropping out. (Amber et all, 2010)



3.1 Research design

A qualitative method will be used in this research. This will enable the researcher to identify the case of dropout from higher education at master level of education in one university in Phnom Penh.

3.2 Tools/instruments for data gathering

The gate keepers are the university's rector and MEd's director and other key informants such as the MEd's staff (MEd's director assistant). Students, ranging from cohort 1 to cohort 4, will be asked to participate in the study. The students will be contacted through emails and or telephones. However, any unknown change of this information is also something to be considered. Participant observations and in-depth interviewing are the two ways to collect the data. The researcher comes into the people's environment where he or she plans to conduct study and a written record of what is observed and heard is systematically kept. Artifacts, photographs, university memos and records supplement this material (Bogdan & Biklen, 1992).

3.3 Site, population, sample size and sampling method

The study will be conducted in one public university in Phnom Penh at master program of education. The populations are about the master candidates of education who dropped out. Total population of dropout from cohort 1 to cohort 4 (academic year 2009-2011) is 37- 7 females. So one third of this is the sample around 10 to 12 (5 to 6 females) people are involved in the study. In addition, purposive sampling is selected to be used. Purposive sampling is one of the most common sampling approaches. Sample sizes can or can not be fixed prior to data collection. They depend on the times and resources available as well as the study's objectives (Denzin & Lincoln, 2000). However, the samples are divided into two groups. One group is interviewed face to face or by phone. Besides participant observation in cohort 4 is another.

3.4 Data collecting procedures

Using two procedures to collect data-in-depth interview and participant observation. For in-depth-interviewing, contacting the samples via phone or email to interview is first point. MEd's director assistant provides the samples' contact list including sex, phone numbers and email address. Make sure that they understand the objectives of the study and have willingness to take part in the study. Setting and time is set up as affordable as available. While in-depth interviewing, an unstructured interview, following up on what the participant says and not interrupting, asking questions when they don't understand, avoiding leading questions, sharing experiences on occasion, tolerating silence, expressing polite ways to the participants is done. This approach is very useful as a data collection in situation where in-depth information is needed. The flexibility and comparability in interviews is available to obtain as the freedom (Kuma, 1996, p.109). The rest is about the participate observation. The settings are the classroom, MEd room, canteen, restaurants, clubs, etc.-where the cohort 4 students are with the researcher. The participants are the researcher's classmates. Dropout stuff is normally talked among them while break time, meal time, entertainment time, etc. That is informal and unplanned activities. Participant observation is when the researcher is a part in the group activities which being observed in the same situation and manner as its participants, without or with their senses that they have been observed (Kuma, 1996, p.106). Narrative is done as the method of recording observation. It is a description of the researcher's interaction in his own words. While observing the interaction, the researcher makes brief notes. After that the narrative form are made from the detailed notes. Moreover, narrative recording makes available deeper understanding into the interaction (Kuma, 1996, p.107). Rich-thick description for the readers is written in the research report and the trustworthiness is concerned.

3.5 Data analysis

The collected data will be analysed qualitatively. The transcripts of interviews must be many pages. And each interview transcript will be initially coded into thematic categories of personal perspective, difficulties and feedback. Any response that connected more than one category will be coded into all related categories (Gay et al, 2009, p. 452). Addition to it, meaningful and appropriate format of summary of the answer from qualitative questionnaire will be done as well along with the summary of note taking. At the end, matrixes, concept maps and graphs will be illustrated (Gay et al, 2009, p. 454). It will display perspective, difficulties and feedback of the dropout candidates.

3.6 Ethical considerations

The participation in in-depth-interviewing is completely voluntary. Research participant information and consent forms are designed and used. The interviewees have specific rights. They are free to reject to answer any questions and to withdraw from the interview any circumstances. Furthermore, the interviewees can check the transcription of the interview to make sure it is not harmful to them. The data is strictly confidential and anonymous.

3.7 Strength and limitation of method

Flexibility and emphasis on the context is the strength of the methodology-case study. Moreover, this study has several limitations which affect the generalizability of the results. They consist of time constraint and financial issues. Because of these things, only one university is thoroughly selected to be conducted so to some extent its result can reflect issues of only one university. Moreover, all relevant information depends on data and documents from interviewees and the MEd staff, so self bias may exist. Moreover, the sample is only from cohort 1 to cohort 4 excluding cohort 5 the new cohort 2010-2012.The researcher works as a full-time staff for a private international school in Phnom Penh so only weekend time that the study can be done. The last thing is that the researcher has limited budget.


Acuna, C,. Makovec, M,. and Mizala, A. (2010). Access to higher education

and dropouts: evidence from a cohort of Chilean secondary school

leavers. In Carolina Acuna's Master Thesis.

Amber N,. O,. Pont, S, D,. Johnson, J,. and Rochkind, J. (2010). With their

Whole Lives Ahead of Them: Myth and Realities about Why So Many

Students Fail to Finish College. Public Agenda: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Retrieved from advicehere/methodology?qt_active=1

Carneiro, P,. and Heckman, J, J. (2002). The evidence on credit constraints in post-

secondary schooling. NBER Working Papers 9055, National Bureau of

Economic Research, Inc.

Cingano, F, Y. and Cipollone, P. (2000). University drop-out: The case of Italy.

Bank of Italy, and Economic Research Department.

Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches.

Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds.). Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage

Publications, 2000.

DesJardins, S.J., Ahlburg, D., and McCall, B, P. (2006). An Integrated Model of

Application, Admission, Enrolment and Financial Aid. The Journal of Higher

Education 77(3): 381-429.

Dynarski, S. (2002). The behavioural and distributional implications of aid for

college. In American Economic Review 92(2): 279-285.

Ellwood, D, T,. and Kane, T, J.(2000). Who is getting a college education?:

Family background and the growing gaps in enrolment. In Securing

the Future, edited by S. Danziger and J. Waldfogel, 283-324. New

York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (1990). How to design and evaluate research in

education. New York: McGraw- Hill.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., Airasian, P. (2009). Educaiton research: Competencies for

analysis and applications (9th ed). London: Pearson

Letseka, M. and Breire, M. (2008). Student Poverty in Higher Education: The

Impact of Higher Education Dropout on Poverty.

Kumar, R. (1996). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners, p.

106-109. Addison Wesley Longman Australia Pty Limited.

McPherson, M, S,. and Schapiro, M, O. (1991). Does student aid affect

college Enrolment?: New evidence on a persistent controversy. American

Economic Review 81(1):309-318.

Rumberger, R, W. & Lim, S, A. (2008). Why Students Drop Out of School: A Review

of 25 Years of Research. Santa Barbara: University of California.

Smith, J. & Naylor, R. (2000): Dropping Out of University: A Statistical Analysis of

the Probability of Withdrawal for UK University Students. Journal of the Royal

Statistical Society, Series A (Statistics in Society), Vol. 164, No. 2 (2001), pp.

389-405. Retrieved from


Stinebricker, R. and Stinebrickner , T. (2008). The effect of credit constraints on

the college drop-put decisions: A direct approach using a new panel study.

American Economic Review 98(5): 2163-2184.

Tinto, V. (1972). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent

research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89-125. Retrieved from

Wiersma, W. (1995). Research methods in education: An introduction (Sixth

edition). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Willet, J. and Singer, J. (1991). From weather to when: New methods for

studying students dropout and teacher attrition. In Review of Educational Research 61(4):407-450. Retrieved from


Wilkinson, A. M. (1991). The scientist's handbook for writing papers and

dissertations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: