Case Study Academic Teacher Tenure System Education Essay

Published: Last Edited:

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Over several years the United States and Canada has adopted this internal policy under the tenure system, which has been a controversial and perplexing subject to address. Tenure is associated with the teaching profession, which is abused and treated unfairly. With Tenure adopted and integrated in our education system, it gives teachers the power to become incompetent, thereby slacking and destroying child education as a result of an incompetent, idle educator.

Recently teacher unions have become increasingly powerful. In most states, after two to three year the teacher will be granted life tenure, making extremely difficult to fire them. In New York City in 2008, Three out of 30,000 tenured teachers were fired and dismissed for cause. The percentage in other states' dismissal rate were 0.1 percent, zero percent, 0.01 percent, and zero percent, in Chicago, Akron, Ohio, Toledo, and Denver, respectively. Year after year, about 99 percent of all teachers in the United States are rated "satisfactory" by their school systems, if not this usually calls for a costly court battle with the local teacher union which is the sole purpose of why principles do not want to engage and disapprove a teacher's rating.

The Nation Education association which hold 3.2 million members, and the American Federation of Teacher which holds 1.4 million members play major roles in the our Democratic Party significantly in the national and local levels, the Obama has put up costly incentives for state legislatures to "weaken" the power of teachers' unions all together. Under the race to the Top program, states get extra points for getting rid of caps on the number of charter schools, which are often nonunionized, allowing students' scores to play a significant role in the teacher's evaluation. Cities like New Orleans take the opportunity to use student scores to measure teacher effectiveness. In other cities like New York that have more powerful teacher unions it is illegal to use such methods under Tenure decisions. This method will continue you occur unless power is striped from the unions and is regulated accordingly, with having a better method to remove bad teachers who abuse the Tenure system, that give a bad reputation for teachers across the nation.

Programs like Knowledge is Power program (KIPP) have been produced inner-city schools that have soaring graduation rates of 85 percent than the average graduation rate of 60 percent to 70 percent. This KIPP program requires teachers to have cell phones so students can call them anytime, their motto is "work hard, be nice". With that KIPP schools require longer school days and longer school year, for the benefit of better teaching. If public schools could have this ability it would call for better education for the students if it's true to state, more time between student and teacher equals a better chance of graduation and a better education.

In Rhode Island, about half the students drop out of school, with math proficiency exams standing at a disgraceful 7 percent among 11th graders. Superintendent, Frances Gallo, addressed the problem with teachers working 25 minutes longer each day, once a week eat lunch with students, and to be evaluated by a third party. Teachers of Rhode Island wanted $90 an hour including their $75,000 a year salary, which is far more than an average teacher would normally make, the superintendent provided a bold solution, Fire all of the 74 teachers. This statement was praised by the Obama administration, as the Unions retaliated with their speculation of unfairness, finally backing off due to media pressure. This event provides us a stepping stone for superintendents to have the courage to be able to control their school facilities, and to regulate their schools of the bad teachers who don't help their students pass and are protected by the Tenure system.

In Los Angeles, the education bureaucracy was documented for their unwillingness of firing educators, the teacher who purposely recommended to the student to "carve deeper next time" as this student was attempting suicide, and the teacher who kept a stash of pornography and a stash of cocaine at school, which are both still teaching, ironically. With generous cash settlements for teachers accused of touching, sexually assaulting, kissing, and photo taking high school students, continue to have active teaching licenses. There are more ordinary ways teachers let down students, but there are teachers who are unappreciated, underpaid, and overworked but are continued to be disrespected due to the incompetent teachers.

Some teachers do not belong in a classroom; although there is no doubt that the tenure system is over bent and has over extended its welcome there are some benefits towards the controversial subject, Constant support for teachers not losing their education abilities and being protected from "unfair" firings. These are benefits that can save a good teacher but also save a bad one. Which is the sole reason and the most significant problem of the Tenure system. After 2 - 3 years you become immune to being fired, and if you do get fired, compensation will be handed down to you, which strikes unfairness among all teachers who do an excellent job and receive nearly no extra pay for their effort, while their counterpart teachers, who do nothing and receive compensation for their lack of their compassion and efforts to help their students

One option that has been expressed is to reform the teaching Tenure system, to be more effective on rewarding good teachers opposed to rewarding bad teachers. This will help our education system grow if our society has responsible principals and even more responsible superintendents. Furthermore, it could spark a new education system, the system that our country supposed to obtain from president George W. Bush's No child Left Behind Act (NCLB) which should provide the child with stellar teachers whatever location the child lives in. For now addressing the problem and understanding it, is all our society can count on as of now, and to support the teachers who are constantly overworked and unappreciated and giving those teachers the responsibility to change our education system for the better.

Several Republican governors have concluded that removing ineffective teachers requires undoing the century-old protections of tenure. Governors in Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Nevada and New Jersey have called for the elimination or dismantling of tenure. As state legislatures convene this winter, anti-tenure bills are being written in those states and others. Their chances of passing have risen because of crushing state budget deficits that have put teachers' unions on the defensive.

Debates about tenure rules are happening at the local level as well, notably in Washington, D.C., where a proposal to eliminate tenure and seniority rules in exchange for higher pay led to protracted arguments over the local teachers' contract. Washington State, meanwhile, along with Maryland and Ohio, has recently lengthened the number of years teachers have to wait before becoming eligible for tenure. Elementary and secondary school teachers can become eligible for tenure after as little as two years on the job, although the time frame varies by state.

Unlike tenure for university professors, tenure for K-12 teachers does not shield them from dismissal. Instead, it's simply a guarantee of due process that if a teacher is fired, it will be for cause. The advent of tenure, which coincided roughly with World War I and the suffragist movement, was meant to protect teachers, who were often fired for reasons that had nothing to do with their work, including race. Teachers were often let go when a new political party came to power locally, or if the principal wanted to hand out jobs to his friends or even if a teacher got pregnant.

It's clear that the way teachers are evaluated will undergo change. The federal Race to the Top program, a $4 billion pot of money meant to encourage states to pursue innovative educational strategies, insists on tying teacher evaluation to student performance. The ins and outs of how student scores on standardized tests are weighted in evaluating teachers can quickly turn into a topic of interest only to insiders. In contrast, the public can understand and respond to the idea that a lifetime job guarantee has become anachronistic in today's economy.

Teacher tenure is overwhelmingly political for K-12. Evaluation of non-tenured/ probationary teachers is often infrequent, inconsistent and not at all standardized. It was mentioned above that a probationary teacher can be denied tenure based upon a personal gripe. Permanent status may not be granted for probationary teachers without cause--no reason has to be given. The evaluation process is very arbitrary--a poorly performing teacher with connections will earn tenure yet another teacher who complains or otherwise is not "connected" will not secure tenure. Personally, I believe test scores should be considered with many factors. To standardize the tenure system

Tenure is still going to be a tough shell to crack or regulate. Teachers unions are generally considered among the strongest lobbies in most states, and job protection for their members goes to the heart of their mission our goal is to regulate this better and constantly be aware of the loop holes and the fairness of granting tenure and the negativities of granting tenure to teachers undeserving and inconsistent with their work to help children succeed in school, so our society can become a more profound and educated nation, so our society can compete with schools globally around the world with Tenure adopted and integrated in our education system, our society can only hope our leaders are constantly are attempting to regulate this problem in the education system.