Advent of the world wide web


Current Situation

As discussed in the initial report, with the advent of the World Wide Web, the Internet has assured tremendous development, from its roots while, a network of small symmetries generally used by the researchers and academic community, to a prominent public information network . The everlasting requirements of Internet users have down forcing the Internet Service Providers to meliorate the furnished service quality. Particularly with the recent advancements in real-time multimedia applications, a number of demands for instance, eminent bandwidth, quick routing and QoS affirm stays however, undecided. No matter of the type of the application traffics, uncomplicated routing algorithm of the IP gives exclusively a most beneficial attempt service that most effectively suited to the data transfer applications. Hence, particularly voice and video traffics have to be transferred employing other techniques suchlike, MPLS over ATM and IP over ATM, where QoS confirm rewards of the ATM are overworked in particular proposition. ATM can cover the network postponement, apportioning its bandwidth to unlike application traffics reasonably as well as distinguishing the real time and non-real time multimedia traffics. As a consequence, most favorable functioning can be received from the network resourcefulness's for altogether classifies of multimedia applications.

Literature Review

MPLS over ATM and IP over ATM Methods:


Lady using a tablet
Lady using a tablet


Essay Writers

Lady Using Tablet

Get your grade
or your money back

using our Essay Writing Service!

Essay Writing Service

Multi-protocol Label Switching has been brought in by IETF . MPLS by superimposed IP and modifying backbone of broad-area IP networks is an extravagantly hasten technology . It replaces established packet forwarding amongst a network, otherwise a component of network, with a quicker procedure of label consult and switching . ATM cell switching method and label switching in MPLS networks are identical to one another. In order to send out packets speedily, MPLS diminishes complication by consolidation of Layer-2 switching and Layer-3 routing for everlasting integrated resolutions . Integration of IP routers and ATM switching mechanisms gives IP measurability over ATM networks, whereas packet forwarding along with path checking are furnished with routers. MPLS applies the check-driven model to start the appointment and dispersion of label bindings for the organization of Label Switched Paths. An LSP is produced by adding one or more than label shifted hops, appropriating a packet to be forwarded from one label switching router (LSR) to another LSR throughout the MPLS domain. The MPLS network architecture comprises of label switching routers (LSR) in the heart and soul of the network, and label-edge routers (LER) at the edge. The label-edge routers have the chore of examining the IP coping of from each one packet went far, in order to determine the representing forwarding comparability class (FEC) and label-switched track, which helps the label swapping function in the LSR nodes .

Label-edge routers and label-switch routers in spite of appearance an MPLS domain, packet forwarding, compartmentalization in addition to QoS are influenced by the labels and the class of service (CoS) fields. This constructs core LSRs simple. Each MPLS packet has a header that comprises a 20-bit label, a 3-bit Experimental area, 1-bit label heap pointer plus an 8-bit TTL field in a non ATM environment, and appreciations exclusively a label converted in the VCI/VPI field in an ATM environment.

MPLS Header unlike MPLS headers may be used calculating on the surroundings utilized for data transposing. For instance, in a result employing an ATM backbone, data in the MPLS header is forwarded in the ATM header. Then again, for label established forwarding procedure what the data format is, extra labels and selective information to packets is requirement through with MPLS Encapsulation.

IP over ATM

In prominent scale surroundings, core networks ordinarily use switch-based technologies. Routers are as well operated in these networks at sure indicates. IP over ATM sheathing model take places by using these two technologies jointly [10]. As a secondary technology, ATM or Frame Relay some with overlay traffic direction capacities offers the IP backbone system with virtual circuits (VC). IP over ATM networks extend invention space and allow definitive arbitrary practical topologies. IP over ATM model has too a small number of weaknesses. This gains the complication of network architecture and network design. Although IP routing protocols run on ATM, IP routers in the network are associated in concert using Permanent Virtual Circuits (PVCs) throughout an ATM cloud. The number of contiguousnesses in the overlie model in general increases quadratic ally with the number of routers. This produces incomplete neither an ascendable nor an accomplishable network, chiefly since wholly routers on the ATM cloud turn IP neighbors.

Multimedia Applications and Quality of Service

Lady using a tablet
Lady using a tablet


Writing Services

Lady Using Tablet

Always on Time

Marked to Standard

Order Now

QoS is basically end-to-end system structural design. It denotes to the power of a network to allow for amended service to a sure type of application traffic throughout several subordinate connections. QoS signaling is applied for aligning QoS for end-to- end delivery amongst network nodes. QoS policing and direction purposes control and feel end-to-end traffic crosswise the network. There are generally two classes one deals with data applications which have no requirements beyond that of the handed-down best effort regarding IP network. Yet, other one deal with applications that might introduce some new necessities.

Comparison between the Models

All of the multimedia traffic loads in the some models are preferred to be adequate so with the purpose of thoughtfulness of the MPLS over ATM and IP over ATM can well be acted with comparisons.

Figure 8 demonstrates the standard delay graphs related to voice, video and data traffics for evaluating appropriateness of the MPLS over ATM and IP over ATM techniques used for multimedia applications. It can easily determined from the figure that MPLS over ATM model expresses almost average delay results overbalance as compared to the other model which depicts an average delay results approximately 10 times towards data traffic, 100 times towards video traffic plus 1000 times for voice traffic. Furthermore, the latter model has developed extremely high mean holdups constructing it undesirable for altogether of the multimedia application traffics. MPLS over ATM model has afforded not solely improve and lower average delay and delay dissimilar outcomes than those of IP over ATM model just as well it has separated the multimedia traffics according to their expected QoS. Thus, voice, video and data traffics go through unlike end-to-end average delay and delay variations imputable to reasonable and effective role of ATM backbone resources extended with AAL1, AAL2 and AAL3/4 links.

Problems in bother Networks

Random and high end-to-end delay and delay variation effects have been the nearly substantial trouble in the preparation of IP over ATM networks for multimedia applications. It is neither enough nor satisfactory to utilize the IP most beneficial-effort service for the almost calling for real-time voice and video traffic transfer referable to its elementary and association routing protocol approach. Likewise, IP over ATM traffic does not give ample QoS ensures for these applications either. MPLS gains scalability of the routing and forwarding by helping the traffic engineering in IP networks.

MPLS for IP over ATM

The flexibility of IP and the honors of ATM cannot be over-trustful. More or less IP and ATM have their own gains, plus it is certain that a number of IP and ATM are apprenticed to stay. Latterly, lots of work has been going on to combine the advantages of some IP and ATM, by depicting IP networks services over an ATM. However, a lot of indicate that the MPOA requirement suggested by the ATM debate might not be adequate to make up one's mind or a lot acknowledgment. Amongst the most crucial encumbrances found for the formulation of MPOA is the feeling that MPOA protocol is likewise very much composite to deliver beneficial pragmatic outcomes.

MPLS is planned as a interactive process amongst IP and ATM. Afterwards MPLS purposes the suppleness of the IP routing protocols, plus a label switching prototype interchangeable to ATM, it may be capable to play a substantial role in backing IP over ATM. Recognizing this, IETF is working on determining processes for supporting MPLS in ATM environs.

Numerous MPLS-based IP networks can be associated to each other through an ATM backbone. Within the ATM backbone, MPLS packets are switched in the direction of the destination MPLS domain utilizing ATM switching. At the interface between the MPLS as well as the ATM domain there are interworking nodes that can work as an MPLS edge LSR over and above an ATM switch.

Limitations of IP-over-LANE/ATM Networks

The central presumptions that fueled affirm for the unique preparation of ATM to the desktop and ATM-based cores are almost not reasonable. High-speed interfaces, deterministic functioning, and traffic engineering are facing difficulties in distinguishing ATM switches from Internet backbone routers. In addition, VLAN technology is usable nowadays that gives virtual LAN technology lacking of all the ramifications brought in by LANE to compete LANs. To achieve the technique of a broadcast surroundings similar to Ethernet over an ATM network, which is intrinsically a non-broadcast multiple access technology, LANE expects lots of server functions for instance, to execute address discovery of broadcast servers above all address resolution servers.

Lady using a tablet
Lady using a tablet

This Essay is

a Student's Work

Lady Using Tablet

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Examples of our work

ATM network architectures deliver a inequality between the high-speed Gigabit Ethernet, SONET/SDH router edges and the quickest ATM router interfaces accessible, which control solely at OC-12/STM-4 rates. This inequality is referable to the current unfitness to develop commercial router interfaces with SAR practicality for OC-48c/STM-16 plus OC-192c/STM-64. The limits in SAR grading affects network pattern in that to enhance network capability, prominent ATM switches with OC-48c/STM-16 connections between them ought to be positioned. The ATM cell significantly overhead for IP packets forwarded over an ATM core. “According to realistic distribution of packet sizes, a 20-percent overhead take places, leading in 1.99 Gbps of user data and 498 Mbps of ATM overhead of an OC-48c/STM-16 link. At OC-192/STM-64 rates, the overhead consumes 1.99 Gbps of the 10-Gbps bandwidth that could otherwise be used for customer traffic”.

Traffic engineering facilitates you to map traffic flows onto a subsisting physical topology. It offers a means of checking the dispersion of traffic throughout the network links therefore they are further equally utilized. Traffic engineering traditionally requisite the comportment of a Layer 2 technology that defends switching as well as virtual circuits. “On a mixed-media network, the dependency on a specific Layer 2 technology (ATM) to support traffic engineering can severely constrain possible solutions”.

Importance of both Networks

Utilizing the frame based MPLS altogether troubles are solved merely this may require investment in hardware. MPLS appropriates service suppliers to meet their network hooked on a single substructure at the same time as extending the service they currently affirm. MPLS change new services and modify services purveying. MPLS natively confirm the speedy increase in IP applications along with services and MPLS appropriate the integration of the competed services direction into widespread network strategy, placed to confirm integration of packet technologies and visual core. The responsibility of ATM is to transport voice and MPLS is to transport packets. Cells are merely determined length packets and be able to conveyed unaltered throughout an MPLS network. MPLS presents functional competence and major advantages when it is used for IP traffic. A transition from ATM to MPLS may perhaps furnish a number of imperative benefits for service contributors and for the clients. Another key factor which guides to MPLS is the originating training of Voice over IP. An ATM worker may possibly carry voice much better using its native capabilities, but the clients use more and more VoIP as low cost solution and the provider a great deal will see its good organization diminishing since of the little size of the IP packets.

What are the problems with MPLS over ATM and IP over ATM?

There are two most important troubles with applying an IP network to persuade voice traffic. Firstly, resolving how to manage the limitations and services for a call. The PSTN utilizes a protocol recognized as Signaling System 7, which can be constructed to run over an IP network. If Signaling System 7 is used, you cannot acquire fully benefit of the underlying litheness of the disseminated IP network. Secondly, how to obtain the voice excellence we anticipate from telephone classification over IP networks, with no long and irregular delays. They do not still inevitably come at their destination in the similar order as sent. Accordingly, most of the IP networks are taken as long and random delays. Although these effects don't pretend data communications, they bring mayhem with delay-responsive traffic for instance, voice and video traffic. Handling with QoS is one of the major ambitious expressions of VoIP. As far as telecommunications industry is concerned, preeminence is made between the control information flow as well as the media flow, and in lots of protocols they use unlike paths within the same network. The gains of classifying to manage the media flows is that it permits a little number of intelligent, valuable signaling devices to handle a large number of simpler and cheaper media devices.

Quality of Service Deficiencies in IP Networks

To provide assured QoS in a network, the entire data packets sent in each way, throughout each session, is obliged to pursue the identical path and a number of means for appropriating resources along that path must survive. IP is not link pointed, and IP routers don't normally have advanced mechanisms for devoting resources at each hop; for this reason insuring an assigned QoS is therefore, hard over an IP network. Two mechanisms have undertaking to figure out this trouble unproductively. The Differentiated Services protocol was fixed to change dissimilar levels of services to be supplied across IP networks, their protocol expends a noticeable space in the IP header to suggest different traffic types and priorities. Routers in the network are capable to appear at this data and prioritize traffic consequently at the same time as DiffServ provides no ensures. For instance, over-crowding and lining up can enhance latency, dilute useable bandwidth, plus thereby reduce voice excellence. By itself, DiffServ is not enough for VoIP. “The Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) is a signaling protocol used in IP networks to reserve resources for certain specified data flows”. [16] While RSVP is capable to appropriate the resources, it cannot assure that traffic will flow along the path on which the specific resource was set aside: as nodes and connections are added or get rid of in an IP network, the path on which data flows can modification. RSVP undertakes to make progress and create a modified path reflecting the newly technology, however, there know how to be no ensure that the QoS will be preserved, and it is potential that RSVP will fail to generate a modified path.


  1. A. Viswanathan, N. Feldman, Z. Wang, R. Callon, Evolution of Multiprotocol Label Switching IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 36, Issue 5, pp. 165-173, May. 1998.
  2. Young-Chul Kim, Mike Myung-Ok Lee, Dae-Jin Kim, VLSI design and architecture of a VC-merge capable crossbar switch on MPLS over ATM, ASIC 2001 Proceedings 4 th. International Conference on 2001, pp. 440-443.
  3. M. Murata, K. Kitayama, A perspective on photonic multiprotocol label switching, IEEE Network, Vol. 15, Issue 4, pp. 56-63, July-Aug. 2001.
  4. F. M. Chiussi, D. A. Khotimsky, S. Krishnan, A network architecture for MPLS-based micromobility, Wireless Communications and Networking Conference 2002, IEEE Vol. 2, pp. 549-555, March 2002.
  5. R. Callon, P. Doolan, N. Feldman, A. Fredette, G. Swallow, A. Viswanathan, A Framework for Multiprotocol label switching, IEEE Draft <draftietf- mpls-framework-05.txt> September 1999.
  6. A. Kos, J. Bester, P. Homen, M. Pustisek, IP over ATM for multimedia traffic; MPLS, Proc. Of the
  7. International workshop on Intelligent Communications and Multimedia Terminals, Ljubljana, November 1998.
  8. Cisco MPLS Controller Software Configuration Guide, Release 9.3.0, April
  9. 2000.
  10. X. Xiao, A. Hannan, B. Bailey, L. M. Ni, Traffic Engineering with MPLS in the Internet, IEEE
  11. Network, Vol. 14, Issue 2, pp. 28-33, March-April 2000.
  12. Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS), The International Engineering Consortium,
  13. F. Gonzales, C. H. Cheng, L. W. Chen, C. K. Lin, Using Multiprotocol label Switching (MPLS) to Improve IP Network Traffic Engineering,
  14. C. Semeria, Multiprotocol Label Switching Enhancing Routing in the New Public Network, Juniper Networks, White Paper, Jan. 2001.
  15. M. M. Shahsavari, A. A. Al-Tunsi, MPLS Performance Modeling Using Traffic Engineering to Improve QoS Routing on IP Networks, Southeast Conference 2002, Proceedings IEEE pp. 152-157 2002.
  16. B. Williams, Quality of Service Differentiated Services and Multiprotocol Label Switching, Ericsson White Paper, March 2000,
  17. R.Hunt, A rewiew of guality of service mechanisms in IP-based networks integrated and differentiated services, multi-layer switching, MPLS and traffic engineering, Elsevier Computer Communications March 2001, pp. 100-107.
  18. J.M.S. Doar, Multicast in the Asynchronous Transfer Mode Environment, CCITT Draft Recommendation I, May 1990.
  19. Horney, C. (2008), Quality of Service and Multi-Protocol Label Switching White Paper. Available from: [Accessed: January 3, 2010].
  20. Minta, A. (2008), ASPECTS OF NETWORK MIGRATION FROM ATM TO MPLS. Available from: [Accessed: January 3, 2010].
  21. Kasera, S. (2006), ATM NETWORKS Concepts and Protocol, 2nd ed, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited.