There Are Many Dimensions To Poverty Economics Essay

Published: Last Edited:

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Poverty can be defined as the conspicuous impoverishment in the welfare of the masses in general and can have a variety of dimensions. It is inclusive of meager earnings and the lack of ability in obtaining basic amenities and facilities of life. Poverty is synonymous with physical ailments, no access to academic institutions, dearth of drinking water and sanitation facilities and also, the lack of ability to improve life standard on an individual basis. Inequality can be referred to as ill treatment of masses based on individual social status or ethnic differences. It can also be discrimination against the helpless sections of the society by the powerful ones. Vulnerability can be termed as the probability or likelihood of having to deal with poverty, in future although; one may be sufficiently financially equipped for contemporary times. There can be many reasons for this, financial crisis, losing one's job, drought and perhaps also reduction in the prices associated with farm products.

The leading earning group of Australia have seen a major change in their income; a threefold rise in their salaries in the past few years. This is an established fact brought to light by a new research conducted by The Australian National University. The mean incomes of CEOs, judges working for high court and the finest public servants, increased significantly and much more then the salaries of ordinary workers.

Kevin Rudd made redundant the outcry of some billionaires when his government wrapped up the discussion about introducing a new tax meant for the extraordinary profits made by the mining companies. Families who are working extremely hard to get access to a decent living standard are supposed to be taxed less and the wealth of the mining industry profits is apparently going to be taxed higher than usual. This has caused heated debates amongst the rich section and the government but the government is adamant on imposing this tax despite disapproval from quite a few sections of the society.

Australia has a reputation of supporting egalitarianism but the recent statistics suggest that the rich section of the society was getting richer with every passing moment. However, the best part is that the increased amount of taxes on the rich segment ensured that people earning not-so-well also get access to a standard way of life. These taxes on the affluent earners uplift the way of life of the masses in general since these are utilized by the state to improve situations of the deprived and helpless people who have become reduced to the state of impoverishment

A total of 170,000 people who took home more than the estimated value of $197,000 saw a twofold increase in their percentile salary allowance from the time of 1980. Prior to this unexpected financial catastrophe, they received the largest portion of the cake from the time of 1950s. The profits by the leading 0.1 per cent --17,000 Australians who had an income of more than $693,000 -- are much more conspicuous and astounding. They have increased their salary percentage by a threefold rise in their regular income.

Evaluating rates of GDP across five Angle-Saxon countries, namely Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United Kingdom and United States of America, it can easily be concluded that the countries where English was spoken as the first language are significantly correspondent with each other. There is quite a significant similarity between these five countries in the top income field. All of them have supposed followed a U-shaped pattern and path in one period of time. However with a clearer analysis and inspection, the differences in the patterns, percentages and ratios in regard to the income of the elite class of these countries, get more prominent. Providing that high income ratios are influenced by international financial crisis, or the strategy alterations that are made at the same time by quite a few countries, it can be presumed that across countries, correspondence will be positive. On the other hand, if high salary groups are significantly adaptable, their ratios will have a negative interrelationship across countries.

At the commencement of this century, the salary ratio of the richest was significantly higher when compared with all the times in the span of last fifty years. Amongst high salary groups, in these fresh years there has been a notable rise in the allowance of high salary group people, thereby accumulating in the hands of the affluent and wealthy segments of society. The direction of top salary ratios is indistinguishable with others amidst other aristocracy segments for example adjudicators, legislators, civil servants and CEOs.

Sir Timothy Coghlan, Government Statistician of Australia, wrote in 1886 that "the difference between the wealthy and the destitute, which appears to be so unusual period of contemporary human development, comes across no equivalent in this land of South" (quoted by Raskall, 1992, page1). (McLean and Richardson 1986, page 68) once stated that "the scarcity of study proof with respect to discrimination in Australia has not averted speculation about long-run inclinations." The reason for utilizing these statistics is that to reach a quantitative conclusion for measuring current trends, one has to put these taxations facts and figure into service.

After the escalating influence of international monetary forces universally Australia, similar to other progressive democratic countries, made a step to select neoliberal fiscal strategies with stressing on intensifying deregulation of financial markets operating in the global world. The fiscal alterations introduced since the 1980s have essentially transformed the whole financial system and gave birth to a more versatile toil market. Employment escalation has been intensive in productions and businesses that are reliant mainly on temporary and impermanent employees. As a result, the percentage of all the jobs which are long-term and stable has faced a major downswing. In an effort to analyze in what way have these changes have influenced the degree of salary and financial discrimination in the confines of the Australian society. Despite the fact that there is a mutual consensus amid researchers that there has not been a noteworthy escalation in discrimination with respect to either salary or financial resources between the time frame of 1980s and the 2000s, some investigators contend that income discrimination has noticed a considerable increase. A proof of a discrepancy between impartial calculations of discrimination and the impressions of the people of Australia with a considerable mass of respondents in a local analysis organized in 2005 believing that Australia had transformed into a highly disunited, biased and prejudiced society since the 1980s.

The current economic calamity demonstrates that capitalism is not merely a spirited system, but one that is intrinsically susceptible to disaster. As far as this sense is concerned, Marx had always been right.

During each stage of financial amelioration and opulence, is consigned to oblivion, amidst brags that echo and bust have been expelled for all times to come. This catastrophe has once again contradicted the existence of such exaggeration. Granted that this financial pandemonium proved the analysis of Marx right but it has also proved Keynes, too. In this crisis it has been observed that market can demonstrate unexpected outcomes in cataclysmic consequences; and only government has the right, ability and capability, as the representative of the masses who elected it, to intercede and sort the whole confusion out. It symbolizes the conclusion of the neo-liberal period and the recurrence of general elective government.

The percentage of local salary expressed by Australia's most affluent and wealthy independent people has jumped to its most elevated position since the time of Korean War. This is owing to the salary increments in the incomes of the top level chief executives. Apparently, to dispute notions that Australia has become somewhat a society believing in equality for all and sundry, analysis and survey carried out by the Australian National University and Oxford University has wind up the research stating that the wealthiest 1 per cent of the whole inhabits has almost virtually doubled its percentage of state and local financial resources. This report, conducted by ANU economist Andrew Leigh and Oxford's Sir Anthony Atkinson, established that the wealthiest 1 per cent of residents of Australia had the percentage of 9% national income, contrasted with a mere 5 per cent share in the era of 1980.

Double-salary occupants with no kids have been given an increase in salary of 12%, while at the same time progress in occupations, professions and careers have helped to raise the mean salary of single parents by a total of 9%. Professor Heady said a conspicuous and marked finding from the survey conducted by the elective government-funding analysis of household, salary and workers in Australia, concluded that 60% of the inhabitants had achieved additional monetary profits, and while 40% had either stationary statistical value or a slight reduction. The sections of society which trailed back in this analysis were mostly single men, whose salary saw a decrease of 4%, and the elderly, who are slightly behind in the overall calculations.

Professor Heady has been known to conclude that statistical values taken for the aged people were far from reliable, mainly due to the fact that they had the possession and ownership of their houses and could utilize some basic resources. He also stated that the increase in expendable salary was less than what was expected, because of the mean rise in the GDP per person of almost 12% in the last five years. This is due to the increased percentage of financial surge which is meant for the profits of companies not the wages of employees. The increased financial gain is demonstrated and signified by ameliorated financial resources, for instance superannuation. Professor Heady also mentioned that the salary was not sufficient enough to provide proper and satisfactory living standards all by itself by itself. For instance, the penury ratio, which calculates the count of people surviving on half of standard incomes, holds the value of about 12.9%, down from 14% which was the value five years ago.

The resolution to dismiss the role of Industrial Relations Commission and increasingly waken the commerce amalgamations came at a historic time in midst of the workers and seat of government. The percentage of state earnings going to capital at 27.2% of the whole local product has not been escalated simply as the wage share, at 53 per cent, has never beenmore abated than this. The ratio which is supposed to go to the capital is considerably excessive because of the production and privatization strategies but even then, they are alarming numbers. When Howard initially transformed into a treasurer in 1978, the financial gain was only limited to 13%. This was the time when administration and business complained there was actual payments protrudes. The government responded by following the strategy of Whitlam government campaign, in order to make the public sector the trendsetter in raising the percentage of salary meant for the workers. It had been contended that the eventually repressed financial gain percentage held back financing merely due to the fact that the repay in business enterprises was not satisfactory. With the most high profit share rates in history, Australia has emerged as a capitalist heaven. Worker's portion of the financial system has decreased but with some apprehension and anxiety.

From the time of 1980s, an array of ameliorations has assisted in creating an increasingly global unified financial system of Australia. These ameliorations are inclusive of deregulation economy, a variable rate of exchange, the dismissal of finance regulatory authorities, increased commerce and holding possessions freedom. In the latest analysis executed in Australia, the OECD reported that Australia has the least amounts of hurdles to deal and invest in all the OECD countries.

All the aforementioned amendments have prompted extensive social modification: couples opted for less number of children, and that too later in life; women became more interested in education and started working properly with a career based mindset; skills of females rose higher; students studied more in school and attempted to go for tertiary study in record breaking numbers; sizes of households got reduced; and mature aged workers opted for different kinds of trainings and retraining to excel in their field.

These kind of social changes have crucial influence on markets of labor and the salary distribution associated with it. It is beyond belief that gigantic changes could have come about through society without requiring significant moderations in how work was organized, and it would be more then commendable if considerable changes in the wage distribution were not contemplated about. From 1980s, these communal alterations have co-existed with significant improvements to the markets of the labor and work relations they had with the management, in addition to training and education. All these reforms have either a direct or indirect influence on the income distribution strategy.

A recent OECD volume on directions and dominant factors in the distribution of wages/salaries and impoverishment in the OECD region signifies that comparative and complete penury decreased in Australia between the time span of 1980s and 1990s. Not every local researcher agrees with this point, as demonstrated in the latest heated debate over the Smith Family analysis and the evaluation of it by the Centre for Independent Studies. In Australia comparative penury is majorly referred to in regard to a `poverty line' touchstone on a particular percentage of the average salary in the society.

The tax system introduced and executed in July of 2000 gave one of the most gigantic personal income tax reductions in addition to replacing many irrational and indirect taxes with only a tax which is applicable on every citizen and also possesses a reasonable taxation system.