Crime has been a regular part of the UK society with ups and downs with its rates, there are times when the controlling authorities are on top and bring the crime ratios down while some time it's the trouble makers who come up with ideas that are smart enough to disturb the populace to a great extent. In order to avoid these frequent ratios of crime going up it has been the chief goal of the concerned bodies and authorities whether it's the government, the law enforcement agencies or general public to work together in order to come over the consequences that these crimes may bring with them and may become cause of serious harms to the society. (Davidoff, L. and Dowds, L. (1989))
Formal facts are as well challenging particularly in view of knives and guns associated crimes. In UK, the tracing of 'knife related' crimes did not begin until April 2007 (with the exemption of London, where such traces began to be gathered in 2003), which makes it unworkable to create any contrast with previous periods (Eades et al 2007). Furthermore the Home Office class of 'firearm related' and 'knife related' crime eliminates crimes of possession (Squires 2008a). The reality that crimes of unlawful knife and gun ownership are not regularly gathered for the Home Office makes it hard to set up the effect of strategies intended at discouraging young citizens from carrying guns, together with searches and detectors, communal protection education movements, knife amnesties (Squires 2008b). Official account have until lately not differentiated the weapon by which a crime is done, and the official meaning of 'wounding' encompasses acts where the skin is pierced or cut, which is expected to typically concerned wounding by knives, however includes other resources by which such damage may perhaps be caused.
There were 289,500 aggressive crimes traced amid July and September previous year, evaluated by means of 253,000 in the same phase in 2002. (Dwyer, D.C. (1995))
However ministers say part of the augment has affected as of novel techniques in the manner police trace crimes.
In general crime rates stayed steady, by major falls in thefts as well as vehicle crimes.
Offences of aggression aligned with the individual rose 17%, grave violence such as murdering were up 18%, as well as grave wounding plus sexual offences rose 8%.
However the British Crime study - stared by ministers as a supplementary dependable pointer of drifts - proposes violent crime in fact dived 3% in the year to September.
The BCS in addition designates a minor fall in general crime rates over the same stage.
There is as well support that public are less worried concerning crime than they were in the past.
According to the Home Office Minister, Hazel Blears, said "transforms in police recording practices initiated in 2002 by the National Crime Recording Standard (NCRS) elucidated much of the obvious climb in crime."
Improved footage, said Ms Blears, destined police forces at present had a clearer image of crime in their regions.
Disruptive deeds plus "low-level crime" - mutually incorporated in aggressive crime figures - were in addition further precisely traced.
"We are in addition heartening victims to report crimes, particularly violent and sexual offences, as well as we would anticipate seeing a climb in these statistics."
General crime steady
According to the BCS, generally crime was losing 1% evaluated to the similar quarter in 2002, while theft, burglary plus vehicle crime, fell considerably. The police forms proposed general crime stayed constant.
According to the President of the Association of Chief Police Officers Chris Fox supposed: "It is excellent news that reported crime usually is not increasing, plus in numerous categories continues to drop.
However he said the increase in brutal crime stayed a "meticulous worry", even though he added the BCS had proposed a drop in aggressive offences in excess of the time.
The BCS statistics are based on interviews among 36, 854 adults living in classified households in England plus Wales.
The fieldwork was approved by BMRB communal study flanked by October 2002 as well as September 2003.
'Hold up' in gun crime
In the meantime, differing gun crime shapes designate a two percent augment in firearm offences in the year to March 2003.
The statistics came as the Home Office proclaimed that criminals acquiring prohibited weapons would as have currently on receive an obligatory five-year prison verdict.
It said the gun crime statistics illustrated "a vivid hold up" evaluated to a 34% augment the preceding year.
However they in addition pointed to a 46% climb in the employ of imitation firearms, with 1,815 recorded offences.
UK CRIME STATS:
[1stÂ ofÂ 30]
[2ndÂ ofÂ 20]
[2ndÂ ofÂ 46]
Death penalty > Last executed
[19thÂ ofÂ 55]
183,419 per 100,000 people
[2ndÂ ofÂ 46]
producer of restricted sums of imitation drugs as well as synthetic forerunner chemicals; chief user of Southwest Asian heroin, Latin American cocaine, as well as synthetic drugs; money-laundering centre
[1stÂ ofÂ 39]
[7thÂ ofÂ 49]
Kills with firearms
[29thÂ ofÂ 36]
Insight of security > Walking in dark
[12thÂ ofÂ 15]
[6thÂ ofÂ 47]
[5thÂ ofÂ 168]
[6thÂ ofÂ 20]
[5thÂ ofÂ 50]
[5thÂ ofÂ 47]
Software piracy tempo
[97thÂ ofÂ 107]
Suicide rates in ages 15-24
6.7 per 100,000 people
[15thÂ ofÂ 17]
Suicide rates in ages 25-34
10.6 per 100,000 people
[15thÂ ofÂ 17]
Overall crime victims
[3rdÂ ofÂ 20]
[2ndÂ ofÂ 50]
Looking at the statistics above one may certainly feel that the results show are still quite have for the standards that UK police and law enforcement agencies posses this should be other way round and crime should be a word almost forgotten by the public. But the figure clearly tells the story of there is something wrong somewhere, in order to remove those casual efforts and weak links a questionnaire has been designed for the Home Office in order to enable it to understand what exactly is required in order to improve the efficiency and capability of police in order to help them act fast in response to crime that may take place anywhere anytime.
Have you ever been victim of any crime?
If yes, what was the nature of the crime and your experience with the service provided by police? Please write brief and clear with your contact details.
If yes, can you please state the time of the crime?
If happened in the night can you tell us about the lighting situation where the crime took place?
How efficient was the police response?
How secure did you felt?
Have you noticed in weak links or loop holes in your area by the council or authorities that you think may have helped the crime ratio to augment?
What would you like to suggest in order making Home Office and the other concerned bodies in order to improve the level of operations and the overall standards to bring down the crime ratio?
How far are you satisfied with the efforts from Home Office and law enforcement agencies in order to control the crime ratio by bringing them down?
Thanks for your time and participation!!!
Violence is a compound product of inter-related individual, family, communal, organic and ecological factors. For instance, teenagers who experience aggression untimely in childhood frequently fail to increase trusting associations. Interferences that inspire understanding and mean to decrease a propensity to depersonalize aggression would consequently seem imperative.
Interventions missing such characteristics would emerge, at face importance, lacking even while they may be responding to the nearness of an apparent disaster. Quick fixes are not likely to be flourishing.
Dual-agency, incorporated strategies that are nearby based and merge different approaches to avoidance and repression have proved more flourishing than sole-based imposing-led interventions by agencies functioning in remoteness.
Serious and improved steps are required from the concerned authorities in order to improve the standards of living in the UK from the crime ratio point of view. UK is considered as head by most of the European bodies and issues like crime may not help it to concentrate on its growth and impression in the global society. Home Office, the police and other concerned authorities will have to act fast and work with the local populace in order to over come these growing figures of crime that may end up in major disasters than one might have expected. There are a couple of recommendations that may help the concerned bodies to improve the standards provided through police to the local people. (Gelles, R. J. (1997))
The use of technology: police officer should be provided with handheld computers with predefined questionnaire with possible answers in a dropdown menu rather then they holding sheets where they have to as loads of questions from the victims and write it down and then check for any mistakes and asking the victim to sign the statement. This is a lengthy process and 20 percent of public avoid the police as they think its waste of time. They keep it to them and don't share it with the police, which encourage the criminals and their confidence.
Police and other concerned bodies should be authorised to take strictest action after the crime has be proved and the person is found guilty in order to make it clear for the criminals about the seriousness of Home Office in repelling the crime from the society in full.