Problems Characterizing Current Crime Statistics Criminology Essay

Published: Last Edited:

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Crime statistics are efforts to present statistical procedures of the crime in any civilization. Numerous techniques for determining crime are present, comprising of domestic surveys, healthcare or insurance descriptions, and records by law enforcement agencies. Crime statistics are collected and accounted by almost all countries and are of significance to a number of worldwide institutions, including UNO and the Interpol.

According to Goldberg and Rosenfeld (2008), even though killing and burglary rate increased in the US in late 20th century, still they have had decreased by 40%. Nonetheless, many researchers including Dijk, Kesteren, and Smit (2008) propose that utilization of crime prevention actions could certainly be the general aspect behind reduction in general intensity of crime in the Western world.

Problems Characterizing Current Crime Statistics:

The problem that appears to have mainly contributed to current uncertainty about crime statistics is the law enforcement agencies' documented crime statistics and the respective crime surveying authorities, such as BCS in England, demonstrating dissimilar tendencies. Generally, entire recorded felonies illustrate an increasing inclination, whilst the surveying authority depicts overall crime as moving downward. Those construing the statistics will hence have to formulate results regarding what the facts generally denote.

The present insertion of a great deal of felonies in the countrywide crime statistics does indicate that they are more hard to understand, have fewer steady development, comprise of several offenses which have uneven coverage and proofing rates - or are the result of positive regulation which differs in due course - and are principally vulnerable to adjustments in existing system. It is these subjects that have been chiefly accountable for the contemporary intricacies in understanding phases in police recorded transgressions. Distinctions in types of crimes are the basis for determining what punishment a criminal should be alleged with.

Another problem in crime statistics is the lack of appropriate information about the crime. The skill of the police to react to crime bases on possessing correct information and majority of that information appears originally from the community. There is an imperative intelligence about which crime should be observed as belonging to the community instead to the law enforcement. In any law dispute, the most helpful technique for the police to guarantee themselves of the consistency of their data is by sharing it with the public as a source of analyzing its legitimacy. In considering what information about crime should be available locally, different considerations apply from considerations appropriate at the national level. Holding to description those in charge of countering to crime is still a significant matter, but in the vicinity it is the law enforcement - and other neighboring peacemaking contributors who require working in company with the police, e.g. local systems.

Both the scope and description of the countrywide statistics that are developed need a fundamental renovation. Noteworthy assemblies of victims are not recorded by present investigations and particular main categorical offenses' classifications are bewildering and deceptive.


The insinuation is that the local police forces should have data on all these concerns for the area they are in charge for. In scientific provisions, this symbolize they will require the entire crime data and all occurrences information for the part. Certainly, the leader of squad will need to use that data to reviewer; how well a squad is reacting to problems and community requirements for service in the vicinity. A change in prominence is necessary in the assembling and communication of crime statistics. The attention ought to shift from the publishing.

Governance, administration and institute of the police and Home Office atmospheres in which crime statistics are created and covered should be revised to afford the public with absolute guarantee of definite and professed sovereignty and honesty of the statistics.

Community Policing: A sufficient quantity of police officers requires being presented and detectives should be retained when essential to avoid assassinations, rapes and provoked physical attacks. Governmental and municipal law enforcement bureaus need to be attentive to compose a cavity in decreasing the crime statistics. By functioning in the same locales each day, law enforcement officers can produce real ties to the society, solve troubles in the regions and outline affiliations in order to put off transgressions.

Domestic and Drug Violence: Armed drug providers, criminal band members and aggressive youngsters should be stopped. Funds for anti-drug efforts to alert youngsters about the hazards of drug consumption and to treat peaceful criminals can also be collected and a sense of awareness is to be created. Broad drug checking must be carried out by the government. State should set up 24/7 customer-care for domestic violence sufferers, support females' protection and impeach domestic hostility criminals.

Using Statistics and Prediction: Law enforcement officers can predict upcoming crimes exercising aptitude and can apply prognostic crime scrutiny, statistics mining and coverage.

Situational Crime Prevention (SCP) is a comparatively new theory that utilizes a anticipatory approach by focusing on schemes to decrease the available prospects for crime. This theory centers on the unlawful background and is dissimilar from the other methods of criminology as it initiates with an inspection of the situation that permit meticulous form of crime (Wilson, 2006).

Biasness in the Criminal Justice System:

In contrast to the large quantity of literature on classifying bias, fewer concerns have been showed on how to deal with it.

While infrequently tackling with bias openly, rejoinders have focused on dealing with providers of racial unfairness. They comprise of reactions targeted at decreasing antisocial and societal responses attending to process-related causes within the criminal justice system related to thorough or unconcealed structures of bias i.e. stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination, rejoinders focused on the function of unbiased governing, rules, and decision-making standard which outcome in disparate outcomes.

Biases in the criminal justice system are also caused due to funding concern; occuring from the durable holistic focus of many rejoinders and the economic allotment across, and temporary consequences required by, administration sector. Liability because of an over-reliance on diminutive statistics of native and/or racial-minority employees, mainly volunteers, also causes biasness in CJ system.

A deficiency government responsibility for assembling and circulating applicable managerial data on racial minority/aboriginal discrimination in the criminal justice system is one of the major ways of inequality that creates favoritism in CJ system. Tensions between crime-control objectives and goals of social/racial inclusion also contribute a lot towards this issue.

The factors mentioned that contribute in the biasness in criminal justice system can be solved through these techniques; approve a holistic perception, considering beyond the remit of the CJ system to attend to organizational variations more generally, integrate apposite traditional constituents, are properly supervised, distinguish that optimistic alteration to criminal justice conclusions may take time to organize and that dissimilar events of achievement may therefore be requisite in the constitution, concentrate on all of the diverse features of the difficulty, felony, direct favoritism and tortuous biasness. 


Paying attention to the more solemn crime would offer a comprehensible representation of the countrywide crime development. Also, this runs the hazard of conveying an unplanned indication that the management is no longer concerned in the volume of (less severe) offenses. That would still leave the problem of what ought to be incorporated in an inventory of more somber crimes. This has got to be unavoidably an affair of conclusion.