This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.
Every day in the United Kingdom there are some cases of domestic violence where a man batters his/ her wife who may be his current wife and or former or divorced wife or even girl friend. This is a very fearful fact but the worse part of this is there is a constant growth in this condition, even though researchers, journalists, governing bodies and other concern authorities are highlighting and trying to resolve this issue in order to make life easier and safer for women who are a victim of domestic violence. (Hattendorf, 1997)
The most occurring aspect of domestic violence is Spousal abuse. Here men's violence can do more damage as compared to women. There are many issues regarding this that is faced by women. They have to go through a lot as they may have to fight with the person who is pressurizing them, and or they may remain silent. (Walker, 1995)
One would be surprised to learn that there are victims who do even report it as they are so much under pressure and scared of reporting because of the threatening attitude of the men. Another type of women that may be the victim of this battering and domestic violence might be found so blur and dull, one can easily see that shattered level of confidence that they may possess and the effects that are faced by them disturbing their abilities and talents. There are a few numbers of women who do report these violence and governments and other concerned authorities try their level best to look after and rescue them from the situation. (Sauders, 1992)
This fear in their mind is so strong, that even if they come out of this situation it takes them long to come out of the depression and other effects this may have caused on their personality. Along with the sign of depression, there are many other symptoms that may be seen in these types of women. They can be, fear, and lack of confidence, insomnia, drugs, and failing to face the public with confidence and in serious case attempts to commit suicide. (Jensen, 2000)
One question they may come to the mind of the reader is why someone would be this much cruel to batter women in this passion or make their life miserable with domestic violence. The answers can be quite a few depending on the situation of that male, maybe he has into been so successful throughout his carrier and this may have caused him to become a victim of depression and egoism. Where one feels in secure to share his feelings with others and when ever felt that someone even his wife has intentionally or unintentionally said something that according to his nature might be a breach of self respect will cause him annoyance resulting gin argument and then battering from then onwards, mentally or physically abused in the childhood and or even sexually abused cases in the later stages are victims of these situations where they have nothing in their mind but hate and aggression. (Jensen, 2000)
Additional examination exposed that male violence was far more probable to be dangerous, intimidating, involve grave injury, and report for all differences in fretfulness signs among men and women in the illustration. More qualitative examination exposed that while a major number of men frequently and ruthlessly physically battered, intimidated and humiliated their partners, not any of the women carried out same attacks. The few women who had badly battered their spouses did so during a psychotic collapse or after experiencing brutal frequent beatings. Others attacked their partner in self-protection while they were being beaten up, or else struck only one or two blows, or infrequently slapped or pushed their partners, who effortlessly protected themselves, were not frightened and were regularly amused. Distinct the men who used relentless violence, women hardly ever seemed objective on harming their partners and desisted right away on the few occasions they got the advantage. Women's violence hardly ever succeeded in shifting men's deeds, while men were much more expected to force such changes in women.
Within the UK, there are no nationwide actions for organized compilation of data on domestic violence cases coming to the awareness of public agencies. Stanko (2001) designed an inventive day-count methodology, which endeavoured to measure the degree of domestic violence getting the notice of an assortment of public and voluntary division agencies within one weekday in September 2000. A variety of UK agencies reviewed their domestic violence interactions that day. Result indicated an uneven total of violence faced by women and carried out by men. 86% of calls to police that day concerned female victims assaulted by male spouses/ex-partners, 8% male sufferers assaulted by female spouses/ex-partners, 2% female victims attacked by female partners/ex-partners, and 7% male victims attacked by male partners/ex-partners. 90% of contacts completed with victim shore up in England linking domestic violence were from women and 100% in Wales. More proof of significant disparities in male as well as female violent behaviour comes from a reassesses of cases sent for examination below the Protection as of Harassment Act (Harris 2000). 94% of partner harassment doers were male.
While differences in persecution occurrence rates in accordance with ethnic group have been found in several worldwide surveys, they reduce considerably when results attributable to socio-economic as well as other demographic changeable, for example education and wages, are controlled (Jewkes 2002, Tjaden & Thoennes 2000b). Similarly, danger for UK women does not considerably vary by racial source (Mirrlees-Black 1999, Walby & Allen 2004). Richardson et al (2002) realized that violence revelation rates were somewhat lesser for black and Asian women in Hackney. Research reviews (Hotaling & Sugarman 1986, Schumacher et al 2001, Walby & Myhill 2001b) wrap up that there is no noteworthy association among race/ethnicity and persecution.
Anti-social behaviour by a tiny fraction of persons and families brings desolation and misery to local communities. According to reports of anti-social behaviour in England as well as Wales outlays government agencies approximately £3.4 billion annually (Home Office, 2004). There are as well noteworthy indirect costs to countrywide communities along with businesses, as well as emotional costs to sufferers and eyewitnesses. In 2003 the Home Office created the Anti-Social Behaviour Unit with yearly funds of £25 million to plan and execute the Government's policy on anti-social behaviour. During September 2005 the Government proclaimed the formation of the cross administration Respect Task Force to take forward the anti-social behaviour programme and in January 2006 the Government published the Respect Action Plan.It can be examined from work by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation in the UK that mental illness is associated with around 18% of anti-social behaviour cases; there is also a range of other sources for such behaviour including abuse (18%), drug misuse (12%) and alcohol misuse (11%). To date AHURI research has focused on the related questions of the role of services for mentally ill tenants (Reynolds 2002; O'Brien et al 2002), on supporting people with complex needs (mental health and disabilities) and on how anti-social behaviour can be addressed through housing management policies (Jacobs & Arthurson 2003).
The government increased the stress and focus on how to tackle the anti-social behaviours (ASB); it is very clear within the Home Office through its establishment of Anti-Social Behaviour Unit (ASBU), the introduction of anti-social behavior of the law in 2003 and finally the initiation of Anti-social Behavior 'Together' Action Plan. Antisocial behavior is considered as the main concern of the community. There are a number of studies carried out by the Union in England and Wales in 2003, precisely in September, found that reports were submitted to several agencies on one day; they were more than 66,000 reports. Statistics made by the British Crime Survey (BCS) in 2003 shows that more than a quarter of the public's perception of certain actions, for instance, teenagers Loitering in the neighborhood and litter. The community awareness has gradually showed some improvement. The estimates of the BCS in 2003 shows that 16% of the public see high rates of antisocial behavior in their neighborhoods, corresponding to the estimates which were done in 2002 (Dodd, Nicholas, Buffy Walker, 2004).
There are high confirmations from the United Kingdom that the Anti-social Behaviour is a severe discomfort to the housing agencies as well as the tenants. For instant, in 1999, Nixon et al's survey showed that 75% of the landlords in the United Kingdom believe that the antisocial behaviors are considered as a problem. His survey also showed that housing executives spent 20% of their time solving ASBs and that 10% to 2% of tenants were complained about. People understand what comprises anti-social behavior (ASB) and sets out a sequence of aspects, counting background, patience, position, and community quality of life expectations (Nixon and others 2003). Consequently, people's reaction to a certain differ from person to another; some actions can be acceptable by certain people while for others the same actions can be intolerant which makes defining a certain behavior a difficult task.
Popkin et al (2005) indicates that it is difficult to house people, including barriers between families, to deal with a range of problems such as incomplete work accounts, low levels of literacy, drug abuse, physical and mental health problems, domestic violence and criminal records, and little or no experience in the market Assembly. These groups can be defined as "residents of public housing who are at risk of loss of rent and for reasons beyond affordability" (Popkin et al Qaeda 2005: 5). There are concerns as well regarding the support services whether they are adequate for weak families or not. Unfortunately, the current policies have not yet met the needs of the residents of the housing community who rely on the public housing.
A new legislation has been introduced by the British Government in 1996 under which the Housing Act 1998 and Crime and Disorder Act allow Law Enforcement Agencies and Housing to tackle the antisocial behavior efficiently. As a result of the alterations, some practices have developed including leases test, fast-track procedures for expulsion and anti-social behavior orders (Flint, 2002; Ministry of the Interior, 2002). Legal measures are necessary to be taken by the United Kingdom Government to speak to the most disturbing cases of the antisocial behaviours. These strategies are very effective when taken against those continuous offends (Cowan et al, 2001). Many housing authorities in the United Kingdom has confirmed the lease agreements to include accounting seriously by the lessee or visitor as a breach of the lease and grounds for expulsion (Papps, 1998). It is more legitimate to make tenants aware of the capability of housing agencies. This will reduce difficult behaviors and will demonstrate the ability to exercise discretion. For example, the aptitude to rapidly expel drug-related cases, and stop the intimidation, vandalism and sympathetic consideration by the other tenants (Flint, 2002).
Domestic violence is an immoral as well as an unexcused deed, which we as a civilization must challenge to finish. Battered women face frequent difficulties, jointly with individual as well as legal, during their trip in the square categorization. It is unfeasible to attain an effortless answer to end aggression alongside women as well as children, other than we ought to link the clash to end the anguish that they are required to tolerate.
Anti-social behaviour can have a damaging effect on victim's mental and physical health, and on the surroundings. It is an unlikeable truth of numerous people's daily life, despite of whether they exist in verdant, rural villages or disadvantaged inner-city estates. Anti-social behaviour is the obvious sign of instinctive issues such as fear of crime and disorder, lack of opportunity, a feeling of being disconnected from facilities and services from influential effects of drink, drugs and scarcity. It covers a variety of issues that case suffering to people in the community from destruction to noisy neighbours to littering. (Norris, 2003)