This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.
Malware is a collective term for any malicious software which enters system without authorization of user of the system. The term is created from amalgamation the words 'malicious' and 'software'. Malware is a very big hazard in today's computing world. It continues to grow in capacity and advance in complexity. As more and more organization try to address the difficulty, the number of websites distribute the malware is rising at an frightening rate and is getting out of control. Most of the malware enters the system while downloading files over Internet. Once the malicious software finds its way into the system, it scans for vulnerabilities of operating system and perform unintended actions on the system finally slowing down the performance of the system.
Malware has ability to infect other executable code, data/system files, boot partitions of drives, and create excessive traffic on network leading to denial of service. When user executes the infected file; it becomes resident in memory and infect any other file executed afterwards. If operating system has a vulnerability, malware may also take control of system and infect other systems on network. Such malicious programs (virus is more popular term) are also known as parasites and adversely affect the performance of machine generally resulting in slow-down.
Some malware are very easy to detect and remove through antivirus software. These antivirus software maintains a repository of virus signatures i.e., binary pattern characteristic of malicious code. Files suspected to be infected are checked for presence of any virus signatures. This method of detection worked well until the malware writer started writing polymorphic malware  and metamorphic malware. These variant of malware avoid detection through use of encryption techniques to thwart signature based detection. Security products such as virus scanners look for
characteristics byte sequence (signature) to identify malicious code. The quality of the detector is determined by the techniques employed for detection. A stealth malware detection technique must be able to identify malicious code that is hidden or embedded in the original program and should have some capability for detection of yet unknown malware. Commercial virus scanners have very low resilience to new attacks because malware writers continuously make use of new obfuscation methods so that the malware could evade detections.
2.1 Computer Virus
A computer virus is basically a program which is written by the programmers whose behaviour is to duplicate itself and spread from one system to another system. The term virus is also normally, but incorrectly, used to refer to some another types of malicious software, including but they are not limited to adware .and these spyware programs which do not have a reproductive ability.
Malware includes various computer viruses, such as computer worms, Trojan horses, most of them are rootkits, spyware which are also considered as dishonest adware and other malicious or redundant software, including proper viruses. Viruses are occasionally confused with worms and Trojan horses, which are theoretically different. A worm mayexploit security vulnerabilities to spread itself repeatedly to several other computers through networks, while a Trojan horse is the infected program that may appears nontoxic but hides malware functions. Worms as well as Trojan horses, just like viruses, may harm data of the computer or recital. Some viruses or other malware have the same symptoms which is noticeable to the various computer user but there are many surreptitious or may be simply do nothing in order to call attention for them. Some of the viruses do nothing beyond reproducing themselves.
An example of a virus which is not a malicious software, but it is putatively benevolent, is Fred Cohen's theoretical compression virus. However there are various other antivirus professionals don't admit the concept of kindly viruses, as any beloved function may be implemented without consisting a virus automatically compression, for example, which is also available under the Windows OS at the choice of the a particular user. Any virus will by definition make unconstitutional changes to a computer system , which is adverse even if no damage is done or projected. On the page one of Dr Solomon's Virus.pdf, the undesirability of viruses, even those which do nothing but reproduce they are thoroughly explained.
2.1.1 Academic Work
Veith Risak published the article whose title was as follows "Selbstreproduzierende Automaten mit minimaler Information sübertragung" (Self-reproducing automaton with minimum information switch over). The article described a fully serviceable virus written in assembler language for a particular SIEMENS 4004/35 computer system.
In the year 1980 Jürgen Kraus wrote his thesis on Selbstreproduktion bei Programmen at the University of Dortmund. In his work Kraus guess that computer programs maybehave in a way parallel to biological viruses.
In the year of 1984 Fred Cohen at the University of Southern California has written his paper on the concepts of Computer Viruses which is related to Theory and Experiments". It was the first paper of him in which he has explained to clearly call a self-reproducing program a "virus", a term introduced by Cohen's mentor Leonard Adleman. Fred Cohen published a exhibition that there is no algorithm that mayperfectly detect all potential viruses.
An article that published on malware that describes "useful virus functionalities" was available by J. B. Gunn in the title "Use of virus functions to provide a virtual APL predictor under user control" in 1984.
2.1.2 Science Fiction
There are several myths associated with the science.The actual term "virus" was first used to symbolize a self-reproducing program in a small story by David Gerrold in Galaxy magazine in 1969-and later in his 1972 novel, When HARLIE Was One. In that novel, a attentive computer named HARLIE writes viral software to recover damaging personal information from other computers to blackmail the man who wants to turn him off.
Michael Crichton told as a sideline story of a computer with telephone modem dialing potential, which had been automatic to randomly dial phone numbers until it hit a modem that is answered by another computer. It was an attempt to program the answer computer with its own program, so that the second computer would also begin dialing unsystematic numbers, in search of yet a different computer to program. The program is assumed to spread exponentially through susceptible computers.
2.1.3 Virus Programs
The Creeper virus was first detected on ARPANET, the prototype of the Internet, in the early 1970s. Creeper was an new self-replicating program developed by Bob Thomas at BBN Technologies in 1971. Creeper has used the ARPANET to infect DEC PDP-10 computers which are running on the TENEX operating system. Creeper gain admission via the ARPANET and banal itself to the isolated system where there was a message, "I'm the creeper, catch me if you can!" usually displayed. The Reaper program was created to delete Creeper.
A program called which is known as "Elk Cloner" was the first PC virus to appear in the uncultivated i.e. outside of the single computer systems or laboratories where it was created by Richard Skrenta, it attached itself to the Apple DOS 3.3 operating system and spread through floppy disk. This virus are created as a sensible joke when Skrenta was studying in the high school and was injected in particular game on the floppy disk. On his 50th iterative use the Elk Cloner virus would be activate, which prone to infecting the PCs and displaying a short poem beginning "Elk Cloner: The program with a personality."
The first IBM PC virus in the natural was a boot sector virus dubbed and created by the Farooq Alvi Brothers in Lahore, Pakistan, seemingly to determine the piracy of the software they had been written.
Before computer networks became spread out and most viruses spread on different removable media, such as floppy disks. In the early days of the PCs, many users frequently exchanged their information and programs on floppies. Some of the viruses are spread by infecting programs which are stored on these disks, while others programs installed themselves into the disk boot sector, which ensure that they would be run when the user booted the computer from the disk, usually inadvertently. Personal computers of the period would try to boot from the floppy at first if one had been left in the drive. Until floppy disks rejects, this was the most unbeaten infection strategy and that is why boot sector viruses were the most common in the wild for many years.
Conventional computer viruses emerge in the 1980s, that are driven by the spread of PCs and the consequential increase in BBS, modem use, and software sharing. Bulletin board-driven software giving out contributed directly to the swell of Trojan horse programs, and computer viruses which were written to infect readily traded software. Shareware and bootleg software were equally common vectors for viruses on BB Systems Viruses may increase their chances of spreading over the several other computers which in networks by infecting the files on the particular network file system or a file system which maybe access by other computer systems.
Macro viruses had became common since the last-1990s. Most of these viruses are written in the one of the scripting languages for Microsoft application programs such as MS-Word and MS-Excel and spread all through the Microsoft Office by infecting different documents and spreadsheets. Since Word processor and Excel spread sheets were also available for Mac OS, most could also spread to Macintosh computers. Although most of these computer viruses may not have the capability to send contaminated email messages to those viruses which do take the advantages of the Microsoft Outlook COM interface.
Some old versions of Microsoft Word allow macros to repeat themselves with added blank lines. If two macro viruses concurrently infect a particular document, which is the combination of the two, if they are self-replicating, may be appeared as a mating point of the two and would likely be detected as a virus unique from their parents.
A virus may also be send a web address URL as an message to all of the contacts that on to the infected machine. If any recipient is thinking about link from a particular friend which may be trusted source which follows the link to the website, the virus may be hosted at particular site would be able to infect the new computer and continue propagating as well.
Viruses which spreaded with the help of cross-site scripting which was first reported in 2002, and were academically first confirmed in 2005. There may have been several instances of the cross-site scripting viruses in the wild as well as exploiting websites such as MySpace and Yahoo!.
In order tocopy itself, a virus must be granted in order to execute code and then write it to the main memory. Therefore, several viruses attached themselves to several executable files which may be part of legitimate programs. If a user attempts to begin an infected program, the virus' code may be executed concurrently. Viruses may be separated into two types based on their performance when they are executed. Nonresident viruses straight away search for other hosts system or OS which may be infected, or infect those targets, and finally transfer organize to the application program they infected. Tenant viruses do not search for hosts when they are happening. Instead, a resident virus masses itself into main memory for execution and transformation control to the host based program. The virus still remains active in the background and can infects new host program when those files are accessed by other programs or the operating system itself.
2.2.1 Nonresident Viruses
Nonresident viruses may be notion of as that consisting of 1. finder module and 2. replication module. The finder module is generally responsible in order to finding new files to infect. For each new executable file the finder module encounters then it calls the replication module to infect those files.
2.2.2 Resident Viruses
Resident viruses contain a replication module which is parallel to the one that is engaged by nonresident viruses. This section, however, it will not be called by a finder module. The virus masses the duplication module into main memory when it will executed instead and ensures that this module is executed each time the operating system is called to carry out a certain operation. The replication module maybe called, for example, every time the operating system executes a particular file. In this situation the virus usually infects every suitable program which are executed on the computer.
Resident viruses are sometimes may be divided into a class of fast infectors and a class of slow infectors. Fast infectors are those which are designed to infect as many files as soon as possible. A fast infector, for instance, may infect every potential host file that is accessed. This pose a special difficulty when using AV software, since a virus scanner will check only the prospective host file on a computer when it could be able to performs a system-wide scan. If the scanner failed to notice that such a virus is present in the memory it may piggy-back on the virus examiner and in this way infect all files that have been scanned. Fast infectors basically rely on their fast infection rate in order to spread. The main disadvantage of this tecnique is that while infecting many files may make detect more likely, because the virus may be slow down a computer or perform several other suspicious actions that may be noticed by AVS. Slow infectors, however, are designed to infect hosts infrequently. They, for example, only infect files when they are copied. They are designed to avoid detection by restraining their actions as they are less attemptive to slow down a computer noticeably and will be infrequently trigger anti-virus software that detects suspicious behavior by programs. This approach, however, does not seem very successful.
In most of the operating systems which use file extensions to determine program relations such as Microsoft Windows. The extensions may be normally hidden from the user by default. This makes it probable to create a file that is of a different type than it appears to the users or programmers. For example, an executable file may be created named "picture.png.exe", in which the user sees only "picture.png" and therefore it assumes that these files is an image are most likely is safe, when it opened runs the executable on the client machine.
Other scheme in order to generate the virus system from parts of existing OS files by using the CRC16 orCRC32 data. The starting code may be quite small or may be unpack a fairly large virus. This is similar to a biological prion in the way that it may work but is vulnerable to signature based detection. This attack has not yet been seen "in the wild".
2.3 Infection Strategies
Virus avoids detection by users, some viruses employ different kinds of deception. Some of the old viruses, especially on the MS-DOS operating system, make sure that the previously modified host file stays the similarly when the file is infected by the other virus. This method do not make fool antivirus software, however, especially those which pertains and date cyclic redundancy checks on file enhancement.
Many viruses may infect files without increasing their length or destroying the files. They accomplished this by overwriting not used areas of executable files. These are known as cavity viruses. For example, the CIH virus, or Chernobyl Virus, infects Portable Executable files. Because those files have many gaps, the virus, which was 1 KB in length, did not add to the size of the file.
Some viruses try to avoid detection by destroying the tasks associated with antivirus software before it maydetect them.
As computers and OS generally grow larger and more complicated, old hiding techniques need to be updation or for replacement. Shielding a computer against viruses may be demanded that a file system migrate towards detailed and clear permission for every kind of file access.
2.3.1 Read Request Intercepts
While many antivirus software employ various techniques in order to oppose stealth mechanisms, once the infection occurs any option to clean the system which is unreliable. In Microsoft Windows OS, the NTFS file system is proprietary. Direct access of files without using a Windows OS is undocumented. This generally leaves AVS little different but in order to send a read request to Windows Operating System files that can handle such requests. Some of the other viruses trick antivirus software by intercepting its requests to the Operating System. A virus may hide itself by intercepting the request to read the infected file, handling the request itself, and returns which is not infected version of the file to the AVS. The interception maybe done by code injection of the actual OS files which would able to handle the read request. Thus, an antivirus software attempt in order to detect the virus will either not given a permission to read the infected file or the read request will be served with the not infected version of the same file.
File hashes stored in Windows in order to identify altered Windows files, maybe overwritten so that the System File Checker will report that system files are originals.
The only method to avoid stealth is to boot from a medium that is must be known to clean. Security software may then be used to check the dormant OS files. Most secured software rely on the virus signatures base or they are able to employ heuristics, instead of using the databases of file hashes for Windows OS files. Using file hashes in order to scan for altered files would guarantee deleting an infection. The security software may identify the altered files, and request Windows installation media to replace them with authentic versions.
Most of the modern antivirus programs try to determine virus-patterns inside ordinary applications in order to scanning them are known as virus signatures. Unhappily, the term is deceptive, in that viruses do not have unique signatures in the way that the human beings usually do. Such a virus signature is only a sequence of bytes that an antivirus program proceeds for because it is known to be part of the virus. A better term may be called search strings. Other antivirus programs will employ different types searching strings, and truly different search methods, when classifying viruses. If a virus scanner search such a patterns in a particular file, then it may perform other checks in order to make sure that it has found the virus which is not merely a coincidental patterns in an blameless file, before it could notify the user that this file has infected. Then the user can be able to delete or in some of the cases clean or may be heal up the infected file. Some viruses may employ this techniques which make detection by means of signatures based difficult but probably is possible. These viruses can modify their code on each infection. That is, each such infected file may contains a different variation of the virus.
2.3.3 Encryption With A Variable Key
A more advanced method is the utility of simple encryption to encipher the particular virus. In this situation , the virus may consists of a small decrypting dependent functions as well as an encrypted copy of that virus code. If that virus is encrypted with the help ofn other key for each infected file, then the only part of the virus that leftovers stable will be the decrypting unit, which would be added to the end. In this case, a virus scanner must not able to detect directly the virus using signatures, but it may only detect the decrypting unit, which still make undirectional enlightening of the virus possible. Most of these would be symmetric keys, stored on the infected host systems . Truly speaking completely possibility for decryption of the final virus, but this will be almost certainly not needed, because self-modifying code is such a lacking that it may be base for virus scanners in order to at least flag the file as suspicious.
This may be poor , but solid, encryption involves XORing each byte in a virus with a even, so that the exclusive-or operation has only to be frequent for decryption. It is doubtful for a code to adjust itself, so the code to do the encryption as well as decryption may be part of the signature in many virus definition.
2.3.4 Polymorphic Code
Polymorphic code was the first technique that posed a serious threat to virus scanners. Likewise various normal encrypted viruses such as a polymorphic virus infects files with an encrypted copy of itself, which may be decoded by a decryption method. In the case of polymorphic viruses or polymorphic worms, however, this decryption module is also modified on each infection. A well-written polymorphic virus thus has no parts which wait identical between infection, making it very hard in order to detect directly using signatures. AVS may detect them by decrypting the viruses using an emulator, or may be by numerical pattern in order to analysis of the encrypted virus body. To enable polymorphic code, the virus has must have a polymorphic engine which is also called mutating engine or mutation engine anywhere in its encrypted body. Some viruses employ polymorphic code in a system that constrain the change rate of the virus appreciably. For example, a virus maybe planned to alter only slightly over time, or it maybe programmed to refrain from mutating when it infects a file on a computer that previously contains copies of the virus. The benefit of using such sluggish polymorphic code is that it makes it more difficult for antivirus professionals to get representative sample of the virus, because tempt files that are infected in one run will naturally have identical or parallel sample of the virus. This will make it more liable that the detection by the virus scanner will be variable, and that some instances of the virus may be able to avoid detection.
2.3.5 Metamorphic Code
To avoid being detected by different emulation, some of the viruses revise themselves completely at each time when they are likely to infect the new executables. Viruses which can make use of this techniques are said to be metamorphic virus . In order to enable metamorphism, a metamorphic engine must be wanted. A metamorphic virus is usually very large and complicated. For example, W32 / Simile persists of over 15,500 lines of assembly language code, 90% of which is part of the metamorphic engine.
2.3.6 Avoiding Bait Files and other Undesirable Hosts
A virus wants to infect hosts in order to multiply further. In some cases, it might be a bad idea to infect a mass program. For example, many antivirus softwares perform an integrity check for their own code. Such infecting programs will therefore enhanced the possibility that the computer virus may be detected. For this reason, many viruses are programmed not to infect applications which are known to be a part of AVS. Other type of host that are viruses sometimes avoid are generally bait files. These Bait files (or goat files) are files that are specially developed by antivirus software, or may be by antivirus professionals themselves, to be infected by a virus. These files maybe created for various reasons, all of which are related to the detection of the virus:
Antivirus professionals may use tempt files to take a test of a virus. It is more realistic to store and exchange a small, infected lure file, than to swap a large application program that has been infected by the virus.
Antivirus professionals may use bait files to study the actions of a virus and assess detection methods. This is particularly useful when the virus is polymorphic. In this case, the virus maybe made to infect a large number of entice files. The grimy files maybe used to test whether a virus scanner detects all versions of the virus.
Many AVS may employ bait files that are accessed regularly. When these files are being modified, the AVS warns the particular user that a virus is may be active on the system.
Since bait files are used in order to detect the virus, or in order to make detection probable, a virus maybe benefited from not infecting them in any case. Typically many viruses do this by neglecting suspicious programs, such as small piece of program files or entire programs that contain certain sequences called garbage instructions.
A related tactic in order to make baiting more difficult is the sparse infection. Sometimes these sparse infector does not infect the host file which would be a appropriate candidate for infection in any other circumstances. For example, a virus may decide on a random basis whether to infect a file or not, or a virus may only infect host files on particular days of the week.
2.4 Vulnerability and Countermeasures
2.4.1 The Vulnerability of Operating Systems to Viruses
Due to genetic diversity in a population decreases the chance of a single disease wipe out a population, the diversity of software on a network likely to limits the destructive prospective of viruses. This was done in the late 1990s, when Microsoft gained market domination in desktop OS and office suites. Microsoft software is targeted by virus programmers due to their desktop supremacy.
Although Windows is the most popular targeted OS for virus programmers . Viruses can also exist on the other platforms. Other OS may allows third-party programs to run may be able to run viruses.
As per 2006 report, there were minimum 60 known security exploit targeting the base installation of Mac OS X that is Unix-based file system and kernel. The number of viruses for the older Apple OS, known as Mac operating systems Classic, varies from one source to another source, with Apple mentioning that there are only four kind of viruses, and the independent sources stating that there are so many other viruses. Many of them are Mac OS Classic viruses targeted the HyperCard authoring environment. The difference between these virus vulnerability Macs and Windows is a chief selling point, one that Apple uses in their Get a Mac advertising. In the year January 2009, Symantec announced the discovery of many Trojans which targets Macs. This discovery did not gained much coverage since April 2009.
While Linux, and other Unix based in general, has always natively blocked normal users from having entrance to make changes to the OS environment, Windows users are generally not. This difference has continued partially due to the spread out use of admin accounts in contemporary versions like Windows XP. In 1997, when a virus for Linux was released which is known as Bliss a leading antivirus vendors issued warnings that Unix-like OS could be fall prey to viruses just like Windows OS. The Bliss virus may be considered behavior of viruses which has opposed to computer worms as on the Unix systems. Bliss requires that the user must run it clearly, and it may only infect those programs for which the user has the access to modify. Unlikely the Windows users or most of the Unix users do not log in as an admin user except in order to install or configure the software; as a result, even if a user run the virus, it could not be able to harm their OS. The Bliss virus never became widespread, and remains chiefly a research curiosity. Its creator later posted the source code to Usenet, allowing researchers to see how it worked.
2.4.2 The Role of Software Development
Because software are oftenly designed with security features in order to prevent unauthorized use of system resources and many other viruses may exploit software bugs in the system or application in order to spread. Software development strategies that produce large numbers of bugs will generally also produce potential exploits.
2.4.3 Anti-Virus Software and other Preventive Measures
most of the users may install anti-virus software in order to detect and remove known viruses after the computer downloads and run the executable. There are two common types that an AVS application uses in order to detect viruses. At first and by far the most common method of virus detection is using a list of virus signature definition. This may works by tentative the content of the computer's memory i.e. RAM, and boot sectors and also the files are stored on fixed or removable drives such as hard drives, floppy drives etc and after comparing those files against a database of familiar virus "signatures". The main disadvantage of these types of detection methods are that users are only get protected from viruses that can be pre-date their last virus definition update. The second method is to use a heuristic algorithm in order to find viruses based on common functionalities. This techniques has the ability to detect novel viruses that anti-virus security firms have yet to create a signature.
Some other anti-virus programs are able to opened files in addition to send and received email messages "on the fly" in a similar manner. This method is called as on-access scanning. AVS do not change the underlying capabilities of host software systems in order to transmit viruses. Users must update their software regularly to patch security holes. AVS also needs to be regularly updated in order to recognize the latest threats.
One may also reduce the damage done by viruses by making regular backups of data and the different operating systems on different media, that are either kept not connected to the system most of time, read-only or not accessible for other reasons for example using different file systems. In this way, if data is lost through the virus, one may start again using the backup which may be preferably be recent.
If a backup session on optical media such as CD and DVD is closed, it becomes read-only and may not longer be affected by a virus(so long as a virus or infected file might not be able to copied onto the CD/DVD). Similarly, an OS on a bootable CD may be used to boot the computer if the installed OS has become unusable. Backups taken on any removable media must be carefully examined before the restoration process. For example the Gammima virus propagates via various removable flash drives.
2.4.4 Recovery Methods
A lot recovery options exists after a computer detected a virus. These actions mainly depends upon the virus. Some of them may be safely removed by many functions that are available in most AVS products. Others may be required reinstallation of destroyed programs. It is necessary to know the behaviour of the virus which involved to take the correct action, and AV products will classify the known viruses more precisely before try to "disinfect" a computer otherwise such action could have been itself cause a lot of destruction. New viruses that anti-virus researchers have not yet studied therefore present an ongoing problem, which may requires anti-virus packages to be updated normally.
2.4.5 Virus Removal
One possibility on the Operating systems such as Windows ME, Windows XP, Windows Vista and Windows 7 is the tool which is known as System Restore, which restores the registry and critical system files in order to a previous checkpoint. Often a virus may cause the system to hang, and a subsequent hard reboot as well which will render the system restore point from the same day corruption. Restore points from earlier days must work provided the virus is not designed to corrupt the restored files and can not exist in the previous restore points. Some of the viruses may disable the System Restore and many other important tools such as Task Manager and Command Prompt. For example a virus which does this is Cia Door. Many similar viruses maybe removed by rebooting the computer, entering Windows safe mode , and then using system tools.
Many websites run by AVS companies may provide free online virus scanning with the limited cleaning facilities. Some websites allowed a single suspicious file to be checked by many antivirus programs in a single operation. Additionally, several capable AVS programs are available for free download from the internet (usually restricted to non-commercial use), and Microsoft provide a free anti-malware utility that runs as part of their regular Windows update regime.
2.4.6 Operating System Reinstallation
Reinstalling any OS is other loom for virus removal. It involves either again formatting the computer's hard disk drive and installing the OS and all programs from original media, or may be restoring the entire partition with a clean backup imacange. User data may be restored by booting from a live Compact Disk, or putting the hard drive into another computer and booting from its operating system, using great care not to infect the second computer by executing any infected programs on the original drive; and once the system has been restored precautions must be taken to avoid re infection from a restored executable file.
These methods are obvious straightforward to do, may be faster than not infecting a computer, and are made certain to remove any malicious software. If any OS and programs must be reinstalled from scratch, the time and try to reinstall, reconfigure again, and restore user preferences must be taken into account.
2.5 Computer Worm
A computer worm is a standalone malware computer program that replicates itself in order to spread to other computers. Often, it uses a computer network to spread itself. This is due to security shortcomings on the target computer. Unlike a computer virus, it does not need to attach itself to an existing program. Worms almost always cause at least some harm to the network, even if only by consuming bandwidth, whereas viruses almost always corrupt or modify files on a targeted computer.
Many worms that have been created are designed only to spread, and don't attempt to change the systems they pass through. However, as the Morris worm and Mydoom showed, even these "payload free" worms may cause major disruption by increasing network traffic and other unintended effects. A "payload" is code in the worm designed to do more than spread the worm-it might delete files on a host system e.g., the Explore Zip worm, encrypt files in a cryptoviral extortion attack, or send documents via e-mail. A very common payload for worms is to install a backdoor in the infected computer to allow the creation of a "zombie" computer under control of the worm author. Networks of such machines are often referred to as botnets and are very commonly used by spam senders for sending junk email or to cloak their website's address. Spammers are therefore thought to be a source of funding for the creation of such worms and the worm writers have been caught selling lists of IP addresses of infected machines. Others try to blackmail companies with threatened DoS attacks.
Backdoors maybe exploited by other malware, including worms. Examples include Doomjuice which may spread using the backdoor opened by Mydoom, and at least one instance of malware taking advantage of the rootkit and backdoor installed by the Sony/BMG DRM software utilized by millions of music CDs prior to late 2005.
2.5.1 Worms with Good Intent
Beginning with the very first research into worms at Xerox PARC, there have been attempts to create useful worms. The Nachi family of worms, for example, tried to download and install patches from Microsoft's website to fix vulnerabilities in the host system-by exploiting those same vulnerabilities. In practice, although this may have made these systems more secure, it generated considerable network traffic, rebooted the machine in the course of patching it, and did its work without the consent of the computer's owner or user. Regardless of their payload or their writers' intentions, most security experts regard all worms as malware.
Some worms, such as XSS worms, have been written to research how worms spread. For example, the effects of changes in social activity or user behavior. One study proposed what seems to be the first computer worm that operates on the second layer of the OSI model (Data link Layer), it utilizes topology information such as Content-addressable memory (CAM) tables and Spanning Tree information stored in switches to propagate and probe for vulnerable nodes until the enterprise network is covered.
2.5.2 Protecting Against Dangerous Computer Worms
Worms spread by exploiting vulnerabilities in operating systems. Vendors with security problems supply regular security updates and if these are installed to a machine then the majority of worms are unable to spread to it. If a vulnerability is disclosed before the security patch released by the vendor, a zero-day attack is possible.
Users need to be wary of opening unexpected email, and should not run attached files or programs, or visit web sites that are linked to such emails. However, as with the ILOVEYOU worm, and with the increased growth and efficiency of phishing attacks, it remains possible to trick the end-user into running malicious code.
Anti-virus and anti-spyware software are helpful, but must be kept up-to-date with new pattern files at least every few days. The use of a firewall is also recommended.
In the April-June, 2008, issue of IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, computer scientists describe a potential new way to combat internet worms. The researchers discovered how to contain the kind of worm that scans the Internet randomly, looking for vulnerable hosts to infect. They found that the key is for software to monitor the number of scans that machines on a network sends out. When a machine starts sending out too many scans, it is a sign that it has been infected, allowing administrators to take it off line and check it for malware. In addition, machine learning techniques maybe used to detect new worms, by analyzing the behavior of the suspected computer.
2.5.3 Historical background of worms
The actual term worm' was first used in John Brunner's, The Shockwave Rider. In that novel, Nichlas Haflinger designs and sets off a data-gathering worm in an act of revenge against the powerful men who run a national electronic information web that induces mass conformity. "You have the biggest-ever worm loose in the net, and it automatically sabotages any attempt to monitor it... There's never been a worm with that tough a head or that long a tail.
On November 2, 1988, Robert Tappan Morris, a Cornell University computer science graduate student, unleashed what became known as the Morris worm, disrupting an estimated 10% of the computers then on the Internet and prompting the formation of the CERT Coordination Center and Phage mailing list. Morris himself became the first person tried and convicted under the 1986 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.