Assessing The Different Methods Of Planning Commerce Essay

Published: Last Edited:

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

There are many kinds of perspectives, models and approaches used in strategic planning. The development of the strategic management depends on the nature of the organization's leadership, complexity of the organization's climate and culture of the organization, size of the organization, expertise of planners or leaders, etc. For example, there are different kinds of strategic planning models, which includes goals-based, issues-based, organic, situation (some would assert that situation planning is more of a technique than model), etc.

1) Goals-based planning is expected the most common and starts with pure substance on the organization's mission and vision or values, goals to work toward the mission and vision, strategies to achieve the goals, and action planning, (who will do what and when).

2) Issues-based strategic planning often starts by examining issues which an organization is facing, strategies to explain those issues and action plans.

3) Naturally efficient strategic planning might start by communicating the organization's vision, mission and values, and then action plans to get the vision while supported to those values. Some planners favour a particular approach to planning, e.g., obliged inquiry.

One of the main goals when drafting a strategic plan is to develop it in a way which is easily convertible into action plans. Most strategic plans address high level of ability to act on its own ability and over-arching goals, but don't get translated into day-to-day tasks and projects that will be needed to achieve the plan. Choice of wordings, as well as, the level a plan is written, is both examples of easy ways to fail at introductory stepping your strategic plan in a way that makes physical faculty and is executable to others. Often, plans are filled with conceptual terms which don't tie into day-to-day real existence for the staff expectation to carry out the plan.

Part 2

Strategic planning is a very significance business activity. It is also significance in the public sector areas such as education. It is practiced over large range informally and formally. Strategic planning and decision process s ends with based on facts and a guide of ways to achieve them.

One approach suggests having short-term goals, medium-term goals, and long-term goals. In this model, one can confidently believe to attain short-term goals fairly and easily: they stand just vaguely above one's reach. At the other tremendous, long-term goals mixed very difficult, almost impossible to attain. Strategic management verbiage sometimes refers to "Big Hairy Audacious Goals" (BHAGs) in this context. Using one goal as a stage of progress to the next includes goal sequencing. A person or group starts by accomplishing the easy short-term goals, then steps to words the medium-term, and then goes to words the long-term goals. Goal determination can create a "goal stairway". In an organizational setting, the organization may work together goals so that they do not difference with each other. The goals of one part of the organization should trap consistent with those of other parts of the organization.

Part Three:

There is a number of strategic planning tools available -- in distillation mental approaches & procedure to apply to develop effective strategic plans.

S.W.O.T is a strategic planning tool, most of the time used as part of doing an conservational scan which helps to identify external factors that needs to be planned for, and internal factors i.e. strengths and weaknesses that needs to be planned for in influencing where a business should be going in the future.

More exclusively, the process which involves identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats(warning) (which is what the letters S.W.O.T stand for).

The S.W.O.T evaluation can be done as part of strategic planning, but it can also be done reliantly of the larger process of a standalone.

By benefit's form something is one's strengths, and correcting or decreasing one's weaknesses, a company is better able to take benefits of advantageous chance as they mixed, and cope with threats before they become hazardous.

The P.E.S.T Analysis or model is another implement, totally same to the SWOT model, but is more focused and dedicated on the external environment and important factors, that can affect present and future of the business. The PEST acronym stands for:





Unquestionably, once political, social, economic and technological factors are recognize (which is the first step), the next step is to create a business strategy or strategies that will take advantage of these trends and changes, while decreasing risk to the company.

Of course, matching the needs and wants of the customers, and the supply (usually of products, but this can apply to services only) is important, and required planning. Supply Chain Strategic Planning is a method to make this matching happen.

What is also most likely unquestionably to you is that the convolution of supply chain analysis is going to depending that which kind of business, business level and a number of factors. Large wholesale companies, for example, often use sophisticated computer software to track and manage inventory that they have in hand, to re-order products in a timely fashion, and to track customer purchasing designs.

Task Two:

Part One:

Any influence in the market, outside to the marketing organization, which has the capacity for development to negatively effect demand for the marketer product or service. An environmental warning might be the appearance of a new competitor, the unification of two competitors, the beginning of a new brand, the enlargement of new technology, governmental changes, or social and economic direction. For example, the tobacco industry has faced a lot of environmental threats due to quantity social, medical, and governmental pressure against smoking. The marketer must be located through competitive intelligence and other market direction research to replying quickly to environmental unpleasant. The tobacco industry responds emotionally by intensely discounting some new products and redirecting its possessions to non-tobacco products and to foreign markets where the environmental warnings are not as great.

start Most reporter analyzing events feel that in today's chaotic and restless business environment the best scanning orderliness available is unbroken scanning because this give permission to act quickly or urgently, taking advantage of favourable conditions before competitors do and respond to environmental warning before important damage is done.

There are four (4) critical areas effecting business plans to change. All are changing tendencies' in the business environment. The four areas we are going to examine are:

1) Government trends.

2) Economic trends.

3) Technological trends.

4) Cultural tendencies. Each one reasons a specific effect on our decisions and needs us to make adjustments. Some changes are striking and needs striking reactions to decrease their impact on our business.

These tendency types have definite effects on our business plan. They are all warnings to present business actives and also present new favourable conditions. If we make changes in our business actives to become environment friendly, employee friendly or technology should be modern our business increase new public interest leading to new sales. Too, we receive free interest created by publicity that positively affects our business believability and stature. Indifferent of the fringe advantage to our business, we must frequently be aware and open to new directions so that our business plan and operation doesn't make progress or become less practical in the changing environment.

Part Two:

A stakeholder is any person or organization, who can be positively or negatively effecting by, or cause an effect on the actions of a company, government, or organization. Kinds of stakeholders are:

Primary stakeholders: are those eventually affected, either positively or negatively by an organization's action.

Secondary stakeholders: are the 'intermediaries', that is, person or organizations who are intended affected by an organization's actions.

Main stakeholders: (who can also belong to the first two groups,) have meaningful influence upon or significance within an organization.

Therefore, the stake holder are analysing has the goal of developing cooperation b/w the stake holder and the project teams and, eventually, making sure successful results for the project. Stake holder analysis is accomplished when clarify the consequences of envisaged changes are required or at the beginning of new projects and in physical link with organizational changes generally. It is significance to recognize all stakeholders for the purpose of recognizing their success judgment and turning these into quality goals.

Stakeholder analysis helps with the identification of the following:

Stakeholders' interests.

Potential risks.

Main people to be knowledgeable about the project during the execution phase.

Negative stakeholders as well as their opposing impacts on the project.

Why carry out a stakeholder analysis?

Draws out the interests of stakeholders in relative to the glitches which the project is or you are seeking to address.

Identifies difference of interest and potential conflict.

Identifies practicable other than in pure financial terms (e.g. includes social not just economic factors).

Helps provide the whole picture.

Helps identify relationships b/w different stakeholders - helps possible political alliance.

Part three:

An Environmental assessment can also be mange internally by companies or organizations to recognize their standing collision with good environmental management practices. That is, did they make themselves for things that sensibly could go wrong? Examples are how are deadly stored, what related (fugitive) losses confinement from plant processes, are unfair conducting

programs in place, what spill reaction planning is in place and what information is shared with societies, government and employees.

International companies such as ISO have thrived auditing protocols and training to make standard approaches to audits and the development of Environmental management Systems.

Business environment is getting more complicated and moving violently and more and more difficult to manage. Globalization, free from regulation, technological creation and innovation, competitive process of pressing steadily and customer driven market are main factors triggering the difficult environment. Many top level management are struggling with the issue of how to effectively modify and respond to such difficult environment. 


They understand that there are a number of gaps between the organization actual demonstration and company ambitions but can not do much. They fully appreciate that there are severing organizational issues triggering the accomplishment gaps but do not know for sure how to manage with the pressing issues in the most efficient and effective way.

Precise measurement of organizational issues or effectiveness calls for a holistic complete approach. An incomplete assessment could deceive management resulting in wrong decision that ultimately adds more problems than solutions as organizational fundamentals are highly interrelated. All main organizational fundamentals must be assessed for their effectiveness and obedience to the best practices. Inputs from people across organization flat covering over must be accurately and independently captured. Fact-based analysis fundamental principle on tried and tested analytical methodology must be accurately and independently performed. Endorsement ion for solving the organizational issues must be exactly provided considering the interrelationship of all organizational fundamental. Superiority must be set by applying the 80-20 rules to achieve maximum results and momentum.

Assignment Two:

Part One:

The importance of competitive improvement stems from the competitive nature of open systems. Organizations and nations are open, or only moderately enclosed, systems, that are reliant on their environment for possessions. When resources are in undersized supply, organizations and nations must contest for them. They do so by scanning forward, creating approximate  calculation that allow them to identify long range goals, and put into proposal courses of action make gain competitive advantage.


An attribute of an organization or institution or nation enables it to complete more effectively for resource and thus to survive.


The main objectives of national security strategy are to set and achieve the organizational goal that in the long term will present a high level of security for the nation and its citizens as well. This intention is expressed in a process that examines the strategic environment, forms an evaluation, imagines long-range objectives, and devises long-range plans to achieve them.

This strategic scan is unusually excellent difficult, and examples of not accurate scans abound. Some of these can be ascribe to the basic difficulties complicated in "seeing the future." It seems contradictory to speak of an environmental scan reaching out 20+ years and in fact this is possible only in the measured across terms.

Top level strategy makers must gain a sense of vigorous forces in their environment to create good strategy. One building block is to get a physical faculty of history, coupled with the replication required to examine the stream of events over time in order to appreciate the cause and effect diplomatic procedure that have been operational. An underlying of reference must be built.

A second crucial building block is the understanding skill and openness required to test the historical context of reference over time, to make sure it is still representative of the real world. This undoubtedly speaks to the use of feedback circles.

Barriers to precise strategic scans occur in both the environment, and in the top level decision maker. George (1980) characterizes many of the barriers internal to the decision maker. They contain his/her personal view in the result, which may make objective detailed examination difficult.

Another standard are the personal values of the top level management that might lead to importance not shared by other players; the risk that strategy might be fail and terrorize self-esteem; the risk that strategy might hurt career prospects and the risk that advancing strategy might be lose the support of main  especially a business.

Part 2

The primary strategic options for a new or legally recognized business include the following:

Grow fast (and ahead of most competitors)

Grow in line with industry

Defend existing status (assumes a moderately strong starting position)

Catch up (with leaders &then grow with or ahead of them)

Turn around (from being an underperformer)

Hang in (go with the flowbut don't expend much effort)

Harvest (milk the opportunitywith a view to withdrawal)

The favourite option is likely to be very influenced by the changing aspects and prospects of the sector in which the business works. For example, if the sector is under serious long-term warnings then the only sensible options might be to hang in or yield.

The two key approaches to strategic development for a recognize business can be divided as either organic or quantum as illustrated below:



Low risk

High risk

Limed resource needed

Substantial resources needed

Absorbs less effort

May divert/deflect attention

Low immediate returns

Higher returns (?)

Incremental learning/progress

Excellent insights required

Strategic flexibility

Unforgiving of errors

In the case of a start-up joint venture, quantum & organic approaches translate into soft or hard start up strategies. An example of a soft start would be a software company that developed with the passage of time from a part time business into full time service provider and then positive development into software products (classic start). Another example would be an engineering company which begins in a radiate and with the passage of time moves into proper premises, (garage start).

Soft start strategies can be effective as they allow proprietors to learn the trade (and making mistakes) without happening major,

impossible to revoke

(And may be premature) responsibility. Hard starts are legally where considerable investments in (R&D, market or assets) & resources (technology, manpower) are required from the initial stage. It can be possible to soften a hard start by renting premises; leasing necessary items (instead of purchasing etc); entering into a joint venture; or secondary contract manufacturing, distribution, accountancy services etc.

Part 3

The strategic positioning of an organization contains the devising of the required future position of the organization on the fundamental of present and predictable developments, and the making of plans to understand that positioning.

This research provides answers to the following questions:

How the things are in the market at existing?

How does the future look like?

How could the organization be physically positioned in the future?

How can opportunities be affecting and how can intimidation are met?

How can this be put into practice in a methodical way?


Both qualitative and quantitative research techniques, as well as desk research, are used to influence an organization's positioning.


Outline of a Brief Strategic Plan:

1. Statement of vision, mission & objective.

2. Set out the main markets that you work in or wish to work in.

3. Set out the location of the organization.

4. Recognize performance indicators.

5. Set out outside environmental factors.

Set out inside environmental factors.

7. Recognize the organization's main strategic issues, to a maximum

Of five.

8. Evaluation of stress and weaknesses.

9. Evaluation of favourable conditions and threats.

Strategies required reaching the objectives and addressing the main issues.

11. Action to be taken.

Programs to be developed.

13. Investments required - human resources, financial resources.

14. Financial results of strategy.

Task 4

Part 1

Strategy implementation is "the process of earmark some resources to support the chosen strategies". This process contains the distinct management activities that are necessary to put strategy in action, institute strategic controls that monitor positive development, and eventually achieve organizational goals.

For example, according to Steiner,

"The implementation process covers the entire managerial activities including such matters as motivation, compensation, management appraisal, and control processes".

Higgins has pointed out, "almost all the management functions -planning, controlling, organizing, motivating, leading, directing, integrating, communicating, and innovation -are in some degree applied in the implementation process".

Pierce and Robinson say that "to effectively direct and control the use of the firm's resources, mechanisms such as organizational structure, information systems, leadership styles, assignment of key managers, budgeting, rewards, and control systems are essential strategy implementation ingredients".

Part 2


· there are vital features of strategic implementation. Strategic implementation contains an order of control/actions, time lines and important event. The project budget playing an important part in the implementation, too. According to the My Strategic Plan website, a 1999 cover story in "Fortune" magazine reported that 60% of businesses failed because they did not link their strategies back to their budgets.

Work Breakdown Structures;

· a work breakdown structure (WBS) is a map of all the steps that require to be taken to perform action in strategic project. According to the Carnegie Mellon website, work breakdown structures are hierarchical depictions that list actions in the order in which they must occur.


· Time management is a significant part of strategic implementation because so many steps must be completed with a different time frame. As a result, project managers create implementation commitments that roughly calculate time how long each step should ideally take to resolve when the project will be finished.


· Businesses use milestones to check the growth of implementation processes. If the implementation progression is not where it should be by a certain milestone, it means the project is behind commitments.