Zebrafish, Genetic Screens, and GNE Myopathy
Disclaimer: This work has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional academic writers. You can view samples of our professional work here.
Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays.
Published: Tue, 22 May 2018
- Caroline Haver
Scientists continuously research to better understand the human stages of development and progression of diseases. Due to the complexity and ethical concerns of testing with humans, scientists instead utilize model organisms such as Danio rerio (zebrafish) in their research. Gaining understanding of processes in these less complex organisms allows for better application and comprehension in more complex organisms. Therefore, I will discuss why zebrafish are a great model organism, how to conduct a zebrafish genetic screen, and how screening zebrafish has helped in understanding the human disease GNE Myopathy.
Zebrafish are deemed model organisms for several reasons. First and foremost, zebrafish are vertebrates and therefore have similar developmental processes found in other vertebrates (Gilbert, 2014). Also, zebrafish can be genetically modified (Gilbert, 272). In regards to their presence in labs, zebrafish are useful and easy to care for subjects, as they are able to produce a large amount of offspring, reproduce all year long, and are easy to keep alive. Overall, mutants can be easily found and “propagated in the laboratory” (Gilbert, 2014, p. 271). What sets zebrafish apart from other model organisms are their characteristic transparent embryos that develop externally from the mother (Gilbert, 2014, p. 271). Furthermore, these embryos develop rapidly (Gilbert, p. 271). These qualities allow scientists to be able to view development clearly and in a short time frame.
Forward genetic analysis is described by Duncan et al. (2012) as “the concept of identifying gene function from mutants with a discernable phenotype” (p. 1). This process can be performed with model organisms with the goal of applying the results to more complex organisms. A zebrafish genetic screen has several steps and here is the following technique.
First, a group of male fish is exposed to a chemical mutagen that will cause mutations within the germ lines (Gilbert, 2014). In Pierce’s genetic screen using zebrafish, the chemical ethylmethytlsulfonate (EMS) was used to induce the mutations in the sperm, but noted that radiation or transposable elements could also be used to create mutations (Pierce, 2012). Next, each male mates with a wild-type female, creating an F1 generation (Gilbert, 2014). The F1 generation fish should have the mutations their father had (Gilbert, 2014). Gilbert went on to explain that if the mutation is dominant, expression will occur in this generation, but if it is recessive, the mutant phenotype will not be seen (Gilbert, 2014). The fish of the F1 generation are then mate with wild-type fish to create the F2 generation, all of which carry the mutated allele (Gilbert, 2014). Since the hallmark of zebrafish is visible development because of the transparent embryos, scientists can easily observe and track abnormal development, and “defects in development can often be traced to changes in a particular group of cells” (Gilbert, 2014). In summary, a mutation is induced within a group of zebrafish and this mutation is passed to subsequent generations through specific mating procedures. The end goal of this process is to observe development and trace issues back to original cells. Once function in a model organism is determined, the cells and function can start to be tracked in more complex organisms such as humans, allowing for better understanding of physiological processes and disease progression.
Gilbert explains there are two processes to determine if zebrafish genes are needed for a certain action to occur: the use of morpholino antisense molecules and green fluorescent protein reporter genes (Gilbert, 2014). Morpholino antisense molecules are used to test if a gene is needed for a specific function through susceptibility to the molecule (Gilbert, 2014). In regards to the green fluorescence protein reporter gene, this gene can be bound to promoters or enhancers to look for gene expression due to this control (Gilbert, 2014). The fluorescence protein will be expressed at the same time and location as the proteins that are expressed through this control (Gilbert, 2014). Scientists will be able to easily view locations due to their bright green color and compare it to controls to see if issues are present.
Zebrafish have been used by scientists to further investigate GNE Myopathy. GNE Myopathy is described as a “rare recessively inherited neuromuscular disorder” (Daya et al., 2014, p. 1). This disease has characteristics including onset in adult years and slow advancement of muscle weakness. It also includes features like “cytoplasmic rimmed vacuoles and filamentous inclusions composed of tubular filaments” (Daya et al., 2014).
While GNE Myopathy is found throughout the world, the following groups have had an increased incidence (Daya et al., 2014). They are the Jewish Persian and Jewish Middle Eastern groups (Daya et al., 2014). Additionally, a variant form of this disorder called distal myopathy with rimmed vacuoles has been found in some Japanese individuals (Daya et al., 2014). The Gne gene is responsible for making a protein comprised of 722 amino acids called UDP-N- acetylglucosamine 2 epimerase/ N-acetylmannosamine kinase, located in many types of human cells, including muscle cells (Daya et al., 2014). This enzyme is bifunctional due to its epimerase and kinase domains, and when mutations occur in both domains’ sequences, GNE myopathy can result (Daya et al., 2014). It is understood that this enzyme functions as the limiting factor in formation of sialic acid and is necessary for embryonic development (Daya et al., 2014). However, the authors explain that there is no clear evidence of how the enzyme relates in GNE Myopathy. So, this study used knockdown and transgenic techniques to prove that the GNE gene is necessary for embryonic and muscle development, including myofiber formation, creation of integrity of the muscle, and ability of muscle to perform locomotor actions, therefore potentially playing a role in GNE Myopathy (Daya et al., 2014, p. 2).
GNE gene location on Chromosome 9 by GNE. (2008). United States National Library of Medicine, United States National Institutes of Health. Retrieved from http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/gene/GNE
Zebrafish were chosen by the authors for use in their study of GNE Myopathy because they are great model organisms for researching human conditions, especially neuromuscular diseases (Daya et al., 2014). Also, all of the proteins involved in human skeletal muscle disorders are expressed in these organisms and take part in the same pathways (Daya et al., 2014). This will allow for direct relation of results found in zebrafish to humans.
The results of the experiments supported the original hypotheses. In regards to the Gne gene being necessary for embryonic development, expression of the gene was found in multiple stages during in situ hybridization (Daya et al., 2014). It was first seen in one-cell embryo stages as mRNA expression of the gene (Daya et al., 2014). Also, ubiquitous expression was seen until “the first day of development” (Daya et al., 2014, p. 2). Once at day one past post-fertilization, expression of the gene was seen in the eyes, central nervous system, and slightly in the muscle (Daya et al., 2014). In addition, during the first three days, expression in the muscle was seen but declined as the days progressed (Daya et al., 2014). These results showed that the Gne gene is present at very early stages of development and in various regions including the brain and muscles, which the scientists sought out to find.
When the scientists knocked out the expression of the Gne gene using antisense molecules and created three experimental groups, the zebrafish were observed at day three post-fertilization (Daya et al., 2014). The three groups were named normal/mild, intermediate, and severe based on their characteristics (Daya et al., 2014). Those in the normal/mild group “showed slightly reduced body length, smaller eyes, or no apparent malformations” (Daya et al., 2014, p. 5). Zebrafish in the intermediate group “had a curved tail, small eyes, and pericardial edema” (Daya et al., 2014, p. 5). The severe group “had a very short undeveloped trunk and showed all mentioned developmental defects” (Daya et al., 2014, p. 5). These results reiterated the previous results in that Gne expression had been found in regions of the eye and muscle, and in this test, developmental problems occurred in these regions. Furthermore, the most severe group had the most numerous and detrimental developmental abnormalities, showing that as severity increased, abnormalities increased.
Figure A from page 5 clearly reflects the statements above. Those in the most severe phenotypic category suffered from severe abnormal development in specific regions. By Daya, A., Vatine, G. D., Becker- Cohen, M., Tal-Goldberg, T., Gothilf, Y., Du, S. J., & Mitrani- Rosenbaum, S. (2014, February 11). Gne depletion during zebrafish development impairs skeletal muscle structure and function. Human Molecular Genetics, 1-13. Advance online publication. Retrieved from PubMed database. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu045. Copyright 2014 by Oxford University Press.
In regards to locomotor activity ability, knock out techniques were again utilized (Daya et al., 2014). It was observed in seven day post-fertilization zebrafish subjected to exposure of either 1 mM gne E313-MO or with the control 1mM control-MO that “gne morphants swim at a significantly lower average velocity compared with the control” (Daya et al., 2014, p. 6). This result showed that those lacking Gne gene expression have abnormal locomotor ability, and presumably abnormal muscles.
After the results from the locomotor test, the scientists wanted to test how the knockout technique influences the muscle structure (Daya et al., 2014, p. 6). Results yielded that, compared to the control zebrafish, the fast myofibers in the knockout zebrafish were “narrower and not as straight and organized” (Daya et al., 2014, p. 5). Also, those with the knockout experienced changes in “slow and fast muscle development and morphology” (Daya et al., 2014, p. 6). These results showed that knockout of the Gne gene greatly impacts the muscle structure and function. The structural changes leads to impaired action.
In their discussion, the authors stated “the mechanism leading from the mutations to the muscle defect remains unexplained” (Daya et al., 2014, p. 6). Even though the exact connection to GNE Myopathy was not found in this study, their research was valuable in it was able to show that the Gne gene is present and necessary in certain regions of the zebrafish for embryonic and muscular development (Daya et al., 2014). Scientists now have a better understanding of the relationship between the Gne gene and muscles. Further studies will be able to use this information to help try to make the direct link between the Gne gene and GNE Myopathy.
Zebrafish have proved themselves to be valuable model organisms within the field of science. Their unique characteristics allow for ease of experimentation and observation of results, especially within genetic screens. In regards to furthering knowledge of human disease, zebrafish have allowed for better understanding of the Gne gene and its relationship to GNE Myopathy. The goal of testing with model organisms is to gain knowledge, be able to apply results to more complex organisms, gain better understanding of human diseases, and begin to create treatments to help those inflicted. Zebrafish have certainly contributed to this process.
Daya, A., Vatine, G. D., Becker- Cohen, M., Tal-Goldberg, T., Gothilf, Y., Du, S. J., & Mitrani- Rosenbaum, S. (2014, February 11). Gne depletion during zebrafish development impairs skeletal muscle structure and function. Human Molecular Genetics, 1-13. Advance online publication. Retrieved from PubMed database. doi: doi:10.1093/hmg/ddu045
Duncan, L. M., Timms, R. T., Zavodszky, E., Cano, F., Dougan, G., Randow, F., & Lehner, P. J. (2012). Fluorescence-based phenotypic selection allows forward genetic screens in haploid human cells. PLoS ONE, 7(6), 1-5. Retrieved from Academic Search Premier database. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039651
Gilbert, S. F. (2014). Developmental biology (10 ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
GNE. (2008). United States National Library of Medicine, United States National Institutes of Health. Retrieved from http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/gene/GNE
Pierce, B. A. (2012). Genetics: A conceptual approach (4 ed.). New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: