This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.
The pulpodentin complex
The dental pulp is surrounded by the dental hard tissue, which is a physical barrier against pathogen and injury. The pulp and dentin are often discussed together as a functional unit, the pulpodentin complex. Pulp is capable to elaborate dentin both physiologically and in response to external stimuli. The permeability properties of dentin regulate the rate of diffusion of irritants that initiate pulpal inflammation. Pulp carries vascularity and nerve supply. Blood vessels are for nutrient supply and cells recruitment, while nerves are for dental sensitivity and defense response following injury either from dental caries or trauma. Due to encapsulation, the dental pulp has a low capacity for defense or repair because of impairment of an adequate blood supply and recruitment of cells following injury (1).
Pulpodentin complex is extremely rich in innervation that influences the defense reactions in the connective tissue of the pulp (Figure 5.3). These consist of sensory fibers, sympathetic fibers, and parasympathetic fibers.
G:\New Folder (2)\scan0001.jpg
Among all, the sensory fibers are the great majority. They originate from trigeminal ganglion and terminate in the spinal trigeminal nucleus, then pass through the apical foramen, diverge and branch in the coronal pulp. Finally they terminate in the odontoblast layers, predentin or in the inner 0.1 mm of dentin. There are three subgroups of sensory innervation based on size, conduction velocity, and function. A-beta fibers, the medium-sized myelinated fibers, are the smallest group of sensory fibers that sensitive to mechanical stimuli such as hydrodynamic. Small myelinated A-delta can be seen much greater in dental pulp. The largest portion of sensory fibers is C fibers, the unmyelinated, slow conducting fibers. Both A-delta and C fibers are nociceptive. The sensory fibers provide vitality of the dental pulp by interacting with other pulpal cells, such as odontoblasts, immunocompetent cells, and blood vessels. This can be seen in the previous study of rat molars with occlusal exposure, teeth with sensory denervation have more severe loss of pulp tissue than the innervated one (2).
The sympathetic fibers are from superior cervical ganglion. They are less numerous than sensory fibers and locate along the blood vessels in deeper pulp. Their function is vasoconstriction. The other group of pulpal innervation is parasympathetic fibers which function in regulation of pulpal blood flow but are much less important than the other two mentioned before.
During the maturation and aging, dental pulp becomes narrower with tertiary dentin and dead tracts which are denervation. With increasing loss of primary dentin, tooth innervation decreases and there is reduction in expression of neuropeptides and their receptors (3).
The overall coronal innervations in both primary and permanent teeth extend toward the odontoblast layer but subodontoblastic nerve plexus appear denser in permanent teeth than in primary teeth (4).
In this study, we will study the dental pain associated with dental caries in human primary teeth. Therefore, sensory innervation in primary teeth is what we are interested due to its prominent function as pain transmission. The sensory innervation in primary teeth differs from that of permanent teeth as described below.
The study of Egan et al 1996 (5) demonstrated sensory nerve supply in primary human teeth using immunohistochemistry and unveiled the different between primary and permanent teeth in two way. First, the distribution within the crown of primary teeth were highest at cervical, while the permanent teeth were densely supplied in the pulpal horn dentin. Next, the primary tooth roots were supplied, especially near cervical ends, but the permanent root dentin was virtually uninnervated. The results of this study differ from the other comparing primary and permanent teeth. This may be explained by differences in the methods of fixation and processing used.
There are a plenty of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) containing fibers, a peptidergic fibers which are subpopulation of nociceptive sensory fibers, in the pulp horn and subodontoblastic plexus of both primary and permanent molars, but overall CGRP expression are greater in permanent teeth (6). Therefore, this can be assumed that primary teeth have less sensitivity than permanent teeth. (The role of CGRP will be explained later in sensory neuropeptides in dental pulp)
In healthy primary teeth with physiological root resorption, there was no significant difference related to physiological resorption and histological structure of primary tooth pulp (7). The pulpal horns are the most densely innervated region with multiple free-ending fibers extending toward the pulp-dentin junction. The overall innervation density has no significant difference due to the degree of root resorption in either pulpal horn or mid-coronal region (8).
In summary, the location of sensory fibers in dental pulp is approximately the same for primary and permanent teeth but the quantity of those is less in primary teeth. Physiologic root resorption does not affect histological structure and overall innervation.
Sensory neuropeptides in dental pulp
The sensory fibers are afferent fibers involved predominantly in perception of pain. The terminals of sensory fibers contain neuropeptides, the protein involved in the nervous system, which are synthesized from neurons. These peptidergic neurons are associated with neurogenic inflammation in order to provide the vitality of dental pulp. They change dynamically during inflammation that caused by stimuli such as dental caries, drilling, probing of the exposed dentin, or percussion of the teeth, by extensive sprouting and result in an increase in potential sites of neuropeptide release. The profuse innervation of pulp and dentin releases neuropeptides. Neuropeptides cannot cross cell membranes, so they trigger biologic effects by activating receptors located on the plasma membrane of the target cells and they are rapidly degraded by the enzyme in pulp tissue after exerting the effects. Functions of sensory neuropeptides are multiple and variable. They could act as neurotransmitters, growth factors, hormones, and immune system signaling molecules. It is generally accepted that neuropeptides contribute to promote neurogenic inflammation and healing of the pulp by modulate vasodilation, increase in vascular permeability, and also immunomodulation. These neuropeptides include calcitonin gene-related peptides (CGRP), substance P (SP), neurokinin A (NKA). Summary of the sensory neuropeptides in dental pulp are shown in table 1. For review please read (9) and (10).
Peptidergic sensory fibers and arterioles within the midcoronal of both primary and permanent tooth pulps are located in close spatial relationship. It is believed that peptidergic afferent fibers are involved in control of pulpal blood flow. They cause vasodilation and inhibit vasoconstriction that induced by sympathetic fibers in response to stimulation. The CGRP-containing fibers are the majority of vessels innervation (11). SP initiates vasodilation, while CGRP is responsible for the continued long-lasting elevation of pulpal blood flow. Thus, CGRP is believed to be associated with prolonged pain. Otherwise, CGRP also produces immunosuppression by inhibiting T-lymphocyte proliferation, blocking H2O2 production in macrophage, reducing antigen presentation of class II antigen-presenting cells, and inhibiting the induction of delayed-type hypersensitivity. CGRP induces histamine release from mast cells and result in an increased vascular permeability and increased blood pressure. It also stimulates growth of fibroblasts and odontoblast-like cells (12).
Immune system in dental pulp
The voltage-gated sodium channel
The voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs) are complex transmembrane pores that open within a millisecond in response to electrical change across the membrane to allow sodium ions influx, and then terminate within unextended periods of time to occlude the sodium ions flow. After this process, VGSCs return to resting state and are available to open again in response to new wave of electrical change. VGSCs play the role in the propagation of nerve impulses and continuous activation of VGSCs gives rise to unprovoked spontaneous action potential activity, that finally cause continuous pain (13). The sodium channel is the selective filter composed of 1 large continuous protein, α-subunit and 1 or 2 smaller proteins, β-subunits. The α-subunits, a 220-260 kD polypeptide, contain a functional part of ion channel including voltage sensor, ion pore, activation, and inactivation gate. The β-subunits modulate the functions of the α-subunits and stabilize them to the plasma membrane (14).
In mammals, 9 genes have been identified to encode VGSC α-subunits into 9 isoforms depend on amino acid sequence homology and genetic location. Each isoform differs in function such as tissue distribution, electrophysiology, pharmacology, and response to nerve injury and inflammation. Moreover, each one is associated with variety of receptor molecules to regulate nociceptor excitability, so there are diversified processes of nerve impulse propagation depending on the present of sodium channel α-subunit isoform, for example, varying in opening thresholds, opening time length, amount of inactivation time, or rate of isoform transition from closed inactivated state to the resting close state (14).
Sodium channels can be classified by flow of the current through the channels as low- or high- threshold and by the rate of inactivation as fast or slow. Furthermore, each isoform of sodium channels varies in sensitivity to blockade by tetradotoxin (TTX), a toxin found in the liver of puffer fish. Some isoforms are highly sensitive, while the others are relatively resistant (14). The properties of each VGSC α-subunit isoforms are shown in table 2.
The sensory neurons in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) express both TTX-sensitive (TTX-S) and TTX-resistant (TTX-R) sodium channels. The large neurons are mechanoreceptive with rapid-inactivating TTX-S sodium channels. The small neurons are nociceptive, expressing a mixture of rapid-inactivating TTX-S and slow-inactivating TTX-R sodium channels. NaV1.8 and NaV1.9, the slower TTX-R components, are remarkably found in small DRG neurons that have been identified as nociceptive neurons and believed to be involve in the prolonged duration of action potential in response to painful stimuli (14). Based on distribution, both NaV1.8 and NaV1.9 might be a new target for treatment of pain. NaV1.8 has a high activation threshold, slow inactivation kinetics and contribute to electrogenesis of action potential in C-type peripheral neurons of mice models (15). NaV1.9 activates at potentials near resting membrane potential and generates relatively persistent current (16).
Following inflammation, VGSCs change their expression in sensory neurons and contribute to the activation of pain pathways, leading to an increasing pain states (14). The studies of painful teeth with irreversible pulpitis reveal an increase in expression of NaV1.7 (17), NaV1.8 (18, 19) and NaV1.9 (20), each of which is an isoform of α-subunit of sodium channel, compare to dental pulp of nonpainful teeth. Although may be at least 3 α-subunit isoforms of sodium channel are associated with dental pain, we focus only on NaV1.8 and NaV1.9. For NaV1.8, the reason is that NaV1.8 has been proved to be increase in expression in human permanent tooth pulp with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis using western blot analysis, the same method we will use in this study.
Within the human dental pulp, NaV1.8 immunoreactive fibers are found in subodontoblastic layer (18).
Table 2 Voltage-gated sodium channel α-subunits isoform and their properties (13, 14)
Channel α-subunit isoform
Site of expression
Sensitivity to blockade by TTX
CNS and DRG sensory neurons
CNS and DRG sensory neurons
DRG sensory neurons and sympathetic ganglia
DRG sensory neurons
Small DRG sensory neurons and trigeminal ganglia
Very slow (persistent)
Dental pain assessment
Pain assessment is a complex process to obtain pain information and effects on the person along with quantitative values. The examination and evaluation of pain can be done by taking patient's history, systems review and use of pain measurement tools (21).
Although many tools are often used to measure pain severity in children, visual analogue scale (VAS) is commonly used. VAS is a line of 10 centimeters long, the left end of the line refers to no pain while the right end points of the worst pain a child can imagine of. It requires cognitive ability to understand serial order and translate into a distance measure. According to Piaget's developmental stage of intelligence, the stage at which the children can perform serial ordering operation and able to generalize along a linear dimension is concrete operations, by the age of 7-11 years. Consequently, VAS seems to be difficult to measure pain intensity in children under 7 (reference champion: Measurement of pain by self-report 1998), but widely used to assess pain severity in both adults and older children. However, O' Rourke (21) reported the use of VAS in children from 5 years and older with excellent validity and reliability. Excluding consideration of age, VAS is a powerful tool to quantify magnitude of pain due to more informative and sensitive to changes comparing to faces scales.
Faces scales are popular methods for pain severity measurement in children, consisting of a series of faces that express discriminate degree of pain intensity, from smiling to crying. Faces scales are handled by matching the face that corresponds most closely to the child's feeling. These methods are assumed to be easier than VAS (Champion 1998) because less cognitive ability is needed. Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scales (WBFPS) is one of the faces scales that have shown to be valid and reliable in pediatric setting. It is a scale with 6 faces representing different levels of pain and scales as 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 (figure 3). Garra et al (22) found that both of VAS and WBFPS had excellent agreement when used in pediatric emergency patients. The same result was demonstrated in Thai children that VAS and WBFPS were significant correlate in children at age 4 years and older (23).
The participants in this study will be the children of age from 5 years. Because, until now, no tool is a gold standard for pain intensity measurement tool, so we will use both VAS and WBFPS to reassure that each participant really understands how to use the pain severity measurement tools.
Figure 2 Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Figure 3 Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale (WBFPS)
1. Okiji T. Pulp As a Connective Tissue. In: Bywaters LC, editor. Seltzer and Bender's Dental Pulp 3rd ed: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc; 2002. p. 95-121.
2. Byers MR, Taylor PE. Effect of sensory denervation on the response of rat molar pulp to exposure injury. J Dent Res. 1993 Mar;72(3):613-8.
3. Byers MR, Narhi MVO. Nerves Supply of the Pulpodentin Complex and Responses to Injury In: Bywaters LC, editor. Seltzer and Bender's Dental Pulp 3rd ed: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc 2002. p. 151-80.
4. Rodd HD, Boissonade FM. Innervation of human tooth pulp in relation to caries and dentition type. J Dent Res. 2001 Jan;80(1):389-93.
5. Egan CA, Bishop MA, Hector MP. An immunohistochemical study of the pulpal nerve supply in primary human teeth: evidence for the innervation of deciduous dentine. J Anat. 1996 Jun;188 ( Pt 3):623-31.
6. Rodd HD, Boissonade FM. Comparative immunohistochemical analysis of the peptidergic innervation of human primary and permanent tooth pulp. Arch Oral Biol. 2002 May;47(5):375-85.
7. Sari S, Aras S, Gunhan O. The effect of physiological root resorption on the histological structure of primary tooth pulp. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1999 Spring;23(3):221-5.
8. Monteiro J, Day P, Duggal M, Morgan C, Rodd H. Pulpal status of human primary teeth with physiological root resorption. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2009 Jan;19(1):16-25.
9. Wakisaka S. Neuropeptides in the dental pulp: distribution, origins, and correlation. J Endod. 1990 Feb;16(2):67-9.
10. Caviedes-Bucheli J, Munoz HR, Azuero-Holguin MM, Ulate E. Neuropeptides in dental pulp: the silent protagonists. J Endod. 2008 Jul;34(7):773-88.
11. Rodd HD, Boissonade FM. Immunocytochemical investigation of neurovascular relationships in human tooth pulp. J Anat. 2003 Feb;202(2):195-203.
12. Jontell M, Okiji T, Dahlgren U, Bergenholtz G. Immune defense mechanisms of the dental pulp. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1998;9(2):179-200.
13. Cummins TR, Sheets PL, Waxman SG. The roles of sodium channels in nociception: Implications for mechanisms of pain. Pain. 2007 Oct;131(3):243-57.
14. Amir R, Argoff CE, Bennett GJ, Cummins TR, Durieux ME, Gerner P, et al. The role of sodium channels in chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain. J Pain. 2006 May;7(5 Suppl 3):S1-29.
15. Renganathan M, Cummins TR, Waxman SG. Contribution of Na(v)1.8 sodium channels to action potential electrogenesis in DRG neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2001 Aug;86(2):629-40.
16. Dib-Hajj S, Black JA, Cummins TR, Waxman SG. NaN/Nav1.9: a sodium channel with unique properties. Trends Neurosci. 2002 May;25(5):253-9.
17. Luo S, Perry GM, Levinson SR, Henry MA. Nav1.7 expression is increased in painful human dental pulp. Mol Pain. 2008;4:16.
18. Renton T, Yiangou Y, Plumpton C, Tate S, Bountra C, Anand P. Sodium channel Nav1.8 immunoreactivity in painful human dental pulp. BMC Oral Health. 2005 Jul 7;5(1):5.
19. Warren CA, Mok L, Gordon S, Fouad AF, Gold MS. Quantification of neural protein in extirpated tooth pulp. J Endod. 2008 Jan;34(1):7-10.
20. Wells JE, Bingham V, Rowland KC, Hatton J. Expression of Nav1.9 channels in human dental pulp and trigeminal ganglion. J Endod. 2007 Oct;33(10):1172-6.
21. O'Rourke D. The measurement of pain in infants, children, and adolescents: from policy to practice. Phys Ther. 2004 Jun;84(6):560-70.
22. Garra G, Singer AJ, Taira BR, Chohan J, Cardoz H, Chisena E, et al. Validation of the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale in pediatric emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. Jan;17(1):50-4.
23. Newman CJ, Lolekha R, Limkittikul K, Luangxay K, Chotpitayasunondh T, Chanthavanich P. A comparison of pain scales in Thai children. Arch Dis Child. 2005 Mar;90(3):269-70.