Agroclimatological Factors in Soybean Plants
Published: Last Edited:
Disclaimer: This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. You can view samples of our professional work here.
Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays.
The world today is faced with great challenges to produce adequate food, fiber, feed, industrial products and ecosystem services for the globe's 6.4 billion people. With nearly 80 million people are being added every year, and ecosystem goods and services must be developed to meet 8 billion by the year 2025 and over 12 billion by 2050. About 84% of this growth is expected to occur in the developing countries (Xiaobing et al., 2008). Since there is essentially no new arable land that can be cultivated, the increased food supply must come primarily from more intensive cultivation of existing arable land. Added to these stresses comes a threat - global climate change resulting from increased greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere due to anthropogenic activities (Jaleel et al., 2009). Global surface temperature has increased by more than 0.6°C because of anthropogenic climate-forcing agents since the Industrial Revolution (Sato et al., 2000; Mahmoud et al., 2009). Future increases in greenhouse gases are projected to increase Earth's surface temperature to anywhere between 1.5 to 11°C by the year 2100 (Calviño et al., 2003). It was shown that the changes projected in climate will have profound impacts on crop production as evidenced from studies using field and controlled-environments and modeling exercises (Reddy and Hodges, 2000; Shao et al., 2009). Similarly external factors and environmental stresses affects plant growth and production throughout the world (Jaleel et al. 2006, 2007, 2008). Lobell and Asner (2003) evaluated the relationship between climate variation and crop production on two major crops (corn and soybean) grown in the United States between the years 1982 to 1998 and reported that for every 1°C rise in temperature, there was an average 17% decrease in yield. In addition, extreme temperatures during flowering period will have even more severe effects on crop yield than just rise in season-long temperature conditions (Reddy et al., 1999). Therefore, extensive research has been carried out to quantify the effect of increasing temperature on crop production. Fruit set in many agronomic crops is sensitive to supra-optimal temperatures; cotton (Reddy et al., 1992), bell pepper (Erickson et al., 2001), tomato (Sato et al., 2000), bean (Porch and Jahn, 2001), groundnut (Prasad et al., 2003), soybean (Ferris et al., 1998), common bean (Gross and Kigel, 1994), and cowpea (Ahmed et al., 1993).
Soybean (Glycine max L. Merill) is an important legume cash crop grown for its oil and protein with over 74.4 Mha worldwide and 29.3 Mha in the United States (http://www.fao.org, September, 2005). For example, during 2003, the United States grew about 29.7 million hectares of soybean and produced 2.41 billion bushels of grain (USDA, 2004). Therefore, soybean crop production is extremely important to the economic structure of the global food network, especially the United States. First domesticated in Northeast parts of China, conventional and genetically modified cultivars of soybean have been adapted and commercially cultivated in all climatic zones of USA and in all populated continents of the world (Zhang et al., 2009). Genotypes have been grouped into 13 maturity groups ranging from 000 to XI distributed from Canada to the southern border of the USA based on latitude (Poehlman and Sleper, 1995). Most US genotypes were derived from a small number of ancestral soybean cultivars brought to the USA in the early 1900s (Carter et al., 1993), indicating a small genetic pool.
Soybean is sensitive to the changes in day-length and temperature (Allen and Boote, 2000; Jayakumar et al., 2007; Eunsook et al., 2009). Therefore, soybean breeders and researchers have routinely selected genotypes that are most responsive to a combination of day-length and temperatures for a given niche environment (Mahmoud et al., 2009). Selection for high temperature tolerance has also occurred in crops such as rice (Huang et al., 2009) and soybean (Mahmoud et al., 2009). Vegetative growth was stimulated by increasing temperature, as was leaf and canopy photosynthesis (Boote et al., 1997). However, reproductive growth leading to seed yield was often depressed by the same increases in temperature that enhanced vegetative growth and development (Fang et al., 2008). A temperature between 33 and 40°C reduced soybean growth (Vu et al., 1997). When plants were exposed to temperatures of 35°C for 10 h during the day, soybean yield reductions of about 27% were observed (Gibson and Mullen, 1996). Flower initiation was reduced by temperatures more than 32°C and delayed seed formation at 40°C (Thomas et al., 2003).
Pollen grains are developed within the anther and at maturity contain the products of both sporophytic and gametophytic gene expression (Taylor and Hepler, 1997). They act as independent functional units once released from anthers and are exposed to multiple environmental stresses (Kent and Carter, 2009). Under humid conditions in the southern USA, soybean anther dehiscence occurs between 0800 and 1000 h. Therefore, high temperatures during flowering or short episodes of high temperature during pollen release and germination may more severely affect male reproductive processes than the deeply seated ovules (Matsuyama et al., 2009).
High temperatures during flowering have been shown to affect pollen germination, tube growth, and fertilization in numerous crops (Monterroso and Wein, 1990; Porch and Jahn, 2001; Adriana et al., 2007). Pod yield, the number of flowers produced, and proportion of flowers that were fertilized and retained, were reduced by high temperatures in groundnut (Prasad et al., 2003). Pollen abnormalities were observed in soybean (Koti et al., 2004), snap bean (Suzuki et al., 2001), and common bean grown in high temperatures (Porch and Jahn, 2001). With high temperatures, early degeneration of the tapetal layer occurred in the anthers of snap bean (Suzuki et al., 2001). Recent studies have shown that microsporogensis was more sensitive to high temperature than megasporogenesis, leading to lowered fruit set (Young et al., 2004). Lower pod and seed set were related to nonviable pollen, unsuccessful anther dehiscence, and pollen shed in (Sato et al., 2000) resulting in reduced pollen tube penetration into the stigma and weakened female performance (Gross and Kigel, 1994). In vitro pollen studies for both pollen germination and pollen tube length in groundnut and cotton genotypes were varied in their responses to base (Tbase), optimum (Topt), and maximum (Tmax) temperatures (Kakani et al., 2005). Differences in these cardinal temperatures have been used as screening techniques for tolerance or sensitivity of cotton and groundnut genotypes to high temperature (Kakani et al., 2005; Craufurd et al., 2003; Jegor et al., 2006). To date, there have been no studies conducted to specifically document in vitro pollen germination and pollen tube growth technique for screening soybean genotypes to high temperatures. Also, studies describing the variation in cardinal temperatures for reproductive parameters in any soybean genotype or whether genotypic variation exists in pollen responses to temperature are lacking. Therefore, identifying cardinal temperatures for pollen germination and pollen tube growth and developing temperature dependent functional responses for these processes will be useful for understanding mechanisms of temperature-tolerance in soybean and to provide a much needed database for modeling soybean growth and yield. Finally, this information will aid in cultivar selection based on niche environments. As Earth's surface temperatures are projected to rise, a global search for genetic material that is more tolerant to abiotic stresses, especially higher temperatures, is needed for soybean.
Physiological parameters that have been widely used to study plant tolerance to high temperature include photosynthesis rates, stomatal conductance, chlorophyll fluorescence (Vu et al., 1997), and cell membrane thermostability (CMT) (ur Rahman et al., 2004). Photosynthetic rates were considered as good indicators of thermo-tolerance in maize at the seedling stage under heat and salt stresses (Karim et al., 2000; Hiroyuki et al., 2009). CMT has been used as a measure of heat-tolerance in several crops including rice (Tripathy et al., 2000), soybean (Tang et al., 2009). CMT in rice has been used as a major selection index for drought tolerance in cereals (Tripathy et al., 2000). Furthermore, CMT was found to be positively and significantly correlated with biomass and yield under stress conditions but not with biomass or yield under non-stress conditions (ur Rehaman et al., 2004). Also, cultivars showing higher CMT yielded better than the cultivars with lower CMT in crops such as wheat (Fokar et al., 1998) and cotton (ur Rahman et al., 2004). However, recent studies showed that CMT was not correlated with pollen germination under high temperature in groundnut and cotton (Craufurd et al., 2003; Kakani et al., 2005). Thus, it would be helpful to understand the relationships between pollen parameters such as pollen germination and tube length and physiological parameters such as photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, pigments and CMT in different crops and in particular, soybean genotypes (Sinclair et al. 2007). Therefore, the objectives of this research were to (i) quantify the responses of in vitro pollen germination and pollen tube growth to temperature, (ii) determine cardinal temperatures of each genotype and classify genotypes based on their tolerance to temperature, (iii) understand the morphological disturbances of pollen when plants are exposed to high temperature, (iv) determine whether the observed genotypic variation in reproductive parameters is correlated with vegetative parameters such as photosynthetic rates, photosynthetic pigments and cell membrane thermostability, and (v) classify genotypes as tolerant, intermediate or sensitive to high temperature. An additional objective of this study was to determine the basis of tolerance or sensitivity of the genotypes to high temperature.
Origin and Distribution of Soybean
Soybeans cultivation has spread widely from its center of origin in the north and northeastern areas of China, where it has been grown since 2500 B.C. In the late 1700s, soybean was introduced sporadically into the United States. The soybean growing region is part of the temperate climate of northern China and was formally called the Chinese soybean or Manchurian bean (Morse, 1950). Though it has been referred by numerous botanical names, in 1948, Ricker and Morse coined the botanical name to the domesticated soybean wild types as Glycine max (L.) Merrill, which originated from G. soja. The crop is adapted to latitudes of 0° to 50° and altitudes of less than 1000 m. Soybean is an annual crop and produces more protein and oil per unit of land than any other crop. The average composition of today's soybean is 40% protein, 21% oil, 34% carbohydrate, and 5% ash. Soybean cultivation has been on the increase and with worldwide production increasing by approximately 400% over the last forty years; in 2003, about 37% of world production was from the United States (FAO, 2005).
Climate Change and Temperature Effects
The world today is faced with great challenges to produce adequate food, fiber, feed, industrial products, and ecosystem services for the globe's 6.4 billion people (http://www.usaid.gov/pubs/apr96/ch1.pdf). Future projections indicate that if the human population continues to rise, and the earth will be inhabited by anywhere between 7.4 to 10.6 billion people by the year 2050 (United Nations, 2003). It has been estimated that pressure from global population will cause the demand for cereals and grains to escalate additional 40% by 2020 (Duvick and Cassman, 1999), or an annual-average increase of 1.3%. Furthermore, per capita food consumption rates are also steadily increasing around the world, particularly in developing countries with increasing incomes. Since there is essentially no new arable land that can be cultivated, the increased food supply must come primarily from more intensive cultivation of existing arable land. Kendall and Pimentel (1994) points out that when population and food consumption rate increases are accounted, then the food production will need to triple by the 2050. In addition, gaseous emissions from human activities are substantially increasing the concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases, which have increased and will increase average world temperature. The increase in CO2 and other greenhouse gas concentrations since the Industrial Revolution has resulted in 0.6°C increase of the earth mean temperature (Sato et al., 2000). Recent model projections suggest that the global mean surface air temperatures will increase by 1.4 to 5.8°C by 2100 (Houghton et al., 2001). A recent study indicated that the projected temperatures may range from 1.5 to 11°C by the year 2100 (Calviño et al., 2003). The current model simulations indicate more intense, more frequent and a longer lasting summer heat-waves over North America and Europe (Meehl and Tebaldi, 2004) in the coming years.
Increasing temperatures will result in a substantial reduction in crop yields, especially if they coincide with the flowering stage of crops. In 2003, Europe experienced a 6 °C increase over the long-term mean temperature and a 50% decrease in precipitation, resulting in crop yield losses of up to 36% (Ciais et al., 2005). It was shown that changes projected in climate will have profound impacts on crop production as evidenced from studies using field and controlled-environmental studies and modeling exercises (Reddy and Hodges, 2000). Therefore, it is essential to protect crop yields both in the present as well as in the future climates.
Maturity Groups and Plant Types of Soybeans
Soybean is a short day plant and was the first species in which photoperiod sensitivity was discovered with cultivars differing in critical day length (Garner and Allard, 1920) and temperature (Carlson and Lersten, 1987). Soybean is classified by maturity groups based on differences in day length conditions. Thirteen maturity groups have been established for soybean cultivars grown in the United States and the Canada (Poehlman and Sleper, 1995). Soybean cultivars range from Group 000, adapted to the longer day lengths of the northern United States and southern Canada to Group VIII grown in the southern part of the United States (Kenji et al., 2009). Recently, those that flower after Group VIII were identified as Group IX. Figure 1 shows the geographical distribution of the 13 maturity groups of soybean according to their attitude (Poehlman and Sleper, 1995). Most soybean cultivars respond to photoperiod as quantitative short-day plants and are adapted for production in a narrow band of latitudes. The soybean plant has a juvenile stage after emergence when it is especially sensitive to temperature and insensitive to day length (Cheng et al., 2009).
Soybean cultivars are classified as determinate and indeterminate types according to their reproductive stage and differences due to genetic variation. Groups 000 to IV represent the indeterminate growth habit: flowering starts before stem elongation ceases, in the oldest and lowest nodes, and moves up to the youngest nodes over several weeks. Indeterminate flowering cultivars tend to be more clustered. Varieties within Groups V to IX are mostly of the determinate growth habit and all nodes flower at the same time repeatedly. Most determinate cultivars grown in the United States have long racemes with two to thirty-five flowers each (Cheng et al., 2009). The determinate type is adapted to a long growing season, in which the soybean plant completes vegetative growth before or shortly after flowering is initiated.
Temperature Effects on Soybean Growth
Plant growth is a concert of numerous processes that differ in temperature optima and temperature range. Growth results in an increased volume and size. Yield depends on the amount of assimilate that is transported to the harvested organ. The increase in agricultural yields is mainly attributed to the improvement of the harvest index, or the harvested yield to shoot ratio mass known through breeding programs. Breeding efforts to increase the partition of assimilates to storage organs of interest have been very successful. However, when exposed to environmental stresses, several physiological processes that contribute to crop yield are affected by resulting in lower yield.
One of the causes for yield improvement in soybean seems to be enhanced leaf photosynthesis through increased leaf area and duration. High temperature and other abiotic constraints like chemical stresses, modifies soybean photosynthesis as it regulates the photosynthetic biochemistry (Qian and Zhou, 2009). The measurement of leaf photosynthetic rates of soybean grown in field has been reported between 30 and 40µmol m-2 s-1 (Carla et al., 2008). Hofstra and Hesketh (1969) reported that photosynthesis of soybean leaves increase with temperatures > 35°C and declines above 40°C. Soybean normally produces more flowers than pods, and yield is relatively unaffected by which flowers become pods. The number of pods that successfully mature will mainly be a result of the amount of photosynthate available during pod-set. During the seed-fill period, less photosynthate supply results in pod abortion. In contrast, more photosynthate supply will prolong flowering up to three weeks. Photosynthesis is extremely sensitive to high temperaturestress, especially during the reproductive stage. Ashley and Boerma (1989) and Ferris et al. (1998) found reductions in seed production which coincided with photosynthesis during flowering and seed filling. Photosynthesis was considered an indicator of thermotolerance in maize at the seedling stage during heat stress conditions (Karim et al., 2000).
Dry Matter Accumulation
Dry matter is the culmination of several plant growth and developmental processes. The amount of dry matter accumulated in soybean per unit input (light, water and nutrients) determines the efficiency of the production system. Temperature above or below an optimum value reduces dry weight or biomass accumulation. With air temperatures above 30°C, dry matter accumulations in whole plants begin to decline in soybean (Raper et al., 1977). Increasing temperature affects dry matter accumulation due to direct on leaf initiation (Thomas and Raper, 1976) and indirect effects of increased leaf water deficits on leaf expansion, as well as the metabolic level of photosynthesis and respiration. Temperatures above 38°C during the day reduced dry matter production (Prasad et al., 2003) and decreased biomass by 25% at 35°C to 50% at 45°C in groundnut.
Partitioning to Pod Growth
The fluctuation in air temperature that we witness today affects plant growth through altered partitioning of photosynthate between organs (Thomas and Raper, 1976; Pinheiro et al., 2009). Pod yield is usually positively correlated with total dry matter accumulation and therefore any effect of temperature on total dry matter accumulation affects pod yield (Cox, 1979). High temperature has been reported to reduce partitioning of dry matter between roots and shoots and between vegetative and reproductive structures (Nigam et al., 1994). Partitioning has been identified as the main cause for yield reductions in controlled environments and in field studies. Wheeler et al. (1997) found that a daytime temperature of 45°C reduced the harvest index by 50% compared to a control temperature of 30°C. Nigam et al., (1994) reported that soybean cultivars consistently showed maximal accumulation and partitioning of dry matter and suggesting that these physiological traits are associated with agronomic improvement (Ergun et al. 2007).
Temperature Effects on Soybean Development
Development is defined as a sequence of phenological events which are influenced by the environment. Temperature is the most critical factor affecting development. High temperature has major effects on plant development, especially during the reproductive stage. Miransari and Smith (2009) found that differences in date of flowering of soybean genotypes were due mainly to differences in growth temperature during growth.
Time to Set Flowering
The reproductive stages, from initiation of flower to anthesis, are considered to be the most sensitive to any supra-optimal temperatures compared with any other crop stages. The timing of flowering and pollination are important determinants of seednumber. Flowering occurs gradually toward the top of the main stem so that flowering, pod development, and rapid seed growth may occur simultaneously at different locations within the plants. The reproductive stages during development are critical in determining yield potential. The number of flowers per plant plays an essential role in determining the yield potential, i.e., sink size and seed filling. However, actual sink size is often limited by environmental stresses. Thomas and Raper (1977) found that temperature controls the number of flowers and pods in soybean. Also, Gross and Kigel (1994) reported a decrease in the flower number and sensitivity of bean to high temperatures. Extreme temperatures during the flowering period can have even more severe effects on fruit set in many agronomic crops such as in cotton compared to plants grown at optimum temperature conditions (Reddy et al., 1999), tomato (Sato et al., 2000), soybean (Ferris et al., 1998), and cowpea (Ahmed et al., 1993). Extensive research has been conducted on the chronology of flower and ovule development in soybeans (Prakash and Chan, 1976; Salem et al., 2007). Soybean pods are set in 18 to 49 d between the first and last flower (Dybing, 1994). In summary, soybean requires 20-25 d for initiation of floral primordium in axial of bract, and for sepal, petal, stamen and carpel differentiation depending on temperature. Ovule initiation takes place 10 d before flowering and anther initiation starts 7 d before flowering. Pollen grains are normally mature one day before flowering. Soybean genotypes differ in their time to flowering in response to temperature (Piper etal., 1996). Bell and Mullet (1991) found that peanut plants grown at 33/23°C temperatures flowered 2-3 d earlier than those at 33/17°C.
Time to Pod Initiation
From the moment fertilization is complete, the fertilized ovary begins to elongate into fruit, while the style and stigma dry out. Maximum pod length is reached rather early in development, about 25 to 30 days after bloom. Approximately, 30 days are required for pod maturation. Plants at optimum temperature produce more nodes and axillary branches and more pods per node compared to high or low temperatures (Thomas and Raper, 1977).
Temperature Effect on Flower and Pod Number
Soybean plant produces more flowers than can develop into pods. Genotypes differ in their time to flowering in response to temperature. About 20 to 80% of the flowers were reported to abscise based on various stresses. Flower initiation was reduced by temperatures greater than 32°C and seed formation was delayed at 40°C (Thomas et al., 2003) in soybean. Koti et al. (2004) reported that soybean genotypes grown under high temperatures (38/30°C) produced smaller and shorter flowers with poor pollen germination compared to flowers at grown at a temperature of 30/22°C. Harmful effects of high temperature on flower number have been recorded in sensitive crops and cultivars. For example, Peet et al. (1997) reported a 17% reduction 17% in flowers in tomato when plants were exposed to a mean temperature of 34°C as compared to optimum temperature. In peanut, Talwar et al. (1999) found similar results; however, the increase was correlated with an increase in leaf numbers and plant dry weight.
The yield component of a soybean crop is based on pod development and seed filling, the two most heat-sensitive stages in soybean (Korte et al., 1983). Temperatures have a significant effect during the reproductive stage and seed filling (Gibson and Mullen, 1996). A temperature of 40°C results in adverse effects on growth rate, flower initiation and pod set for soybean reproduction. Ferris et al. (1998) studied the determinate soybean cultivar, 'Fiskeby V', and reported that the number of pods was increased by 18% under elevated CO2 concentrations and high temperatures. Prasad et al. (2003) reported pod number was reduced in peanuts by a high temperature of 38/22°C. High temperature at podding time reduced pod number by about 32% whilst high temperature at flowering reduced pod number by only 22%.
Temperature Effect on Pollen, Stigma and Ovary
The viability of pollen has been defined as having the ability to live, grow, and germinate. Pollen viability and germination are known as the most heat-sensitive stages among various developmental stages in crops (Stone, 2001). Pollen viability and germination were shown to be the limiting factors during fruit set under high temperatures in tomato (Peet et al., 1998), groundnut (Prasad et al., 2003), and kidney bean (Prasad et al., 2003). Several tests have been developed for a fast and comparable assessment of pollen viability such as staining rates after incubation with fluorescein diacetate (FCR). Schueler et al. (2005) found that the FCR was the most discriminating test for pollen germination. Pollen viability of other crop plants has been studied using various staining techniques, such as 2-3-5-triphenyle tetrazolium chloride (TTC), propionic caramine and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyle-galactoside. Prasad et al. (2003) assesses pollen viability by staining with TTC and reported that pollen viability was reduced when pollen was exposed to night temperatures of 22 and 28°C with day temperatures increasing from 28 to 48°C. High temperature conditions affected development of pollen grains and reduced germination in the bell pepper; these conditions could also possibly affect sucrose utilization in pollen grains. Dane et al. (1991) studied the effect of temperature on tomato pollen. Weaver et al. (1989) reported that flowers that were exposed to temperatures over 35°C have less than 50% of pollen viability and at temperatures over 40°C, the pollen was killed.
Even if pollen grains are viable based on a viability test, pollen must germinate, the pollen tube must grow in length, and fertilization must occur for deed production. ElAhmadi and Stevens (1979) found that viability percentages are not necessarily correlated with successful fertilization of the ovary. In artificial in vitro medium, cotton pollen grains started geminating in about 10 min (Kakani et al., 2005). Tolerance of both pollen germination and pollen tube length to temperature could be used for selecting genotypes for greater seed production in high temperature environments. Temperature affects all aspects of plant growth and development. All biological processes have nonlinear functions that have three coefficients of the cardinal temperature: minimum (Tbase), optimum (Topt), and maximum (Tmax) temperatures. Cardinal temperatures for pollen and pollen tube growth parameters have been reported for many crops. In groundnut, identifying crops with high/low cardinal temperatures for key reproductive processes that may be anticipated in current and future climate conditions may directly contribute to the seed yield enhancement. That may help in defining cultural solutions and breeding strategies to improve heat stress tolerance and may provide better cultivars for a given production area. Previous studies have not reported cardinal temperatures (minimum, optimum and maximum) for soybean reproductive parameters or determined whether genotypic variation exists in pollen tolerance to temperatures. Various in vitro pollen germination technique has recently become one of the most important screening methods for screening crop cultivars for heat tolerance. In vitro pollen germination percentages have been reported for several crops: 35% in apricot, 32% in bell pepper (Erickson et al., 2002), 42% in avocado (Sahar and Spiegel-Roy, 1994), 44% in cotton (Kakani et al., 2005) and 64-76% in soybean (Koti et al., 2004).
Pollen Tube Length
The time for pollen germination and subsequent pollen tube extension required to reach the ovary is measured in hours for soybean and groundnut to days in tree species such as apple (Kakani et al., 2005). Unlike pollen germination percentage, length of pollen tube required for fertilization depends on the length of the style. Exposure to abotic stresses such as temperature may delay the pollen tube growth and length. Cardinal temperatures for reproductive parameters for many crops. Variation in in vitro pollen tube lengths have been reported in several crop species (Kakani et al., 2005).
Stigma Style and Ovule
Although male gametes are very sensitive to high temperature, little information is available on its effect on female reproductive structures (Stigma, style, and ovule) and on flower receptivity. Gross and Kiegal (1994) found lower fruit set due to lower in female receptivity in common bean. Peet et al. (1997) concluded that high viability in pollen grains does not ensure fruit set under high temperatures. Saini and Aspinall (1982) reported that female sterility may have contributed to a decreased grain yield. Approximately 35% of the heat-stressed ovaries contained abnormal embryos and their stigmas had fewer pollen tubes reaching the ovary, decreasing the chances for successful fertilization.
Screening for Heat Tolerance
Abiotic stresses, particularly higher temperatures and periodic episodes of heat and drought, could exacerbate the effect on many aspects of crop growth and development thereby reducing crop yield (Reddy et al., 1999). Different physiological mechanisms may contribute to heat-tolerance in crops. Heat-tolerance metabolism is indicated by higher photosynthetic rates, stay-green and greater membrane thermostablility (Dogan et al., 2007). Heat avoidance is indicated by canopy temperature depression. In any crop improvement programs, the first and foremost requirement is to identify suitable genotypes or lines to be used in breeding after assessing their tolerance to a particular stress. Therefore, it is imperative to use cost effective and reliable techniques to screen available germplasm for various eco-physiological, morphological and reproductive traits to assist their utilization in crop breeding programs. Breeding programs may measure such traits to assist the selection of heat tolerant parents, segregating generations or advanced lines (Reynolds et al., 2001).
Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence
The impacts of high temperature on photosynthesis and several other vegetative growth parameters have been reviewed by Long (1991). Thomas and Raper (1976) found that duration of the vegetative period in soybean was significantly affected by high temperatures. Al-Khatib and Paulsen (1990) found that high temperature decreased the period of photosynthetic activity in wheat. Extensive studies have been conducted on the short-term and long-term effects of temperature on physiological and cellular processes in plants. Short term effects include change in gene expression, such as heat shock protein synthesis, are expected to occur in soybean (Mathilde et al., 2008). Longer-term include modification in the rate of carbon dioxide assimilation and electron transport per unit leaf area, weakened cell carbon metabolism, and finally, a reduced carbon and nitrogen partitioning within and between organs. Thus, crops that are able to maintain cellular stability and crop production despite heat stress may possess a high level of heat tolerance. High temperature has been reported to damage photosynthesis before other processes in sensitive species (Zhang et al., 2007). Photosynthesis was depressed by supraoptimal temperatures in tropical cereal crops (Tashiro and Wardlaw, 1989). The thermal stability of the photosynthetic system, however, differed markedly between species. Therefore, photosynthetic rates are considered a good indicator of thermotolerance in agronomic crops (Al-Khatib and Paulsen, 1990; Reynolds et al., 2001).
Chlorophyll fluorescence is a subtle reflection of primary reactions of photosynthesis. Intricate relationships between fluorescence kinetics and photosynthesis help our understanding of photosynthetic biophysical processes. This technique is useful as a non-invasive tool in eco-physiological studies, and has been used extensively in assessing plant responses to environmental conditions such as water stress, heat stress, salt stress, and chilling stress in many crops (Srinivasan et al., 1996; Sayed, 2003). For example, in wheat, Reynolds et al. (2001) found correlations between the photosynthesis rate and leaf chlorophyll content during grain filling period in a warm environment. The incidence of heat stress during flowering and early seed filling reduced leaf photosynthesis and seed yield in soybean (Gibson and Mullen, 1996). A close relationship between photosynthesis measured after flowering and the seed yield of soybean has also been reported (Egli and Zhen-Wen, 1991). Also, in soybean, Allen and Boote (2000) reported an increase in yield by 33% due to increased photosynthesis, and photosynthesis was shown to be correlated with heat tolerance (Maher et al., 2008a).
In the last few decades, breeding programs have resulted in the release of germplasm adapted for high yielding genotypes but, paying no attention to specific plant traits that might be conducive to higher yields. However, comparing high yielding lines of any crop with low yielding lines shows clearly that many morphological, physiological, and biochemical traits have been altered under hot environment (Elizabeth et al., 2007). Amani et al. (1996) used stomatal conductance as physiological screening method under irrigated conditions and found a relationship under a range of climatic conditions. Lu et al. (1998) found a remarkable positive correlation between increased yield and increases in stomatal conductance. The higher stomatal conductance increases CO2 diffusion into the leaf and favors higher photosynthetic rates that could in turn promote a higher biomass and crop yield. Similarly, Al-Hamdani et al. (1991) found that stomatal conductance appears to be a useful tool for screening sorghum genotypes at the vegetative stage. Stomatal conductance plays an important role in the plant atmosphere water exchange and hence it is a key parameter in many ecological models (Chen et al., 1999). Vilhelmsen et al. (2001) reported that the heritability of stomatal conductance is reasonably high. Therefore, to improve heat tolerance in current cultivars, including discovery and exploitation of new genes was a target in breeding of agricultural crops for higher crop production. Genetic options and the interaction of a wide range of environmental factors determine the yield of soybeans. Screening methods have been used to examine for high temperature during the vegetative growth such as cell membrane thermostability, leaf chlorophyll, stomatal conductance, and photosynthesis. Other methods can be used to screen during the reproductive stage such as pollen germination and pollen tube growth (Maher et al., 2008b).
Cell Membrane Thermostability
Although resistance to high temperatures involves several complex tolerance and avoidance mechanisms, the cell membrane is thought to be a site of primary physiological injury by heat, and measurement of solute leakage from tissue can be used to estimate damage to membranes. The technique of measuring the amount of electrolyte leakage from leaf discs bathed in de-ionized water after exposure to heat treatment was first used by Sullivan (1972) for screening heat-tolerance in crops. Later modification to this method has also been proposed for specific crops. Therefore, cell membrane thermostability has been used as one of the promising selection criterion and an easy tool for screening crops for heat tolerance. In soybean, Martineau et al. (1979) used cell membrane thermostability as a screening method, but with a limited number of genotypes. Shanahan et al. (1990) found that plants with higher CMT yielded better than plants with lower CMT. Similarly, Reynolds et al. (2001) found significant correlation between CMT and wheat production grown in several locations. Ismail and Hall (1999) reported that a cowpea genotype with tolerance to high temperature at flowering and pod-set had higher membrane stability (lower electrolyte leakage) than the susceptible genotypes. In contrast, recent research showed that CMT was not highly correlated with heat tolerance based on reproductive parameters as such as pollen germination and pollen tube length in in cotton (Kakani et al., 2005). However, CMT was found to be positively and significantly correlated with biomass and yield under stress conditions but not with biomass or yield under non-stress conditions (ur Rehaman et al., 2004).
Pollen Germination and Tube Length
Once pollen grain is dispersed from the anther, it remains an independently functional unit and can be directly exposed to environmental stresses such as high temperature. Any increase in temperature during that period can reduce viability and germination, resulting in lower fruit-set. Recently, Prasad et al. (2003) found good correlations between pollen germination, and fruit-set and yield in kidney bean and peanut. For higher seed establishment, pollen must be viable and stigma should be accessible and receptive, a pollen tube must germinate, and fertilization should succeed. In maize, a supra optimal temperature higher than 38°C caused reduction in pollen germination and pollen tube length resulting in lower yield. Tolerance of both pollen germination and pollen tube length to temperature could be used for successful seed production. In vitro pollen studies for both pollen germination and pollen tube length in groundnut and cotton genotypes showed that genotypes varied in response to temperature for cardinal temperature: minimum (Tbase), optimum (Topt), and maximum (Tmax) temperatures, pollen germination percentage and maximum pollen tube length (Kakani et al., 2005). The differences in these cardinal temperatures have been used as screening techniques for tolerance or sensitivity of cotton and groundnut genotypes to high temperature (Kakani et al., 2005). To date, there have been no studies conducted to specifically document in vitro pollen germination and pollen tube growth technique for screening soybean genotypes to high temperatures. Also, there are no studies describing the variation in cardinal temperatures for reproductive parameters in any soybean genotype or whether genotypic variation exists in pollen responses to temperature.
The future projected climate is going to be warmer and global warming could have tremendous and highly significant impacts on crop yield and production. Selection for high temperature tolerance has also occurred in crops such as tomato (El-Ahmadi and Stevens, 1979) and soybean (Martineau et al., 1979). Soybean breeding programs developed some high temperature tolerant genotypes which did not correlate well with high yields, as the introduction of soybean into US is very recent, in 1900s and are derived from a small number of ancestral parents (Carter et al., 1993). Egli and Zhen-wen (1991) reported that high temperature could decrease soybean yields by reducing rates of growth and lower the period of seed filling. A modeling study found that the number of days from planting to flowering or physiological maturity will increase at supra optimal temperatures due to a decrease in reproductive developmental rates. Ismail and Hall (1998) reported that heat-tolerant cowpea genotypes produced less vegetative shoot biomass and higher harvest index compared to heat-sensitive genotypes under very hot conditions. Ferris et al. (1998) documented that grain yield of wheat declined by about 40% with higher temperatures. Nielsen and Hall (1985) found reduction in grain yield of cowpea under field conditions is mainly due to reductions in pod-set and harvest index under high temperature conditions. Peet et al. (1998) studied the effects of high temperature on growth of tomatoes and found that reduced fruit number, fruit weight per plant, and seed number per fruit were only 10%, 6% and 16%, respectively, at 29°C compared with those at 25°C.
Conclusions and Future Perspectives
Examining the mechanism of stress tolerance concomitant with the involved genes in terms of signal network is really important for crop enhancement. If some stress-inducible genes associated with representative performance can be further identified and exerted at a higher level of transcription, then the effect of investigation can carry out a positive regulation of the cellular milieu and plant tolerance. More detailed research in the future, for example, microRNAs emerge as an important role in abiotic stress (Pallavi et al., 2008). In response to the drought stress, the adverse relationship between drought stress and the performance of many biological macromolecules and small molecules involved needs much more study and examination to clear up.
Particularly, it is very intriguing to pay much more efforts to understand what is the possible regulatory mechanism or genes involved on the down or up expression of the transgenic plants under stress resistance. It will be a rather useful guide for the illumination of a sophisticated metabolic network and a feasible strategy to improve stress tolerance toward crop productivity increase. Plant growth and development are coordinalely controlled by several internal factors and environmental signals. To sense these environmental signals, the higher plants have evolved a complex signaling network, which may also cross talk with each other. The perception of extracellular signals is thought to be mediated by various receptors. The abiotic stress signaling in plants involves calcium changes, MAP kinase cascades and phytohormones. The road to engineering such tolerance into sensitive species is still far from us. Much effort is still required to uncover in detail each product of genes induced by abiotic stress and signal transduction pathways. Plant biologists should look forward for defined set of markers to predict tolerance towards a particular type of stress with a definite degree of assurance.
Through this review we tried to describe some aspects of Agroclimatological Factors in soybean plants, which might be useful in current and future soybean breeding programs.
- Adriana G.K, Jorge L. Mercau, Gustavo A. Slafer, Víctor O. Sadras Simulated yield advantages of extending post-flowering development at the expense of a shorter pre-flowering development in soybean. Field Crops Research, 101, 2007, 321-330.
- Ahmed, F. E., A. E. Hall and M. A. Madore. 1993. Interactive effects of high-temperature and elevated carbon dioxide concentration on cowpea (Vigna unguiculata.Walp). Plant, Cell and Environment, 16: 835-842.
- Al-Hamdani, S. H., J. M. Murphy and G. W. Todd. 1991. Stomatal conductance and CO2 assimilation as screening tools for drought resistance in sorghum. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 71: 689-694.
- Al-Khatib, K. and G. M. Paulsen. 1990. Photosynthesis and productivity during hightemperature stress of wheat genotypes from major world regions. Crop Science, 30: 1127-1132.
- Allen, L. H. and K. J. Boote. 2000. Crop ecosystem responses to climate change: Soybean. In: Reddy, K. R., and H. F. Hodges (eds.). Climate Change and Global
- Amani, I., R. A. Fischer and M. P. Reynolds. 1996. Canopy temperature depression association with yield of irrigated spring wheat cultivars in hot climate. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 176: 119-129.
- Bell, E. and J. Mullet. 1991. Lipoxygenase gene expression is modulated in plants by water deficit, wounding, and methyl jasmonate. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 230: 456-462.
- Boote, K. J., J. W. Jones, G. Hoogenboom and G. G. Wilkerson. 1997. Evaluation of the CROPGRO-Soybean model over a wide range of experiments. In: Kropff et al. (ed.) Systems Approaches for Sustainable Agricultural Aevelopment: Applications of Systems Approaches at the Field Level. Kluwer Academic Publ., Boston. pp. 113-133.
- C. Tang, X.Z. Han, Y.F. Qiao, S.J. Zheng. Phosphorus deficiency does not enhance proton release by roots of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Murr.]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 67, 2009, 228-234.
- Carla G.Z, Karina B. Balestrasse, Gustavo G. Yannarelli, Ariel H. Polizio, Diego M. Santa-Cruz, María L. Tomaro. Heme oxygenase up-regulation under salt stress protects nitrogen metabolism in nodules of soybean plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 64, 2008, Pages 83-89
- Carlson, J. B. and N. R. Lersten. 1987. Reproductive morphology. In: Wilcox, J. R. (Ed.). soybeans: Improvement, Production, and Uses. Agronomy, Monogr. 16. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI. pp. 97-132.
- Carter, T. E., Jr., Z. Gizlice and J. W. Burton. 1993. Coefficient-of-parentage and genetic similarity estimates for 258 North American soybean cultivars released by public agencies during 1945-1988. U.S. Dep. of Agric. Tech. Bull. Num. 1814. U.S. Govt. Print. Office, Washington, DC.
- Chen, J. M, J. Liu., J. Cihlar and M. L. Goulden. 1999. Daily canopy photosynthesis model through temporal and spatial scaling for remote sensing applications. Ecological Modelling, 124: 99-119.
- Cheng L., Shu-yan LI, Guang-yuan HE. Isolation and Expression Profile Analysis of Genes Relevant to Chilling Stress During Seed Imbibition in Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Meer.]. Agricultural Sciences in China, 8, 2009, 521-528
- Ciais, Ph., M. Reichstein, N. Viovy, A. Granier, J. Ogee, V. Allard, M. Aubinet, N. Buchmann, Chr. Bernhofer, A. Carrara, F. Chevallier, N. De Noblet, A. D. Friend, Cox, F. R. 1979. Effect of temperature treatment on vegetative and fruit growth. Peanut Science, 6: 14-17.
- Craufurd, P. Q., A. Qi, R. H. Ellis, R. J. Summerfield, E. H. Roberts and V. Crop Productivity. CAB International, Cambridge University Press, UK. pp.133160.
- Dane, F., A. G. Hunter and O. L. Chambliss. 1991. Fruit set, pollen fertility, and combining ability of selected tomato genotypes under high temperature field conditions. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science, 116: 906-910.
- Dogan E, Halil Kirnak, Osman Copur Deficit irrigations during soybean reproductive stages and CROPGRO-soybean simulations under semi-arid climatic conditions. Field Crops Research, 103, 2007, 154-159
- Duvick, D. N. and Cassman, K. G. 1999. Post-green revolution trends in yield potential of temperate maize in the North-Central United States. Crop Science, 39: 1622-1630.
- Dybing, C. D. 1994. Soybean flower production as related to plant growth and seed yield. Crop Science, 34: 489-497.
- Egli, D. B. and Y. Zhen-wen. 1991. Crop growth rate and seed number per unit area in soybean. Crop Science, 31: 439-442.
- Elizabeth R., Andrea Galatro, Susana Puntarulo. Iron role in oxidative metabolism of soybean axes upon growth: Effect of iron overload. Plant Science, 172, 2007, 939-947.
- Ergun D., Halil Kirnak, Osman Copur. Effect of seasonal water stress on soybean and site specific evaluation of CROPGRO-Soybean model under semi-arid climatic conditions. Agricultural Water Management, Volume 90, 2007, 56-62.
- Erickson, A. N. and A. H. Markhart. 2002. Flower developmental stage and organ sensitivity of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) to elevated temperature. Plant, Cell and Environment, 25: 123-130.
- Eunsook C., Chang-Woo Cho, Bo-Hyun Yun, Hong-Kyu Choi, Hyun-Ah So, Seon-Woo Lee, Jai-Heon Lee. Molecular cloning and characterization of the soybean DEAD-box RNA helicase gene induced by low temperature and high salinity stress. Gene, 443, 2009, 91-99.
- Fang S., Ryo Yamamoto, Satoshi Shimamura, Susumu Hiraga, Norikazu Nakayama, Takuji Nakamura, Kiyoshi Yukawa, Mayumi Hachinohe, Hiroshi Matsumoto, Setsuko Komatsu. Cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase 2 (cAPX 2) is involved in the soybean response to flooding. Phytochemistry, 69, 2008, 1295-1303.
- FAO, 2005. Online at http ://www.fao.org/
- Ferris, R., T. R. Wheeler, P. Hadley and R. H. Ellis. 1998. Recovery of photosynthesis after environmental stress in soybean grown under elevated CO2. Crop Science, 38: 948-955.
- Fokar, M., H. T. Nguyen and A. Blum. 1998. Heat tolerance in spring wheat: I. Genetic variability and heritability of cellular thermotolerance. Euphytica, 104: 1-8.
- Gibson, L. R. and R. E. Mullen. 1996. Soybean seed quality reductions by high day and night temperature. Crop Science, 36: 1615-1619.
- Gross, Y. and J. Kigel. 1994. Differential sensitivity to high temperature of stages in the reproductive development of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Field Crops Research, 36: 201-212.
- Hansen, J. and M. Sato. 2004. Greenhouse gas growth rates. National Academy of sciences, 101: 16109-16114.
- Hiroyuki T, Kumiko Fukuda-Yamada, Toshio Kojima, Masakazu Shiraiwa, Hidenari Takahara. Molecular characterization of a novel soybean gene encoding a neutral PR-5 protein induced by high-salt stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 47, 2009, 73-79.
- Hofstra G. and J. D. Hesketh. 1969. The effect of temperature on stomatal aperture in different species. Canadian Journal of Botany, 47: 21-32.
- Houghton, J. T. 2001. Climate change: The Scientific Basis. Contributions of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, pp.1-94. Cambridge University Press.
- Huang J., Shu-Jing Sun, Dong-Qing Xu, Xia Yang, Yong-Mei Bao, Zhou-Fei Wang, Hai-Juan Tang, Hongsheng Zhang. Increased tolerance of rice to cold, drought and oxidative stresses mediated by the overexpression of a gene that encodes the zinc finger protein ZFP245. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 389, 20 2009, 556-561.
- Ismail, A. M. and A. E. Hall. 1999. Reproductive-stage heat tolerance, leaf membrane thermostability and plant morphology in cowpea. Crop Science, 39: 1762-1768
- Jaleel C.A, R. Gopi, G. M. Alagulakshmanan and R. Panneerselvam, Triadimefon induced changes in the antioxidant metabolism and ajmalicine production in Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don. Plant Science, 2006; 171: 271-276.
- Jaleel C.A, Paramasivam Manivannan, G.M.A. Lakshmanan, Ramalingam Sridharan, R. Panneerselvam. NaCl as a physiological modulator of proline metabolism and antioxidant potential in Phyllanthus amarus. Comptes Rendus Biologies. 2007; 330, 806-813.
- Jaleel C.A., P. Manivannan, G.M.A. Lakshmanan, M. Gomathinayagam, R. Panneerselvam. Alterations in morphological parameters and photosynthetic pigment responses of Catharanthus roseus under soil water deficits. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 61/2 (2008) 298-303.
- Jaleel C.A, R. Gopi, P. Manivannan, M. Gomathinayagam, Ksouri Riadh, Jallali Inès, Zhao Chang-Xing, Shao Hong-Bo, R. Panneerselvam. Antioxidant defense responses: Physiological plasticity in higher plants under abiotic constraints. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 31/3, (2009) 427-436.
- Jegor M., Hideki Kurosaki, Joe W. Burton, Milica Hrustic, Dragana Miladinovic. The adaptability of short season soybean genotypes to varying longitudinal regions European Journal of Agronomy, 25, 2006, 243-249
- Jayakumar K., P. Vijayarengan, Zhao Chang-Xing, C.A. Jaleel. Soil applied cobalt alters the nodulation, leg-haemoglobin content and antioxidant status of Glycine max (L.) Merr. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 67 (2) 2008: 272-275.
- Kakani, V. G., K. R. Reddy, S. Koti, T. P. Wallace, P. V. V. Prasad, V. R. Reddy and D. Karim, M. A., Y. Fracheboud and P. Stamp. 2000. Effect of high temperature on seedling growth and photosynthesis of tropical maize genotypes. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 184: 217-223.
- Kendall, H. and D. Pimentel. 1994. Constraints on the expansion of the global food supply. Ambio, 23: 198-205
- Kenji K., Yumiko Yamashita, Tomoko Ozawa, Naomi Imanishi, Nguyen Tran Nguyen, Ryuichi Suwa, Pravat Kumar Mohapatra, Syunsuke Kanai, Reda E. Moghaieb, Junki Ito, Hany El-Shemy, Kounosuke Fujita. Photosynthetic acclimation to elevated CO2 is dependent on N partitioning and transpiration in soybean. Plant Science, 177, 2009, 398-403.
- Kent O.B., T.E. Carter Jr. Foliar resistance to ozone injury in the genetic base of U.S. and Canadian soybean and prediction of resistance in descendent cultivars using coefficient of parentage. Field Crops Research, 111, 2009, 207-217
- Korte, L. L., J. H. Williams, J. E. Specht and R. C. Sorenson. 1983. Irrigation of soybean genotypes during reproductive ontogeny. I. Agronomic responses. Crop Science, 23: 521-527.
- Koti, S., K. R. Reddy., V. G. Kakani, D. Zhao and V. R. Reddy. 2004. Soybean (Glycine max) pollen germination characteristics, flower and pollen morphology in response to enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation. Annals of Botany, 94: 855-864.
- Lobell, D. B. and G. P. Asner. 2003. Climate and management contributions to recent trends in U.S. agricultural yields. Science, 299: 1032.
- Long, S. P. 1991. Modification of the response of photosynthetic productivity to rising temperature by atmospheric CO2 concentrations: Has its importance been underestimated. Plant, Cell and Environment, 14: 729-739.
- Lu, Z., R. G. Percy, C. O. Qualset and E. Zeiger. 1998. Stomatal conductance predicts yields in irrigated Pima cotton and bread wheat grown at high temperatures. Journal of Experimental Botany, 49: 453-460.
- M. Miransari, D.L. Smith. Alleviating salt stress on soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) - Bradyrhizobium japonicum symbiosis, using signal molecule genistein. European Journal of Soil Biology, Volume 45, 2009, 146-152
- Mahalakshmi. 1998. Effect of temperature on time to panicle initiation and leaf appearance in sorghum. Crop Science, 38: 942-947.
- Maher B.J., Nader Katerji, Marcello Mastrorilli, Gianfranco Rana. Analysis of the effect of ozone on soybean in the Mediterranean region: I. The consequences on crop-water status. European Journal of Agronomy, 28, 2008a, 508-518.
- Maher B.J., Nader Katerji, Marcello Mastrorilli, Gianfranco Rana. Analysis of the ozone effect on soybean in the Mediterranean region: II. The consequences on growth, yield and water use efficiency. European Journal of Agronomy, 28, 2008b, 519-525.
- Mahmoud T., Kiyoshi Yukawa, Mohammad-Zaman Nouri, Setsuko Komatsu. Proteomics approach for identifying osmotic-stress-related proteins in soybean roots Peptides, 30, 2009, 2108-2117.
- Markley, K. S. (Eds). Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York. pp 3-59.
- Mathilde C., Annie Lambert, Didier Herouart, Eric Boncompagni. Identification of new up-regulated genes under drought stress in soybean nodules. Gene, 426, 2008, 15-22
- Matsuyama A, Kazuma Yoshimura, Chie Shimizu, Yoshihiro Murano, Hiroyuki Takeuchi, Masao Ishimoto. Characterization of glutamate decarboxylase mediating α-amino butyric acid increase in the early germination stage of soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr). Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 107, 2009, 538-543.
- Meehl, G. A. and C. Tebaldi, 2004: More intense, more frequent, and longer lasting heat waves in the 21st century. Science, 305: 994-997.
- Monterroso, V. A. and H. C. Wien. 1990. Flower and pod abscission due to heat stress in beans. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science, 115: 631-634.
- Morse, W. J. 1950. History of soybean production. In: Soybeans and Soybean Products.
- Nielsen, C. L. and A. E. Hall. 1985. Responses of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) in the field to high night air temperature during flowering. II. Plant responses. Field Crops Research, 10: 181-196.
- Nigam, S. N., R. C. Nageswara Rao, J. C. Wynne, J. H. Williams, M. Fitzner and G. V. S. Nagabhushanam. 1994. Effect and interaction of temperature and photoperiod on growth and partitioning in three groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes. Annals of Applied Biology, 125: 541-552.
- Calviño P. A., V. O. Sadras and F. H. Andrade. Development, growth and yield of late-sown soybean in the southern Pampas. European Journal of Agronomy, 19, 2, 2003, 265-275
- Friedlingstein P., T. Grunwald, B. Heinesch, P. Keronen, A. Knohl, G. Krinner, D. Loustau, G. Manca, G. Matteucci, F. Miglietta, J. M. Ourcival, D. Papale, K. Pilegaard, S. Rambal, G. Seufert, J. F. Soussana, M. J. Sanz, E. D. Schulze, T. Vesala and R. Valentini. 2005. Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature, 437: 529-533.
- Pallavi P., Won-Seok Kim, Rebecca E. Cahoon, Joseph M. Jez, Hari B. Krishnan. The role of 5'-adenylylsulfate reductase in the sulfur assimilation pathway of soybean: Molecular cloning, kinetic characterization, and gene expression. Phytochemistry, 69, 2008, 356-364.
- Pinheiro G.L., Carolina S. Marques, Maximiller D.B.L. Costa, Pedro A.B. Reis, Murilo S. Alves, Claudine M. Carvalho, Luciano G. Fietto, Elizabeth P.B. Fontes. Complete inventory of soybean NAC transcription factors: Sequence conservation and expression analysis uncover their distinct roles in stress response. Gene, 444, 2009, 10-23.
- Piper, E.L., K.J. Boote, J.W Jones and S.S. Grimm. 1996. Comparison of two phenology models for predicting flowering and maturity date of soybean. Crop Science, 36: 1606-1614
- Poehlman, J. M. and D. A. Sleper. 1995. Breeding Field Crops. 4th (ed). Ames, IA. Iowa State University Press, pp. 259-265.
- Porch, T. G. and M. Jahn. 2001. Effects of high-temperature stress on microsporogenesis in heat-sensitive and heat-tolerant genotypes of Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant, Cell and Environment, 24: 723-731.
- Prakash, N. and Y.Y. Chan. 1976. Embryology of Glycine max. Phytomorphology, 26: 302-309.
- Prasad, P. V. V., K. J. Boote, H. Allen and J. M. G. Thomas. 2003. Super-optimal temperatures are detrimental to peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) reproductive processes and yield at both ambient and elevated carbon dioxide. Global Change Biology, 9: 1775-1787.
- Qian P., Q. Zhou. Influence of lanthanum on chloroplast ultrastructure of soybean leaves under ultraviolet-B stress. Journal of Rare Earths, 27, 2009, Pages 304-307.
- Raper L.R. Parson, D. T. Patterson and P. J. Kramer. 1977. Relationship between growth and nitrogen accumulation for vegetative cotton and soybean plants. Botanical Gazette, 138: 129-137.
- Reddy, K. R. and Hodges H. F. 2000. Crop ecosystem responses to global climate change: cotton. In: Reddy K. R, Hodges H. F. (Eds). Climate Change and Global Productivity. Wallingford: CAB Inter national. pp 161-187.
- Reddy, K. R., V. R. Reddy and H. F. Hodges. 1992. Effects of temperature on early season cotton growth and development. Agronomy Journal, 84: 229-237.
- Reddy, K.R., G. H. Davidonis, A. S. Johnson and B.T. Vinyard. 1999. Temperature regime and carbon dioxide enrichment alter cotton boll development and fiber properties. Agronomy Journal, 91: 851-858.
- Reynolds, M. P., S. Nagararan, M. A. Razzaque and O. A. A. Ageeb. 2001. Heat tolerance. In: Reynolds, M. P., J. I. Ortiz-Monasterio and A. McNab. (Eds). Sahar, N. and P. Spiegel-Roy.1984. In vitro germination of avocado pollen. HortScience, 19: 886-888.
- Saini, H. S. and D. Aspinall. 1982. Abnormal sporogenesis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) induced by short periods of high temperature. Annals of Botany, 49: 835-846.
- Salem M.A., Vijaya Gopal Kakani, Sailaja Koti, Raja Reddy K (2007) Pollen-Based Screening of Soybean Genotypes for High Temperatures. Crop Sci 47: 219-231.
- Sato, S., M. M. Peet and J. F. Thomas. 2000. Physiological factors limit fruit set of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under chronic high temperature stress. Plant, Cell and Environment, 23: 719-726.
- Sato, S., M. M. Peet and J. F. Thomas. 2002. Determining critical pre- and post-anthesis periods and physiological processes in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. exposed to moderately elevated temperatures. Journal of Experimental Botany, 53: 1187-1195.
- Sayed, O. H. 2003. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool in cereal crop research. Photosynthetica, 41: 321-330.
- Schueler, S., K. H. Schlünzen and F. Scholz. 2005. Viability and sunlight sensitivity of oak pollen and its implications for pollen-mediated gene flow. Trees, 19: 154-161.
- Shanahan, J. F., I. B. Edwards, J. S. Quick and J. R. Fenwick. 1990. Membrane thermostability and heat tolerance of spring wheat. Crop Science, 30: 247-251.
- Shao H.B, Li-Ye Chu, C. Abdul Jaleel, P. Manivannan, R. Panneerselvam, M.A. Shao. Understanding water deficit stress-induced changes in the basic metabolism of higher plants-biotechnologically and sustainably improving agriculture and the ecoenvironment in arid regions of the globe. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 29/2: 2009, 131-151.
- Srinivasan, A., H. Takeda and T. Senboku. 1996. Heat tolerance in food legumes as evaluated by cell membrane thermostability and chlorophyll fluorescence techniques. Euphytica, 88: 35-45.
- Stainforth, D., T. Aina, C. Christensen, M. Collins, N. Faull, D. Frame, J. Kettleborough, S. Knight, A. Martin, J. M. Murphy, C. Piani, D. Sexton, L. A. Smith, R. Spicer, A. Thorpe and M. Allen. 2005. Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Nature, 433: 403-406.
- Stone, P. 2001. The effects of heat stress on cereal yield and quality. In: A.S. Basra. (Ed.) Crop Responses and Adaptations to Temperature Stress. Food Products Press, Binghamton, NY. pp. 243-291.
- Sullivan, C. Y. 1972. Mechanisms of heat and drought resistance in grain sorghum and methods of measurement. In: Rao N.G.P and L. R. House (Eds.). Sorghum in the seventies. New Delhi, India: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. pp 247-264.
- Suzuki, K.,
Cite This Essay
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: