Table of Contents
Milk total bacterial count (TBC) is an indication of on-farm hygiene practices and microbial quality of raw milk. TBC bacteria include staphylococcal aureus, streptococcal aureus, coliforms, enterobacteriaceae and E.coli. In 2015, the milk quota was abolished, due to this abolition it gave farmers the opportunity to expand their herds. Subsequently, an increased herd means raw milk will be stored on farms for longer periods of time (O’Connell et al., 2016). Milk supplied in Lee Strand Co-operative is separated as liquid milk and manufacturing milk. TBC results are kept on file and any supplier with results over the threshold will be manufacturer processed the following month. Liquid milk produce requires strict standards as it is a ready-to-eat product with severe consequences if viable bacteria numbers are present (Sugrue., 2018). Microbial growth increases the longer it is stored on farm. There are many EU regulations in place to ensure the safe production of milk that is safe for human consumption. Ireland have a threshold of 100,000 cfu/ml for TBC (EC regulation no. 852-853/2004). Cfu/ml are colony forming units per ml which is a measure of bacteria numbers. Milk exceeding this threshold cannot be accepted by liquid milk processors. Milk not accepted by the processors mean the milk must be discarded. Discarded milk is a massive loss to the farmer’s profit, making good farming practises their most valuable asset. Farmer’s with low TBC counts carry out hygienic farm practices. Farmers’ will be provided with a milk quality bonus for supplying good quality milk. TBC above standards is high risk contamination and can cause serious consequences to the food chain. The majority of liquid milk processors implement an initiative to maintain standards such as deductions if thresholds are disobeyed. TBC is influenced by many on-farm factors. TBC and on farm practices have stayed relevant over the years with hygiene practices still contributing to total bacteria counts. The aim of this literature review is to identify ways to improve total bacterial counts on farms and to research if different hygiene programmes have different impacts on plate counts. It will also be researched what environments have an impact on total bacteria count. Udder hygiene (Galton et al., 1983), teat preparation (Gleeson et al., 2009), milking plant hygiene (Neijenhuis et al., 2001) and winter housing are all foundations of lowering the risk of bacterial contamination.
Our academic experts are ready and waiting to assist with any writing project you may have. From simple essay plans, through to full dissertations, you can guarantee we have a service perfectly matched to your needs.View our services
The dairy sector accounts for over 50% of the agricultural industry in Ireland, making the production of high quality milk vital especially for liquid milk producers. After the abolition of the milk quota, Ireland’s dairy milk production increased by 40% (Creed, 2017). With the expansion of herds, it is important farmers still place a good emphasis on the quality of their milk. There is a close link between farm practices and bacterial count (Elmoslemany et al., 2010).
There are many factors that affect the growth of microbes in raw milk:
Dairy hygiene programmes include hygiene of teats pre milking, hygiene of the cow’s udder, hygiene of the milking plant, and milk cooling systems and storage and winter housing periods.
Milking plant hygiene: An operational hygiene routine should be in place to disinfect the milking plant. Bacteria, if left in milk lines can multiply. This can comprise of washing the milking plant before milking or after or both. The cleanliness of milking machines has a direct association with increasing the contact between bacteria and teat ends. Bacteria numbers can be transmitted via the cluster from cow to cow and quarter to quarter. Making teat preparation an important factor pre-milking. If all teats are cleaned adequately, bacterial transmitting will be reduced. Propeller motions of the milking machine vacuum system can aid in the direct transmission of bacteria from the outside of the teat into the teat end (Bramley et al., 1992). Is there a relationship between TBC and SCC? Milk suppliers in Lee Strand who have a high SCC result also tend to have an increased TBC result (Sugrue., 2018). Lopes., (2012) concluded that with increasing bacteria shredding on the teat end, the greater the occurrence of a bacterial infection. The occurrence of a bacterial infection invariably increased SCC. If good hygiene practices are in place, TBC will be reduced, therefore reducing the risk of infections which will in turn, reduce SCC. Good teat conditions are important to reduce risk of bacterial contaminations as they are the first line of defence. Muscles on the outside of the teat contract during milking’s to act as a barrier against bacteria entering the teat gland. Milking machines can damage and change the structure of the teat which reduces its ability to protect the gland against bacteria. “Teat-end callosity” or “hyperkeratosis” result in the thickening of the skin around the teat. Cows with abnormal “teat lengths, teat positions and teat shape” are more prone to developing hyperkeratosis. Hyperkeratosis is developed by extreme vacuum pulsations and liner slipping during milking (Neijenhuis et al., 2001). Hyperkeratosis or teat-end callosity can be prevented by avoiding over-milking the cow or providing an adequate dry period and hygiene routines (Emre and Alacam., 2015). There is a strong correlation between hyperkeratosis and mastitis. Mastitis will occur if bacteria numbers on clusters are high. Gleeson et al., (2004), stated that teats not disinfected after milking had a higher incidence of developing hyperkeratosis which invariably will increase the risk of mastitis and increase bacteria count in milk. Teats can change and develop a hardening on the skin during severe weather conditions. It is important that teats are protected after milking always. An effective way to reduce the incidence of bacterial transmission via the milking machine is to implement a hygiene protocol routine. Circulating hot water and a detergent at correct volume rates through the milking plant lines is the most common cleaning routine. A standard rule of thumb is to have water basins of 14 litres per milking unit to be sufficient enough for cleaning. The most common wash routine includes: Removing any soil on jars, clusters and parlour floor with jetters to remove any heavily soiled areas. Pre rinsing the plant with water at 30oC to remove milk residues, followed by circulating the plant with hot water at 85oC and adding the detergent half way through this stage. To finalise the wash routine, a circulation of cold water through the plant to remove any detergent residues in the milk line which could contaminate milk at the next milking. Some farmers only implement a hot wash routine once a week but research has shown it is the most effective way to reduce bacterial numbers. Modern milking parlours have a built in automatic washing system, which, if implemented correctly can increase labour efficiency (Luciana et al., 2010). Cluster flushing is also a component of new parlours, which eliminates cluster dipping in between cows reducing bacteria numbers that will increase bacteria count.
Teat hygiene pre-milking: A good teat hygiene routine pre-milking must be carried out at each milking to reduce the risk of environmental bacterial contamination into milk. Pre-milking hygiene is the most vital routine a farmer can carry out to try and eliminate and reduce bacteria counts. Hygiene of the teats is the last place in which a farmer can try and control or eliminate bacteria entering the milk. Having a low TBC increases profits and provides a high standard of milk. A research carried out by (Gleeson et al., 2009), provided different pre-milking udder wash routines to groupings of 10 animals. These routines included; an iodine wash, a chlorhexidine foam disinfectant, the use of a paper towel to wash and dry the udder, no preparation at all, a chlorine teat foam and disinfectant wipes. Gleeson et al, found that there was a significant reduction in bacteria on the teats when pre-teat preparations were carried out. Gleeson et al, concluded that using a chlorine dip resulted in a 30% reduction in microbes, iodine resulted in an 18% reduction, and disinfectant wipes and chlorohexidine had a 20% reduction in microbes. No preparation of the teat pre-milking had no effect on microbial count. Magnusson et al., observed that the use of a moist towel followed by a paper towel to dry the teat, was the most effective way to reduce microbial numbers pre-milking. Although implementing a pre-teat hygiene programme increases labour time and costs due to disinfectant costs, it greatly reduces the incidence of bacterial contamination and infection which in turn, increases profit margins. Mastitis incidence can be reduced by up to 43% when implementing a pre-milking teat hygiene practice to reduce bacteria numbers occurring (Oliver et al., 1993). These costs can be massive to a farmer with costs occurring for discarded milk and antibiotic treatment of the infected cow. Along with pre-milk teat hygiene, care of the udder is also important. Udder preparation resulted in the lowest plate count of bacteria (Galton et al., 1983). Fore stripping the udder can be done to check for any clots in the milk which indicates a mastitis infection which in turn will increase TBC (Watters et al., 2012). Keeping the udder clean will in turn make pre-milking hygiene practices quicker which reduces labour time. A healthy udder will reduce the incidence of mastitis. Udders should be checked daily for signs of mastitis by fore milking the cow. Any cow with signs of mastitis should be milked separately and into a different holding tank. This cluster used to milk this cow should be flushed to avoid contamination to the next cow. If communal cloths are being used to wash cows pre-milking, any cow with mastitis signs should not be washed with this cloth as infection can be spread to the next cow. Udder health also includes clipping of the hair on the udder to avoid clumps of dirt and faeces collecting on the udder (Dufour., 2010).
Post-milking teat disinfection and hygiene effects on mastitis incidence: The occurrence of mastitis on farms causes an increase in bacteria numbers in milk. Farmers who implement both a pre-milking and post-milking teat disinfection programme have significantly reduced bacteria counts. Post milking teat dipping is a preventative for mastitis (Yu et al., 2017). Post-milking teat dipping reduced bacteria numbers multiplying on the teat. Mastitis is an inevitable situation on most dairy farms resulting in losses and reducing the overall quality of milk. Pathogens within the environment are the main cause of the occurrence of clinical mastitis in dairy herds. Control of environmental pathogens will invariably reduce the cost on antibiotic treatment (Smith and Hogan., 2016). A study was carried out by Wesen and Schultz (1970) to examine the efficacy of post-milking teat dips. They concluded that teats that were dipped with iodine directly after milking had a 53.2% reduction in udder infections than those who were not post-dipped. Wesen and Schultz concluded that a post-dip was the most effective way to prevent new infections occurring, therefore lowering bacteria numbers.
Milk cooling: When milk leaves the udder it is 35oC and needs to be cooled rapidly in order to reduce the growth of microbes (Wildridge et al., 2018). After rapid cooling the milk must be kept at a steady temperature to ensure no further microbial contamination. Milk kept at a storage above 15oC has the ability to rapidly multiply bacteria numbers. (Paludetti et al., 2018). Along with the reduction of bacterial numbers, Murphy et al., (2016) has stated that pre-cooling milk also saves on energy costs of up to 50%. Pre-cooling significantly decreases the temperature of milk before it reaches the bulk tank. Pre-cooling is also very efficient as the water implemented in the pre-cooling stage can be used to wash dairy floors and udders. According to O’Connell et al., (2016), milk that is supplied every day only requires a cooling temperature of 8oC, whereas milk that is held for more than 48 hours requires a cooling temperature of 2-4oC to minimize microbial growth. Plate cooling is an effective way to help reduce the milk temperature rapidly. There are different types of plate cooling systems- single stage and 2 stage plate cooling system. A single stage plate cooler implements a mains or well water and supply. A double stage plate cooler uses mains or well water along with an ice bank to significantly reduce the temperature even further before entering the bulk tank. Typically a single stage plate cooler cools the milk from 35oC to 17oC and a double stage plate cooler cools the milk rapidly from 35oC to 6oC (Paludetti et al., 2018). O’Connel et al., (2016) observed that milk stored at 2oC and 4oC had no increase in bacterial numbers whereas milk stored at 6oC or more was seen to have a substantial bacterial growth rate after 36 hours. Regardless of the quality of milk entering the storage tank, inadequate cooling has a significant impact on microbial growth. Murphy et al., (2016) indicated that cow milk has <1,000 cfu/ml when it leaves the udder, <3000 cfu/ml after leaving the milk lines and if adequate cooling systems are in place, <5,000 cfu/ml in the bulk tank. This is if hygiene programmes are run at each phase of milking. These TBC results will solely be dependent on the first bacteria count leaving the udder. So, if a cow had a bacterial infection, the first TBC leaving the udder would be generally higher, consequently increasing throughout the milking process.
Environment and seasonality effects on bacteria counts: With Irish dairy farms predominantly grass based, cattle are housed for the winter period of the year. When housed, cattle are very susceptible to contamination from bacteria if housing hasn’t been cleaned adequately (Oliver et al., 2005). A clean environment is essential for quality milk production and animal welfare (Hauge et al., 2012). Bacteria numbers rapidly increase when faeces is not trafficked through slats (Ward et al., 2002). Trafficking occurs when cattle move freely around the slated shed, pushing faeces down into the slats while doing so. A shed low stocked has less trafficking, therefore increasing faeces build up. Automatic scrapers have become a big part of modern farming. Automatic scrapers are activated by a timer and scrape animal waste down the slats as often as the farmer allows. The implementation of automatic scrapes reduces labour time and Bramm et al., (1997) has stated that automatic scrapers decrease ammonia emissions. Cattle housing is most important in terms of cleanliness. Faeces from cattle contain enterobacteriaceae which can potentially cause a foodborne illness (Hauge et al., 2012). In low tbc herds, 97% of farmers implemented a regular clipping and a pre and post dipping routine (Hauge et al., 2012), and 84% of farmers claimed they scraped out housing 2 times a day. Housing design is also an important factor for cow cleanliness. Kirkland and Steen., (2001), observed that housing with good ventilation had reduced condensation. Condensation results in wet bedding and cattle which influences bacteria growth. It was experimented by Barbari and Ferrari (2014) that mats on cubicles with 3.3kg of straw per cow was the best practice for low TBC results. It is important to note that when implementing a straw bedding routine, a good infrastructure must be in place. If poor ventilation is present in a cubicle shed, condensation will occur. Condensation wetting the straw will provide an environment favourable for bacteria growth which can be transferred onto the cow’s teat. High TBC results came from farms where cows were in cubicles with no mats or bedding. An acceptable level of hygiene and relatively low TBC comes from cows on cubicles with mats. This practice is one most implemented on the majority of Irish farms as it is more labour efficient. Although, implementing a housing with straw bedding is a high input cost and high labour, if carried out correctly, TBC will be significantly lower.
TBC results are a major factor of liquid milk production to produce a high standard quality of milk. With strict regulations outlined in the EU regulation 852-853/2004 it is important farmers adhere to hygiene protocols. As outlined in regulation no. 853/2004 it is mandatory for the liquid milk processors to carry out at least 2 TBC tests a month. Acceptable criterion is that all milk samples are below threshold of 100,000 cfu/ml in order to be accepted (FSAI., 2004). Cattle housing are the first source where bacteria can grow. A clean, hygienic housing implements an easier milking routine. Hauge et al., (2012) concluded that 68% of farmers that had a high TBC resulted admitted to only scraping out houses every 2 days and not implementing a teat hygiene routine. The next source of contamination occurs in the dairy. Applying a teat hygiene programme is important to reduce bacteria numbers entering the milk (Gleeson et al., 2009). It is vital that liquid milk production is of high quality standard as it is a ready-to-eat product (FSAI., 2004). The production of liquid milk requires strict on-farm hygiene protocols that must be carried out. Gleeson et al., (2009), concluded a chlorine or chlorhexidine pre-milking teat dip resulted in the lowest TBC. The initial TBC leaving the udder is the most important, low TBC at the first stage will result in a low TBC throughout if conditions are right (Murphy et al., 2006).
- Barbari, M., Ferrari, P., 2014. Hygienic conditions of milking cows in loose housing systems with different lying areas. Animal production.
- Bramley, A.J., Dodd, F.H., Mein, G.A., 1992. Machine milking and lactation. Insight books, Hurlington, pp 355-368
- Bramm, C.R., Ketelaars, J.J.M.H., Smits, M.C.J., 1997. Effects of floor design and floor cleaning on ammonia emission from cubicle houses for dairy cows. Wageningen journal of life sciences, Volume 45 pp 49-65
- Creed, M., 2017. The dairy sector in Ireland. The department of agriculture, food and marine.
- Dufour, S., Frechette, A., Barkema, H.W., Mussell A., Scholl, D.T., 2010. Effect of udder health management practices on herd somatic cell count. Journal of dairy science Volume 94 pp 563-579
- Elmoslenmany, A.M., Keefe, G.P., Dohoo, I.R., Wichtel J.J., Stryhn, H., Dingwell, R.T., 2010. The association between bulk tank milk analysis for raw milk quality and on-farm management practices. Preventative veterinary medicine.
- Emre, B., Alacam, E., 2015. The occurrence of teat hyperkeratosis in cows and its effect of milk somatic cell counts. Research Gate, pp one-four
- FSAI., 2004. Corrigendum to regulation (EC) no 853/2004 of the European parliament and of the council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin. Official journal of the European union. [online] Assessed on the 17/12/2018
- Galton, D.M., Petersson, L.G., Merrill, W.G., Bandler, D.K., Shuster, D.E., 1983. Effects of Premilking Udder Preparation on Bacterial Population, Sediment, and Iodine Residue in Milk. Journal of dairy science, Volume 67 pp 2580-2589
- Gleeson, D., O’Brien, B., Flynn, J., O’Callaghan, E., Galli, F., 2009. Effects of pre-milking teat preparation procedures on the microbial count on teats prior to cluster application. Irish veterinary journal, Volume 62 pp 461-467
- Gleeson, D., Meaney, W., O’Callaghan, E., Rath, M., 2004. Effect of teat hyperkeratosis on somatic cell counts of dairy cows. Intern j appl res vet med, Volume 2 pp 115-121
- Hauge, S.J., Kielland, C., Ringdal, G., Skjerve, E., Nafstad, O., 2012. Factors associated with cattle cleanliness on Norwegian dairy farms. Journal of dairy science, Volume 95 pp 2485-2496
- Kirkland, R.M., Steen, R.W., 2001. Studies on the effects of housing system on the behaviour, welfare and performance or beef cattle and on factors affecting the cleanliness of housed cattle. pp 30-39
- Lopes, J., Lange, C., Brito, M., Santos, S., Moraes, L., Souzas, G., 2012. Relationship between total bacteria counts and somatic cell counts from mammary quarters infected by mastitis pathogens. Scielo microbiology, Volume 42.
- Luciana, B., Zucali, M., Brasca, M., Zanini, L., 2010. Efficiency of cleaning procedure of milking equipment and bacterial quality of milk. Italian j animal science, Volume 8 pp 387-389
- Magnusson, M., Christiansson, A., Svensson, B., Kolstrup, C., 2006. Effect of different premilking manual teat-cleaning methods on bacterial spores in milk. Journal of dairy science, Volume 89 pp 866-75
- Murphy, M., Upton, J., O’Mahony, M., 2016, Rapid cooling control with varying water and energy consumption. Biosystems engineering, Volume 116 pp 15-22
- Neijenhuis, F., Reinemann, D., Hillerton, E., Baines, J., 2001. Evaluation of bovine teat condition I commercial dairy herds: 4. Relationship between teat-end callosity or hyperkeratosis and mastitis. Mastitis and milk quality, pp 362-365
- O’Connell, A., Ruegg, P.L., Jordan, K., O’Brien, B., Gleeson, D., 2016. The effect of storage temperature and duration on the microbial quality of bulk tank milk. Journal of dairy science, Volume 99 pp 3367-3374
- Oliver, S. P., Gillespie, B.E., Lewis, M.J., Ingle, T.L., Dowlen, H.L., 1994. Evaluation of chlorhexidine as a premilking teat disinfectant for the prevention of intramammary infections during lactation. J. Food Prot. Volume 57 pp 614–618
- Oliver, S.P., Jayarao, B.M., Almeida, R.A., 2005. Foodborne pathogens in milk and the dairy farm environment: food safety and public health implications. Foodborne pathogens and disease, Volume 2 pp 115-129
- Paludetti, L., Kelly, A., O’Brien, B., Jordan, K., Gleeson, D., 2018. The effect of different precooling rates and cold storage on milk microbiological quality and consumption. Journal of dairy science, Volume 101 pp 1921-1929.
- Smith, L., Hogan, J., 2015. Environmental Mastitis. Veterinary clinics of North America: Food animal practice, Volume 9 pp 489-498
- Sugrue, J., 2018. Lee Strand quality manager. [Personal correspondant] Lee Strand Co-operative LTD
- Ward, W., Hughes, R., Faull, J.W., Cripps, W.B., Sutherland, J., 2002. Observational study of temperature, moisture, pH and bacteria in straw bedding, and faecal consistency, cleanliness and mastitis in cows in four dairy herds. The veterinary record, Volume 151 pp 199
- Watters, R.D., Schuring, N., Erb, H.N., Schukken, Y.H., Galton, D.M., 2012. The effect of premilking udder preparation on Holstein cows milked 3 times daily. Journal of dairy science, Volume 95 pp 1170-1176
- Wildridge, A., Thomson, P., Garcia, S., John, A., 2018. The effect of temperature-humidity index on milk yield and milking frequency of dairy cows in pasture-based automatic milking systems. Journal of dairy science Volume 101
- Wesen, D.P., Schultz, L.H., 1970. Effectiveness of a post-milking teat dip in preventing new udder infections. Journal of dairy science, Volume 53 pp 1391-1403
- Yu, J., Ren, Y., Xi, X., Huang, W., Zhang, H., 2016. A novel lactobacilli-based teat disinfectant for improving bacterial communities in the milks of cow teats with subclinical mastitis. Frontiers in Microbiology, Volume 8 pp 1782
- Zucali, M., Bava, L., Tamburini, A., Brasca, M., 2011. Effects of season, milking routine, and cow cleanliness on bacterial and somatic cell counts of bulk tank milk. Journal of dairy research, Volume 78 pp 436-441
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
Related ServicesView all
DMCA / Removal Request
If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have your work published on UKEssays.com then please: