Enzalutamide In Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Biology Essay

Published:

One in seven Canadian men are diagnosed with prostate cancer which is the most common cancer in men. 1 Prostate cancer proliferates in the presence of androgens with majority being testosterone. For these tumours, blockade of androgens typically inhibits tumour growth. Treatments typically include hormonal therapy to remove or reduce androgens in the system. This may involve orchiectomy, antiandrogens (flutamide, bicalutamide), luteinizing-releasing hormone antagonists (leuprolide), and androgen synthesis inhibition (ketoconazole, progesterone). However, in advanced stages of prostate cancer, cells are able to grow without signalling from androgens. The cancer cells are no long sensitive to blocking these signals which leads to resistance in therapy. This type of condition was previously known as hormone-resistant prostate cancer, however has evolved its name to castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) due to the fact that the proliferation of the cancer cells were partially due to over expression of androgen receptors. Enzalutamide is an androgen-receptor signalling inhibitor and was chosen as an agent to combat against CRPC on the basis that it has high activity towards overexpression of androgen receptors.

Lady using a tablet
Lady using a tablet

Professional

Essay Writers

Lady Using Tablet

Get your grade
or your money back

using our Essay Writing Service!

Essay Writing Service

CRPC may be defined as a progression of disease despite the use of androgen depletion therapy. It may be presented as a rise in prostate serum antigen (PSA), progression of the disease, and the presence of metastases.

Current Guidelines on CRPC

Based on the Canadian Urological Association guidelines, the first line therapy for CRPC involves a second attempt at hormonal treatment. Currently there is no evidence on the survival benefit of secondary hormonal treatment, however the studies done in this area have been small and confounded. Typically patients are treated with luteinizing-releasing hormone agonist as monotherapy or those with orchidectomy a total androgen blocker (eg. bicalutamide) may be used. These treatments may offer PSA reduction in about 30-35%. Corticosteroid therapy is also offered with low dose prednisone or dexamethasone to help improve PSA and palliative outcomes in 30% of men. Corticosteroids also may have anti-neoplastic effects on CRPC.

In patients with advanced prostate cancer with metastatic disease is generally considered a candidate for chemotherapy. Docetaxel and prednisone combination is the current standard of care for CRPC. This decision was based on two large randomized controlled trials when compared to the traditionally used mitoxantrone and prednisone combination. These studies determined that docetaxel had improved survival over mitoxantrone when given with prednisone. Therefore, current second line chemotherapy when docetaxel has failed is mitoxantrone, but this agent has limited activity and increased toxicity in CRPC patients. Therefore treatment algorithms in the Canadian Urological Association guidelines suggests clinical trials in situations where docetaxel has had no response and failed as treatment.

Mechanism of Enzalutamide in CRPC

As mentioned earlier, enzalutamide (MDV3100) is an androgen receptor antagonist, however it has the ability to inhibit nuclear translocation of the androgen receptor, DNA binding, and recruitment for co-activation when compared to current androgen antagonists. It also has greater affinity for androgen receptors without any agonistic activity.

AFFIRM trial

A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of the Investigational Drug MDV3100 (AFFIRM) was an international phase 3, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study that evaluated the use of enzalutamide in patients with castrate resistant prostate cancer. Patients were required to be previously treated with one to two chemotherapy regimens, with at least one of them that contained docetaxel. The primary endpoint was to determine overall survival (death from any cause). Secondary endpoints measured response such as PSA level, soft tissue, and quality of life scores and progression of cancer such as time to PSA progression, radiographic progression free trials, and time to first skeletal-related events.

This study enrolled 1199 patients with a 2:1 ratio to receive enzalutamide (800 patients) 160 mg orally once daily or placebo (399 patients). The study was halted after planned interim analysis. The median overall survival was 18.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.3 to not yet reached) and 13.6 months (95% CI, 11.3 - 15.8) for enzalutamide and placebo respectively. Secondary endpoints showed superiority with enzalutamide compared to placebo. The PSA level was reduced with enzalutamide and placebo being 54% and 2% (P< 0.001) respectively. Other outcomes favoured enzalutamide compared to placebo with soft tissue response rate (29% vs. 4%, P< 0.001), quality-of-life response rate (43% vs. 18%, P< 0.001), time to PSA progression (8.3 vs 3.0 months, P<0.001), radiographic progression-free survival (8.3 vs. 2.9 months, P<0.001), and time for the first skeletal-related event (16.7 vs. 13.3 months, P<0.001). The authors of this study conclude that enzalutamide was able to significantly prolong survival in metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer after chemotherapy with docetaxel use.

Lady using a tablet
Lady using a tablet

Comprehensive

Writing Services

Lady Using Tablet

Plagiarism-free
Always on Time

Marked to Standard

Order Now

This study was important in determining new therapies after failure of docetaxel in CRPC. This study lead to the early approval by the US Federal and Drug Administration (FDA) for its use in men with late-stage or metastatic CPRA despite medical or surgical intervention to minimize testosterone. The AFFIRM trial was relatively well designed, however due to interim analysis the study was not carried to completion and may have inflated the mortality benefits of enzalutamide. Despite this drawback, the indication of this medication is used in patients that lack treatment options which may therefore benefit from a trial with sufficient evidence.

Side Effects of Enzalutamide

Enzalutamide is generally well tolerated. The AFFIRM trial reported the most common side effects (>5%) were fatigue, diarrhea, muscloskeletal pain, and headache. Other more serious common side effects include hypertension, spinal cord compression, and upper/lower respiratory infections. Seizures were reported in 0.6% of patients. Enzalutamide is a strong inducer of CYP3A4 and moderate inducer of CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 and is metabolised by CYP2C8 and CYP3A4. Precautions should be taken if enzalutamide or other medications interact with these enzymes.

Future use and other available treatments

There are two other agents that have the indication for CRPC which was approved while the AFFIRM trial was in process. These agents are cabazitaxel and abieraterone both in combination with prednisone. The benefits of enzalutamide is its use as monotherapy without the need of prednisone compared to the other available agents. Over time, with the availability of this agent, other factors such as patient appropriateness and cost-effectiveness will be factors in choosing the right medications for the patient.

Conclusion

Although this agent is not available in Canada to date, this may be a suitable option for patients that have metastatic CRPC that have failed docetaxel therapy and other treatment options are not appropriate. More studies high quality studies may have to be completed to determine its efficacy, safety, and place in therapy however may be a viable option in these populations.

As pharmacists, it is important to know available treatments to be used in specific settings in oncology. Having knowledge of a new medication for specific indications allows for optimizing patient treatment regimens to improve patient care.