0115 966 7955 Today's Opening Times 10:30 - 17:00 (BST)
Place an Order
Instant price

Struggling with your work?

Get it right the first time & learn smarter today

Place an Order
Banner ad for Viper plagiarism checker

Effect of Serratia Marcescens Pilli on Red Blood Cells

Disclaimer: This work has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional academic writers. You can view samples of our professional work here.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays.

Published: Tue, 15 May 2018

INTRODUCTION.

The aims of the investigation are to identify the effect of bacteria, for example, what effect can Serratia marcescens pilli on red blood cells gives when mixed with molecular inhibitor. Also, to examine how pathogenic bacteria for example Clostridium perfringes produce toxin and what effect does toxin have on cells. In addition to the above, to examine the microbial resistance by using four different antibiotics by BASC method this will guide us to know the sensitivity and resistance to particular type of antibiotics.

Pathogenicity is the capability of microorganism to cause disease. According to Madigan et al (2009) the favarouble environment for growth of microorganism is live in or on human body and cause disease. Bacteria have protein filaments called pili which bind to the epithelial cells and cause infection.Pili are much more common in Gram negative bacteria. In our study we used Gram negative pathogenic organism Serratia marcescens which can cause disease to human also Serratia marcescens genome has pili on cell surface for adherence to the epithelial cells and cause infection. In our investigation we use this bacteria suspension to agglutinate with erythrocytes by examined the activity of pili in the presence of molecular inhibitor. Also we investigate the pathogenicity of bacteria by analysing the toxin they produce. In addition we study on microbial resistance to different antibiotics to know the sensitivity and resistance to the drugs. Since 1950s, pathogenic microorganisms have developed the ability to resist some antimicrobial chemotherapy agent. The earliest widely used of chemotherapy agents were amongst penicillin and sulphur drugs. However, these drugs are no longer commonly used as they were back in 1950s, this due to majority of pathogens have obtained some resistance.( Madigan et al 2009).Furthermore, at present some strains of pathogens become resistance to almost all antimicrobial agent, such as Staphylococcus aureus, Mycobacteriun tuberculosis and Candida albicans which are not treatable. An experiment of antimicrobial resistance can be carry out to test some antibiotics which are Cephalosporin’s group, against five strains

RESULTS : DILUTION Table 1

DILUTION

TEST

CONTROL

10-1

Positive within 20sec

10-2

Positive within 30sec

10-3

Positive within 30 sec

10-4

Weak + within 30 sec

10-5

Weak within 30sec

The table above shows the results which obtain after bacteria dilution were tested against erythrocytes.

PILI RESULTS: Table 2

SUGARS

TEST

CONTROL

Glucose

Positive after 15 seconds

Positive after 5sec

Fructose

Positive 35 seconds

Mannose

Negative

Table 2 shown the results when Serratia marcescens tested with erythrocytes to check for their ability to agglutinate in the presence of glucose, fructose, and mannose.

FOUR BACTERIA SUSPENSION Table 3

RESULTS

 

MANNOSE

WITHOUT MANNOSE

Bacteria

Agglutination

Time

Agglutination

Time

310258

Positive

15 sec

Strong Positive

10 sec

310217

Negative

30 sec

Weak Positive

25 sec

704476/2

Negative

30 sec

Weak Positive

20 sec

706498

Negative

30 sec

Negative

30 sec

Table 3. Among these four bacteria only one resulted in marked agglutination after 15 seconds in the presence of mannose and strong agglutination observed within 10 seconds without mannose as shown on the table

Toxin test results Table 4

Lecithinase

Result

Clostridium perfringens

Strong positive(+++)

Staphylococcus epidermidis

Negative

DNAase

 

Staphylococcus aureus

Positive

Staphylococcus epidermidis

Haemolysis

 

Streptococcus pyogenes

Positive

Streptococcus sanguis

The table above showed the production of toxin during bacteria growth.

ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY RESULTS Table 5

SAMPLE

CEFALAXIN

CEFUROXIMINE

CEFOTAXAMINE

CEFEPIME

Control

20/22

32/30

45/40

45/44

310258mm

0

17/18

30/32

35/44

310258 S or R

R

R

R

S

310217mm

0

0

0

0

310217 S or R

R

R

R

R

704476/2mm

20/21

26/20

34/36

30/35

704476/2

S

S

S

S

706498mm

18/22

19/17

34/34

34/36

706498 S or R

S

R

S

S

The disc of antibiotics show susceptibility is determined by measuring the diameter of the zone growth of bacteria inhibition. In the table shown above, the bacterium is susceptible to most antibiotics.

DISCUSSION

Five organisms including Serrecia marscence and control were tested for the presence and absence of pili. These organisms were tested with erythrocyte to assess their ability to agglutinate in the presence and absence of different types of sugars. Serretia marscence is Gram negative organism, its genome code for pili on their cell surface because pilli are protein found on the cell surface of bacteria cell. Pilus is a contributing factor of microbial adherence to host epithelial cells. ( I. E. Salit,$ and E. C. Gotschlich) There are there are 2 classes of pili, these are mannose sensitive (MS) and mannose resistant (MR) of adhension One class is mannose resistant pili is capable to agglutinate erythrocyte in the presence of D-mannose known as type non-type 1 pili and second class mannose sensitivite pili adherence linked with mannose sensitive haemagglutination of chicken and guinea-pig erythrocytes and also known as type 1 pili (A. Hejaz and F. R. Falkiner 1997) .In addition Dhakal 2009 said Gram negative organism encoded pili and show significant role in cause infection of some of those of Gram negative bacteria. .

Agglutination test of bacteria were carried out on together with the control as shown on table 1, almost each bacteria dilution after gentle mixing with erythrocytes together with PBS on a slide, result in clear agglutination within 30 seconds on101 to 103 but weak positive observed on104 to 105 within 30 seconds.

On table 2 show the result from the activity of Serratia marcescens pili by means of molecular inhibitor for example mannose, glucose and fructose. Mannose inhibited the agglutination since have the ability of preventing the adhesion of bacteria pili on to the cells. Therefore Serratia marcescens has type 1 pili since it is mannose sensitive, mannose prevents the adherence by protecting cell surface receptors, therefore inactivates the bacteria pili to adhere to the red cells. In place of glucose agglutination occurs in 15 seconds and fructose was showing agglutination within 35 seconds therefore glucose and fructose has no influence to act as inhibitor. Both glucose and fructose are able to absorbed with erythrocytes but unable to stop the adherence. Additionally, agglutination was much slower in control in the presence of glucose and fructose.

Clostridium perfiringes break down the lecithin caused halo around the streak on the egg york agar because egg york contain a lot of lecithin which make easy for detecting lesithinase activity. This lesithinase activity is produce by Clostridium perfringes which cause the breakdown of the lecithin in the cell membrane. Clostridium perfringens contains two main toxins which are alpha-toxins phospholipase and sphingomyelinase but the key toxin is alpha toxins which play main role in the pathogenicity of Clostridium perfringes. As it also contain lecithanase activity as target cell membrane. (O’Brien, 2004) Staphylococcus epidermis does not breakdown the lecithin since does not have toxin contain enzymes to breakdown the lecithin (www1)

In DNase plate two bacteria were tested for DNase reaction, these are Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermins where Staphylococcus aureus produce hallow or clear zone around DNase after covered and acidified with 1NHCL that indicate positive but no precipitates are produced by Staphylococcus epidermis means DNase negative. DNAse is suitable to differentiate Staphylococcus aureus which are coagulase positive from other Staphylococcus which are coagulase negative.(www3)

A simple analysis to investigate the haemolysis of red blood cells used in identification of Streptococcus pyogens and Streptococcus sanguis reaction on blood agar. Hemolytic type reactions used to categorize strains of Streptococci, the hemolysis that is related with extensive lysis of erythrocytes surrounding the colony is known as β-Hemolysis while hemolysis associated with lessening of erythrocytes and produce greening hemolysis is known as α-hemolysis (www2). Result on table 4 show there was a wide haemolysis around the Streptococcus pyogens colony known as beta haemolysis. Streptococcus .pyogens belongs to beta haemolytic group and produce virulent factors such as pyrogenic toxin which play role in haemolysis and produce a clear zone (www 2). There was no haemolysis around the Streptococcus.sanguinis which means it would be simple to investigate these bacteria through their toxins. Especially that S.sanguinis is partially destructing the erythrocytes and belongs to alpha haemolytic group.

Four bacteria were tested according to BSAC method to investigate antimicrobial susceptibility. Cephalosporin’s group was used and cephalosporin is a group of Beta-lactamases antibiotics. The 1stgeneration cephalosporin antibiotics have much effect with gram positive bacteria and less effect against gram negative bacteria. However gram negative bacteria are more effective to 3rd generation and 2nd generation are more active than1st generation.

The table 5 show the bacteria strain 704476/2 was susceptible to all four antibiotics. This suggest that this bacteria indicate have not got any resistance genes in its plasmid and furthermore all four antibiotics can treat the patient infected with this strain as showing on above table. Strain 310217 was resistant to all antibiotics including all three Cephalosporin group, this indicate that this bacteria has resistance gene, so this strain has to be treated with other antibiotics. In addition bacteria strain 706498 only resistant to one antibiotic and susceptible to the remaining three antibiotics while bacteria strain 310258 was resistant to three antibiotics but susceptible to one antibiotic. There is slightly difference that affected my result if I compare my control test with control chart this may be due to human error which can be caused by inoculation, because inoculum size is the most important factor affecting result, furthermore antibiotic be difference because could make with different company. Also on resistant result is not on a good interpretation because if I compare my results with my control some of them show the resistance but if I compare with zone chart provided is susceptible or intermediate I would suggest that in order to improve my experiment results then I should undergo once again until I produce the results that is more accurate and valid. It has been suggested that the results of antimicrobial susceptibility test can affect both the clinician’s choice of antimicrobial therapy and the patient’s outcome. (Daniel J. Diekema 2003)

CONCLUSION

To improve the experiment more study is necessary to correct the mistakes in the investigation, thus to have good results. However generally the experiment went good mainly in haemolytic test where Streptococci pyogens show clear zone of haemolysis when clear the colour of the agar as they breakdown erythrocytes as we expected.

REFERENCE

Hejazi, A. And Falkiner., F.R. 1997. Serratia marcescens. J. Med. Microbiol (online), pp903-912. Accessible at: http://jmm.sgmjournals.org/content/46/11/903.long (Accessed: 18/11/2013)

Dhaka, B.K., Bower, J.M.and Mulvey, M.A.2009. Pili-Fimbriae. Encyclopaedia of Microbiology(online), pp470. Accessible at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123739445000511 (Accessed: 18/11/2013)

O’Brien, D. K. and Melville, S.B. 2004. Effects of Clostridium perfringens Alpha-Toxin (PLC) and Perfringolysin O (PFO) on Cytotoxicity to Macrophages, on Escape from the Phagosomes of Macrophages, and on Persistence of C. perfringens in Host Tissues. American Society for Microbiology (online), pp2204-5206. Accessible at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC517428/ (Accesses : 18/11/2013)

Tan, T. Y., C. McNulty, A. Charlett, N. Nessa, C. Kelly, and T. Beswick.2003. Laboratory antibiotic susceptibility reporting and antibiotic prescribing in general practice.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.51:379-384.9. Accessible at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC404617/ (Accessed: 20/11/2013)

Schentag, J. J., C. H. Ballow, A. L. Fritz, J. A. Paladino, J. D. Williams, T. J. Cumbo, R. V. Ali, V. A. Galletta, M. B. Gutfeld, and M. H. Adelman.1993. Changes in antimicrobial agent usage resulting from interactions among clinical pharmacy, the infectious disease division, and the microbiology laboratory.Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.16:255-263. Accessible at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC404617/ (Accessed; 20/11/2013)

Johannes F. Van Den Bosch,1Ursula Verboom-Sohmer,1Peter Postma,1Johannes De Graaff,2andDavid M. MacLaren1 1980Mannose-sensitive and mannose-resistant adherence to human uroepithelial cells and urinary virulence of Escherichia coli.Accessible at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Verboom-Sohmer%20U%5Bauth%5D

British Society For Antimicrobial Chemotherapy ,Susceptibility Testing 2013 at: http://bsac.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Version-12-Apr- (Accessed 17/11/2013)

Websites

www1

http://www.lecithinguide.info/lecithin-is-powerful.html. (Accessed 18/11/2013)

www2-

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK7611/ (Accessed :19/11/2013)

www3

2013_final.pdfhttp://www.vetbact.org/vetbact/?biochemtest=1&PHPSESSID=00b630304e2e57b12bc34a9a8bb7497b#id27 (Accessed 23/11/2013)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2180968/pdf/je14651169.pdf (Accessed 18/11/2013)

APPENDIX

C:UsersAmiryAppDataLocalTempRar$DIa0.76020131105_095541.jpg C:UsersAmiryAppDataLocalTempRar$DIa0.067tmp_20131106_120531387569284.jpg

C:UsersAmiryAppDataLocalTempRar$DIa0.733tmp_20131106_11053449764367.jpg C:UsersAmiryAppDataLocalTempRar$DIa0.118tmp_20131106_1153371999218930.jpg


To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Request Removal

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please click on the link below to request removal:


More from UK Essays