Research and Development Theme:
The number of cybercrime threats has grown tremendously due to the significant
advancements in World Wide Web (WWW) and its applications. Information security OEM
Symantec reported that during 2008, they observed more than 18 million drive-by download
attacks and more than 23 million misleading application attacks . These crimes are
emerging as major threat for e-business, e-health and other WWW applications on the
Internet. Recent surveys show that about 80% of Web based attacks are being deployed at
the application layer of OSI model and more than 90% of Web applications are vulnerable to
these attacks. Enormous effort has been made to mitigate these attacks through various
security mechanisms in the form of scanners, intrusion detection systems, encryption
devices, and firewalls. However, these measures are unable to mitigate many of the threats
which specifically aim to compromise Web application security. In particular, existing
Get your grade
or your money back
using our Essay Writing Service!
solutions cannot capture the context of online users' requests (queries) in relation to the Web
applications and underlying protocol. Our research findings show that capturing the context is
an essential requirement to design and implement effective defense mechanisms against
Web application attacks. We propose a semantics-based Web Application Security system
architecture. The proposed system is a novel approach based on a paradigm shift from
existing network security techniques. We use ontologies to specify the context of attacks
through semantics, and define rules to detect the attacks effectively. By using the ontological
representation, we can significantly improve the detection of most important Web application
attacks such as XSS (cross-site scripting), SQL Injection, and Directory Traversals. The
proposed system architecture can be refined and expanded with nominal effort to cater for
more attacks. The ontologies for our proposed system will be developed in Web Ontology
Language (OWL). JENA API will be used for analyzing the users' requests to detect
complex as well as zero-day Web application attacks based upon known attacks methods.
Initial attack detection capability of the system will be carried out by generating attacks using
Paros tool. Final evaluation of the system will be carried out in cooperation with industry
partners in real scenarios on Web servers, and comparison will be made to the existing
network security and web security analysis tools like Mod Security, Secure Sphere, and
Application for ICT-Related Development and Research Grant Page 4
Snort [43, 45, 47]. The implementation of our work will be released as an open-source
product, with the ability to detect and analyze only the most common web application attacks,
including XSS, SQL Injection, and Directory Traversal. The system will be designed to
handle other web application attacks too, but these extensions may be reserved for future or
commercial development of our work. It is important to mention that we have already
designed and implemented the ontology based prototype as a proof of concept for the
detection of some basic Web attacks.
(Please mark )
ƒn New Modification to previous Project
Extension of existing project
Expected Starting Date: 01/09/2009
Planned Duration in months: 24 months
The aim of this project is to provide an effective and open source intrusion detection system
for Web-based attacks. The exponential increase in cyber crimes with the expansion of Web
applications have become the most important security concern for e-business, e-health and
other Web applications on the Internet. Recent survey shows that about 80% of Web based
attacks are being deployed at the application layer of the OSI model and more than 90% of
Web applications are vulnerable to these attacks. Various security mechanisms in the form
of intrusion detection systems, encryption devices, and firewalls have been deployed but
tend to be less effective against the Web-based threats, due to their extremely flexible
nature. In order to mitigate application level attacks the system needs to grasp the context of
the information contents (e.g., web page or script) and able to filter that contents on the basis
of its consequences on the target applications. This proposal introduces new concepts and
Always on Time
Marked to Standard
an architecture to use semantics for detecting and preventing attacks at the application layer
(specifically, attacks through HTTP). The proposed system will be capable of performing
intrusion detection through the ontological representation of attacks, application protocols
such as HTTP and associated data; furthermore it allows automatic generations of attack
rules. By building the attack model using ontologies, the system will significantly improve
attack detection capability and should be able to detect Web attacks which appear to be
generalized forms of existing attack techniques (i.e., zero day attacks based on existing
methods). We have already developed a prototype ontology model of application layer
attacks for the HTTP protocol. The proof-of-concept prototype uses Description Logic based
Web Ontology Language (OWL) for knowledge representation and it is implemented on top
of the JENA framework. The prototype system is deployed and evaluated as a surrogate
proxy in front of the Web server to detect and protect Web applications from application layer
attacks like Cross Site Scripting (XSS) and SQL injection. System evaluation shows
significantly improved detection capability, as compared with some other existing techniques
and solutions, and provides significant search space reduction, as well as it helps in
Application for ICT-Related Development and Research Grant Page 5
eliminating many problems associated with existing techniques. We are sure that through
this research project we will provide significantly improved ontology based intrusion detection
system that works at the application layer.
Scope, Introduction and Background of the Project
A. Scope of the Project:
Web Application Security is a sub-domain of information security, which deals with securing
web resources in term of confidentiality, integrity and availability of web-based information.
Information security is divided into a number of domains, such as network security,
application security, database security, and operating system security. Application security
can be further sub-divided into the domains of peer-to-peer security (security of
Information/contents which are shared/accessible to everyone else in the peer-to-peer
environment, and vice versa), e-mail security (protection of Electronic Mail) and web
application security. Web application security represents one of the more exposed and
challenging tasks in the present scenario of information security.
Figure 1: Domain of this project
Web application security is the domain of this project which deals with the attacks mounted
on Web resources from the hackers.
According to Web Application Security Consortium, "Web application security covers the
technology layers starting with the web server and follows through to the software created to
run online banks, e-commerce, auctions, webmail, etc. As a general rule, if the application
communicates over http, it is under the scope of web application security" .
Initially the proposed IDS would be focusing on the Web applications using only HTTP
protocol. However, the research outcomes will be Web application and protocol independent
and therefore later can be applied to secure web applications in heterogeneous environment.
Application for ICT-Related Development and Research Grant Page 6
The Web applications security has become increasingly important in the last decade due to
its massive increase in development, deployment and use of web application technologies
(such as e-business, e-sciences and e-health). A security assessment by the Application
Defense Center, which included more than 250 Web applications from e-commerce, online
banking, enterprise collaboration, and supply chain management sites, concluded that at
least 92% of Web applications are vulnerable to some form of attack . Another survey
found that about 75% of all attacks against Web servers target Web-based applications .
Web application attacks especially SQL injection and cross-site scripting are two of the most
common security vulnerabilities that plague web applications nowadays . On April 24,
2008 hundreds of thousands of Web servers were hacked, including several at the United
Nations and in the UK government through exploitation the vulnerabilities of Microsoft IIS .
According to the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), a repository for documented
network and software security threats, there are over 18,500 vulnerabilities in the web based
applications which include 2,147 cross-site scripting (XSS), 2,757 buffer overflow and 1,600
This Essay is
a Student's Work
This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.Examples of our work
SQL injection vulnerabilities .
Unchecked input validation is the major source of attacks at web application level. According
to the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP), four of the top ten vulnerabilities for
Web applications are input validation problems . The vulnerability caused by unchecked
input can lead a hacker to "inject" code to bypass or modify the originally intended
functionality of the program to gain information, privilege escalation or unauthorized access
to a system.
For example, in an XSS attack, it is possible for a hacker to obtain sensitive information (via
cookies) belonging to a user that is accessing a trusted website. Another web-based attack
exploits poorly implemented server-side web applications, and can enable a hacker to get
superuser (root) privileges through accessing executables on the website host such as the
shell, chmod, ps or other UNIX commands.
In an SQL Injection attack, a database query is manipulated through user (client) input. For
example, the following statement containing an SQL query may be used by a web
aa = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = " + UserName + " AND password = " + PassWord
The USERNAME and PASSWORD fields are substituted according to user input strings
provided on a form on a legitimate web page; However, suppose that the user entered the
following strings on the website form:
Password: anything' OR 'x' = 'x
The SQL query is expanded to:
SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = 'admin' AND password = 'anything' OR 'x' = 'x'
Since, the expression 'x' = 'x' is always true, this query will return all the users in the USERS
table. Similarly, a hacker can use DELETE, DROP or UNION commands to manipulate and
modify web application server databases through malicious input.
Traditional security solution like web scanners provides the first line of defense against web
attacks and detects the "well-known" security flaws whose signatures are present. Current
network security scanners lack semantic knowledge about web applications and are thus
unable to make intelligent decision upon data leakage or business logic flaws , failing to
detect many critical vulnerabilities . Signature based solutions usually maintain a "white
Application for ICT-Related Development and Research Grant Page 7
list" and a "black list" containing signatures of benign inputs and signatures of malicious
attack vectors respectively. These lists need regular updating of signature, and are unable to
detection variations of known attack techniques (hence no zero day attacks can be
detected). Consequently, such solutions may generate many false positive and false
negative alarms .
Furthermore, most network security solutions analyze network traffic packets individually,
and do not continually monitor each and every network flow for possible security violations.
So due to the lack of contextual information, these network solutions are ineffective in
mitigating application level attacks, whereas a semantic system can intelligently understand
the application's context, the actual data and contextual nature of attacks. A more effective
system should validate the input syntactically and semantically: Syntax-based validation
provides the size or content restrictions and semantic-based validation may focus on
specific data type, specific format and understanding potentially dangerous and malicious
commands or content with respect to their context and consequences.
Ontology-driven software systems are capable of showing a shared understanding of
structured information about the concepts within a specific domain and also provide the
reasoning and ability to analyze the information automatically. Ontology-driven software
systems can also specify the various semantic relationships among different concepts,
mitigating the interoperability issue and allowing reuse and progressive evolution. The
proposed system maintains the concept of different entities such as protocols, data, attacks,
and describes their relationship in the form of ontologies. This gives important reasoning that
is the basis for an efficient and robust detection system. Specific rules are generated by
capturing the context of the domain and the relationship between the entities.
Unlike traditional systems of IDS we have planned for developing the Web application
Firewall as a reverse proxy, keeping in view the positive aspects of web application firewall.
In order to comply with PCI 6.6 (important clause introduce by the Payment Card
Industry(PCI), a Data Security Standard), that organizations have to fulfill one of the two
requirements before December 2009 otherwise monthly fines may ranging from $5,000 to
$100,000 for missed deadlines. These are as follow:
- All the custom application code must be reviewed for common vulnerabilities by an
organization that specializes in application security.
- Deploying an application layer firewall in front of Web Applications.
Web Application Firewall has been selected in our case instead of going for code review due
to the following points:
• It entails less cost
• More flexible solution
• Less resource utilization
• Time consuming
We will provide some detail for each aforementioned reason below:
It entails less cost:
According to Jeremiah Grossman the CTO of White Hat security, says that an annual
average cost is approximately 40,000 USD in consulting fees for each small to medium sized
Web application. Similarly, according to Robert Begg, CEO of Digital defense, each line of
source code would approximately cost five USD. So cost associated with code review is
huge and in large projects where line of code extends to millions line of code, this entails a
sufficient amount of the organizations budget.
Application for ICT-Related Development and Research Grant Page 8
More flexible solution:
• Deploying an application layer firewall gives you a single point of control so that you
can specify what content is allowed to users.
• The outer world clients are not aware of the names of the content or actual web
servers which allow you to easily change content servers or to make host name
• It can be installed without having any impact to existing infrastructure.
Less resource utilization:
As code review indulge your project into an endless and costly, find, fix and test loop that ties
your overall organizational resources. At the other side, application layer firewall gives you
the protection from the most common attacks to all the application servers deployed in the
organizational internal network. Moreover, it does not engage organizational resources and
allow them to perform more productive tasks.
PCI 6.6 requirement demands organizations to get their source code reviewed, line by line.
This code review again is very time consuming especially for very large projects. This activity
more often result in crossing project deadlines.
As we are developing the Web Application Firewall (WAF) that complies with Payment Card
Industry Data Security Standards (PCI DSS) Requirement 6.6. The scope of this standard
includes a wide range of requirements, thus requiring great deal of resources both in terms
of manpower and finances as the project scope is reasonably very large. Team working on
the project shall put in its best with limited resources to come up with a state of the art
application within the given span of time to capture the Web application security market well
in time. Following clauses introduced in PCI DSS may facilitate in understanding the scope
of the project, need of WAF and its timely delivery to the market even further:
For a WAF to be compatible with the PCI 6.6 it must:
• React appropriately to OWASP Top Ten vulnerabilities
• Inspect web application input and respond to them based on active policy or rules,
and preserve the action taken.
• Prevent the data leakage that is it should inspect web application output and respond
to it based on the active policy or rules, and preserve the action taken.
• Enforce both positive and negative security models. The positive model defines
acceptable whereas negative model defines what is NOT allowed.
• Inspect both web page content, such as Hypertext Markup Language (HTML),
Dynamic HTML (DHTML), and Cascading Style Sheets (CSS), and the underlying
protocols that deliver content, such as Hypertext Transport Protocol (HTTP) and
Hypertext Transport Protocol over SSL (HTTPS). (In addition to
• SSL, HTTPS includes Hypertext Transport Protocol over TLS.)
• Inspect web services messages, if web services are exposed to the public Internet.
Typically this would include Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) and extensible
Markup Language (XML), both document and RPC-oriented models, in addition to
Application for ICT-Related Development and Research Grant Page 9
• Inspect protocols (proprietary or standardized) or data construct (proprietary or
standardized) that is used to transmit data to or from a web application, when such
protocols or data is not otherwise inspected at another point in the message flow.
Note: Proprietary protocols present challenges to current application firewall
products, and customized changes may be required. If an application's messages do
not follow standard protocols and data constructs, it may not be reasonable to ask
that an application firewall inspect that specific message flow. In these cases,
implementing the code review/vulnerability assessment option of Requirement 6.6 is
probably the better choice.
• Defend against threats that target the WAF itself.
• Support SSL and/or TLS termination, or be positioned such that encrypted
transmissions are decrypted before being inspected by the WAF. Encrypted data
streams cannot be inspected unless SSL is terminated ahead of the inspection
• Prevent and/or detect encrypting session cookies, hidden form fields or other data
elements used for session state maintenance.
• Automatically receive and apply dynamic signature updates from a vendor or other
source. In the absence of this capability, there should be procedures in place to
ensure frequent update of WAF signatures or other configuration settings.
• Fail open (a device that has failed allows traffic to pass through uninspected) or fail
closed (a device that has failed blocks all traffic), depending on active policy. Note:
Allowing a WAF to fail open must be carefully evaluated as to the risk of exposing
unprotected web application(s) to the public Internet. A bypass mode, in which
absolutely no modification is made to the traffic passing through it, may be applicable
in some circumstances. (Even in "fail open" mode, some WAFs add tracking headers,
clean up HTML that they consider to violate standards, or perform other actions. This
can negatively impact troubleshooting efforts.)
• In certain environments, the WAF should support Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) client
certificates and providing the client authentication via certificates.
• Some ecommerce applications may require FIPS (Federal Information Processing
Standards) hardware key store support. If this is a consideration in your environment,
make sure that the WAF vendor supports this requirement in one of their systems
and be aware that this feature may drastically increase the cost of the solution.
Anatomy of a Web Application
The web is a worldwide network providing a highly interactive environment for electronic
communication to billions of users globally through a diverse range of applications. A Web
application is a computer program providing services to website visitors for submission and
retrieval of information over the Internet. The web services are accessed and interacted with
via Web browsers.
The major components of web applications include code that resides on the Web servers,
application servers, databases, and backend systems of an organization. The simple model
Application for ICT-Related Development and Research Grant Page 10
of web application is shown in Figure 2 .
Figure 2: A Simple Web Application Model
Web browsers interact with the web application by sending requests to the web application
server through the HTTP protocol. The Web application server manipulates the request and
processes the request in shape of query to a database to retrieve the required information,
which is subsequently sent as a response to the web browser for the end user.
The traffic generated on WWW mostly relies on the HTTP protocol for communication. The
HTTP requests mainly consist of two parts: message header and message body. The
message header contains the general information like client software name, referrer,
executing script path, while the body is made up of name pair values of the controls on the
submitted form. Due to the stateless nature of HTTP protocol, the server cannot distinguish
between two users. The server distinguishes between two users through a session ID. This
session ID is valid only for a given time slot.
Figure 3 explains the mechanisms used by Web application for the protection of sensitive
information flowing from user browser to database. The user is authenticated by a username
and password. This information travels trough network from the browser to the server (in
encrypted form if HTTPS/SSL is used). A firewall filters undesirable network traffic, and the
Web server validates the input. In case the data has any semantic or syntactical errors (e.g.,
invalid format or invalid result of type checking), the server raises an exception. The
application server performs the auditing and logging activity and keeps the records of all
transactions. Finally, sensitive information received by the server may be stored in encrypted
Semantics based Web Application Security:
Concept, Design and Implementation
School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences A center of excellence for quality education and research
Application for ICT-Related Development and Research Grant Page I
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
EE External Evaluators
ICT Information and Communication Technologies
IPR Intellectual Property Rights
JPD Joint Project Director (Co-Director)
PD Project Director
PI Principal Investigator (Organization)
"Principal Investigator" means the person, company, partnership,
undertaking, concern, association of persons, body of individuals,
consortium or joint venture which receives funding from the
Company to execute a research and development project."