Nike's cost accounting and management decisions

Published: Last Edited:

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Executive Summary

Nike Inc. was established in 1962 by Bill Bowerman and Phil Knight as an association under the name, Blue Ribbon Sports. Our unobtrusive objective then was to appropriate ease, fantastic Japanese athletic shoes to American buyers trying to break Germany's mastery of the local business. Today in 2000, Nike Inc. not just fabricates and disperses athletic shoes at each attractive value point to a worldwide business, yet more than 40% of our business originate from athletic attire, sports gear, and backup wanders. Nike keeps up customary and non-conventional dissemination directs in more than 100 nations focusing on its essential business locales: United States, Europe, Asia Pacific, and the Americas (excluding the United States). We use more than 20,000 retailers, Nike plant stores, Nike stores, NikeTowns, Cole Haan stores, and web based Web destinations to offer our games and recreation items. We rule deals in the athletic footwear industry with a 33% worldwide piece of the pie. Nike Inc. has possessed the capacity to achieve this head position through "quality creation, inventive items, and forceful advertising." subsequently, for the monetary year end 1999, Nike's 20,700 workers produced practically $8.8 billion in revenue.


Our essential item center is athletic footwear intended for particular game and/or relaxation use(s). We additionally offer athletic attire convey the same trademarks and brand names as a number of our footwear lines. Among our fresher item offerings, we offer a line of execution gear under the Nike brand name that incorporates game balls, timepieces, eyewear, skates, bats, and other supplies intended for games exercises. Likewise, we use the accompanying completely possessed auxiliaries to offer extra games related stock and crude materials: Cole Haan Holdings Inc., Nike Team Sports, Inc., Nike IHM, Inc., and Bauer Nike Hockey Inc. Our most prevalent item classifications incorporate the accompanying: Running, Ball, Broadly educating, Open air Activities, Tennis, Golf, Soccer, Baseball, Football, Bicycling, volleyball, Wrestling, Cheerleading, Sea-going Activities, auto Racing, other athletic and recreational employments.

Cost Accounting and Management Decisions

NIKE clearly perceives incomes from the offer of items at the time of offer. It perceives income from permit expenses as earned, which is most likely at the time of conveyance of items to licensees. The criteria for income distinguishment are:

  • Generous execution of administrations to be given,
  • Receipt of money or a receivable whose money identical quality a firm can gauge with sensible exactness.

The offer of items to retailers constitutes generous execution unless NIKE is obliged to take back unsold things. There is no sign that profits are considerable. The Futures buying program likely matches items to particular client needs. NIKE conveys generous records receivable from its clients. Money due expanded at a higher rate than the development rate of offers amid Year 7 however at a slower rate amid Year 8 , so there is no evidence of a generous development of uncollectible records. The remittance for uncollectible records had an equalization equivalent to 3.0 percent of terrible records receivable [$33/ ($1,053+ $33)] toward the end of Year 7 and 3.1 percent [$43/ ($1,346 + $43)] toward the end of Year 8. Accordingly, NIKE's income distinguishment seems suitable.

The essay will show that NIKE utilizes LIFO for residential inventories and FIFO for universal inventories. Firms are allowed to choose their stock expense stream presumption from the set regarded worthy by standard-setting bodies. These bodies don't give a set of criteria that organizations must apply to figure out which stock expense stream suspicion is "fitting". The Financial Accounting Standards Board licenses firms in the United States to utilize FIFO, LIFO, weighted normal, and a few different strategies. NIKE's utilization of LIFO spares salary assessments amid times of climbing creation costs. Given the prerequisite in the U.S. that organizations utilizing LIFO for assessment reporting must additionally utilize LIFO for budgetary reporting likely clarifies NIKE's utilization of LIFO in the U.S. Most different nations don't allow firms to utilize LIFO. Subsequently, NIKE's decision set in these nations incorporates FIFO and weighted normal. NIKE's most likely uses FIFO on the grounds that the physical stream of its stock is FIFO. Likewise, NIKE spares record keeping expenses by utilizing FIFO for both answering to outside governments and answering to its shareholders in the U.S.

NIKE does not direct any of its own assembling. Consequently, devaluation cost identifies with structures and supplies utilized as a part of offering and authoritative exercises. NIKE's pay articulation arranges costs by their capacity rather than by their tendency. Along these lines, NIKE incorporates deterioration cost in offering and regulatory costs. d. The Notes show that pay duty cost of $346 incorporates $418 payable presently and an increment in conceded assessment resources or a lessening in conceded expense liabilities of $72. Firms perceive conceded duties for impermanent contrasts between assessable salary and wage for monetary reporting. The assessable salary of NIKE for Year 8 surpasses its pay before assessments for budgetary reporting. This presumably happened on the grounds that NIKE perceived incomes for duty reporting in Year 8 that it perceived in prior years for money related reporting and in light of the fact that it perceived costs amid Year 8 for budgetary reporting that it won't perceive as an expense conclusion until later years. The premise for measuring the measure of wage duty cost is the measure of incomes and costs perceived amid the year for budgetary reporting. The premise for measuring salary charge payable is the measure of incomes and costs perceived amid the year for assessment reporting. Since these sums are generally diverse, firms are obliged to perceive conceded assessment resources and conceded expense liabilities on their asset reports. Administrative laws direct the way of measuring assessable pay. The length of firms apply these laws accurately in measuring their assessable salary every year and pay the obliged assessments, they have no extra commitment to administrative substances as of now. The vicinity of a conceded expense resource or a conceded assessment risk on the accounting report is not an evidence that administrative bodies have allowed firms to postpone paying charges. Rather, it demonstrates the craving of standard-setters to match wage assessment cost with salary before expenses for monetary reporting.

The stipend for uncollectible records record emerges on the grounds that NIKE perceives income sooner than the time when it gathers money. Since NIKE is not prone to gather 100 percent of the sum reported as deals income, it must perceive a cost for assessed uncollectible records and diminish terrible records receivable to the sum it hopes to gather in real money. NIKE expands the offset in the recompense represent evaluated uncollectible records emerging from deals every year. It diminishes the equalization in the recompense represent real clients' records considered uncollectible. NIKE reports the equalization in the remittance account as a subtraction from terrible records receivable.

Utilization of a LIFO expense stream presumption brings about reporting the latest buy costs in expense of merchandise sold on the pay proclamation every year and the most established buy costs in inventories on the monetary record. The more extended a firm has been on LIFO, the all the more out-of-date the book estimation of the inventories will be in respect to current substitution costs. To abstain from misdirecting clients of the monetary proclamations, the Securities and Exchange Commission obliges firms utilizing LIFO to report the contrast between the current substitution expense and the book esteem for inventories. The moderately little distinction between these two sums for NIKE may mirror

  • Little changes over the long run in the buy costs of stock things,
  • Price tag diminishes lately to balance price tag increments in prior years,
  • Appropriation of LIFO just as of late,
  • Liquidation of LIFO layers of prior years as NIKE transformed its product offerings,
  • Utilization of LIFO for just a part of its inventories.

The essay also shows that NIKE utilizes the straight line system for structures and leasehold upgrades and the declining offset strategy for hardware and supplies. Likewise with the stock expense stream presumption, standard-setting bodies give firms opportunity to choose any devaluation system from the set esteemed satisfactory. These bodies don't give criteria as to which strategy is more "suitable" for a specific firm. The techniques that NIKE utilizes for monetary reporting nearly correspond with the systems it utilizes for duty reporting. Along these lines, NIKE spares record keeping expenses by utilizing the same devaluation strategies for budgetary and duty reporting.

The enhanced net income/sales rate between Year 6 and Year 7 outcomes fundamentally from a lessening in the expense of merchandise sold to deals rate. The reduction in deals between Year 5 and Year 6 recommends that NIKE may have needed to diminish offering costs or assimilate assembling expense increments so as to move its items. The increment in deals between the Year 6 and Year 7 recommends a more appealing valuing environment for NIKE, bringing about a diminishment in the expense of merchandise sold to deals rate. NIKE might likewise have encountered a shift in its business blend between these two years to higher edge items. NIKE does not give overall revenue data to its different items. The enhanced net revenue between the Year 7 and Year 8 outcomes principally from a diminishment in its offering and authoritative cost/deals rate. NIKE encountered a 35.9 percent expansion in deals between these two years as opposed to a 6.1 percent deals increment for Reebok and a 9.3 percent expansion for Adidas. Some piece of the increment for NIKE originates from including a full year of offers for Bauer, Inc. The rest of the build originates from expanded footwear and clothing deals. NIKE most likely acknowledged profits of economies of scale as it spread the generally altered expense of its deals and authoritative association over a much bigger deals base.

Income Statement (see the attach Excel file while reading to the below information to correct get the mean being brought out).

Revenue - Total income perceived amid the period (got from products sold, administrations rendered, protection premiums, or different exercises that constitute a substance's acquiring procedure). For budgetary administrations organizations, likewise incorporates speculation and investment pay, and deals and exchanging increases.

Operating income - The net result for the time of deducting working costs from working incomes.

Income before Income Tax - Entirety of working benefit and non-operating wage (cost) before pay (misfortune) from value system ventures, salary charges, uncommon things, total impacts of changes in bookkeeping standards, and non-controlling investment.

Net Income before continuing operations - This speaks to the pay or misfortune from proceeding with operations attributable to the financial substance which might likewise be characterized as income less costs and expenses from progressing operations before remarkable things, combined impacts of changes in book keeping standards, and non-controlling investment.

Net Income - The part of solidified benefit or misfortune for the period, net of wage duties, which is attributable to the guardian. On the off chance that the substance does not present solidified money related proclamations, the measure of benefit or misfortune for the period, net of salary assessments.


Penman, S. H., & Penman, S. H. (2007).Financial statement analysis and security valuation(p. 476). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Grant, R. M. (2010).Contemporary strategy analysis and cases: text and cases. John Wiley & Sons.

Crain, D. W., & Abraham, S. (2008). Using value-chain analysis to discover customers' strategic needs.Strategy & Leadership,36(4), 29-39.

Chiang, W. Y. K., Chhajed, D., & Hess, J. D. (2003). Direct marketing, indirect profits: A strategic analysis of dual-channel supply-chain design.Management science,49(1), 1-20.