The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) was established in 2001 to enlarge International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). A year later, European Union (EU) member states committed to requiring IFRS for all listed corporations in their jurisdictions useful year 2005 (EC, 2002). The first IFRS was issued in 2003, by which time at least 19 countries compulsory compliance with the international standards. Since then, nearly 70 countries have mandated IFRS for all listed companies. Further, about 23 countries have either mandated IFRS for some listed companies. However, as of 2007, at least 40 countries continue to require internally developed accounting standards over IFRS, and this list includes various huge economies like Brazil, Canada, China, Japan, India, and the US (Ramanna & Sletten, 2009).
International Financial Reporting Standards is a set of accounting standards developed by an independent, not-for-profit business called the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). The purpose of IFRS is to give a global structure for how public companies organize and reveal their financial statements.
Get your grade
or your money back
using our Essay Writing Service!
IFRS provides common direction for the preparation of financial statements to a certain extent than setting rules for industry-specific reporting. at this time, over 100 countries allow or need IFRS for public companies, with more countries probable to conversion to IFRS by 2015. Having an international standard is particularly essential for large companies that have subsidiaries in different countries. Adopting a solo set of world-wide standards will make simpler accounting procedures by allowing a company to use one reporting language all over. A single standard will also provide investors and auditors with a solid analysis of finances. Proponents of IFRS as an international standard maintain that the cost of implementing IFRS could be equalize by the potential for fulfillment to get better credit ratings. IFRS is occasionally puzzled with IAS (International Accounting Standards), which are older principles that IFRS has replaced (Search Security, 2010).
Under the International Accounting Standards Committee Foundation organization(IFRCF), the objectives of the IASB are:
(a) To increase, in the public knowledge, a solo set of high value, logical and enforceable overall accounting values that need high value, clear and comparable information in financial statements and other financial reporting to help participants in the world's capital markets and other users build profitable decisions;
(b) To encourage the use and exact function of those standards; and
(c) In satisfying the objectives connected with (a) and (b), to take account of, as suitable, the exclusive desires of small and medium-sized entities and rising economies; and
(d) To carry on convergence of national accounting standards and International Accounting Standards and International Financial Reporting Standards too far above the ground value solutions (Tohmatsu, 2010).
SCOPE OF IFRSs
IASB Standards are well-known as International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs).
All International Accounting Standards (IASs) and Interpretations issued by the previous IASC and SIC maintain to be valid unless and until they are amended or quiet.
IFRSs are legal to the common reason financial statements and other financial reporting by profit-oriented entities - those busy in profitable, industrial, financial, and parallel activities, apart from of their lawful form.
Entities other than profit-oriented business entities may also discover IFRSs suitable.
common use financial statements are planned to gather the common needs of shareholders, creditors, workers, as well as the public at huge for information about an entity's financial situation, presentation, and cash flows.
Additional financial reporting includes information provided exterior financial statements that assist in the understanding of a whole set of financial statements or improves users' capability to make professional financial decisions.
IFRS affect to Entity Company and consolidated financial statements.
A whole set of financial statements includes a statement of economic situation, a statement of comprehensive income, a statement of cash flows, a summary of accounting policies, a statement of changes in equity, and explanatory notes. When a disconnect income statement is presented in accordance through IAS 1(2007), it is piece of that complete set.
In budding Standards, IASB intends not to allow choices in bookkeeping treatment. Additional, IASB intends to think again the choices in presented IASs with a vision to reducing the quantity of those choices.
IFRS will present basic principles in bold appearance kind and other direction in non-bold type (the 'black-letter'/'grey-letter' distinction). Paragraphs of both types have the same power.
Always on Time
Marked to Standard
The provision of IAS 1 that conformity with IAS requires compliance with every applicable IAS and Interpretation requires compliance with all IFRSs as well (Tohmatsu, 2010).
DUE PROCESS FOR IFRS
Due method steps for a Standard will in general take in the following:
staff work to recognize and learn the issues
study of presented general standards and practices
IASB consults with SAC about the sense of adding the mission to the IASB's memo
IASB usually forms an recommended group
IASB publishes a conversation document for remark
IASB considers remarks acknowledged on the conversation document
IASB publishes an exposure draft with at least 9 confirmatory votes* (the exposure draft will include nonconforming opinions and foundation for conclusions)
IASB considers clarification acknowledged on the exposure draft
IASB considers the interest of holding a public hearing and of conducting field tests
IASB approves the final Standard with at least 9 confirmatory votes* (the Standard will include nonconforming opinions and base for conclusions)
IASB deliberates in meetings open to public inspection (Tohmatsu, 2010).
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS
IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards
IFRS 2 Share-based Payment
IFRS 3 Business Combinations
IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts
IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations
IFRS 6 Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Assets
IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures
IFRS 8 Operating Segments
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (Tohmatsu, 2010)
INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements
IAS 2 Inventories
IAS 3 Consolidated Financial Statements - Originally issued 1976, effective 1 Jan 1977. Superseded in 1989 by IAS 27 and IAS 28.
IAS 4 Depreciation Accounting - reserved in 1999, replaced by IAS 16, 22, and 38, all of which were issued or revised in 1998.
IAS 5 Information to Be Disclosed in Financial Statements - Originally issued October 1976, effective 1 January 1997. Superseded by IAS 1 in 1997
IAS 6 Accounting Responses to Changing Prices - Superseded by IAS 15, which was withdrawn December 2003
IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows
IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors
IAS 9 Accounting for Research and Development Activities - Superseded by IAS 38 effective 1.7.99
IAS 10 Events After the Reporting Period
IAS 11 Construction Contracts
IAS 12 Income Taxes
IAS 13 Presentations of Current Assets and Current Liabilities - Superseded by IAS 1.
IAS 14 Segment Reporting
IAS 15 Information Reflecting the Effects of Changing Prices - Withdrawn December 2003
IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment
IAS 17 Leases
IAS 18 Revenue
IAS 19 Employee Benefits
IAS 20 Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance
IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates
IAS 22 Business Combinations - Superseded by IFRS 3 effective 31 March 2004
IAS 23 Borrowing Costs
IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures
IAS 25 Accounting for Investments - Superseded by IAS 39 and IAS 40 effective 2001
IAS 26 Accounting and Reporting by Retirement Benefit Plans
IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements
IAS 28 Investments in Associates
IAS 29 Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies
IAS 30 Disclosures in the Financial Statements of Banks and Similar Financial Institutions - Superseded by IFRS 7 effective 2007
IAS 31 Interests In Joint Ventures
IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation - Disclosure provisions superseded by IFRS 7 effective 2007
IAS 33 Earnings Per Share
IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting
IAS 35 Discontinuing Operations - Superseded by IFRS 5 effective 2005
IAS 36 Impairment of Assets
IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
IAS 38 Intangible Assets
IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement
IAS 40 Investment Property
IAS 41 Agriculture (Tohmatsu, 2010)
Ramanna (2009) focuses on International Financial Reporting Standards as developed and sponsored by the IASB opening 2002, and particularly prohibit International Accounting Standards promulgated by the IASB's prototype, the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC). This is because those IASC standards are culturally quite dissimilar from IFRS. In particular, whereas the IASB's standards are subjective by Pan-European accounting background, the IASC's work was supposed as more Anglo-centric. The IASC was reputable in 1973, the year the UK connected with European Community. Benston et al. (2006) dispute that by this time, accessible European Community countries had made major development towards accounting management, and the IASC was created to help out the UK have a voice in future cross-country standardization.
Net Economic Value of IFRS
The net financial value of IFRS to a country as arising out of two factors:
This Essay is
a Student's Work
This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.Examples of our work
(1) The worth from having a collective body of accounting standards; and
(2) The relative excellence of local governance institutions. The feature of both factors is as follows:
The worth from having a collective body of accounting standards: IFRS are urbanized particularly for broad international use. Proponents of IFRS disagree that by adopting a general body of global standards, countries can be expecting to lower the cost of information dealing out and auditing to capital market participants (Barth, 2007; 2008). More preparers, users, and auditors of financial reports can be predictable to become well-known with one universal set of international accounting standards than with a variety of local accounting standards.
If the adoption of IFRS is predictable to lower information expenses to capital markets, it is predictable that countries more dependent on foreign capital and trade to worth these financial benefit more. lacking international accounting standards, foreign investors must acquire costs of becoming recognizable with domestic bookkeeping practices. These expenses are predictable to be approved on to the investment-destination country. If adopting IFRS is predictable to lower such costs, then we can imagine countries that are dependent on foreign capital to perform so. Correspondingly, countries where foreign trade is a significant part of the economy can be probable to adopt IFRS. Related to the point above, it can be argued that countries decide to adopt IFRS when they look forward to enlarge the share of foreign capital and trade in their economy: predictable foreign participation in an economy can build existing adoption of international standards more eye-catching. In this logic, even countries with low levels of foreign capital and trade can choose to adopt IFRS if they are expecting expansion in those factors.
Adopting IFRS to lower information costs is theoretically different from adopting IFRS due to its "network benefits." theoretically; "network benefits" refer to idea that IFRS becomes more attractive as more countries adopt it; while adopting IFRS to inferior information costs refer to the standards' prospective "platform benefits."
The relative quality of local governance institutions: The qualified worth of local accounting standards to be an significant determinant in the judgment to adopt IFRS. Local accounting standards are fraction of a multifaceted system of governance institutions that contain auditor guidance, auditing principles, enforcement (regulatory and judicial), and example for the security of assets rights, government dishonesty, and the role of the press, with others. Adopting IFRS can be costly if these institutions are collectively not compatible with the international standards. The qualified worth of present governance institutions refers to the skill of these institutions to make easy the able provision of capital in an economy.
In countries where the worth of existing governance institutions is comparatively high, IFRS acceptance is likely to be less eye-catching. High class institutions stand for high opportunity and switching expenses to adopting international accounting standards. The opportunity costs occur because in adopting IFRS, countries miss the profit of any past and probable future innovations in local reporting standards exact to their economies. IFRS, by meaning, are the outcome of international political economy balance, and thus cannot be predictable to give reporting standards that are individually matched to any given country's conditions (Leuz & Wysocki, 2008). The switching costs start because countries with well urbanized control institutions are probable to have fit developed capital markets, and thus further market participants needing retraining in IFRS.
On one hand, opportunity and switching costs in these countries are minor, so the possibility to take on an outwardly urbanized body of accounting standards presents an benefit. On the other hand, such countries are likely to bear from dishonest, slack, or unsuccessful governments that are opposing to or powerless of change (La Porta et al., 1999). At the intense, countries with weak institutions are unsuccessful states, where the adoption of IFRS is improbable to be of any interest or outcome (e.g., Talibanruled Afghanistan or Somalia). Thus, along with countries with less urbanized institutions, the choice to adopt IFRS is likely to be single-minded by lower opportunity and switching costs just if such countries are in fact able and ready to make cost-benefit tradeoffs.
Net Political Value of IFRS
The adoption of IFRS by a country also involves trading off the probable expand from being gifted to control international standard situation against the cost lost from compromise local power over bookkeeping standards. Tradeoffs between these benefits