This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.
This business proposal is prepared to consider how accounting, reporting and auditing field processes might change if the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) is implemented in Australia. It outlines the The Carbon trading and Carbon Reduction Pollution Scheme(CRPS), white paper and green paper guidance under Emission Trading scheme(ETS), the potential changes in Accounting, Auditing and Compliance Reporting relating to the ETS and finally the report will provide few of Accounting ,Auditing and Compliance reporting suggestion when ETS implementing in Australia in 2012.
This is a report going on with how accounting filed is going to provide guidance to the Australian companies when they accounting their assets and liabilities. Basically Accounting field consider the financial accounting practices relating to the carbon emission allowances. And in both accounting and reporting field deems with associated risks and doubts. Moreover Auditing standards are effectively support the scheme financial reports by ensuring whether the information provide to the market is more accurate and with high quality. The successful reporting and compliance engagement will provide efficiency economic foundation to the scheme by preparing annual emission reports with sufficient records.
CARBON TRADING AND CRPS
Carbon trading is an organisational approach used to reduce pollution by providing economic encouragement for achieving diminution in the emissions of pollutants.
In recent times, the blazing of fossil fuels like coal, oil and natural gas -which stored carbon for millions of years- combined with accelerated land clearance, has led to extraordinary levels of greenhouse gas emission carbon sinks can't remain, and focussing of green house gases in the atmosphere have raised drastically leading to an enhanced greenhouse effect.
As per Kyoto Protocol, in which Australia participated in 2007, permits developed countries are essential to limit their greenhouse gas emissions according to the following formula
"Actual emission must be less than or equal to the assigned amount +/-carbon sinks and Kyoto emissions"
Under United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, countries are allowed to use a trading system to facilitate gather their emission targets. In law, a country may allot permits to individual companies for the emission of a definite quantity of greenhouse gases. If permits are only issued to a point equal to or below the assigned quantity, then a country should meet its Kyoto obligation. If a country is incompetent of meeting its target, it can buy permits from countries that are beneath their targets. Likewise companies within a country that demonstrate extra competent to decrease their emissions are sanctioned to 'trade ' surplus permits to other, more polluting enterprises.
CPRS (Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme)
The Federal Government aims to have the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) legislation through Parliament by June 2009, paving the way for a start date of 1 July 2010.CPRS is a proposed cap-and -trade system of emissions trading for anthropogenic greenhouse gases, yet to be introduced by the Rudd government, as constituent of its climate change policy. It marks a key modification in the energy policy of Australia. The objective of carbon pollution reduction scheme is to accumulate Australia's emission reduction targets in the most bendable and commercial way, to maintain a successful worldwide reaction to climate change, and to make available for transitional backing for the most exaggerated households and firms. The foundation of a Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme is the cap and trade system, and is a means of restricting greenhouse gas pollution, in addition to giving individuals and businesses an inducement to decrease their emissions (Department of Climate Change, 2008, 11). The primary action for the Australian Government is to put a cap on carbon emissions, which must be steady with longer period aims of dropping Australia's emissions by 60% compare with 2000 levels by 2050 (Department of Climate Change, 2008, 11). There are two essential elements of the cap and trade scheme. First one the cap itself, the cap is the limit on greenhouse gas emission imposed by the CPRS. The second is the 'ability to trade'. Since carbon pollution permits will be tradable, the price of permits will be determined by the market. It present objective is to create a visible and healthy carbon market in Australia
EMISSION TRADING SCHEME
Emission Trading Scheme is an internationally build-up market device and inducement to trim down greenhouse gas emissions. The scheme is to bring a price on carbon which presently does not have a price so as to generate a rate for carbon. It is a market-based trading scheme for rights to emit greenhouse gasses that contribute to globalwarming. The ordinary form of an ETS is a cap and trade, where Government put a cap on the total amount of emission and supplies allowances to locate cap. Corporations who exceed their target can buy credit from lower pollutants. But the caps reduced by time to cop up with the national emission reduction scheme.
In Australia before November 2007, the state and territory Governments in collaboration with the then opposition commissioned a study into the financial side of climate change and its blow in Australia. As a result an interim report released which have final due in September 2008; at present know as Garnaut Review. National Emission Trading taskforce was generated which particularly focused at the possibility of an ETS in Australia By 2012; Australia has to convene a target of 108% of 1990 greenhouse gas emissions.
In 16 July 2008, the green paper(position and consultation) on the carbon pollution reduction scheme was released. The Green Paper on the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme has been prepared by the Commonwealth as a consultation paper. Commonwealth is the major financer in this proposal. The carbon pollution reduction scheme, as sketch out in the green paper, is a market-based approach to greenhouse gas pollution, to be executed in 2010.The main worry for the Australian government at current is realization the plan of such a scheme accurate, in order that it will harmonize the incorporated economic policy structure, and need to be steady with the Government's commercial strategy (Department of Climate Change, 2008, 10).
The Australian Federal Government released white paper (policy Position) proposal in 15 of December 2008, at the present it is the best indication to be expected from Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme. (a). The white paper enclosed much more updated details than the green paper, and it is enable to discuss about climate change review report and 'The National Greenhouse & Energy Reporting Act 2007' ("NGER") report. The white paper released by Rudd Labour government contain, objective for green gas emission reductions, 5% below 2000 by 2020 on independent basis or up to 15% below 2000 by 2020, if also approved by the other main emitters. This match up to the 25 to 40% cut compare to 1990 emissions suggested by the IPCC as require to be made by developed counties to maintain CO2 below 450 ppm and to have a rational chance of carry on global warming at less than 2 degree Celsius boost above pre-industry time.
Australia is dealing with issues of carbon accounting. Its National Carbon Accounting System (NCAS) is a world leading system that monitors greenhouse gases from land based activities. In 2008 it was announced that this Australian model would be used to develop global carbon monitoring system for developing countries.
Carbon credit permits will be assets on the balance sheet and are likely to be intangible assets, measured initially at the cost of purchase. A corresponding liability will arise for the obligation to surrender these permits, as CO2-e is emitted.
Strongly affected industries (SAIs) and emissions-intensive trade-exposed entities (EITEs): Certain emitters within the energy sector may be eligible for free permits from the government. These permits will be accounted for differently, under government grant accounting. This may lead to both permits and liability being recognised at nil value on the balance sheet, although this accounting treatment remains under review by the IASB.
Discrete provision of the income tax law would be developed.
Provisions would allow a deduction for expenditure, which incurred on the purchase of permit. Cost of acquiring a permit would be deductible at the time of purchase but if it is financed by bank then deductions would be deferred until the permit is surrendered or sold including any proceed from sale of a permit is considered assessable income.
Value of permits held at beginning and at the end would be considered while deferring the expenditure.
Value of free permit would be added in the year when we acquire permit.
Reporting and Compliance
Meaningful emission reduction with in a trading system can only occur if they can be measured at the level of operation on installation and reported to a regulator. For greenhouse gases all trading countries maintain an inventory of emissions at national and installation level.
The scheme builds on the existing national green house and energy reporting system(NGER act) and move towards minimising compliance costs. There would be same treatment under the normal GST rules.
It focus three points
- Monitor and report emissions annually.
- Maintain records of reported emission to make it available for auditing
- Eligible emission permits should be equal to their annual emission.
The National greenhouse and energy reporting act 2007(NGER act), is an individual reporting framework focuses on greenhouse gas , emissions , projects , energy consumption and production. If reporting would be more flexible then it will benefit the scheme by timely flow of price sensitive information to capital market which will result in more stability of market situation
In some industrial processes emissions can be physically measured by inserting sensors and flow meters in chimneys and ,but many types of activity rely on theoretical calculations or measurement depending on local legislation, these measurements may require additional checks and verification by government or third party auditors ,prior or post submission to the local regulation.
Under the scheme should be supported by a strong assurance regime.
- Internal Audit could minimise compliance cost and risk the creditability of the scheme.
- Assurance by independent third party on a mandatory basis before the submission of the emission reports to government (External Audit)
The European Union ETS it is required to submit report which are assured by third party and assurance is undertaken by the liable entity expenditure.
Under the audit data must be complete, accurate which will lead to efficiency of the scheme and provide quality information to the market.
Should require standard for quality auditing of reports of emissions.
Establishment of accreditation system for auditors with the form and nature of the accreditation (by government or by non Government body)
ETS in Australia
The emission schemes (ETS) main aim is to reduce the carbon release by offering price for carbon. Australia currently accounts world trade of 2 percent and as similar to the United Kingdom represent 1.5 percent of global market. To attain their goal government strictly limited carbon supply therefore the carbon users need to take an action to reduce their use of carbon or have to pay an amount for the use of carbon. Actually the carbon cost basically depends on the supply & demand of carbon. Until year 2012, the CPRS limited the price of carbon as $10 a ton. Because of that CPRS generate only the centrally planned market economy for carbon. because of in point Australia allow to brought carbon from overseas that mean carbon reduce from other countries and Australian companies do not have any new plans to reduce their carbon out put. As a result of taking carbon credits from overseas those foreign competitors may become more comparative than the Australian competitors.
At leased for Australian companies need to have a market price for carbon credits under the current accounting rules because rapid changes in asset costs may be dramatically effect on their share prices. Most of the times, those companies have trouble with loan agreements and also with increasing interest rates. The carbon market depends basically on investor's behaviour and the weather.
Whilst bearing in mind our ETS implication proposal in Australia, the Australian government member condition need to agree with Australian commission restricts which is approaching on national emission. In the mean time industrial operators can allocate their grants to the scheme and can authenticate the real emissions in agreements beside the sum of the related allocations. In the end of the each year it is important as well as requires to do run off the allowances in the scheme. At the time of ownership of an allowances modification Australian commission need to legalize their operations. If we suggest 10,000 of energy intensive plants crosswise the Australia and they are able to purchase and trade permits to release carbon dioxide to environment, that's mean it's representing about 40% of the Australian's total CO2 emissions. Although this projection involve active plans only when we spread this structure more and more can be target this should grow 7.4% by 2012.
when we considering Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) proposal with the Australian Environment, the CPRS implications basically try in to change the Australian Environment and its related projects. To carry on in this new carbon forced proposal to people they may need to have good information as well as the knowledge regarding the carbon contacts and their target market and the supply chain.
Current emission rights is effect to the various accounting behaviours such as in financial reports balance sheet and profit and loss statements may getting different depending the take on behaviour. This possibly will have a important implications both in financial act and the point of how we going to manage our participation in CPRS. Therefore it is sufficient to understand the accounting policy.
Whilst considering the accounting implications, specially, cost of carbon giving an impacts to the assets impairment and major capital investments.the second implication is on the accounting policies. It is resolve the formal guidance nonattendences and accounting the forward sales of permits. Next is Earning and cash flow, earning provides the guidance to the accounting policy and cash flow offer purchasing and trading permits under the scheme. Finally, the financial reporting supervise progress in accounting standards for emission rights accounting policies.
Tax implication is another important issue relating in the accounting field. For instance, impact of the tax action of the acquisition, sale and the convenience of permit allocations. International tax matters create the bridge with Australian scheme and international ETS.
There are challenges to the accountants in making of markets where the emission rights are trading places.when emission require more allowance than the organisation have then they have to obtain extra allowances from market and if organisation have excess allowances they can trade that to others.
Australian companies needed to develop their management teams intelligent on the current emission. Because there are notable skills shortage in carbon audit field. The main point is there is small group of people around the world with good skills in carbon audits.
Auditing should provide the assurance rule to attain good economic efficiency through carbon market without giving too much load on liable entities.
Third party assurance is more valuable thing when we considering the emission statements in scheme operation. It is more significance taking guidance and assurance by a third party whilst before the liable entities going to submit their reports. Furthermore when we implication ETS in Australia hopes it should be more worthy to generate certificate under the scheme by third party audit.
On the other hand, the liable entity's compliance cost should be reduce while we working with implementation of self assurance model. But the noted point is in the mean time the scheme trustworthiness on the risk.
The robust, transparent and integrity carbon market, still also desires to be prop up by a properly apparent and healthy accounting and assurance frame work. Yet the improvement on latest meeting of the International Accounting Standard Board (IASB),a faltering agreement was reached that emission permits were an asset, but there was no conclusion as to the type of asset, or the treatment of the credit side of the accounting entry
In the intervening time, the effects of the CPRS maintain to be felt across industry sectors. Carbon will soon become a real input cost for many industries. Australian businesses and management of the commercial threats and opportunities of that input will become a crucial business priority. It is significant that management of financial risks in regard to carbon's effect on asset values and income statements does not get packed out by existing distress over the global financial crisis.(Reporting and Accounting CPRS ,Gas Today ,May-2009)
In short Carbon Emission Trading has been steadily increasing because of the relative increase in the Industries and Co2 emission. CPRS's cap and trading scheme is expected to be making major changes in energy policy of Australia in 2010, as per the financial and economic impact proposed in the Green paper and white paper schemes. As the schemes permits to create an effective price mechanism, it should be supported by Accounting Standards .But it is still in developing stage .Australian Carbon trading scheme was announced as the international model. Rudd Government clearly incapable of managing to pass legislation, as per news it may implemented in 2012. Australian ETS does not seem to be in the direction of achieving its basic goals.
Features of the proposed ETS
Some of the features of the emissions trading scheme planned include
- a production as divergent to utilization based scheme
- A representation of carbon price choice of AUD 20 to AUD 40 per tonne of carbon.
- Less than 1,000 businesses will have to version for their emissions and purchase or be billed free permits.
- AUD 4.8 billion of support for the mainly polluting electricity originators.
- Financial backing to reimburse small and middle income families from improved outlay.
- Open permits to emissions-intensive, trade-exposed businesses - such as aluminium producers, iron and steel makers, petrol refiners and LNG producers, firstly working out 25% to 33% of permits and growing to 45% by 2020.
- There will be whole offset of the collision on fuel prices on households for 3 years.
- Agricultural emissions are not incorporated at first but may be built-in from 2015.
- There will be a price cap on emissions, which will switch on at AUD 40 per tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent.
- Firms will be capable to pay for unrestricted amount of emissions portion from the international market, but will not be competent to trade them throughout the early years.