Ending Of Wide Sargasso Sea Novel History Essay
The Sargasso Sea was the sea between the West Indian and Caribbean Islands that was full of seaweed. In earlier, thought that the ship would be got stuck in this Sargassum. Antoinette was a young girl in early of Nineteenth century in Jamaica and she had lived on a run-down plantation called as Coulibri Estate. After the passage of Emancipation act of 1833, her father was died due to the lack of his body condition. Mr. Edward Rochester was an English man and he decided to marry Antoinette. After she had suffered by many influences and that were happened in her life. These were the earlier events of Antoinette.
The ending of Wide Sargasso Sea was separated by three ways and the three ways were included different concepts. The first way was that the house of Antoinette and her family were fired by ex-slaves and her family were also afraid by the ex-slaves in the case of this story. According to this story, Antoinette and her family were affected by several factors in their life. The life of Antointee was not very happy and also she was not having any goods for her life.
The second way was shown the critical situation of Antoinette and her life and this referred that Mr. Rochester faced Antointee after he slept with Amelie and he was not given any privileges and freedom to Antoinette. She was also known about Rochester by his way of illegal action. Then she was known that Mr. Rochester betrayed her and also she was separated from him. The third ways was that she was burned down Thronfield Hall and killed herself. Her life was very critical and the user couldn’t be satisfied with this story due to the lack of correct reasons.
Review of Wide Sargasso by Sandra Drake
Sandra Drake was addressed the issues in the case of Wide Sargasso sea novel and he couldn’t be satisfied with the points of Jan Rhys. He opposed the concept of Jean Rhys. The effect of ex-slaves was the one reason that was opposed by Sandra Drake. The effects of abolishment of slavery on slave owners and Afro-Caribbean ex-slaves were the one event in that novel. The second case was opposed by Drake that Antoinette had struggled for fitting in the Caribbean culture. The third case referred that the attention of Antoinette into the social tension and the social pressure increased growth on Wide Sargasso Sea.
Sandra Drake had explained the things for disagreeing the ending of Wide Sargasso Sea novel. The unexpected abolishment of slavery was the reason for dissatisfaction of Drake in regarding this novel and because this action led bad situation and economic situation to Antoinette and her family. Her family members were affected heavily due to the abolishment of slavery. She was also affected negatively by the external factors and there was no solution for her in order to resolve her problems in Caribbean culture. Antoinette’s marriage and her own seem to be only viable solution for the problem of Antoinette’s family as well as their conditions.
Drake was opposed the second point that was she had struggled against the survival of Caribbean and European Patriarchy and empire. European colonialism and patriarchy were the actions that were done by the European culture to the Afro-Caribbean people. This action affected heavily Antoinette’s family and environment. The third one was the responsible for Antoinette’s death. This referred that Rochester was an English man and he was the main reason. These reason led Drake that he was opposing the ending of this novel.
Review of Wide Sargasso Sea by Judith Raiskin
Judith Raiskin was the man and he was also opposed the ending of Wide Sargasso Sea novel and the concepts of this novel. The ending of this novel was not satisfied by him and this climax had the negative outcome to Antoinette as well as her family members. Antoinette was affected by lack of qualities and she was not having any satisfaction in the case of getting her requirements. He opposed the ending of this novel by explaining the weaknesses of this novel. Raiskin was noted about the negative influences of Caribbean culture to the Antoinette and her family.
The historical violence of colonization was the negative influences to Antoinette. He was also noted the Caribbean culture as the problem to Antoinette’s family. According to his point of view, the slavery was the problem and the culture of Caribbean was not suitable for Antoinette. The life of Antoinette was not turned well at the end of this novel and Raiskin dissatisfied the horrible things. He noted the points that he didn’t know why Antoinette skips them and also they would be given the extra ordinary value to this novel.
In the case of her marriage life, he couldn’t be got any privileges and goods from his husband. Her husband was the main reason for her death and she was suffered by her husband in the case of many events. Finally, she had known that her husband betrayed her by facing her husband slept with Amelie. Then Antoinette burned down Thronfield Hall and killed herself. This was also the reason that Raiskin was dissatisfied this ending of this novel. Another main was that she was not fitting for English culture. Antoinette was also struggled against the survival of the Caribbean and European patriarchy and empire. He was also disagreeing the ending of this novel for these reasons.
Ending of the novel by critics
The ending of this novel was shown the Antoinette’s triumph over her oppressor’s and reunion with her West Indian Roots. This novel was ending with the death of Antoinette’s and but her scarification was very helpful for the enhancement of West Indian regions. According to above critics, the attention of Antoinette increased the growth of West Indian regions. Initially, she had struggled in order to fit in the Caribbean culture and the English culture and but in the climax her contribution was important to West Indian regions.
Antoinette betrayed herself in order to make the social tension to the Wet Indian Regions. The unexpected abolishment of slavery was made the bad social and the economical situation to the Antoinette as well as her family. But she didn’t take that negative influence as the hard one and also she concentrated very much in the case of making the reunion in West Indian Region. Her contribution was the proofs in order make the reunion to West Indian regions.
She was also shown her interaction in order to make the relationship between English and Caribbean groups and she was also concentrated the dependence on black servants in West Indian regions. Initially, the relationship between the white and the black groups were differentiated negatively by the lack of coordination between them. They were occupied the roots of West Indies. During that time, her mother’s remarriage and Antoinette’s seem to be the viable solutions for their problem in order to make the reunion to West Indian roots. Her struggling identify had focused the region of West Indies in order to make the better benefit for them.
During that situation, she was died due to her husband’s illegal actions and her husband also the reason for her death. West Indies servants were affected by the impact English groups on their cultures. But she didn’t make any negative influence to their culture or Caribbean culture. The better action was made by Antoinette in order to getting victory against over her oppressors for making reunion to West Indies roots.
The contribution of Antoinette was very powerful to West Indies roots and Caribbean culture was having many advantages due to her legal actions against her oppressors in Caribbean culture. She was also made the interaction in order to make the reunion to Caribbean regions. Hence the review of Sandra Drake and Judith Raiskin was provided with the essential reason. The life of Antoinette was very critical in West Indian roots by after reviewing this novel.
If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please click on the link below to request removal: